Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Advance is taxable in year of receipt

Vivek Jalan
Advance Payments for AMCs Taxable Upon Receipt, Rules Court; Overrides Matching Principle Under AS-9, Citing Section 5 IT Act. In the case concerning the taxability of advance payments for services, the Madras High Court ruled that advance receipts for annual maintenance contracts (AMCs) are taxable in the year of receipt. This decision was based on the absence of refund clauses and the non-refundable nature of the payments. According to Section 5 of the Income Tax Act, such amounts are included in total income upon receipt, regardless of service fulfillment. The court found the reliance on the 'matching principle' under AS-9 misplaced, emphasizing that tax laws take precedence. The invocation of Section 41(1) for deferred liability was deemed incorrect. (AI Summary)

Incase of a works contractor or a AMC provider or another service provider, collection of the entire year’s charges is done at one go in advance. The amount is many a times recorded as 'current liability' in the balance sheet as 'income received in advance.'

The question for income tax purpose is whether it is to be treated for Income Tax purpose that the entire amount is taxable income in the year of receipt, or on grounds of 'matching principle' and AS-9 guidelines it is taxable under mercantile accounting and deferred. In the case of THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI VERSUS M/S. JOHNSON LIFTS PVT. LTD. [2024 (11) TMI 96 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] it was held that Advance AMC receipts constitute income in the year of receipt as –

1. There was no clause for refund, and the amounts were non-refundable.

2. The provisions under Section 5 of the Income Tax Act mandate the inclusion of amounts received in total income when received, irrespective of when the service obligation is fulfilled

3. The reliance on the 'matching principle' under AS-9 is misplaced, especially where the consideration is received upfront and the service obligation spans a short duration (one year say).

4. The principle is not absolute and must yield to specific tax laws

5. Invocation of Section 41(1) of Income tax Act to substantiate the deferred liability treatment was erroneous as the section pertains to remission or cessation of a liability, not recognition of revenue for services to be rendered.

It is pertinent to note that the Point of Taxation Rules under Service tax and the VAT Rules were also deliberated in as much as incase income is chargeable to tax there, then why should it not be taxed in income tax. However, the main difference there and here is the fact that such rule for payment of tax on advance basis is specially carved out in such Laws. In income tax Act Section 145 allows acceptance of accrual basis of accounting.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles