Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
Profile

CA Rakesh Jain is an indirect tax professional with over 10 years of experience advising businesses on GST, Service Tax, and VAT matters, including compliance, refunds, and litigation. He currently serves as Department Head at Suresh & Co. and Director at Annveshan Business Solutions Private Limited. 

Rakesh has extensive experience assisting clients with GST litigation, departmental audits, refund claims (including inverted duty structure refunds), and complex compliance matters. He regularly represents clients before tax authorities and supports businesses in managing tax risks through practical and commercially viable solutions. 

In addition to his advisory work, Rakesh is actively involved in professional knowledge sharing, contributing to discussions on indirect tax developments and conducting training programs for professionals and corporate teams. 

His approach combines technical expertise with a strong understanding of business realities, enabling him to deliver practical and sustainable tax solutions. 

Showing 1 to 2 of 2 Results
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 120661
A professional entered into a contract with a company. As part of consideration, the professional was entitled to equity compensation (shares ... Read Full Issue
Date 18 Dec 2025
Replies 4 Replies
Views 559 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 120201
"My Net ITC is already computed after the deduction as per Rule 42. Now, for refund calculation, am I again required to apply the proportionate ... Read Full Issue
Date 01 Jul 2025
Replies 2 Replies
Views 2443 Views
0 Replies on 0 Issues

No replies have been made yet!

Showing 1 to 1 of 1 Results
Like0Bookmark
Omission of provision in intermediary law may void pending GST proceedings absent a saving clause, altering place of supply rules.
Budget 2026 amends Section 13(8) of the IGST Act to reframe the treatment of intermediary services and the place of supply, but omits an explicit saving clause; under the Hikal principle, omission of a provision without preservation can render non final proceedings unsustainable, leaving only matters that are "past and closed" unaffected and potentially stripping pending investigations, show cause notices, adjudications and appeals of their statutory anchor. (AI Summary)
Author
Date 14 Mar 2026
Rakesh Jain
Organization
Organization

Suresh and Co Chartered Acccountants

Connected
Connected

June 2025