Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Assessment Order Must be passed after Personal Hearing

Abhishek Raja
Assessment Order Without Personal Hearing Violates Natural Justice, Highlights Section 75(4) of GST Act. An assessment order issued without a personal hearing contravenes the principles of natural justice, as emphasized by the Madras High Court. In a case involving a tax liability of Rs. 8,88,584 in penalties and Rs. 4,44,292 each in CGST and SGST, the court highlighted the necessity of a personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the GST Act. This provision mandates a hearing if an adverse decision is anticipated. The court reaffirmed that the right to be heard is fundamental, aligning with the 'audi alteram partem' principle, ensuring no one is condemned unheard. (AI Summary)

An assessment order passed without a personal hearing violates the principles of natural justice and is liable to be quashed. - Madras High Court

Assessment Order was passed on 28-Dec-2022 determining the tax liability as follows:

CGST: Rs.4,44,292/-

SGST: Rs.4,44,292/- 

Penalty: Rs.8,88,584/-

This Assessment Order was passed without providing Opportunity of being heard.

As per Section 75(4) of GST Laws personal hearing ought to have been afforded to the petitioner since an adverse decision has been taken by the respondent under the impugned assessment order.

Section 75 (4) of the GST Act reads as follows:

'(4) An opportunity of hearing shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person.'

High Court upheld the right of personal hearing to the assessee is mandatory whenever the respondent contemplates any adverse decision in the assessment proceedings. Opportunity of hearing is to be given to assessee where adverse decision is contemplated.

SENDHIL KUMAR VERSUS THE STATE TAX OFFICER, TIRUVALLUR ASSESSMENT CIRCLE, CHENNAI - 2023 (2) TMI 588 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

Honorable Supreme Court in the case of M/S RADHA KRISHAN INDUSTRIES VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS. - 2021 (4) TMI 837 - SUPREME COURT has held that there is no discretion on whether or not to grant an opportunity of being heard.

'audi alteram' is one of the basic pillars of natural justice which means no one should be condemned unheard. 

In ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND SUPERINTENDENT, PREVENTIVE SERVICE CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA AND OTHERS VERSUS CHARAN DAS MALHOTRA - 1971 (2) TMI 41 - SUPREME COURT, it was held by Supreme Court that Power, under Proviso to Sec. 110 of Customs Act, cannot be exercised without an opportunity of being heard is given to the person from whom the goods are seized. 

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles