Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article βœ•
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Pre-Budget Memorandum on GST - Budget FY 2026

Adv. CA Ram Akshya
Goods and Services Tax reforms urged: correct inverted duties, protect input tax credit, centralize audits, ease e way rules. Proposals seek correction of the Inverted Duty Structure to prevent accumulation of Input Tax Credit, including pharmaceutical rate rationalisation and amendment of Rule 89(5) to allow refunds for input services and capital goods. Procedural reforms recommend centralised audits for multi state operators, amendment to allow recipients undisputed entitlement to input tax credit with recovery from suppliers, prohibition of retrospective cancellation of registration based on absence at the principal place of business, and an exemption in Rule 138 from E way bill requirements for intra municipal or short distance movements to ease MSME compliance. (AI Summary)

The GST law has become very successful in a short span of its implementation on 1st July 2017. The Governments revenue per month (on an average basis)Β from the GST is more than rupees one lakh seventy thousand crores. Despite of it, changes in the GST law are required for faster growth of trade and industry, to make India a developed Nation by 2047. Some of the very important suggestions to improve ease of doing business as well as compliance under the GST law have been enumerated below:

1. Correction of Inverted Duty Structure to Avoid Accumulation of GST ITC:

The correction in Inverted Duty Structures is needed to minimize accumulation of input tax credit. The rates of goods and services must be aligned so as to bring output tax rate higher than the input tax rates. In pharma sector, rationalization of rates on inputs under Chapter 29 is a necessity to align with the rate on finished products under Chapter 30. Amend Rule 89(5) to allow refund of input services and capital goods in addition to inputs.

2. Centralize Audit u/s 65 of CGST Act for Multi State Operating Companies

The audit of taxpayers registered in various States must be simplified and conducted at a single place by the common audit authority nominated by the CBIC. This will improve ease of doing business and reduce compliance cost as well.

3. Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act Needs Amendments to Allow ITC to the Customers undisputedly:

Considering the decisions of various High Courts across the Country, Section 16(2)(c) of CGSS Act, 2017 must be amended to clarify that the tax should have been remitted by the supplier. However, recipient is not responsible for non-payment of tax by the supplier and ITC is allowed. The recovery must be made with the supplier first.

4. Cancellation of GST Registration from Retrospective Date (Date of Registration) due to Non- Presence of Taxpayer at PPOB is Not Legal:

The GST Officers are cancelling GST registration from retrospective date or date of registration obtained, if taxpayer is not present on date of verification of principal place of business by TI. Consequently, ITC claimed by customers are disputed and disallowed to the customers. It results in unnecessary litigation.

5. Rule 138 of the CGST Rules must be Amended to Exempt from Requirement of E-way bill for Movement of Goods within Jurisdiction of a Municipal Corporation / Panchayat or up to a specific distance within the limits of a city.

The exemption will reduce compliance burden and improve ease of doing business for MSMEs.

The Government should focus on above points and resolve it for the betterment of trade and industry.

Β 

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles