Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Applicability of GST on Works Contracts entered before the GST Implementation

Bimal jain
Petitioner Must Pay GST on Post-GST Payments for Pre-GST Contracts, Court Rules in Dismissed Petition. The Calcutta High Court ruled that the petitioner, engaged in contractual services with the State Government, is liable to pay GST on payments received after the GST regime's implementation, even for work contracts entered before its commencement. The petitioner challenged a Revenue Department order, arguing that guidelines issued by the Government of West Bengal did not address payments for pre-GST contracts completed post-GST. The court found that since the contract was executed and completed after GST's implementation, the petitioner must pay GST on the amount received. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the validity of the Revenue Department's order. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court, in the case of DIPAK SARKAR VERSUS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. - 2023 (10) TMI 407 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT, dismissed the writ petition and held that the assessee is liable to pay the GST on payment received after implementation of the GST regime for the work orders given prior to the implementation of the GST regime.

Facts:

Dipak Sarkar (“the Petitioner”) is engaged in the business of providing contractual services to the State Government for executing the works contract.

The Petitioner, aggrieved by the appellate order (“Impugned Order”) passed by the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) under the GST Act, contended that Notification No. 5050 – F(Y) dated August 16, 2017under which Government of West Bengal stated the guidelines regarding issues pertaining to treatment of works contracts entered with the government of West Bengal in the Pre-GST and Post-GST regime, wherein the Notification does not deal with payments made in the post-GST regime in respect to the works contracts or outgoing projects that have been approved before July 1, 2017.

The Respondent contended that the Contract was executed on August 20, 2018 between the Petitioner and the State Government, and the completion certificate of the work done was issued on July 8, 2023, therefore, no question arises for the applicability of the Pre-GST regime provisions as the Contract was executed and the completion certificate of the work done was issued, after the implementation of the GST.

The Respondent, further contended that numerous opportunities were granted to the Petitioner, but the Petitioner failed to prove the non-applicability of GSTamounting to Rs. 1,90,67,822/- received on the works contract granted and executed after the implementation of the GST Act. Thereby, due to willful misstatement provided by the Petitioner, proceedings under Section 74 of the Central Goods Services Tax Act, 2017 ('the CGST Act”) were initiated against the Petitioner.

Issue:

Whether the Petitioner is liable to pay GST on payment received after implementation of the GST Act for the Works contract entered before implementation of the GST Act?

Held:

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in DIPAK SARKAR VERSUS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. - 2023 (10) TMI 407 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT, held as under:

  • Opined that, the Impugned Order is reasoned and has been passed after taking into consideration all the points raised by the Petitioner. Thus, the Impugned Order is valid and devoid of any error of law. 
  • Held that, all the payments regarding the works contract are executed post-GST, making the Petitioner obligated to pay GST on the payment received and tax had to be deposited after filing of the required forms. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles