Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Rajasthan HC to decide on validity of Notification relating to Amnesty Scheme for filing of Appeals and Section 107(4) of the CGST Act

Bimal jain
Review of GST Act's Section 107(4) & Notification Validity: Concerns Over Appeal Delay Limits and Limitation Period Start Date. The Rajasthan High Court is reviewing the validity of a notification and Section 107(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, challenged by a petitioner. The petitioner argues that Section 107(4) unfairly limits the Appellate Authority's ability to condone delays in filing appeals to one month. Additionally, the notification's specified date for extending the limitation period lacks justification, as it excludes cases with orders passed after March 31, 2023. The court issued an interim order to stay recovery if the petitioner deposits 12.5% of the disputed tax and provides solvent security for the remainder. Further hearings are scheduled for February 21, 2024. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court heard the case of ABDUS SAMI SALFI VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS - 2024 (2) TMI 352 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT wherein the Petitioner has questioned the validity of Notification No. 53/2023 dated November 2, 2023(“the Notification”) andprovisions of Section 107(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(“the CGST Act”).

The Counsel for the Petitioner contended that the provisions of Section 107(4) of the CGST Act restrict the right of the Appellate Authority to condone the delay in filing of appeal by one month only. Also, the date stated in the Notification i.e. March 31, 2023, which provides for extended period of limitation in cases where the orders have been passed before the aforesaid date, has no rationale, as in several other cases the orders were passed even after March 31, 2023, in those cases also the appeals had already become barred by the limitation.  

The Hon’ble High Court passed the interim order wherein the Hon’ble High Court directed that the recovery of the amount as stated in the demand would be stayed if the Petitioner deposits 12.5 percent of the tax amount in dispute and for the rest of the amount the Petitioner is required to submit solvent security.

The Matter has been listed for further hearing on February 21, 2024.

Relevant Provision:

Section 107(4) of the CGST Act:

“Section 107. Appeals to Appellate Authority

(4) The Appellate Authority may, if he is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the appeal within the aforesaid period of three months or six months, as the case may be, allow it to be presented within a further period of one month.”

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles