Just a moment...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
    6. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
    8. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Manuals Income Tax
    What is the impact of ICDS X containing transitional provisions.
    Manuals Income Tax
    Under ICDS X, whether reversal of an asset and the related income would mean that the entry which wa...
    Manuals Income Tax
    Can any expenditure should set off against a provision recognised for another expendiure.
    Manuals Income Tax
    Expenditure on post-retirement benefits like provident fund, gratuity, etc. are covered by specific ...
    Manuals Income Tax
    What is the manner of recording the borrowing costs.
    Manuals Income Tax
    What are the activities necessary to prepare inventory for its intended sale as per ICDS IX.
    Manuals Income Tax
    There are specific provisions in the Act read with Rules under which a portion of borrowing cos...
    Manuals Income Tax
    How to allocate borrowing costs relating to general borrowing as computed in accordance with formula...
    Manuals Income Tax
    Under ICDS IX does borrowing cost include exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowi...
    Manuals Income Tax
    Whether bill discounting charges and other similar charges would fall under the definition of borrow...
    Manuals Income Tax
    Which are the borrowing costs covered by ICDS IX.
    Manuals Income Tax
    What is the manner in which securities held as stock-in-trade are required to be valued.
    Manuals Income Tax
    Para 9 of ICDS-VIII on securities requires securities held as stock-in-trade shall be valued at actu...
    Manuals Income Tax
    Which ICDS would govern derivative instruments.
    Manuals Income Tax
    For subsidy received prior to 1st day of April 2016 but not recognised in the books pending satisfac...
    Manuals Income Tax
    How to deal with a situation where compensation is payable for the purposes of giving ‘immediate f...
    Manuals Income Tax
    Whether a grant which is not directly relatable to non-depreciable assets should be concluded as an ...
    Manuals Income Tax
    Where the grants are received for assets which are outside the block of assets, then what is the tre...
    Manuals Income Tax
    Whether grants should be recognised even in cases where there is no certainty that the conditions at...
    Manuals Income Tax
    How are Government grants to be recognized.
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Open Link
Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Manuals Income Tax
What is the impact of ICDS X containing transitional provisions.
Show AI Summary
Transitional provisions for ICDS X ensure recognition of provisions and contingent items to prevent double taxation or omission.
Transitional recognition under ICDS X requires that provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets and related income be recognised for previous years commencing on or after 1 April 2016 in accordance with this standard, after taking into account any amount recognised for the same items for previous years ending on or before 31 March 2016; the rule aims to prevent double taxation or omission of income.
Manuals Income Tax
Under ICDS X, whether reversal of an asset and the related income would mean that the entry which wa...
Show AI Summary
Supremacy of tax law: reversal of an ICDS-recognised asset must follow tax deduction rules, permitting write-off as bad debt.
Reversal of an asset and related income recognised under ICDS X must conform to the Income-tax Act where conflicts arise; the Act's tax-deduction treatment applies, allowing write-off as a bad debt rather than simply reversing the original accounting recognition entry.
Manuals Income Tax
Can any expenditure should set off against a provision recognised for another expendiure.
Show AI Summary
Set-off of provisions: expenditures may be set off only against the original provision, not provisions for different purposes.
Under ICDS X, expenditures must be set off only against the original provision for which they were recognised; expenditures cannot be offset against provisions recognised for a different event or purpose, as that would conceal the separate financial effects of distinct events and undermine transparent disclosure of provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets.
Manuals Income Tax
Expenditure on post-retirement benefits like provident fund, gratuity, etc. are covered by specific ...
Show AI Summary
Employee post retirement benefit provisioning excluded from ICDS X, governed by specific statutory provisions for income computation.
Provisioning for employee post retirement benefits covered by AS 15 shall continue to be governed by specific provisions of the Act and are not dealt with by ICDS X; ICDS X does not apply to liabilities otherwise falling within AS 15.
Manuals Income Tax
What is the manner of recording the borrowing costs.
Show AI Summary
Borrowing costs capitalization requires capitalizing interest for qualifying assets; inventory only when production is prolonged.
Borrowing costs directly attributable to acquisition, construction or production of tangible and intangible assets must be capitalized as part of the asset cost. Inventory borrowing costs are capitalized only when the inventory requires an extended period to become saleable. Specific borrowings for a qualifying asset require capitalization of actual borrowing costs incurred during the qualifying period. For general borrowings, a formulaic allocation apportions borrowing costs to qualifying assets based on the ratio of qualifying assets to total assets.
Manuals Income Tax
What are the activities necessary to prepare inventory for its intended sale as per ICDS IX.
Show AI Summary
Inventory preparation processes define activities included in inventory cost when making goods fit and saleable under accounting standards.
Activities necessary to prepare inventory for its intended sale include all processes required to make inventory functional for its intended use and to render it saleable, notably quality control to verify fitness for use and primary packing where goods are normally sold in packed condition.
Manuals Income Tax
There are specific provisions in the Act read with Rules under which a portion of borrowing cos...
Show AI Summary
Borrowing cost capitalization must exclude portions disallowed by specific statutory provisions, only allowable amounts may be capitalised.
Borrowing costs capitalised under ICDS IX must exclude amounts disallowed by specific provisions of the Act; only the portion of borrowing cost that remains allowable under the Act may be capitalised, because specific statutory disallowances override ICDS treatment.
Manuals Income Tax
How to allocate borrowing costs relating to general borrowing as computed in accordance with formula...
Show AI Summary
Capitalization of borrowing costs: general borrowing must be allocated to qualifying assets and capitalized on an asset-by-asset basis.
General borrowing costs computed under the ICDS-IX formula must be apportioned among qualifying assets and capitalized on an asset-by-asset basis, so that each qualifying asset's capitalized borrowing cost reflects its proportionate share of general borrowing under the standard.
Manuals Income Tax
Under ICDS IX does borrowing cost include exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowi...
Show AI Summary
Exchange differences excluded from borrowing costs under ICDS IX; foreign exchange effects governed by ICDS VI.
Exchange differences from foreign currency borrowings that are treated as adjustments to interest are excluded from borrowing costs under ICDS IX; the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates, including those relating to interest, are governed by ICDS VI.
Manuals Income Tax
Whether bill discounting charges and other similar charges would fall under the definition of borrow...
Show AI Summary
Borrowing cost: bill discounting and similar charges treated as borrowing cost, except when not tied to borrowed funds.
The definition of borrowing cost is inclusive and generally covers bill discounting charges and similar charges as borrowing cost for income computation and disclosure; however, discounting charges that do not arise from borrowing funds are excluded from that definition.
Manuals Income Tax
Which are the borrowing costs covered by ICDS IX.
Show AI Summary
Borrowing costs include interest and related charges such as commitment charges, amortised discount and finance lease charges.
Borrowing costs under ICDS IX comprise interest and other costs incurred in connection with borrowing funds, including commitment charges, amortised discount or premium, amortised ancillary costs in arranging borrowings, and finance charges for assets taken on finance lease.
Manuals Income Tax
What is the manner in which securities held as stock-in-trade are required to be valued.
Show AI Summary
Valuation of securities as stock-in-trade: mandatorily at lower of actual cost and net realizable value.
Securities held as stock-in-trade must be valued at the lower of actual cost initially recognized and net realizable value at year-end. Unlisted or unquoted securities held as stock-in-trade are to be measured at actual cost as initially recognized, under the income computation and disclosure standards framework.
Manuals Income Tax
Para 9 of ICDS-VIII on securities requires securities held as stock-in-trade shall be valued at actu...
Show AI Summary
Valuation of securities: aggregate category wise cost compared with net realisable value, lower amount taken as carrying value.
For subsequent measurement under ICDS VIII, securities held as stock in trade are aggregated category wise; for each category the aggregate cost and aggregate net realisable value are compared, and the lower of the two is taken as the carrying value.
Manuals Income Tax
Which ICDS would govern derivative instruments.
Show AI Summary
Derivatives accounting: ICDS VI governs typical derivatives, ICDS I applies residually, capital-asset derivatives are excluded.
ICDS VI supplies guidance for derivative contracts such as forward contracts; derivatives outside ICDS VI's scope fall under ICDS I. Derivative instruments that qualify as capital assets are excluded from ICDS and thus not governed by those standards.
Manuals Income Tax
For subsidy received prior to 1st day of April 2016 but not recognised in the books pending satisfac...
Show AI Summary
Recognition of government grants: pre-existing grants deemed recognised on receipt while later grants follow ICDS recognition criteria.
Grants actually received before the ICDS effective date are deemed recognised on receipt under Para 4(2) of ICDS VII and remain governed by pre-ICDS law; grants received on or after the effective date must be recognised only when the ICDS VII recognition criteria in Paras 5-9 are satisfied, with recognition then following ICDS VII.
Manuals Income Tax
How to deal with a situation where compensation is payable for the purposes of giving ‘immediate f...
Show AI Summary
Government grant for immediate financial support must be recognised when receivable, irrespective of actual receipt.
Government grants given as immediate financial support and not tied to specific expenditure must be recognised when the grantee is entitled and sums become receivable; actual receipt is immaterial. If the grant is confined to an individual enterprise and grant-related conditions are met, recognition occurs in the period of receivability, governing timing of income inclusion and disclosure under the income computation framework.
Manuals Income Tax
Whether a grant which is not directly relatable to non-depreciable assets should be concluded as an ...
Show AI Summary
Government grants treatment: grants not directly relatable to nondepreciable assets treated as taxable income rather than reduction in asset cost.
Grants not directly relatable to nondepreciable assets are to be recognised as taxable income under the Act rather than deducted from asset cost; the ICDS preamble confirms the Act prevails over ICDS, and paragraph 7 of ICDS VII applies solely to depreciable assets where reduction of asset cost is appropriate.
Manuals Income Tax
Where the grants are received for assets which are outside the block of assets, then what is the tre...
Show AI Summary
Recognition of government grants: generally recognized as income on receipt unless reasonable certainty permits spreading with related costs.
Grants for assets outside the block of depreciable assets are to be recognized as income; statutory tax provisions control and preclude spreading recognition beyond the year of receipt, except where there is reasonable certainty of receipt permitting deferral and matching with costs incurred for obligations related to the non-depreciable assets.
Manuals Income Tax
Whether grants should be recognised even in cases where there is no certainty that the conditions at...
Show AI Summary
Recognition of government grants: must occur on receipt; potential reversals are applied against unamortized deferred credit balances.
ICDS VII requires government grants to be recognised on the date of receipt and prohibits deferral beyond receipt; where grants become refundable because attached conditions are unmet, reversal of initial recognition must first be applied to the unamortized deferred credit arising from the grant, so income recognition must reflect both receipt and the certainty of meeting conditions.
Manuals Income Tax
How are Government grants to be recognized.
Show AI Summary
Recognition of government grants requires reasonable certainty of compliance and receipt; disclose in income computation accordingly.
Under ICDS VII, government grants are to be recognized when there is reasonable certainty that the related conditions will be complied with and that the grants will be received; such grants should not be postponed beyond the actual receipt date for income computation and disclosure purposes.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Home › TMI Notes › Income Tax › Act-Rules › Category › This
Back

All TMI Notes

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Income Tax

Comparison of section 487 "Abetment of false return, etc." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

17 September, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Print Options

Section 487 Offences by companies.

Income-tax Act, 2025

At a Glance

The documents are two textual variants of Clause/Section 487 dealing with "Offences by companies" under the Income-tax legislation of 2025: (1) Clause 487 - Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version); and (2) Section 487 - Income-tax Act, 2025 (enacted text). Both set out vicarious and personal liability for corporate tax offences. The enacted text contains modest but important drafting differences from the Bill: notably, an expanded non-reliance clause in sub-section (3) and slightly different framing in sub-section (2). Affected parties include companies and persons in managerial or controlling positions (directors, managers, secretaries, other officers, partners, controlling members). Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

Background & Scope

Statutory hooks: the title indicates this provision falls under "Offences and Prosecution" of the Income-tax statute of 2025. Both texts define the circumstances in which a company and specified persons are deemed guilty of an offence under the Act and prescribe liability when offences are committed by companies. Definitions provided in sub-section (5) (Bill) / (5) (Act) define "company" (a body corporate and includes a firm; an association of persons or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not) and "director" (in relation to a firm, a partner; in relation to any association/body, any member controlling the affairs). No other definitions or legislative history are provided in the documents.

Statutory Provision Mode

Text & Scope

Both texts operate on two complementary principles: (a) vicarious or deemed guilt of persons in charge of a company's business at the time an offence was committed (sub-section (1)); and (b) personal culpability where an offence is proved to have been committed with the consent, connivance, or attributable to neglect of specified office-holders (sub-section (3)). Sub-section (4) addresses the sentencing frame where the offence by the company is punishable with imprisonment and fine - prescribing fine for the company and liability to be proceeded against and punished for the concerned persons "as per the provisions of this Act." Sub-section (5) supplies internal definitions for "company" and "director" (as described above).

Interpretation

The texts adopt a classical statutory approach to corporate criminality and derivative liability: imposing deemed guilt on the company and those "in charge of, and responsible to" it for business conduct (sub-section (1)); allowing exculpation if the person proves lack of knowledge or that all due diligence was exercised (sub-section (2)); and imposing direct liability on directors/officers where consent/connivance/neglect is established (sub-section (3)). The enacted text's phrasing in sub-section (3) - prefacing the paragraph with "Irrespective of anything contained in sub-section (1) and (2)" - signals a legislative intention to make sub-section (3) operate notwithstanding the defences or deeming in (1) and (2). The Bill's version limits the non-reliance to sub-section (1) only. That drafting distinction affects how sub-section (2)'s due diligence defence interacts with personal liability under sub-section (3).

Exceptions/Provisos

Sub-section (2) provides a statutory defence for persons deemed guilty under sub-section (1): the person must prove either (a) the offence was committed without his knowledge, or (b) he had exercised all due diligence to prevent commission of such offence. The texts otherwise contain no further provisos, thresholds, or procedural conditions. No ancillary definitions of "due diligence," burden of proof specifics, or evidentiary standards are provided. Not stated in the document: standard of proof (criminal or civil), whether the due diligence defence shifts burden of proof, or procedural mechanisms for prosecution.

Illustrations

  • Illustration 1: Not stated in the document - the text does not supply an example of application where a company commits an offence and an officer invokes the due diligence defence.
  • Illustration 2: Not stated in the document - no example demonstrating the operation of sub-section (3) when consent/connivance/neglect is proved.

Interplay

Both texts cross-reference only internal subsections. No external Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are cited in the provided texts. Not stated in the document: interaction with general principles of criminal liability, procedural provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or any tax procedure rules. The enacted text's broader "irrespective of anything contained in sub-section (1) and (2)" clause suggests a stronger statutory priority for sub-section (3) over the defences in (2), potentially limiting the circumstances in which an officer can invoke the due diligence defence where consent/connivance/neglect are alleged.

Differences Between the Provisions and Practical Impact

  • Scope of non-reliance in sub-section (3): The Bill (old version) states sub-section (3) applies "irrespective of the provisions of sub-section (1)" (i.e., it carves out directors/etc. from the deeming rule in (1)). The enacted Act expands that to "Irrespective of anything contained in sub-section (1) and (2)".
    • Practical impact: Under the Act text, sub-section (3) operates notwithstanding both the deeming in (1) and the due diligence defence in (2). This means that where consent/connivance/neglect is proved, the officer cannot rely on the due diligence defence in (2) to avoid being "deemed to be guilty", thereby narrowing the scope of the due diligence escape for officers in those circumstances.
  • Wording of sub-section (2): The Bill uses "the person referred in the said sub-section proves" while the Act uses "the person referred therein proves". This is a drafting stylistic change with no substantive effect.
    • Practical impact: None substantive; purely editorial.
  • Introductory phrasing to sub-section (3): The Act uses "Irrespective of anything contained in sub-section (1) and (2), where an offence ... such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty" - while the Bill phrases it conditionally ("If it is proved ... then irrespective of the provisions of sub-section (1), such director... shall also be deemed to be guilty"). The Act places the "irrespective" prefix before the conditional clause, making explicit that the operation of sub-section (3) displaces both sub-section (1) and (2).
    • Practical impact: The ordering in the Act strengthens the independence of sub-section (3) as a separate route to personal liability, limiting defendants' ability to rely on (2) once the facts in (3) are established.
  • Sub-section (4) phrasing: Both texts require that where the offence by the company is punishable with imprisonment and fine, the company is fined and the relevant persons shall be "liable to be proceeded against and punished as per the provisions of this Act." Wording differences are minor and do not change the substance.
    • Practical impact: None significant.
  • Terminology in sub-section (5): The Bill states "In this section" while the Act states "For the purposes of this section". Substantively the same.
    • Practical impact: None substantive.

Practical Implications

  • Compliance and risk: Under the enacted text, officers and persons in charge face increased exposure where an offence is proved to have been committed with their consent, connivance or attributable to neglect - they will be deemed guilty irrespective of a previously available due diligence defence. Companies and those in charge should be aware that proving "due diligence" may not be an operative shield where allegations of consent/connivance/neglect are made. The Bill's earlier formulation potentially left more room for invoking sub-section (2) against allegations in (3); that protection is narrowed in the Act.
  • Record-keeping/evidence: Not stated in the document are specific documentary or procedural requirements. However, the text implies that persons in charge who wish to rely on the due diligence defence under sub-section (2) should maintain contemporaneous records demonstrating the exercise of all due diligence and steps taken to prevent offences. Not stated in the document: precise contents or format of such records, retention periods, or evidentiary thresholds.
  • Prosecutorial approach: Not stated in the document whether prosecuting authorities must separately prove both the company's offence and the individual's consent/connivance/neglect, nor how evidentiary burdens are allocated. The enacted drafting suggests prosecutors can pursue personal liability under sub-section (3) even if the person attempts to rely on sub-section (2).
  • Sentencing consequences: Where the company's offence attracts imprisonment and fine, the company is to be punished with fine and implicated persons are "liable to be proceeded against and punished as per the provisions of this Act." Not stated in the document are minimum/maximum fines for the company or sentencing ranges for individuals; no procedural guidance on joint or separate trials is provided.

Key Takeaways

  • Both texts create deeming liability for a company and persons "in charge of, and responsible to" it for corporate tax offences.
  • Both provide a due diligence defence for persons deemed guilty under sub-section (1), but the enacted Act limits the availability of that defence where consent/connivance/neglect is proved under sub-section (3).
  • The Act's sub-section (3) expressly operates "irrespective of anything contained in sub-section (1) and (2)", which narrows officers' defences relative to the Bill version.
  • Definitions for "company" and "director" broaden corporate constructs to include firms and associations and specify partner/controlling member roles.
  • Several procedural and evidentiary details (standard of proof, burden allocation, examples, record-keeping requirements) are Not stated in the document.
  • Practical consequence: officers should ensure robust preventive compliance systems and contemporaneous documentation to the extent available, recognising that such evidence may not avert liability where consent/connivance/neglect is proved.

Full Text:

Section 487 Offences by companies.

Topics

Acts Income Tax
Next ➔