Taxpayer's Rights Triumph: Assessment Order Nullified for Denying Personal Hearing Under GST Act Section 75(4) HC quashed the assessment order due to violation of natural justice principles under Section 75(4) of GST Act, 2017. The court found that no personal ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Taxpayer's Rights Triumph: Assessment Order Nullified for Denying Personal Hearing Under GST Act Section 75(4)
HC quashed the assessment order due to violation of natural justice principles under Section 75(4) of GST Act, 2017. The court found that no personal hearing was provided to the taxpayer before imposing a penalty of Rs. 8,88,584. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with directions to grant a personal hearing within twelve weeks, emphasizing the mandatory nature of procedural fairness in tax assessment proceedings.
Issues: Challenge to assessment order due to lack of personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the GST Act, 2017.
Analysis: The petitioner filed a Writ Petition challenging the assessment order for the assessment year 2021-2022, contending that no personal hearing was provided during the assessment proceedings. The impugned assessment order determined the tax liability under CGST and SGST, imposing a penalty totaling Rs. 8,88,584.
The petitioner relied on Section 75(4) of the GST Act, 2017, which mandates granting a personal hearing when an adverse decision is contemplated against the taxpayer. The Court noted that personal hearing is necessary even if no formal request is made by the taxpayer. Previous judgments by two Judges of the Court on this matter were cited, upholding the mandatory nature of providing personal hearing in case of an adverse decision.
Agreeing with the previous decisions, the Court held that the absence of a personal hearing in the impugned assessment proceedings violated the principles of natural justice. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed, and the matter was remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for a personal hearing within twelve weeks.
The Court directed the respondent to ensure compliance with the principles of natural justice and grant the petitioner a personal hearing on a specified date. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs, and the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.