Just a moment...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
    6. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
    8. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Act Rules Bills
    Rate of income-tax in case of companies - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment Yea...
    Act Rules Bills
    Rate of income-tax in case of every local authority - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the As...
    Act Rules Bills
    Rate of income-tax in the case of ever firm (partnership firm) - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates -...
    Act Rules Bills
    Rate of Tax in case of co-operative society - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment...
    Act Rules Bills
    Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment Year 2018-19 and Rates for deduction of tax at source from "Sa...
    Case Laws VAT / Sales Tax
    Classification of goods - Impact of use of punctuation mark
    Case Laws Customs
    Withdrawal of Anti-Dumping Duty - Designated Authority has no power to give retrospective relief
    Act Rules GST
    Meaning and scope of supply under GST (Part 2) - Import of services will be treated as supply and wi...
    Act Rules GST
    Meaning and scope of supply under GST (Part 1) - Since CGST, SGST or IGST will be levied on supply o...
    Case Laws Service Tax
    Whether the vessels or ships that are afloat are not goods and immovable property? - CESTAT says Yes...
    Case Laws Service Tax
    Adjustment of excess paid service tax – rule 6(3) of STR, 1994
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Currency conversion using telegraphic transfer buying rate (‘TTBR...
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Documents to be furnished for availing FTC
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) in case of MAT/ AMT
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Lower of the tax payable under the Act and DTAA
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Cases in which no FTC benefit would be available
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) shall be allowed if evidence & undertaking furnished within 6 months ...
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Meaning of foreign tax
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Benefit on proportionate basis
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - FTC benefit in the year in which income offered to tax
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Open Link
Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Act Rules Bills
Rate of income-tax in case of companies - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment Yea...
Show AI Summary
Corporate tax rate differential for domestic companies introduced, with tiered surcharge rules and specified cess treatment applied.
The Finance Bill revises company tax by setting a lower rate for domestic companies meeting a specified turnover threshold and a higher standard rate otherwise, while maintaining the existing rate for non-domestic companies. Tiered surcharge rates apply differently to domestic companies and to companies other than domestic companies, with marginal relief available. Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess remain generally applicable, but are not levied on tax deducted or collected at source for domestic companies and other residents under specified entries; both cesses still apply to salary TDS and to non-residents and non-domestic companies.
Act Rules Bills
Rate of income-tax in case of every local authority - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the As...
Show AI Summary
Rate of income-tax for local authorities remains unchanged; surcharge applies and marginal relief available for high-income local authorities.
Rate of income-tax for every local authority is preserved at the level specified for the prior assessment year. Surcharge is imposed on local authorities whose income exceeds the high-income threshold, levied at a specified percentage, and marginal relief is provided to mitigate abrupt liability increases near that threshold.
Act Rules Bills
Rate of income-tax in the case of ever firm (partnership firm) - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates -...
Show AI Summary
Firm income-tax rate continues unchanged, with surcharge for higher-income firms and marginal relief available.
The rate of income-tax applicable to every firm continues at the same level as for the preceding assessment year for assessment year 2018-19. For firms with total income exceeding one crore rupees, a surcharge is levied at twelve per cent, and marginal relief is available where applicable.
Act Rules Bills
Rate of Tax in case of co-operative society - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment...
Show AI Summary
Co-operative society tax rates remain unchanged for the assessment year; surcharge applies to higher incomes and marginal relief provided.
Rates of income-tax for co-operative society taxpayers remain the same as in the prior assessment year under the First Schedule of the Finance Bill, 2017. A surcharge applies to societies with higher income and marginal relief is provided to mitigate surcharge impact at threshold points.
Act Rules Bills
Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment Year 2018-19 and Rates for deduction of tax at source from "Sa...
Show AI Summary
Income-tax rate structure revised for salaries, advance tax and special cases with senior citizen slabs and surcharge.
Part III of the First Schedule to the Finance Bill, 2017 prescribes the income-tax rates for deduction at source from salaries, advance tax computation and charging of income-tax in special cases for financial year 2017-2018. Tiered progressive rates apply to individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs and specified artificial juridical persons. Distinct nil-tax thresholds and slab treatment are provided for resident individuals aged sixty to less than eighty and for those aged eighty or more. A surcharge of ten per cent applies within a defined high-income range and fifteen per cent above the higher threshold, with marginal relief available.
Case Laws VAT / Sales Tax
Classification of goods - Impact of use of punctuation mark
Show AI Summary
Punctuation in statutory entries limits tax conditions, so excise levy applies only to specifically linked goods.
Punctuation in statutory entries must be given effect; a colon and conjunctions in the schedule create a break separating "leather cloth and inferior or imitation leather cloth ordinarily used in book binding" from other goods, so the condition imposing additional excise duty in lieu of sales tax applies only to the latter group. Historical layout of the entry corroborates this limited reading, and absence of argument before the Tribunal does not estop application of the statutory construction.
Case Laws Customs
Withdrawal of Anti-Dumping Duty - Designated Authority has no power to give retrospective relief
Show AI Summary
Withdrawal of anti dumping duty: Designated Authority lacks power to grant retrospective relief; rescission is prospective.
Designated Authority lacks power to recommend retrospective withdrawal of an anti dumping duty following a mid term review; where domestic producers ceased production and the authority recommended rescission, the government's rescission preserved prior acts, and the tribunal held no rule permits retrospective relief in review proceedings, so withdrawal operates prospectively.
Act Rules GST
Meaning and scope of supply under GST (Part 2) - Import of services will be treated as supply and wi...
Show AI Summary
Importation of services: subject to GST under reverse charge; potential double levy with customs needs exemption.
Importation of services falls within the definition of Supply and is subject to GST under the reverse charge mechanism, creating potential overlap with Customs duty where transactions importing goods are contractually treated as services. Administrative or legislative clarification is needed to prevent concurrent levies, either by Customs exemptions for imports characterised as services or reciprocal GST relief where Customs duties apply. The draft also raises uncertainty about personal use exemptions limited to taxable persons and suggests extension or harmonisation of exemptions for non taxable persons.
Act Rules GST
Meaning and scope of supply under GST (Part 1) - Since CGST, SGST or IGST will be levied on supply o...
Show AI Summary
Scope of supply under GST includes consideration-based transactions, importation of services, and specified free supplies.
The statutory definition of supply under the Model GST Law comprises three categories: supplies for consideration in the course or furtherance of business (sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal); importation of services regardless of consideration or business purpose; and specified supplies made without consideration as listed in Schedule I. Clause (a) targets domestic, consideration-based transactions; clause (b) treats importation of services as separately taxable; and clause (c) assimilates certain gratuitous transactions into the tax net via Schedule I.
Case Laws Service Tax
Whether the vessels or ships that are afloat are not goods and immovable property? - CESTAT says Yes...
Show AI Summary
Classification of floating vessels as immovable property may exclude their sale from GST law taxation.
The tribunal held that ships and vessels afloat are not 'goods' but are akin to immovable property because they cannot be severed from the waters; ships are goods only before launch, during breaking up, or when specifically the subject of a sale. As immovable property lies outside the GST domain under the constitutional allocation, this classification raises the question whether GST would apply to sale or supply of floating vessels-a point pending higher judicial scrutiny.
Case Laws Service Tax
Adjustment of excess paid service tax – rule 6(3) of STR, 1994
Show AI Summary
Adjustment of excess service tax permitted as alternative to refund under liberal interpretation of procedural rules.
A liberal reading of Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 permits adjustment of excess service tax paid against future liabilities when facts show an excess payment, rather than restricting the assessee solely to a refund claim, consistent with constitutional limits on taxation and the Revenue's concession of excess payment.
Act Rules Income Tax
Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Currency conversion using telegraphic transfer buying rate (‘TTBR...
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax credit conversion uses telegraphic transfer buying rate on the last day of preceding month.
Foreign tax credit is determined by converting the currency of the foreign-tax payment at the telegraphic transfer buying rate applicable on the last day of the month immediately preceding the month in which that tax is paid or deducted.
Act Rules Income Tax
Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Documents to be furnished for availing FTC
Show AI Summary
Foreign Tax Credit documentation: verified income statement plus certificate and payment or deduction proof to claim credit.
Foreign Tax Credit eligibility requires a verified statement of foreign income and foreign tax paid in the prescribed form, plus a certificate or statement specifying the nature of the income and tax deducted or paid issued by the foreign tax authority, the person who deducted the tax, or signed by the taxpayer, accompanied by a tax challan or online payment acknowledgement for payments and proof of deduction where tax was withheld.
Act Rules Income Tax
Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) in case of MAT/ AMT
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax credit allowed against MAT/AMT like normal tax, but any excess over normal provisions is ignored.
Foreign tax credit under Rule 128 of the Income tax Rules, 1962, is allowable against tax payable under MAT or AMT in the same manner as under the normal provisions; any foreign tax credit available against MAT/AMT that exceeds the credit allowable under normal provisions is ignored when computing MAT/AMT credit.
Act Rules Income Tax
Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Lower of the tax payable under the Act and DTAA
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax credit: credit limited to lower of domestic tax and foreign tax; treaty excess is disregarded.
Rule 128 of the Income tax Rules, 1962 limits Foreign Tax Credit to the lesser of domestic tax chargeable on the doubly taxed income and the foreign tax actually paid, and directs that any foreign tax paid in excess of the tax payable under the applicable DTAA be ignored for credit computation.
Act Rules Income Tax
Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Cases in which no FTC benefit would be available
Show AI Summary
Foreign Tax Credit denial: no credit for domestic interest, fees or penalties and for disputed foreign taxes.
Rule 128 restricts Foreign Tax Credit by disallowing FTC against interest, fees or penalties payable under the Income-tax Act, and by excluding any foreign tax (or part thereof) that is disputed by the assessee.
Act Rules Income Tax
Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) shall be allowed if evidence & undertaking furnished within 6 months ...
Show AI Summary
Foreign Tax Credit requires evidence of settlement, proof of payment and an undertaking within six months of dispute resolution.
Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is allowed for disputed foreign tax only if, within six months from the end of the month in which the dispute is finally settled, the assessee furnishes evidence of settlement, evidence that the tax liability has been discharged by the assessee, and an undertaking that no refund in respect of that amount has been or will be claimed.
Act Rules Income Tax
Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Meaning of foreign tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax definition determines FTC scope: DTAA-covered taxes apply, otherwise income-tax-type foreign levies qualify for credit.
Definition of foreign tax for Foreign Tax Credit under Rule 128: where a DTAA exists, foreign tax is the tax covered by that DTAA; where no DTAA exists, foreign tax is the tax payable under the foreign country's law in the nature of income-tax as defined in the statutory explanation, including excess profits tax or business profits tax charged on profits by central or local authorities.
Act Rules Income Tax
Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Benefit on proportionate basis
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax credit proportionate allocation ensures foreign tax relief is apportioned when income is taxed across multiple years.
Foreign tax credit under the Income tax Rules operates on a proportionate allocation principle when the same income is taxable in more than one year; the credit entitlement must be apportioned across the years in which the income is offered to tax so that relief for foreign taxes corresponds to the portion of income taxed in each year.
Act Rules Income Tax
Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - FTC benefit in the year in which income offered to tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax credit allowed when foreign tax corresponds to income offered or assessed to tax in India in the same year.
Foreign tax credit is available to Indian residents for tax paid in a foreign country or specified territory, and is allowed only in the year when the corresponding income is offered to tax or assessed to tax in India, creating a temporal link between domestic taxation of the income and recognition of the foreign tax credit.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Home › TMI Notes › Income Tax › Act-Rules › Category › This
Back

All TMI Notes

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Income Tax

Comparison of section 484 "Abetment of false return, etc." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

17 September, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Print Options

Section 484 Abetment of false return, etc.

Income-tax Act, 2025

At a Glance

The materials are two textual versions of clause/section 484 concerning "Abetment of false return, etc." - one labeled as Section 484 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (Document 1) and the other as Clause 484 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version (Document 2). Both impose penal consequences for abetting another to deliver false accounts/declarations or to commit the offence u/s 478(1). The differences between the two texts are minor drafting and phrasing variations; no substantive change in the quantum of punishment is apparent from the texts provided. Affected parties include taxpayers, tax practitioners, advisors and enforcement authorities. Effective dates or commencement details are Not stated in the document.

Background & Scope

Statutory hook: Clause/Section 484, placed under the heading "OFFENCES AND PROSECUTION" and titled "Abetment of false return, etc." The provision addresses criminal liability where a person "abets or induces in any manner another person" to (a) make and deliver an account, statement or declaration relating to taxable income which is false and which the abettor either knows to be false or does not believe to be true; or (b) commit an offence u/s 478(1). The provision sets out two tiers of punishment keyed to the amount of tax, penalty or interest that would have been evaded (or is wilfully attempted to be evaded): a higher tier where that amount exceeds twenty-five lakh rupees, and a lower tier for other cases. Definitions of "abet," "induce," "account," "statement" or "declaration," or of "tax, penalty or interest" for the purpose of the provision, are Not stated in the document.

Statutory Provision Mode

Text & Scope

The provision criminalises abetment or inducement of another to:

  • make and deliver an account, statement or declaration relating to any income chargeable to tax which is false and which the abettor either knows to be false or does not believe to be true; or
  • commit an offence u/s 478(1).

Two tiers of punishment are specified:

  • Tier I: Where the amount of tax, penalty or interest which would have been evaded (if the false declaration/account/statement had been accepted as true), or which is wilfully attempted to be evaded, exceeds twenty-five lakh rupees - imprisonment: rigorous imprisonment not less than six months and may extend to seven years; and fine (phrasing differs slightly between the two texts but effect appears the same).
  • Tier II: In any other case - rigorous imprisonment not less than three months and may extend to two years; and fine (again phrasing differs marginally between texts).

Interpretation

The text indicates a mens rea requirement in limb (a): the person must either "know" the account/statement/declaration to be false or "does not believe it to be true." This language imports awareness or lack of belief rather than strict negligence. The provision captures inducement or abetment "in any manner," which suggests a broad concept of participation or encouragement without limiting to specific acts. The provision links the seriousness of the offence to the monetary magnitude of tax, penalty or interest at stake, indicating a purposive approach to differentiate between more serious revenue-impacting conduct and lower-value conduct.

Exceptions/Provisos

No provisos, carve-outs, thresholds other than the monetary threshold of twenty-five lakh rupees, or exemptions (for example, for bona fide errors or for certain categories of persons) are set out in the text. Any mitigating or aggravating factors or sentencing guidelines beyond the minimum and maximum imprisonment terms and the requirement of fine are Not stated in the document.

Illustrations

  • Example 1: An advisor encourages a client to submit a knowingly fabricated account showing fictitious expenses such that the resulting tax, penalty or interest avoided would exceed Rs. 25,00,000. Under the provision, the advisor would attract Tier I punishment (six months to seven years rigorous imprisonment and fine). (The precise ambit of "advisor" and evidentiary standards are Not stated in the document.)
  • Example 2: An individual induces another to make a false declaration that would reduce tax liability by less than Rs. 25,00,000. That conduct would fall in Tier II and attract imprisonment from three months to two years and a fine. (Procedural steps and standard of proof are Not stated in the document.)

Interplay

The provision expressly cross-references section 478(1) as a separate offence the abettor may induce the principal to commit. Other statutory cross-references, procedural provisions, sentencing or compounding rules, or interaction with civil taxation provisions (assessment, appeals, penalty proceedings) are Not stated in the document.

Practical Implications

  • Compliance and risk areas: Persons who assist, advise or otherwise induce the making or delivery of statements, accounts or declarations relating to taxable income face criminal exposure if the assisted declaration is false and the actor knowingly or without belief participates. The monetary threshold at Rs. 25 lakh creates a bifurcated risk profile: greater custodial exposure and longer sentences where the evaded amount exceeds that threshold.
  • Record-keeping/evidence points: Although procedural details are Not stated in the document, the statutory structure implies that proof of the abettor's state of mind ("knows" or "does not believe") and of the quantum of tax/penalty/interest evaded (or attempted to be evaded) will be central in any prosecution. Therefore, contemporaneous communications, advice records, drafts of accounts/declarations, and documents showing the tax impact would be relevant evidentiary materials; however, precise evidentiary standards and burdens are Not stated in the document.

Key Differences Between the Two Texts and Practical Impact

Summary of differences observed between Document 1 (Section 484 of the Income-tax Act, 2025) and Document 2 (Clause 484 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version):

  • Drafting/phrasing in sentencing clause: Document 1 employs the phrasing "with fine;" in both sub-clauses (i) and (ii). Document 2 phrases the corresponding punitive element as "and shall also be liable to fine."
    • Practical impact: No substantive difference in penal consequences is discernible from the texts provided. Both formulations impose imprisonment and a fine; neither text specifies the quantum or method of calculating the fine. Therefore, the difference appears to be stylistic only.
  • Ancillary explanatory sentence: Document 2 concludes with the sentence "Clause 484 of the Bill seeks to provide for punishment for abetment of false return, etc." Document 1 lacks this explanatory line.
    • Practical impact: This is an editorial or explanatory remark present in the Bill text record and absent from the enacted Section text; it does not alter legal effect.
  • Punctuation and minor syntactic variations: e.g., use of commas, placement of "with fine" etc. Practical impact: None apparent; no change to the minimum/maximum imprisonment periods or the monetary threshold of Rs. 25 lakh.

Practical Implications of the Differences

  • No change in sentence ranges or monetary threshold is observable; therefore, stakeholders should treat the two texts as substantively consistent for assessing criminal exposure under clause/section 484.
  • The differing phrasing on fine ("with fine" vs "shall also be liable to fine") does not, on the face of the texts, specify the nature or limit of fine; absence of such detail means sentencing discretion and ancillary rules (if any) will be determined by other statutory provisions or criminal procedure practice - but those are Not stated in the document.
  • Because both texts require knowledge or absence of belief about falsity, there is criminalisation of purposeful or recklessly indifferent facilitation of false tax declarations; mere negligence is not expressly captured by the language used, but a full interpretive analysis is limited because legislative history and definitions are Not stated in the document.

Key Takeaways

  • Clause/Section 484 penalises abetting or inducing another to make false accounts/declarations relating to taxable income or to commit the offence u/s 478(1).
  • Two-tier punishment: (i) Rs. 25 lakh threshold - rigorous imprisonment 6 months to 7 years + fine; (ii) otherwise - rigorous imprisonment 3 months to 2 years + fine.
  • The mens rea requirement in limb (a) requires that the abettor either knows the statement is false or does not believe it to be true.
  • Differences between the Bill (old version) and the enacted Act text are limited to phrasing regarding liability to fine and an editorial explanatory sentence; no substantive change in penalties or threshold is evident from the texts provided.
  • Specifics on definitions, procedural safeguards, sentencing parameters for fine, evidentiary standards, commencement and interaction with other tax/criminal provisions are Not stated in the document.

Full Text:

Section 484 Abetment of false return, etc.

Topics

Acts Income Tax
Next ➔