Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →


Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →


By creating an account you can:
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal Upholds CIT(A) Decision: No Direct Evidence Found u/ss 69 and 56 for Sunshine Group Case.</h1> The Tribunal reviewed appeals against the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer under Sections 69 and 56 of the Income Tax Act for the years 2012-13 to 2018-19. These additions were based on materials from a search on the Sunshine Group, suggesting unsecured loans and bogus investments. The Tribunal found no direct incriminating evidence linking the assessee to these activities, as the evidence was based on third-party statements. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the additions, dismissing the Revenue's appeals and supporting the CIT(A)'s findings due to insufficient direct evidence.
TaxTMI