Just a moment...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
    6. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
    8. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether proceedings can be reopened on the basis of a favourable decision in another case?
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether a wrong decision by jurisdictional court is binding on the parties in absence of any appeal ...
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether an order becomes a final order if no appeal has been filed against it?
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether right to appeal is a inherent right? Whether it is necessary that right of appeal must be ex...
    Manuals Service Tax
    What is the meaning of 'Reason to Believe' in context to search & seizure provisions?
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether in case, composite price (inclusive of service tax) is shown in invoice and no separate duty...
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether Doctrine of unjust enrichment is applicable on finalisation of provisional assessments?
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether Doctrine of unjust enrichment is applicable on duty paid under protest?
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether data in "CD" can be a admissible evidence for refund claim under Section 11B? Whether data i...
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether limitation of refund filing is applicable on the cases where amount paid to the department a...
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether deposit of service tax before rendering services will be covered under limitation of refund...
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether Appellate authority has empowered to increase the penalty? Whether Appellate authority can i...
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether the penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be reduced below the minimum limit...
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be reduced below the limit prescri...
    Act Rules Service Tax
    Whether Service tax paid by back calculations i.e. service tax separately not charged will be covere...
    Act Rules Service Tax
    Whether assessee is liable to pay collected service tax as per provision of Sec.73A even if his turn...
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether ignorance of law can be a factor for not to revoke extended period of limitation?
    Manuals Service Tax
    In what circumstances extended period of limitation is not enforceable? Whether SCN can be issued fo...
    Act Rules Service Tax
    Whether show cause notice related to period beyond 18 months or 5 years as the case may be, is valid...
    Manuals Service Tax
    Whether it is mandatory to mention specific head / sub head of services in SCN in which demand of se...
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Open Link
Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Manuals Service Tax
Whether proceedings can be reopened on the basis of a favourable decision in another case?
Show AI Summary
Finality of proceedings: tax assessments cannot be reopened due to another taxpayer's favourable decision without recall in the same case.
Reopening tax assessment proceedings based on a favourable decision in another assessee's case is ordinarily not permitted; a final order in an assessee's own case remains effective until it is specifically recalled or set aside in that same proceeding.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether a wrong decision by jurisdictional court is binding on the parties in absence of any appeal ...
Show AI Summary
Finality of unappealed decisions: unchallenged jurisdictional rulings bind the parties until lawfully reversed.
A jurisdictional court's unappealed ruling, even if incorrect, becomes final and binding between the parties and remains so until reversed by a higher forum or other statutory remedy; thus unchallenged classificatory or determinative decisions must be obeyed in subsequent proceedings unless lawfully set aside.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether an order becomes a final order if no appeal has been filed against it?
Show AI Summary
Finality of administrative orders follows when no appeal is filed, and remand directions limit reconsideration scope.
An administrative order attains finality where an entitled party does not file an appeal against a Tribunal disposition; remand orders limit reconsideration to the specific issues directed by the Tribunal, and parties who do not contest merits before the Tribunal forfeit the ability to re argue those merits, so that authorities acting on remand cannot expand review beyond the remand directions.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether right to appeal is a inherent right? Whether it is necessary that right of appeal must be ex...
Show AI Summary
Right of appeal is not inherent; it exists only when statute creates and defines it, including scope and procedure.
The right of appeal is not inherent but is a statutory construct: appellate existence, scope and procedure must be authorized by the creating provision; omissions in citation do not automatically bar an otherwise maintainable appeal; absence of an appellate provision does not prevent an order from becoming final.
Manuals Service Tax
What is the meaning of 'Reason to Believe' in context to search & seizure provisions?
Show AI Summary
Reason to believe requires subjective belief grounded in material evidence, preventing arbitrary or capricious searches.
The concept of reason to believe requires that a subjective opinion be based on material on the record, not arbitrary or whimsical; it must be held in good faith and courts may test whether the reasons have a rational and relevant connection to the formation of belief, excluding extraneous considerations.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether in case, composite price (inclusive of service tax) is shown in invoice and no separate duty...
Show AI Summary
Inclusive pricing does not establish passing on of tax burden; composite invoices alone do not prove unjust enrichment.
Showing a composite price on an invoice does not, by itself, establish that the supplier passed the tax burden to customers or realized unjust enrichment; where prices remained unchanged after a tax was imposed, inclusive pricing alone is insufficient evidence that any element of tax was added to the price, and proof of an added tax component is required to infer passing on of the tax.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether Doctrine of unjust enrichment is applicable on finalisation of provisional assessments?
Show AI Summary
Doctrine of unjust enrichment excluded where a refund arises only after finalisation of provisional assessment.
The doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply to refund claims that arise after the finalisation of provisional assessments; refunds or recoveries consequent on the final determination of duty liability fall outside the interim statutory refund framework and are not barred by unjust enrichment objections.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether Doctrine of unjust enrichment is applicable on duty paid under protest?
Show AI Summary
Unjust enrichment doctrine not bar to refund of duty paid under protest; provisional assessments preserve refund entitlement.
The doctrine of unjust enrichment does not bar refund claims for duty paid under protest; recoveries or refunds consequent on final determination of duty liability fall outside bars that would deny restitution. Provisional assessments and unresolved price and classification lists render clearances provisional, supporting the taxpayer's entitlement to have refund claims adjudicated on the basis of final liability rather than dismissed as struck by unjust enrichment.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether data in "CD" can be a admissible evidence for refund claim under Section 11B? Whether data i...
Show AI Summary
Admissibility of electronic records: computerised data on CD can support service tax refund claims and show no transfer of tax burden.
Data on compact disc (CD) can be admissible evidence for service tax refund claims where it constitutes computerised records recognised under the Information Technology Act and the Service Tax Rules. Such electronic records may also be used to prove that the incidence of service tax was not transferred to another party (absence of unjust enrichment), provided the data meets the statutory criteria for admissible computerised evidence and forms part of the assessee's maintained electronic records.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether limitation of refund filing is applicable on the cases where amount paid to the department a...
Show AI Summary
Limitation on refund filings: time-bar inapplicable where payments were not service tax and were excess realisations.
Limitation under Section 11B(1) applies only to refund claims of a duty of excise and interest; payments not constituting service tax or lawful excise levy are outside that bar and may be refunded. Judicial authorities (M/s Natraj and Venkat Associates; ITC Ltd.) recognise that excess realisations beyond what the statute permits are realisations outside the Act and thus not subject to the statutory limitation on excise refunds.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether deposit of service tax before rendering services will be covered under limitation of refund...
Show AI Summary
Limitation on service tax refunds: late claims are barred unless tax was paid under protest.
Refunds of amounts paid as service tax are governed by the statutory limitation provisions; where payments were credited to the service tax account and the claimant acknowledged applicability of the limitation rule, a refund claim filed after the limitation period is barred unless the tax was paid under protest.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether Appellate authority has empowered to increase the penalty? Whether Appellate authority can i...
Show AI Summary
Appellate authority power to increase penalties is limited; payment of tax and interest can justify mitigation of penalty.
Appellate authority does not have power to increase or impose a fresh penalty; payment of tax and interest that neutralises pecuniary advantage is relevant for mitigation, and taxpayer status and proportionality are material in assessing whether a revised penalty is unduly harsh under the statutory penalty framework.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether the penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be reduced below the minimum limit...
Show AI Summary
Penalty minimums prohibited from reduction: statutory scheme prevents lowering prescribed service tax penalty through discretionary provisions.
Penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 cannot be reduced below the statutory minimum by invoking section 80; a conjoint reading of the provisions shows no discretion to levy or reduce a penalty below the prescribed floor, and appellate bodies and tribunals cannot read such power into the statutory scheme.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be reduced below the limit prescri...
Show AI Summary
Penalty under Section 76 cannot be reduced below the statutory minimum; authority's discretion is confined to the prescribed range.
Section 76 penalty under the Finance Act, 1994 confines the authority to a legislatively prescribed minimum-to-maximum range; authorities lack power to reduce the penalty below the statutory minimum per day of default, and courts have rejected construing any additional discretion into the provision as that would amount to rewriting the statute.
Act Rules Service Tax
Whether Service tax paid by back calculations i.e. service tax separately not charged will be covere...
Show AI Summary
Service tax deposit obligations do not arise where tax was not invoiced or collected, limiting unjust enrichment claims.
Where no invoice was raised and no amount was specifically collected as service tax from recipients, the statutory duty to deposit such tax does not arise because there is no collected tax to be held on behalf of the Government, and absence of pass through means the legal condition for invoking unjust enrichment is not satisfied.
Act Rules Service Tax
Whether assessee is liable to pay collected service tax as per provision of Sec.73A even if his turn...
Show AI Summary
Deposit of collected service tax must be remitted even if small provider exempt; penalties apply for non-deposit.
Section 73A requires that service tax collected from customers be deposited with the Central Government even if the collector avails the small service provider exemption; tribunals have held that collection triggers an obligatory deposit and failure to deposit and to file returns attracts penal action and enforcement for non-compliance.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether ignorance of law can be a factor for not to revoke extended period of limitation?
Show AI Summary
Ignorance of law or illiteracy can undermine findings of willful suppression, affecting the validity of tax demand and penalties.
Administrative demands and penalties based on alleged willful suppression of taxable services require supporting record evidence and must correspond to allegations in the show cause notice; where the record does not substantiate suppression and the allegation was not made in the notice, the resultant service tax demand and penalties are not sustainable.
Manuals Service Tax
In what circumstances extended period of limitation is not enforceable? Whether SCN can be issued fo...
Show AI Summary
Extended limitation period: not available where assessee had bona fide belief or doubt about service tax liability.
Extended limitation cannot be invoked where the assessee had a bona fide belief that no service tax was payable, where bona fide doubt existed about chargeability, where the assessee voluntarily approached the department earlier, where the issue is one of legal interpretation creating genuine confusion, or where earlier favorable decisions were subsequently overruled without evidence of suppression.
Act Rules Service Tax
Whether show cause notice related to period beyond 18 months or 5 years as the case may be, is valid...
Show AI Summary
Limitation for recovery of service tax prevents collection for time barred periods but notice remains partly effective.
A show cause notice that includes periods beyond the statutory limitation does not become wholly invalid; the Department cannot recover tax for time barred periods, and the assessee may raise the limitation defence during proceedings. The same rule applies to notices extending beyond a shorter statutory limitation-the excess period yields no departmental entitlement to recovery but does not vitiate valid allegations within the limitation.
Manuals Service Tax
Whether it is mandatory to mention specific head / sub head of services in SCN in which demand of se...
Show AI Summary
Specific service allegation: tax liability cannot be confirmed unless the show-cause notice specifies the service head.
A show-cause notice must specifically identify the service head or sub-head relied upon; absent a precise allegation as to the applicable classification, tax liability cannot be confirmed, and alternative classifications suggested by the Commissioner without being pleaded in the notice render any demand unsustainable.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Home › TMI Notes › Income Tax › Act-Rules › Category › This
Back

All TMI Notes

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Income Tax

Comparison of section 377 "Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

13 September, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Print Options

Section 377 Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue.

Income-tax Act, 2025

At a Glance

Clause 377 (Old Version) is the Bill-stage provision permitting revision by the Competent Authority of orders passed by Assessing Officers or Transfer Pricing Officers if such orders are "erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue." It matters to taxpayers, tax officers and appellate authorities because it authorises administrative revision; who is affected: taxpayers and revenue authorities dealing with assessments and transfer pricing orders. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

Background & Scope

Statutory hooks: Clause 377 sits in the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and refers to (inter alia) sections 166, 241, 239, 244 and section 272 for related powers/directions. The clause covers revision of proceedings "under this Act" where an order passed by an Assessing Officer or Transfer Pricing Officer is considered by the Competent Authority to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Definitions given: "Competent Authority" (Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner/Principal Commissioner/Commissioner) and "Transfer Pricing Officer" (same meaning as in section 166(18)). "Record" is defined to include all records relating to any proceeding available at the time of examination. Other contextual references are to appeals, Board directions, and appellate orders. The text provides no express legislative intent beyond the operative language. Legislative history or parliamentary debates: Not stated in the document.

Statutory Provision Mode

Text & Scope

The clause authorises the Competent Authority to "call for and examine" records of any proceeding under the Act and, if satisfied an order by an AO or TPO is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, to pass such order after giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard and after such inquiry as deemed necessary. Permissible revision outcomes include enhancing/modifying/cancelling and directing fresh assessment; modifying an order u/s 166; or cancelling and directing a fresh order u/s 166. The Competent Authority's review extends to orders made by Joint Commissioners exercising AO/TPO functions, and to orders u/s 166. If an order had been the subject of appeal, the Competent Authority's powers extend to matters not decided in that appeal (the clause uses "had not been decided"). The clause sets a two-year limitation from end of the financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed, subject to exclusions (time taken to rehear u/s 244(2); period of court-ordered stay) and a floor extension to sixty days if remaining period after exclusions is under sixty days. An exception allows revision at any time "to give effect to a finding or direction" of the Appellate Tribunal, High Court or Supreme Court.

Interpretation

The text frames revision as an administrative supervisory power directed to protect revenue from orders considered erroneous and prejudicial. Procedural safeguards are embedded: hearing the assessee and making or causing inquiries. The express cross-references to Board directions (section 239) and to appellate decisions suggest interpretive guidance that compliance with higher court or Board directions is a material criterion for error.

Exceptions/Provisos

Temporal limitation: two years from end of the financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed (sub-section (4)), subject to specified exclusions (sub-section (6)) and the 60-day floor (sub-section (7)). A carve-out in sub-section (5) permits revision at any time to give effect to appellate findings or directions. No monetary thresholds or other substantive exceptions are provided in the text.

Illustrations

  • Example 1: An Assessing Officer reduces taxable income by allowing a claim without inquiry; the Competent Authority, on review, considers the allowance erroneous and prejudicial. After giving hearing, the Competent Authority enhances the assessment. This follows the clause's list (a) and (3)(b). (All factual specifics beyond the clause are hypothetical but consistent with the text.)
  • Example 2: A Transfer Pricing Officer issues an order purportedly to implement an appellate tribunal direction; Competent Authority exercises revision "to give effect to" the tribunal's finding if the AO/TPO order fails to reflect that finding. (The clause allows revision in such cases per sub-section (5).)

Interplay

The clause interactively references section 166 (transfer pricing), section 239 (Board directions), section 241 (delegation/authorization by Board), section 244(2) (rehearing), and section 272 (directions by Joint Commissioner). How these interact in practice depends on the precise content of the referenced sections (not reproduced here). The clause also acknowledges appellate processes and preserves the Competent Authority's competence over matters not disposed of by appeal.

Differences between Document 1 (Section 377, Income-tax Act, 2025) and Document 2 (Clause 377, Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version)

  • Heading wording: Document 1's header expressly includes "Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner" in the line prefacing the section; Document 2's header says "Revision by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner."
    • Practical impact: Document 1's header more fully reflects the range of senior officers identified in the text; Document 2's shorter header could be read as less explicit though the operative clause (8)(a) in both texts defines "Competent Authority" identically. Practical impact on administration: minimal, since the definition clause governs; difference is presentational.
  • Sub-section (5) scope: Document 1 permits revision "at any time in the case of an order which has been passed in consequence of, or to give effect to, any finding or direction contained in the order of the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, or the Supreme Court." Document 2 permits revision "at any time to give effect to a finding or direction contained in the order of the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, or the Supreme Court."
    • Practical impact: Document 1's phrasing is broader (includes orders passed "in consequence of" appellate orders, not only those passed to "give effect"). That potentially enlarges the class of orders against which revision may be exercised beyond those strictly implementing appellate directions.
  • Sub-section (2)(c) wording on appeals: Document 1 states the Competent Authority's powers "shall extend to such matters as had not been considered and decided in such appeal." Document 2 states "shall extend to such matters as had not been decided in such appeal."
    • Practical impact: Document 1's insertion of "considered and decided" arguably captures matters that were not even considered at appellate stage (not merely undecided), potentially broadening the Competent Authority's reach. Document 2's narrower wording might be read as limited to matters not decided by the appeal process.
  • Cross-reference to Transfer Pricing Officer definition: Document 1 defines "Transfer Pricing Officer" as having the same meaning as in section 166(17). Document 2 cross-references section 166(18).
    • Practical impact: potentially significant depending on the text of section 166 subsections (17) vs (18). If those subsections differ (e.g., in scope or operative definition), the Competent Authority's power may apply to a different statutory construct of "Transfer Pricing Officer." The exact effect depends on the content of section 166(17)/(18) which is Not stated in the document.

Practical Implications

  • Compliance and risk areas: Affected taxpayers face the risk of post-assessment administrative revision where an order is considered "erroneous...prejudicial to the interests of the revenue." Practitioners should note the Competent Authority's power to enhance or direct fresh assessments and to revisit transfer pricing orders.
  • Record-keeping/evidence: Since "record" includes all records available at time of examination, maintaining comprehensive contemporaneous files and recordings of inquiries and reasoning before final orders may be critical. The requirement of an opportunity to be heard implies filings and representations should be documented and preserved.
  • Temporal planning: The two-year limitation (with exclusions) sets a practical window for potential revision; stakeholders should monitor for communications u/s 244(2) and any court injunctions that may affect limitation computation.
  • Appeal strategy: Where an order is appealed, issues "not decided" in appeal remain subject to revision; litigants should consider whether matters can be framed/decided on appeal to avoid later administrative revision.

Key Takeaways

  • Clause 377 empowers senior revenue officers (Competent Authority) to revise AO/TPO orders deemed erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, after giving the assessee a hearing.
  • Revision powers include enhancing, modifying, cancelling and directing fresh assessments, and modifying/cancelling orders u/s 166 (transfer pricing).
  • Two-year time limit with specified exclusions and a minimum 60-day remaining period rule; exception allows revision at any time to give effect to appellate tribunal/HC/SC orders.
  • Competent Authority's reach extends to matters not decided in appeal; careful use of procedural and appellate strategy can affect susceptibility to revision.
  • Definitions and cross-references (notably to section 166(18)) matter; any substantive difference in referenced subsections may alter the clause's scope (the content of those subsections is Not stated in the document).

Full Text:

Section 377 Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue.

Topics

Acts Income Tax
Next ➔