Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Delay of 285 days in filing of Appeal Condoned in case where no hard copy of the order was served to the Assessee

Bimal jain
Notice service: absence of physical service can excuse delay in filing a GST appeal when orders are only portal uploaded. Absence of physical service of an order, despite its upload on the electronic portal, can constitute a reasonable cause to excuse delay in filing an appeal; this principle was applied to treat the delay as condonable, while noting a contrasting precedent that treats statutory methods of service as alternative means. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of TVL. DEEPA TRADERS VERSUS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) , THE STATE TAX OFFICER, CHENNAI - 2024 (9) TMI 1468 - MADRAS HIGH COURT allowed the writ petition and thereby condoned the delay of 285 days in filing of appeal in case where the Order passed, though uploaded on GST Portal, but was not served physically.

Facts:

Deepa Traders (“the Petitioner”) filed a writ petition challenging the Order of demand dated February 08, 2023 and the appellate order dated April 25, 2024 (“the Impugned Orders”) rejecting the appeal filed by the Petitioner on the ground that there was delay of 285 days, in filing of appeal.

Issue:

Whether the delay of 285 days Is condonable for filing of appeal based on the ground that no hard copy of the order was provided to the taxpayer?

Held:

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of TVL. DEEPA TRADERS VERSUS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) , THE STATE TAX OFFICER, CHENNAI - 2024 (9) TMI 1468 - MADRAS HIGH COURTheld as under:

  • Opined that, considering the fact that the notices were uploaded in the portal, but no hard copy was served on the Petitioner, thus, the reasonable cause has been shown by the petitioner for the delay.
  • Held that, the Writ Petition is allowed and delay in filing of appeal is condoned.

Our Comments:

However, the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case ofM/S. NEW GRACE AUTOMECH PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. N. KUMAR VERSUS STATE TAX OFFICER THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) HOSUR (NORTH) -2 CIRCLE HOSUR - 2023 (1) TMI 288 - MADRAS HIGH COURT, wherein similar issues were involved, took a contrary view and observed that A careful perusal of language in which Section 169 is couched makes it clear that methods of service adumbrated therein are not conjunctive but are alternate methods of service. The reason is, the language in which sub-section (1) is couched makes it clear that service shall be by one of the methods adumbrated therein. To be noted as many as six methods (a) to (f) have been adumbrated therein.”

 (Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles