Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

No communication is valid if served without DIN

Bimal jain
Assessment Order Invalidated for Lacking Document Identification Number as per 2019 and 2022 Circulars The Andhra Pradesh High Court invalidated an assessment order due to the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN), as mandated by Circulars from 2019 and 2022. The case involved a petitioner, an electrical contractor, who received a letter requesting the stalling of payments without a DIN. The court ruled that communications lacking a DIN are invalid, setting aside the proceedings. However, the court allowed the department to proceed lawfully, with the petitioner required to cooperate in completing the pending assessment order. The writ petition was thus allowed. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in SAI MANIKANTA ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS VERSUS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SPECIAL CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM-II, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) , STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THE CHAIRMAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATION DIVISION VIZIANAGARAM [2024 (6) TMI 1158 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT], set aside the assessment order’s proceedings due to the absence of the Document Identification Number (“DIN”) which was mandatory vide Circular No. 122/41/2019-GST dated November 05, 2019 and Government of Andhra Pradesh, in Circular No. 02 of 2022 dated August 01, 2022(“the Circulars”). However, the Hon’ble Court granted liberty to the Department to proceed in accordance with law.

Facts:

M/s Sai Manikanta Electrical Contractors (“the 'Petitioner') was served Letter dated May 10, 2024 (“the Impugned Letter”), requesting the Managing Director to stall the payment if any payable to the Petitioner. 

The Petitioner contended that the absence of the DIN after serving the notice rendered it invalid, as per the Circular. However, it was argued that any communication not bearing the electronically generated DIN through portal would be considered invalid.

Hence, aggrieved by the circumstances, the Petitioner filed the present writ petition.

Issue:

Whether any communication is valid if served without generating DIN?

Held:

The Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in SAI MANIKANTA ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS VERSUS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SPECIAL CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM-II, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) , STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THE CHAIRMAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATION DIVISION VIZIANAGARAM [2024 (6) TMI 1158 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] held as under:

  • Opined that, the Impugned Letter was issued without generating the DIN number would have no legs to stand in the eye of law and the said proceedings are liable to be set aside.
  • Held that, the Department is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law, and the Petitioner shall cooperate with the Department in all respects in completion of the Assessment Order, which is stated to be pending for consideration before the Respondent. Hence, the writ Petition was allowed.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles