TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Legal Challenge Succeeds: Significant Delay Pardoned, Appeal Reinstated After Thorough Examination of Substantial Cause</h1> <h3>Tvl. Deepa Traders Versus The Deputy Commissioner (ST), The State Tax Officer, Chennai</h3> The HC allowed the writ petition, condoning a 263-day delay in an appeal. The court directed the first respondent to consider the appeal on its merits, ... Rejection of appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of demand - discrepancies in GSTR returns - HELD THAT:- Considering the fact that the notices were uploaded in the portal, but no hard copy was served on the petitioner, this Court feels that reasonable has been shown by the petitioner for the delay. Therefore, this Court is inclined to condone the delay of 263 days in filing the appeal. The delay of 263 days in filing the appeal before the first respondent is condoned and the order of the appellate authority/first respondent is set aside - Petition allowed. The writ petition challenges the demand order issued by the second respondent, which was upheld by the first respondent. The petitioner's appeal was dismissed due to a delay of 263 days, but the court has now condoned the delay and directed the first respondent to consider the appeal on its merits. The writ petition is allowed with no costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
