Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Grounds of arrest under section 69 GST Act must be conveyed at the time of arrest

Deepak Gupta
GST arrest requires written, specific grounds at time of detention; failure to inform makes arrest challengeable An officer authorized to arrest under the GST law is constitutionally and statutorily obliged to inform the grounds of arrest, preferably in writing at the time of arrest; failure to do so renders the arrest vulnerable to challenge. Recent higher-court decisions and administrative instructions require clear, meaningful written communication of arrest grounds. Additionally, the power to authorize arrests must be exercised only after the competent authority is satisfied, on record and with supporting evidence, that the specified offences are made out; routine or indiscriminate use of arrest powers without factual foundation can undermine subsequent prosecution and the charge-sheet. (AI Summary)

Issue:

1. Whether an officer authorized to arrest under Section 69Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act) has an incumbent duty to supply grounds of arrest at the time of arrest?

Relevant Provisions:

2. Constitution of India:

  • Part III Constitution of India guarantees fundamental rights to individuals, including rights related to arrest and detention.
  • Article 22(1):  Provides that no person shall be detained in custody without being informed of the reasons for their arrest.

3. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act):

  • Section 69(2): States that an officer authorized to arrest shall inform the grounds of arrest to the person being arrested.

Analysis:

4. Constitutional Provisions vs. GST Act:

  • Article 22(1) Constitution of India imposes a fundamental right on every individual arrested to be informed of the reasons for their arrest. This right ensures transparency in the arrest process and serves as a safeguard against unlawful detention.
  • Article 22(3) Constitution of India, however, provides certain exceptions to this right, particularly in cases involving preventive detention, but these exceptions do not extend to the requirement of informing the grounds of arrest.

5. Section 69(2) GST Act:

  • Section 69(2) GST Act aligns with the constitutional mandate under Article 22(1)Constitution of India. It plainly requires that the authorized officer inform the person being arrested of the grounds for its arrest at time of arrest. This statutory provision emphasizes constitutional safeguard by ensuring that the arrested person is made aware of the reasons for the action taken against them.

6. Rights of the Arrested Person:

  • A person arrested under Section 69 GST Act has both a fundamental and statutory right to know the grounds of its arrest. This serves not only to clarify the reasons for the arrest but also allows the person the opportunity to seek legal counsel and prepare a defence.
  • The primary purpose of informing the grounds of arrest is to uphold the principles of fairness and justice. It ensures that the arrested individual can understand the legal basis for its detention and can take appropriate steps to contest the arrest, if necessary.

Judicial Enunciation:

7. Supreme Court Precedents:

8. Delhi High Courts Ruling:

Instructions to Convey Grounds of Arrest:

9. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), considering the judicial pronouncements, issued Instruction No. 01/2025-GST dated 13th January 2025. This instruction directs that the grounds of arrest must be provided in writing at the time the arrest memo is served to the person arrested, ensuring compliance with both the constitutional and statutory requirements.

Conclusion:

10. It is clear, in view of the judicial enunciations and the legal provisions under Article 22(1)Constitution of India and section 69(2) GST Act, that the authorized officer has a mandatory duty to convey grounds of arrest in writing at the time of serving the arrest memo. This communication must be made in a clear and meaningful manner, ensuring that the arrested person fully understands the reasons for its detention. The failure to provide written grounds of arrest renders the arrest legally infirm, as reinforced by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and High Court verdicts.

It is, therefore, imperative that officers act in strict adherence to the law by informing the grounds of arrest in writing, thus, safeguarding the rights of individuals and ensuring procedural fairness.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Sadanand Bulbule on Oct 1, 2025

Besides above, I wish to add the following:

Power to arrest.

69. (1) Where the Commissioner has reasons to believe that a person has committed any offence specified in clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 132 which is punishable under clause (i) or (ii) of sub-section (1), or sub-section (2) of the said section, he may, by order, authorise any officer of central tax to arrest such person.

In terms of the above statutory provision, the Commissioner must ensure that one of the offences specified in clause (a), (b), (c) or ( d) of sub-section 132[1] are in fact committed and it should be established on record with incontrovertible evidences. Otherwise such powers cannot be invoked by the Commissioner/Power officer. 

When charge sheet is filed under Section 132 of the Act before the jurisdictional Economic Offences Court for trial, the Commissioner would  be the first authority to be questioned about such satisfaction on records. And he is required to produce the office records in original before the court.

Therefore such powers should not be invoked as a routine administrative matter without confirming the factual position. In many cases, dummy persons have been arrested under Section 69 without establishing such specified offence/s committed by them. This might shake the foundation of the entire chargesheet so filed.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles