Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Responsibility of purchaser limited to verify GST registration of seller on GST Portal

Bimal jain
Purchaser's responsibility limited to verifying seller GST registration; verified purchases prevent automatic confiscation of goods. Purchaser liability is limited to establishing a bona fide purchase after verifying the supplier's GST registration on the GST portal and producing supporting evidence such as bank payments; detention of goods due to questions about the supplier's existence does not by itself justify confiscation, and authorities may release goods on security (partial deposit and bond) while conducting further inquiry. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in M/s Arhaan Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Assistant Commissioner [2023 (8) TMI 583 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] held that, the assessee is responsible only to the extent of establishing that he bonafidely purchased goods from the supplier for valuable consideration after verifying the GST registration of the said supplier on the GST portal.

Facts:

M/s. Arhaan Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) is a trader in iron scrap and Mr. T. Srinivasulu (“the Transporter”) is owner of vehicle in which the Petitioner transported iron scrap.

The Petitioner purchased the iron scrap ('the Goods”) from M/s. K.S. Enterprises (“the Supplier”) located in Vijaywada and further sold the same to M/s Radha Smelters Private Limited (“the Buyer”) located inSankarampet under valid invoice number.  

The Petitioner engaged the transporter for transporting the goods from Vijayawada to Sankarampet accompanied with valid documents such as invoice, way bill, weighment slip etc.

The Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) detained the goods in transit on the allegation that the supplier has no place of business at Vijayawada and initiated the proceedings against the Supplier under Section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(“the CGST Act”).

The Petitioner contended that the Respondent has deliberately ignored the documents produced at the time of check which shows that the Petitioner was the owner of the goods. As per Section 129 of the CGST Act the action can be initiated against the person who is transporting goods, which is in the present case is the Petitioner.

Instead of issuing proceedings in the name of the Petitioner, the Respondent has issued notice against the Supplier who has no interest in the matter after selling the consignment for valuable consideration to the Petitioner.

Further contended that, under the GST law there is no requirement that the Petitioner has to verify whether the Supplier has any registered place of business at Vijayawada. The Petitioner has duly verified the GST registration of the supplier and has paid the consideration through bank account. However, the suspicion against the genuineness of a registration of the Supplier entertained by the Respondent has no bearing with the transaction entered into by the Petitioner with the Supplier.

Issue:

Whether the Revenue Department can confiscate the goods of the assessee basing on the proceedings initiated against the supplier of the assessee?

Held:

The Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court 2023 (8) TMI 583 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURTin held as under:

  • Opined that, it is clear that the proceedings for detention of goods can be initiated while the goods are in transit in contravention of provisions of the CGST Act. In the instant case, the Respondent may initiate proceedings against the Supplier under Section 130 of the CGST Act in view of his absence in the given address and not holding any business premises at provided address. However, the Respondent cannot confiscate the goods of the Petitioner merely on the ground that the Petitioner happen to purchase goods from the said Supplier.
  • Noted that, the claim made by the Petitioner of purchase of goods is highly doubtful as the physical existence of the said supplier is questioned. Thus, the Respondent can initiate proceedings under Section 129 of the CGST Act against the Petitioner and conduct enquiry by giving opportunity to the Petitioner to establish their case.
  • Held that, the Respondent will release the detained goods in favour of the Petitioner on deposit of 25% of the value of goods and execute a bond for the balance and shall also release the vehicles in favour of the transporter.
  • Further held that, the Petitioner’s responsibility will be limited to the extent of establishing that he bonafidely purchased goods from the Supplier for valuable consideration after verifying the GST registration of the said supplier on the GST portal.

To know more watch our video on ‘Responsibility of purchaser limited to verify GST registration of seller on GST portal’.

Adv (CA) Bimal Jain at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLk2x2YE1FI

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles