Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

RECENT GST CLARIFICATIONS – PART 2

Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
CBIC Clarifies GST Rules: Valuation, ITC Time Limits, and Compliance Evidence in Circulars 210, 211, and 212. Following the 53rd GST Council meeting, the CBIC issued clarifications through Circulars 210, 211, and 212. Circular 210 addresses the valuation of import services between related persons, deeming the invoice value as the open market value if the recipient can claim full input tax credit (ITC). Circular 211 clarifies the time limit for availing ITC under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) from unregistered suppliers, aligning it with the financial year of invoice issuance. Circular 212 introduces a mechanism for suppliers to provide evidence of ITC reversal compliance, requiring certificates or undertakings from recipients, especially for amounts exceeding Rs 5,00,000. (AI Summary)

Post 53rd GST Council meeting held on 22.06.2024, CBIC has issued 16 Circulars bearing Nos. 207 to 222, all dated 26.06.2024, clarifying taxability, place of supply, time of supply etc on various issues.

This Part-2 of the Article offers the gist of Circular No. 210, 211 and 212 which are on the following topics:

Circular No. / date

In relation to

Circular No. 210/4/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024

Valuation of supply of import of services by related persons

Circular No. 211/5/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024

Time limit for availment of ITC under RCM supplies from unregistered persons

Circular No. 212/6/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024

ITC related mechanism for providing evidence of compliance by supplier

Valuation of supply of import of services by related persons - Circular No. 210/4/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024

Based on the recommendation of 53rd GST Council meeting held on 22.06.2024, CBIC has issued clarification in relation to valuation of supply of import of services by a  related  person where recipient is eligible to full input tax credit -

  • As per second proviso to rule 28(1) of CGST Rules, in cases involving supply of goods or services or both between the distinct or related persons where the recipient is eligible for full input tax credit, the value declared in the invoice shall be deemed to be the open market value of the said goods or services.
  • Clarification which had been issued videCircular No. 199/11/2023-GST dated 17.07.2023  in respect of supplies of services between distinct persons in cases where full ITC is available to the recipient, is equally applicable in respect of import of services between related persons.
  • Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST dated 17.07.2023, clarification has been issued regarding taxability of services provided by an office of an organisation in one State to the office of that organisation in another State, both being distinct persons.
  • Further, in cases where full input tax credit is available to the recipient, if HO has not issued a tax invoice to the BO in respect of any particular services being rendered by HO to the said BO, the value of such services may be deemed to be declared as Nil by HO to BO, and may be deemed as open market value in terms of second proviso to rule 28(1) of CGST Rules.
  • It was clarified that as per the second proviso to rule 28(1) of CGST Rules, in respect of supply of services by Head Office(HO) to Branch Offices(BO) of an organisation, the value of the said supply of services declared in the invoice by HO shall be deemed to be open market value of such services, if the recipient BO is eligible for full input tax credit.
  • In cases where the  foreign  affiliate is  providing certain  services  to  the related  domestic  entity,  and  where  full  input  tax  credit  is  available to the  related  domestic  entity, the  value  of  such  supply  of  services  declared  in  the invoice  by the said related domestic entity may be deemed as open market value in terms of second proviso to rule  28(1) of  CGST  Rules, 2017.
  • In  cases  where  full  input  tax  credit  is  available  to  the recipient, if  the  invoice  is  not  issued by  the  related  domestic  entity with  respect  to  any service provided by the foreign affiliate to it, the value of such services may be deemed to be declared as Nil, and may be deemed as open market value in terms of second proviso to rule 28(1) of CGST Rules , 2017.

Time limit for availment of ITC under RCM supplies from unregistered persons  - Circular No. 211/5/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024

Based on the recommendation of 53rd GST Council meeting held on 22.06.2024, CBIC has issued clarification in relation on time limit under Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017 in respect of RCM supplies received from unregistered persons -

  • In case of supplies received from unregistered suppliers where tax has to be paid by the recipient under reverse charge mechanism (RCM) and where invoice is to be issued by the recipient of the supplies in accordance with section 31(3)(f) of CGST Act,2017, the relevant financial year for calculation of time limit for availment of ITC under section 16(4) of CGST Act will be the financial year in which the invoice has been issued by the recipient, subject  to  payment  of  tax  on  the  said  supply  by  the  recipient  and  fulfilment  of  other conditions and restrictions of section 16 and 17 of CGST Act, 2017.
  • In case, the recipient issues the invoice  after  the  time  of  supply  of  the  said  supply  and  pays  tax  accordingly,  he will  be required  to  pay  interest  on  such  delayed  payment  of  tax. Further,  in  cases of  such  delayed issuance  of  invoice  by  the  recipient,  he  may  also  be  liable  to  penal  action  under  the provisions of Section 122 of CGST Act, 2017.

ITC related mechanism for providing evidence of compliance by supplier - Circular No. 212/6/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024

Based on the recommendation of the 53rd GST Council meeting held on 22.06.2024, CBIC has issued clarificatory mechanism to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provision of law to provide evidence of compliance of conditions of Section 15(3)(b)(ii) in relation to reversal of ITC by recipient when supplier issues tax Credit Note post supply -

  • At present there is no functionality / facility available on the common portal to enable the supplier / tax officer to verify whether the ITC attributable to such discount offered through tax Credit Notes has been reversed by the recipient or not.
  • GST authorities currently impose demand on supplier till the time substantial proof is submitted for reversal of proportionate ITC by the recipient and the same has been a matter of litigation.
  • It is clarified that till the time a functionality / facility is made available on the common portal to enable the supplier / tax officer to verify the compliance of the said condition of Section 15(3)(b)(ii), the supplier may produce a certificate certifying that the recipient has reversed proportionate ITC at his end in respect of credit note issued by the supplier, where –
  • the amount of tax exceeding Rs 5,00,000 in a FY to a particular recipient, then certificate from the recipient, issued by the CA / CMA,
  • the amount of tax does not exceed Rs 5,00,000 in a FY to a particular recipient, then an undertaking / certificate from the recipient
  • This certificate or self-undertaking from recipient to include:
  • Details of the credit notes
  • Details of the relevant invoice number
  • the amount of ITC reversal
  • details of the FORM GST DRC-03 / return / any other relevant document through which such reversal of ITC has been made
  • certificate issued by CA or CMA shall contain UDIN
  • Such undertakings / certificates issued shall be treated as a suitable and admissible evidence for the purpose of section 15(3)(b)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017.
  • These certificates /undertakings may be produced before the tax officers as evidence during any proceedings such as scrutiny, audit, investigations, etc.
  • For the past period, also the concerned taxpayer may procure and provide such certificates / undertakings to the concerned investigating / audit / adjudicating authority as evidence of requisite reversal of   input tax credit by his recipients.

 (To be continued…)

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles