Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
    6. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
    8. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 153C and the Necessity of AO's Satisfaction: A Detailed Judicial Analysis
    Case LawsGST
    Interpreting E-Way Bill Regulations: High Court's Guidance on Proportionality and Taxpayer Intent
    Case LawsMoney Laundering
    PMLA and CrPC: Supreme Court's Interpretation on Summons, Appearance, and Arrest
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Royalty or Business Income? High Court Clarifies Taxation of Remittances against Software Purchase
    Case LawsGST
    Interpreting the CGST Act: A Landmark Judgment on Record Maintenance, Confiscation, and Penalties
    Case LawsGST
    Excess Stock Findings: Invoking Sections 73 and 74 of UPGST Act, Not Section 130
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Judicial Restraint in SARFAESI Cases: Navigating Alternative Remedies and Writ Jurisdiction
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reassessment Proceedings: Navigating the Complexities
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Faceless Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment: Validity of Notice Issued by the Jurisdictional A...
    NewsBills
    Rates of income-tax in respect of income liable to tax for the assessment year 2024-25.
    NewsBills
    Rates for deduction of income-tax at source during the financial year (FY) 2024-25 from certain inco...
    NewsBills
    Rates for deduction of income-tax at source from “Salaries”, computation of “advance tax” an...
    NewsBills
    Individual, HUF, association of persons, body of individuals, artificial juridical person. [Rates fo...
    NewsBills
    Co-operative Societies [Computation of “advance tax” and charging of income-tax in special cases...
    NewsBills
    Firms [Computation of “advance tax” and charging of income-tax in special cases during the FY 20...
    NewsBills
    Local authorities [Computation of “advance tax” and charging of income-tax in special cases duri...
    NewsBills
    Companies [Computation of “advance tax” and charging of income-tax in special cases during the F...
    NewsBills
    Increase in Standard Deduction and deduction from family pension for taxpayers in tax regime
    NewsBills
    Increase in amount allowed as deduction to non-government employers and their employees for employer...
    NewsBills
    Tax incentives to International Financial Services Centre (MEASURES TO PROMOTE INVESTMENT AND EMPLOY...
❮
❯
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Open Link
    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 153C and the Necessity of AO's Satisfaction: A Detailed Judicial Analysis
    Show AI Summary
    Seized-material nexus under Section 153C: AO must form reasoned satisfaction before reopening assessments for specific years.
    Section 153C requires the Assessing Officer to form a reasoned satisfaction that seized material during a search has a bearing on an assessee's total income before initiating assessments; mere discovery is insufficient, and the AO must identify specific assessment years, map incriminating material year-wise, and record reasons to justify abatement or reopening.
    Case LawsGST
    Interpreting E-Way Bill Regulations: High Court's Guidance on Proportionality and Taxpayer Intent
    Show AI Summary
    E way bill compliance: omission of conveyance details alone should not justify automatic seizure absent intent to evade tax.
    Omission of the vehicle number in Part B of an e way bill, where goods are transferred to a transporter for onward carriage and tax invoiced at applicable rates with registered parties, does not by itself indicate intent to evade tax. Authorities must apply proportionality and consider relevant exemptions and documentary compliance before resorting to detention or seizure under the e way regulatory scheme.
    Case LawsMoney Laundering
    PMLA and CrPC: Supreme Court's Interpretation on Summons, Appearance, and Arrest
    Show AI Summary
    Appearance under summons: accused not treated as in custody and need not apply for bail; ED arrest power limited after cognizance.
    Appearance pursuant to a summons under section 44(1)(b) of the PMLA does not amount to custody; section 437 CrPC therefore does not apply solely on that basis. Sections 205 and 88 CrPC apply to PMLA complaints-allowing dispensation of personal attendance and bonds-yet acceptance of a bond under section 88 is not a grant of bail. Special Courts may issue warrants under section 70 for non appearance and may cancel such warrants on undertakings. After cognizance under section 4 on a section 44(1)(b) complaint, ED officers cannot arrest the accused under section 19.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Royalty or Business Income? High Court Clarifies Taxation of Remittances against Software Purchase
    Show AI Summary
    Royalty classification of software payments: remittances for software purchases are not treated as royalty under established precedent.
    Where distribution agreements or End User License Agreements do not grant any proprietary interest or a right to use copyright, payments for acquiring computer software are not to be characterised as royalty; this conclusion follows controlling precedent and DTAA considerations and renders an Assessing Officer's contrary classification inconsistent with the correct legal interpretation.
    Case LawsGST
    Interpreting the CGST Act: A Landmark Judgment on Record Maintenance, Confiscation, and Penalties
    Show AI Summary
    Record Maintenance under CGST: due process required before determining tax liability and imposing penalties or confiscating goods.
    The judgment emphasizes that maintenance of accurate records, including electronic records under Section 35, is mandatory; tax determination on unaccounted goods under Section 35(6) must follow the procedural safeguards of Sections 73 or 74, including issuance of a show cause notice; confiscation under Section 130 requires proof of statutory prerequisites such as intent to evade tax or failure to account for goods; and penalties under Section 122 must be categorised according to whether tax evasion is quantified, with non-evastion contraventions attracting the statutory ceiling applicable to that category.
    Case LawsGST
    Excess Stock Findings: Invoking Sections 73 and 74 of UPGST Act, Not Section 130
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed supply from unaccounted stock: tax liability must be determined through assessment procedures, not survey provisions.
    Excess or unaccounted stock discovered during a survey constitutes a deemed supply for tax purposes, but the determination and quantification of tax liability on such deemed supply must be effected through the statutory assessment procedure; invoking the survey-specific provision as the primary basis for separate proceedings is inconsistent with the statutory scheme.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Judicial Restraint in SARFAESI Cases: Navigating Alternative Remedies and Writ Jurisdiction
    Show AI Summary
    Judicial restraint in writ jurisdiction: Defer to statutory remedies under SARFAESI to preserve sale finality.
    The note explains that High Courts should ordinarily refrain from exercising Article 226 writ jurisdiction where an effective statutory remedy under the SARFAESI Act exists, particularly in recovery matters; confirmed and registered auction sales attain finality and the right of redemption is extinguished, and interference is permissible only in narrow exceptions such as proven fraud, collusion, or clear statutory or procedural violations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reassessment Proceedings: Navigating the Complexities
    Show AI Summary
    Reopening assessments: procedural compliance and substantive escapement requirements determine validity of reassessment notices.
    The judgment examines validity of notices under Section 148, holding that TOLA does not apply retrospectively for the assessment year at issue and notices issued after the statutory cutoff cannot be back-dated. Notices barred by the limitation in Section 149(1) are ineffective. Procedural prerequisites - notably issuance of a Document Identification Number and issuance through automated allocation by the faceless centre rather than direct action by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer - are mandatory. Substantively, reopening requires escapement of income in the form of an asset, expenditure, transaction, event, or book entry; a mere change of opinion or dispute over an ordinarily allowed deduction does not meet that threshold.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Faceless Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment: Validity of Notice Issued by the Jurisdictional A...
    Show AI Summary
    Faceless assessment: issuance of section 148 reopening notices by jurisdictional assessing officers inconsistent with faceless regime.
    The faceless assessment framework under Section 151A and the Scheme dated 29 March 2022 allocates exclusive jurisdiction to either the Faceless Assessment Officer or the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer for issuance of reopening notices and assessments; actions by an authority outside its assigned jurisdiction are inconsistent with the faceless regime and cause prejudice to the taxpayer as a matter of law.
    NewsBills
    Rates of income-tax in respect of income liable to tax for the assessment year 2024-25.
    Show AI Summary
    Income-tax rate scheme for optional new tax regime governs slab-based taxation for eligible individuals, with surcharge and cess.
    The note confirms tax rates for AY 2024-25 remain unchanged in specified statutory sections and in Part I of the First Schedule, reproduces slabbed rates under the optional section 115BAC regime and explains surcharge rules-including staged surcharge percentages, caps where income includes dividends or incomes under sections 111A/112/112A, marginal relief provisions-and that Health and Education Cess at 4% applies on tax inclusive of surcharge.
    NewsBills
    Rates for deduction of income-tax at source during the financial year (FY) 2024-25 from certain inco...
    Show AI Summary
    Deduction of income-tax at source: updated TDS structure for non-resident capital gains and non domestic companies.
    Part II of the First Schedule to the Finance Bill, 2024 prescribes FY 2024-25 rates for deduction of income-tax at source under specified sections; tax is to be deducted per the relevant statutory provisions. The rate for other income paid to a company that is not a domestic company is proposed to be reduced to thirtyfive percent. A revised table sets distinct TDS rates on capital gains for non-residents for transfers before and on or after 23rd July 2024. Other TDS rates generally remain as in the Finance Act, 2023. Surcharge is unchanged and Health and Education Cess remains at four percent for non-residents.
    NewsBills
    Rates for deduction of income-tax at source from “Salaries”, computation of “advance tax” an...
    Show AI Summary
    Rates for deduction of income tax at source set TDS and advance tax computation, applicable to accelerated assessments.
    Rates for deduction of income tax at source from Salaries and under section 194P and the computation of advance tax are specified in Part III of the First Schedule to the Finance Bill for the relevant fiscal year; those rates also apply to charging income tax in specified accelerated assessment circumstances such as provisional assessment of shipping profits to non residents, assessments of persons leaving India, likely property transfers to avoid tax, and bodies formed for short duration.
    NewsBills
    Individual, HUF, association of persons, body of individuals, artificial juridical person. [Rates fo...
    Show AI Summary
    Concessional tax regime rates set with graduated slabs and capped surcharge for high income taxpayers under new proposal.
    A concessional tax regime under proposed clause (ii) of sub section (1A) of section 115BAC will apply to individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs and certain artificial juridical persons from assessment year 2025 26, prescribing graded tax rates by income band; an opt out under sub section (6) of section 115BAC makes Part III of the First Schedule applicable. Part III also provides age based higher exempt thresholds for resident senior and super senior citizens and includes capital gains under sections 111A, 112 and 112A in taxable income. Surcharge rates rise with income but are subject to caps, specific restrictions for dividend and specified incomes, limits for associations of companies, a reduced cap for persons under sub section (1A) of section 115BAC, and marginal relief at thresholds.
    NewsBills
    Co-operative Societies [Computation of “advance tax” and charging of income-tax in special cases...
    Show AI Summary
    Co-operative society tax regime: rates unchanged with tiered surcharge and optional concessional schemes under sections 115BAD and 115BAE.
    Co-operative society tax rates remain unchanged and are set in the First Schedule; tiered surcharge applies with marginal relief to address surcharge effects. A resident co-operative society meeting specified conditions may elect an optional lower tax regime with a prescribed surcharge. A manufacturing co-operative society formed and commenced production within specified dates, foregoing specified incentives and deductions, may opt for a concessional manufacturing tax rate for assessment years from the stated year, with a prescribed surcharge. These measures are provided in the cited clauses and the First Schedule.
    NewsBills
    Firms [Computation of “advance tax” and charging of income-tax in special cases during the FY 20...
    Show AI Summary
    Surcharge cap on firm tax limits additional levy above the income threshold, preserving tax on threshold plus excess.
    The income-tax rate for firms remains unchanged from the prior year; firms with total income above the threshold face a surcharge on computed income-tax, but the combined tax and surcharge for income exceeding the threshold is capped so it cannot exceed the tax on income at the threshold plus the excess income.
    NewsBills
    Local authorities [Computation of “advance tax” and charging of income-tax in special cases duri...
    Show AI Summary
    Local authority income-tax surcharge capped to limit additional tax burden above the applicable income threshold.
    The income-tax rate for local authorities for FY 2024-25 remains unchanged. A surcharge applies to income-tax where total income exceeds the statutory threshold, calculated as a percentage of income-tax. The combined income-tax and surcharge on income above the threshold is capped so that it does not exceed, by more than the excess income, the income-tax payable on income equal to the threshold.
    NewsBills
    Companies [Computation of “advance tax” and charging of income-tax in special cases during the F...
    Show AI Summary
    Corporate tax rate changes with maintained surcharge framework, marginal relief and a health and education cess applied to computed tax.
    The Bill sets differentiated corporate tax rates for domestic and non domestic companies, preserves optional lower-tax regimes for qualifying domestic companies, and reduces the non domestic base rate. It maintains surcharge bands for domestic and non domestic entities, provides marginal relief in surcharge computation, excludes surcharge on advance tax for certain specified funds, and imposes a Health and Education Cess on tax computed inclusive of surcharge without marginal relief for the cess.
    NewsBills
    Increase in Standard Deduction and deduction from family pension for taxpayers in tax regime
    Show AI Summary
    Standard deduction increase under new tax regime raises allowable salary and family pension deductions to incentivize regime shift.
    An amendment makes the standard deduction for salaries and the family pension deduction operate as if the lower statutory caps were substituted by higher caps where income-tax is computed under the specified clause of the new tax regime; these substitutions apply only when tax is computed under that new-regime provision and take effect from the stated future assessment year.
    NewsBills
    Increase in amount allowed as deduction to non-government employers and their employees for employer...
    Show AI Summary
    Employer pension contribution deduction increased for employees under new tax regime from assessment year 2025-26.
    Employer contributions to an employee's pension scheme will be deductible to the employer up to 14% of the employee's salary instead of the current 10%; contributions made by non government employers will also be deductible for the employee up to 14% of salary where the employee's pay is chargeable under the alternate tax regime. The amendments apply from 1 April 2025 for assessment year 2025 2026.
    NewsBills
    Tax incentives to International Financial Services Centre (MEASURES TO PROMOTE INVESTMENT AND EMPLOY...
    Show AI Summary
    Tax incentives for IFSC expanded: wider fund exemptions, clearing house income relief, VC relief, and interest limit carve outs.
    Proposed amendments broaden IFSC tax concessions: include retail schemes and Exchange Traded Funds as specified funds under section 10(4D); exempt specified income of Core Settlement Guarantee Funds by recognising IFSCA market infrastructure regulations; extend section 68 relief to Venture Capital Funds regulated by IFSCA; and exclude IFSC finance companies from the section 94B interest deduction limitation, subject to prescribed conditions. Amendments take effect from 1 April 2025 and apply to the subsequent assessment year.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Home› TMI Notes › Income Tax › Act-Rules › Category › This
      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Income Tax

      Comparison of SCHEDULE II "INCOME NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN TOTAL INCOME" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      17 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Print Options

      SCHEDULE II INCOME NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN TOTAL INCOME

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      SCHEDULE II sets out classes of income that are excluded from "total income" for income-tax purposes. The Bill (Old Version) and the enacted Act differ in several material respects affecting life-insurance exclusions, pension/NPS entries, references to International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) entities, and the inclusion of equalisation-levy income. Affected parties include policyholders, insurers, employers, employees, pension subscribers, IFSC entities and tax authorities. Effective dates are stated within specific entries (for example, policy issue periods and 1 April 2002/2023) where provided; no single overarching commencement date for the Schedule is stated in the Bill text.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: SCHEDULE II (See section 11) - "Income not to be included in total income." The Schedule lists categories of exempt income (column B) subject to conditions (column C). Definitions and notes at the end assign meanings to terms used in the table. The Bill (Old Version) is the source document for this commentary. Any differences vis-`a-vis the enacted Act are identified only insofar as both texts were provided; where a detail is absent in the Bill text, the phrase "Not stated in the document." has been used.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The Schedule enumerates 16 heads of income excluded from total income, including: agricultural income; sums under life-insurance policies (with sub-conditions tied to period of issue, premium-to-sum-assured ratios and aggregate premium ceilings); provident fund and recognised provident fund payments (with carve-outs for interest on large contributions on/after 1 April 2021); payments under Sukanya Samriddhi, National Pension System (NPS) Trust, Agniveer Corpus Fund, approved superannuation funds; scholarships; awards/rewards instituted or approved by government; interest or other receipts on specified government securities and deposits; interest on gold bonds/certificates; interest on bonds issued by local authorities or State Pooled Finance Entities; income on transfer of certain UTI units; income chargeable to equalisation levy (new insertion); and specific categories u/s 10(15) and related provisions of the 1961 Act as applicable.

      Interpretation

      The text frames exclusions as conditional: each head is subject to prescribed conditions and definitions in accompanying notes. Legislative intent, as discernible from the Bill text, is to preserve traditional exemptions (agriculture, certain pensions, scholarships, specified government securities) while tightening or clarifying tax-exempt treatment for life-insurance receipts and retirement/savings vehicles by reference to issue dates, premium ratios, aggregate premium ceilings and contribution thresholds. The insertion of equalisation-levy related exclusion (Sl. No. 15) signals explicit recognition of overlap between equalisation-levy chargeability and income-tax neutrality for certain cross-border digital services.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Key carve-outs and conditions provided in the Bill include:

      • Life-insurance sums excluded only if policies meet period-specific premium-to-sum-assured ratios and, for certain periods, aggregate premium ceilings (Rs. 2,50,000 or Rs. 5,00,000) - and certain sums (section 127 receipts; Keyman policies) are expressly ineligible.
      • Portions of interest on provident fund/recognised provident fund balances attributable to contributions on/after 1 April 2021 are not eligible for exclusion where contributions exceed specified thresholds (Rs.5,00,000 / Rs.2,50,000) and the amount not excluded is to be computed as prescribed.
      • NPS payments excluded only to the extent they do not exceed 60% of the total amount payable on closure/opt-out.
      • Approved superannuation fund payments are exempt only in specified circumstances (death, commutation at retirement/age, refund in limited cases, transfer to specified pension schemes).
      • Equalisation-levy related incomes are excluded only where not chargeable as royalty/FTS in India under agreements notified u/s 159 (explicit exception in Sl. No. 15).

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A unit-linked life policy issued on 1 Oct 2023 with annual premium such that premium-to-sum-assured ratio is 12% and aggregate premium per tax year is Rs.2,00,000 - the Bill permits exclusion if it meets the Item 2 conditions (unit-linked post-1-April-2023: ratio <=15% for special, <=10% for others; aggregate <=Rs.2,50,000 for ULIP). Whether treated as "special policy" depends on disability/disease status u/rs - Not stated in the document.
      • Example 2: An employee receives accumulated recognised provident fund balance including interest attributable to contributions of Rs.6,00,000 made on/after 1 April 2021 in a year when no employer contribution was made - interest attributable to that contribution is not eligible for exclusion (threshold exceeded Rs.5,00,000); the portion not excluded to be computed as prescribed (procedure Not stated in the document).

      Interplay

      The Bill references other statutory instruments and provisions: Section 11 (hook), Section 127 (for life-insurance ineligibility), Schedule XI para 8, Schedule XV (definition of "actual capital sum assured"), Insurance Regulatory regulations, the Provident Funds Act, Government Savings Promotion Act (Sukanya Samriddhi), Dept. notifications regarding NPS (notifications not reproduced in the Bill text), Finance Act, 2016 (equalisation levy Chapter VIII) and section 159 agreements. The Bill contemplates Board guidelines for removal of difficulties. Where computation methods are required ("as prescribed"), the Bill defers to rules/regulations; these procedural details are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Bill (Old Version) and the Enacted Act - Practical Impact

      TopicBill (Old Version)Act (2025) - Differences & Practical Impact
      Reference to IFSC in life-insurance entryExclusion clause expressly excludes policies issued by "International Financial Services Centre insurance intermediary office" from the general test; IFSC office language appears within clause (a).

      The Act broadens IFSC coverage differently (references to "International Financial Services Centre Insurance Office") and later adds a special carve-out that aggregate premium conditions do not apply to policies issued on or after 1 April 2025 by the IFSC Insurance Office.

      Practical impact: IFSC-issued policies post-1-Apr-2025 enjoy relaxed aggregate-premium limits under the Act versus the Bill - this benefits IFSC policyholders and insurers.

      Section reference for ineligible insurance sumsIneligibility lists section 127 (no subsection reference) and Keyman policies.

      The Act specifies "section 127(4)" as ineligible; this narrows or clarifies which portion of section 127 is meant.

      Practical impact: narrower/clearer exclusion scope for section 127 receipts, reducing interpretive ambiguity.

      Aggregate premium thresholds for policies issued on/after 1-Apr-2023ULIPs: aggregate <=Rs.2,50,000; other policies: aggregate <=Rs.5,00,000.

      The Act restates these ceilings but then adds the IFSC carve-out for policies issued on/after 1-Apr-2025.

      Practical impact: domestic policyholders unchanged, IFSC policyholders gain advantage.

      NPS-related entries (Sl. Nos. 15 & 16)The Bill lacks specific entries for "lump sum amount" defined by a particular notification and for Unified Pension Scheme subscriber-specific references.

      The Act adds two discrete entries (Sl. Nos. 15 and 16) dealing with NPS payments to Unified Pension Scheme subscribers and "lump sum amount" per a departmental notification dated 24 Jan 2025.

      Practical impact: greater specificity and targeted exemption for Unified Pension Scheme subscribers under NPS, linking to a concrete notification (FX-1/3/2024-PR). This reduces uncertainty for affected NPS subscribers.

      Equalisation levy incomeBill includes Sl. No. 15 addressing income chargeable to equalisation levy.

      The Act omits the Bill's Sl. No. 15 equalisation-levy entry or shifts numbering; comparison shows the Act instead includes other NPS-related items.

      Practical impact: the treatment of equalisation-levy incomes requires reconciliation between Act text and prior Bill; taxpayers relying on the Bill's exclusion must verify the final Act wording (Not stated in the document).

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Life-insurance exclusions carry detailed temporal and quantitative conditions (period of issue, premium-to-sum-assured ratio, aggregate premium ceilings). Insurers and policyholders must verify issue date classifications and compute premium ratios and aggregate premiums across the policy term. The explicit ineligibility for keyman policies and section 127 receipts increases scrutiny over policy ownership and assignment.
      • NPS and provident fund entries impose record-keeping obligations: authorities and subscribers must track contributions made on or after 1 April 2021 separately, and identify portions of interest attributable to contributions exceeding thresholds. The method of computing the amount not excluded is left to prescribed rules - until rules are notified, potential uncertainty persists.
      • Equalisation-levy clause (Sl. No. 15): taxpayers and digital service providers should reconcile equalisation-levy exposure and Income-tax chargeability; the clause excludes income chargeable to equalisation levy except where the income is otherwise taxable in India as royalty/FTS under notified agreements (thus creating an interplay with tax treaty determinations and notifications u/s 159).
      • IFSC references: the Bill treats certain IFSC insurance intermediary office receipts differently in the life-insurance entry (exclusion/inclusion language differs versus the Act). Parties operating within IFSCs should note the special treatment and any administrative guidance forthcoming.
      • Procedural uncertainty: multiple entries defer to "as prescribed" computations and to notifications by the Central Government; until those are issued, taxpayers face interpretation and compliance risk. The Board's power to issue binding guidelines (with Central Government approval) is preserved, indicating administrative rule-making will shape practical application.

      Key Takeaways

      • The Bill retains traditional exemptions (agriculture, scholarships, certain pension/retirement receipts) while imposing quantified tests on insurance exclusions (period-specific ratios and aggregate premium ceilings).
      • Interest on provident fund balances attributable to large post-1-April-2021 contributions is explicitly excluded from exemption, with thresholds (Rs.5,00,000 / Rs.2,50,000) and prescribed computation methods.
      • Equalisation-levy related income is newly addressed - excluded except where taxable in India as royalty/FTS under notified agreements.
      • Certain specific sums are expressly excluded from insurance exemption (section 127 receipts; Keyman insurance), tightening the prior broader language.
      • Several entries defer key operational questions to rules/notifications; substantial administrative guidance is required to operationalise the Schedule.

      Full Text:

      SCHEDULE II INCOME NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN TOTAL INCOME

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax
      Next ➔