Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →


Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →


By creating an account you can:
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Mandated CSR non-deduction under Explanation 2 to section 37(1) doesn't automatically bar section 80G claims; section 263 review limited</h1> Tribunals held that mandated corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending, though disallowed as a business deduction under Explanation 2 to section 37(1), does not ipso facto bar claims under section 80G where statutory conditions are met and no quid pro quo exists; Parliament's specific exclusions in section 80G indicate any broader prohibition must be express. They also ruled that a revisional order under section 263 is impermissible where the assessing officer conducted enquiries, considered evidence and adopted a tenable, precedent-supported view - mere disagreement by the commissioner is insufficient to disturb such assessment.
TaxTMI