Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) is distinct from the assessment

Vivek Jalan
Penalty Notices Under Section 271(1)(c) Must Be Specific, Not Vague, to Justify Tax Penalties Penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act are distinct from assessment proceedings and must be independently justified. While assessments provide a basis, penalty proceedings require clear, specific grounds communicated through a statutory notice. An ambiguous or vague notice is insufficient, as penal provisions must be strictly construed in favor of the assessee. The officer must explicitly state whether the assessee concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars. In a referenced case, it was determined that a generic notice lacking specificity on charges and evidence does not satisfy the requirements for invoking Section 271(1)(c). Judicial discipline in issuing such notices is essential. (AI Summary)

The assessment proceedings form the basis for the penalty proceedings, but they are not composite proceedings to draw strength from each other, nor can each cure the other's defect. A penalty proceeding is a corollary; nevertheless, it must stand on its own. It culminates under a different statutory scheme that remains distinct from the assessment proceedings. Therefore, the assessee must be informed of the grounds of the penalty proceedings through statutory notice. An omnibus notice suffers from the vice of vagueness. A penal provision, even with civil consequences, must be construed strictly. And ambiguity, if any, must be resolved in the affected assessee's favour. In this context let us understand Section 271(1)(c) of The Income tax Act which specifies as under –

271. (1) If the Assessing Officer or the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner in the course of any proceedings under this Act, is satisfied that any person-

.......

(c) has concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income, or...
he may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty, -

......
(iii) in the cases referred to in clause (c) …in addition to tax, if any, payable by him, a sum which shall not be less than, but which shall not exceed three times, the amount of tax sought to be evaded by reason of the concealment of particulars of his income or fringe benefits or the furnishing of inaccurate particulars of such income or fringe benefits.


Hence invocation of Sec 271(1)(c) has the following pre-requisites –

1. The officer must record his satisfaction in the notice invoking the said Section

2. The Officer specify the charge he is levying being –

a. the assessee has concealed the particulars of his income, or

b. the assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of such income

Hence, it was held in the case of VANSH INDUSTRIES LTD. VERSUS ACIT, CIRCLE : 26 (1) NEW DELHI. - 2023 (4) TMI 483 - ITAT DELHI that the notice u/s 274 cannot be a stereotyped one not clearly specifying the charge and also an explanation as to the evidences which led to the officer’s satisfaction that 271(1)(c) should be invoked.

As notices of penalty under various sections keep flowing, the judicial discipline in serving notices can be enforced by the assesses.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles