Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →


Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →


By creating an account you can:
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court of India classifies Dimethicone under Tariff Act Sub-Heading 3910, impacting excise categorization and taxation.</h1> The Supreme Court of India ruled that 'Dimethicone' should be classified under Sub-Heading 3910 of the Tariff Act, rather than under 3003.20. This decision was made in the case between a company and the Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta. The classification pertains to the interpretation of tariff codes for central excise purposes, impacting how Dimethicone is categorized for taxation and regulatory measures.
TaxTMI