It is often seen that during inspection and search, the stock is found in excess of the stocks as per books. Such excess stock is subject to levy of tax as Section 36(6) of the Act provides that in the event the person fails to keep their accounts for the goods or the services in accordance with the provisions of Section 35(1), the proper officer is empowered to determine the amount of tax payable on the goods or services which are unaccounted for as if such goods or services had been supplied by such person and the provisions of Section 73 and 74 shall mutatis mutandis apply for the determination of tax.
The tax is to be determined for excess stock under Section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 and not under Section 130, which is not applicable in such cases.
The case of excess stock would not fall under Section 130(i) (ii) or (iv) of CGST Act as the liability to pay tax arises at the time of point of supply and not at any other point earlier than that the scope of Section 130(1)(ii) is that any assesse who is liable to pay tax and does not account for such goods, after the time of supply is occasioned, would be liable to penalty this clause. Section 130(1)(iv) can be invoked by the Department when the Department establishes that there were a contravention of the Act and Rules coupled with the intent to evade the payment of tax. If the stock is found in excess, proceedings, under Section 73 and 74 of the Act will come into play and proceedings under Section 130 of the Act cannot be initiated.
In M/s Ganga Brick Field Umraipurwa/Gangamau Versus Additional Commissioner Grade -2 And Another - 2025 (11) TMI 296 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, where excess stock was found during a survey conducted at assessee's premises and discrepancies were recorded, confiscation of goods was done and penalty proceedings initiated, it was observed and held that proceedings admittedly arose from survey alleging unaccounted stock. Section 35 of CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 required true and correct accounts and sub-section (6) mandated tax determination under section 73 and 74 for goods not accounted for. Since statute prescribed this specific route, recourse to section 130 was impermissible in such facts. The Court observed that Apex Court has categorically held in ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2, & ANR. Versus M/s VIJAY TRADING COMPANY - 2025 (4) TMI 1644 - SC Order (LB) and ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE 2, (APPEAL) & ANR. Versus M/s. PP POLYPLAST PVT. LTD. - 2025 (5) TMI 1442 - SC Order that proceedings under Section 130 cannot be put to service if excess stock is found at time of service. In view of same, impugned order could not be sustained. [Also see:
- M/s Maa Amila Coal Depot Versus State Of Uttar Pradeh And 2 Others - 2025 (6) TMI 101 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Janta Machine Tools Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others - 2025 (5) TMI 1894 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT.
- Juhi Alloys Private Limited Versus State of Up And 3 Others - 2025 (2) TMI 927 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Raj Steel Versus State of U.P. And 2 Others - 2025 (5) TMI 2078 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Gopal Trading Company Versus State of U.P. And 2 Others - 2025 (5) TMI 634 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s J.T. Steel Traders Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others - 2025 (8) TMI 238 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Harilaxmi Alloys Private Limited Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others - 2025 (8) TMI 1698 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Dee Control And Electric Private Ltd Versus Additional Commissioner Grade-2 And Another - 2025 (1) TMI 519 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Santosh Pigment And Chemical Industries Pvt Ltd. Versus State of UP And 2 Others - 2025 (9) TMI 990 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Nikhil Trade & Exports Versus Addititional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeals) 3, State Tax, Kanpur And 2 Others - 2025 (8) TMI 924 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- State of Up Through Deputy Commissioner Versus Additional Commissioner Grade-2 Appeal- Commercial Tax Aligarh And Another - 2025 (11) TMI 671 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- Vivek Kumar Gupta Proprietor Versus State of Up And 2 Others - 2025 (11) TMI 826 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- S/S J.H.V. Steels Ltd Versus Union of India And 4 Others - 2024 (10) TMI 1450 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Dayal Product Versus Additional Commissioner Grade-2 And Another - 2025 (2) TMI 928 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Affirmed in Additional Commissioner Grade-2 & Anr. Versus M/s. Dayal Product. - 2025 (9) TMI 602 - SC Order]
- M/s Tirupati Agro Commodities Versus State of U.P. And 2 Others - 2025 (7) TMI 789 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Tru Sound Pvt Ltd Having At Office Of C-89 Versus State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others - 2025 (9) TMI 466 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Shree Om Steels, M/s Pal Trading Company, M/s Shri Om Krishi Yantra Udyog Versus Additional Commissioner Grade-2 And Another - 2024 (7) TMI 1205 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Vijay Trading Company Versus Additional Commissioner Grade-2 And Another - 2024 (8) TMI 1039 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- S/S Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar Versus Additional Commissioner Grade 2 And Another - 2024 (8) TMI 71 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Kanha Detergent Pvt Ltd Versus Additional Commissioner Grade-2 And Another - 2024 (8) TMI 514 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Sapphire International Versus Additional Commissioner Grade 2 And Another - 2024 (4) TMI 1058 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
- M/s Eco Plus Steels Pvt. Ltd. Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others - 2024 (4) TMI 291 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT




TaxTMI
TaxTMI