Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Interpreting "Or": The Disjunctive Mandate for Personal Hearing in Tax Matters
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Registration Process u/s 80G: Insights from the ITAT Ruling
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Ensuring Fair Proceedings: The Importance of Proper Notice Service in Income Tax Matters
    Demarcating Authority: High Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Limits of GST Officers
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unraveling the Royalty Conundrum and DTAA: ITAT's Stance on Marketing and Reservation Fees
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Royalty or Not? Decoding the Taxability of Marketing and Reservation Contributions under India-USA D...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unraveling the Intricacies: Assessing a Political Party's Claim for Income Tax Exemption
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Bogus Capital Gains and Accommodation Entries: Unraveling the Penny Stock Scam and Tax Evasion
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Strict Interpretation of Exemption Provisions: Supreme Court's Ruling on Section 10B(8) of the Incom...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance u/s 14A: Prospective or Retrospective Effect of the Amendment?
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Complexities of "Charitable Purpose" in Income Tax Exemptions
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Cooperative Banks vs. Primary Agricultural Credit Societies: Implications for Section 80P Deduction
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Exemption u/s 11: Condonation of Delay in Filing Form 10
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting Section 249(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act: When Non-Payment of Advance Tax Cannot Dismiss...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Retrospective Amendments and the Doctrine of Vested Rights: A Judicial Perspective
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Upholding Equality: HC Strikes Down Discriminatory Circular on Charitable Trust Approvals
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Judicial Review of Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) Orders: Navigating the Boundaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Assessee's Lackadaisical Conduct Leads to Dismissal of Income Tax Appeal
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Faceless Appeal Scheme: Lessons from the Judgement on Delayed Filing and Deduction u/...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unraveling the Maze of Round-Tripping: The Doctrine of "Source of Source" in Share Capital Transacti...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Personal hearing mandate in tax proceedings: failure to afford hearing requires reconsideration and a reasoned decision.
    Section 75(4) of the UPGST Act mandates that an opportunity for personal hearing be granted either upon a written request by the person chargeable with tax or penalty or whenever an adverse decision is contemplated; the disjunctive word "or" must be given its plain meaning, creating independent triggers for the hearing obligation. The court concluded the authorities failed to comply with this requirement and directed that a personal hearing be afforded and a reasoned order issued thereafter to ensure procedural fairness in tax adjudication.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 80G registration: provisional approval permits subsequent final registration, with commencement dated from provisional grant.
    The tribunal construed the proviso-based registration mechanism to permit institutions granted provisional approval to apply for final registration, counting the date of commencement of activities from the grant of provisional approval; administrative circulars extending renewal deadlines apply to specified renewal applications and do not curtail the availability of final registration for provisionally approved institutions, while a view excluding applicants who commenced activities prior to provisional approval was considered inconsistent with the proviso scheme.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Proper service of notice: portal-only publication cannot substitute direct communication and mandates a fresh hearing.
    Proper service of notice in income tax proceedings is essential to safeguard the right to be heard and facets of natural justice. Placing notices on an electronic portal without direct communication does not, by itself, satisfy statutory methods of service, and cannot be presumed to give the taxpayer effective notice. Where service in terms of the Act and Rules is not shown, affected parties are entitled to a fair opportunity to file replies and be heard, and the tax administration must provide a fresh hearing and issue an independent speaking order after considering the reply.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdictional limits of GST officers: no proceedings against assessees assigned to counterpart authority absent cross-empowerment notification.
    The judgement clarifies that appointment and delegation of powers under the Central and State GST regimes are confined to officers appointed under each statute, and that assessees allocated administratively to Central or State authorities may be lawfully proceeded against only by those authorities unless a formal cross-empowerment notification permits otherwise; no general cross-empowerment notification exists except for limited refund purposes.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Taxability of marketing contributions: non taxable where receipts are fiduciary and subject to mutuality, not royalty.
    Where receipts from hotels are received with a corresponding obligation to expend them for agreed common purposes and are held in a fiduciary capacity, such marketing contributions, reward program receipts, reservation contributions and central reservation system fees are not consideration for use of intellectual property or fees for technical services and thus do not qualify as royalty or fees for included services under the India-US DTAA, particularly in the absence of a permanent establishment and where coordinate precedent on identical facts supports non taxability under the principle of mutuality.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Royalty characterization: marketing and reservation contributions treated as non-royalty under DTAA when tied to agreed-use obligations.
    Whether marketing and reservation contributions from Indian hotels to a US company qualify as Royalty or Fees for Included Services under the India-USA DTAA turns on their substantive nature: the presence of a corresponding contractual obligation to apply funds for agreed marketing, advertising and reservation activities and supporting auditor evidence indicates such receipts are not consideration for making available intellectual property or technical services, distinguishing them from factual scenarios where contributions increase brand value or transfer intangible know how.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 13A compliance: failure to meet proviso conditions bars political party exemption and informs stay assessment approach.
    A registered political party's claim of exemption under Section 13A was rejected for failure to meet proviso conditions, including receipt of donations in breach of the cash donation prohibition; the tribunal treated non exempt voluntary contributions as income from other sources, disallowing deductions; allegations of mala fides were dismissed due to the party's procedural delays; and the tribunal's prima facie framework for stay applications-assessing merits, undue hardship, and likelihood of success-was upheld, with liberty to apply afresh to the tribunal given changed circumstances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Burden of Proof under section sixty eight: genuineness of share transactions must be established or treated as accommodation entries.
    The dispute concerned alleged bogus long term capital gains from penny stock trading characterised as an accommodation entry; revenue contested genuineness, identity and creditworthiness of parties while assessees relied on expert and market information. Applying the doctrine of preponderance of probabilities, the court reiterated that the initial burden to prove identity and genuineness lies with the assessee, criticised inadequate enquiries by authorities, rejected expert and media reliance as a substitute for due diligence, and described the accommodation entry modus operandi leading to findings that the transactions were not satisfactorily proved.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Strict compliance with exemption conditions: declaration and filing deadline mandatory; revised returns cannot introduce new exemption claims.
    The Court held that both conditions for claiming the exemption-furnishing a written declaration to the assessing officer and submitting it before the due date for the original return-are mandatory and must be strictly complied with. It rejected treating the time limit as directory, distinguished deduction-related authorities, and held that a revised return cannot introduce new exemption claims or claim carry-forward benefits not made in the original return.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Retrospectivity of tax amendment: amendment held prospective; prior rule barring disallowance where no exempt income applies.
    The court held that the Finance Act amendment described as "for removal of doubts" cannot be given retrospective effect where it alters prior law; the Finance Bill memorandum fixing commencement determined prospectivity, and existing Division Bench precedent that no disallowance can be made if no exempt income was earned was applied, subject to the ultimate outcome of the pending higher court challenge.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Charitable purpose clarified: statutory public bodies generally exempt; commercial receipts taxed under quantitative proviso, with annual scrutiny required.
    The judgement narrows the scope of charitable purpose under Section 2(15) by treating statutory public utility bodies as generally exempt while excluding income from commercial activities beyond core regulatory or public-interest functions. Trade-promotion and non-statutory bodies may qualify if charges are nominal, but ancillary fee-generating services and high-fee providers produce taxable commercial receipts. Private trusts' advertisement income is commercial. Assessing authorities must perform yearly scrutiny and apply the proviso's quantitative limits to determine exemption eligibility.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deduction 80P eligibility turns on whether a cooperative society's banking status classifies it as a cooperative bank; AO to verify.
    A cooperative society carrying on deposit-taking and lending, issuing cheques and providing banking services may fall within the banking business definition under the Banking Regulation Act; whether it qualifies as a cooperative bank under that Act-affected by its bye-laws and membership rules-must be determined by fact-specific examination to decide entitlement to the cooperative deduction.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of Delay in Filing Form Ten: reasonable professional oversight accepted, delay condoned and rectification allowed.
    Condonation of delay in filing Form Ten was granted where the auditor's bona fide oversight-reporting accumulation in the audit report (Form Ten B) and misconstruing separate filing requirements-led to a 361 day delay; the court found the lapse inadvertent amid pandemic conditions, accepted the explanation, quashed the refusal order and permitted rectification steps, treating the delay as condoned.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax obligation: absence of taxable income prevents dismissal of appeal for non-payment of advance tax.
    The Tribunal held that the advance tax payment condition for appeal maintainability applies only when the assessee had a legal obligation to compute and pay advance tax; in the absence of taxable income no such obligation exists, and an appeal cannot be dismissed solely for non-payment of advance tax. The Tribunal directed that the matter proceed to merits with an opportunity to be heard, stressing that the payment requirement must be applied in light of factual circumstances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Vested rights preserved against retrospective tax amendments; filings made before enactment remain effective for settlement consideration.
    The court addressed whether a retrospective Finance Act amendment prohibiting settlement applications from a specified date could divest a taxpayer who filed earlier of its vested right to have the application considered. It held that retrospective legislation cannot take away rights already accrued by actions completed before enactment unless clearly intended; that section 119 confers time-extension power but cannot impose new substantive eligibility conditions; and that administrative delay by revenue does not justify denying access where an application was already filed.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Reasonable classification principle: differential deadline for charitable trust tax recognition cannot lack rational basis or equality protection.
    A departmental circular extended a filing deadline for tax recognition to mitigate hardship but excluded newly formed charitable trusts without offering reasons; the exclusion lacked an intelligible differentia and rational nexus to the circular's object, making the differential treatment arbitrary and ultra vires the constitutional guarantee of equality, requiring the excluded applications to be treated as within time and decided on merits.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ITSC jurisdiction extends beyond application disclosures, while full and true disclosure and narrow judicial review govern settlement oversight.
    The Income Tax Settlement Commission may inquire into and decide issues disclosed in the application and any other matters relating to the case as reflected in the Commissioner's report or uncovered by further inquiry; full and true disclosure is mandatory and amendments or contradictory positions that undermine that requirement are impermissible, yet contesting taxability before the Commission does not automatically negate disclosure; judicial review is limited to statutory contravention, prejudice, fraud, bias or malice, while sufficiency of materials placed before the Commission is generally beyond routine court scrutiny.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Delay condonation denied where litigant's evasive conduct and non participation failed to constitute sufficient cause for appeal filing.
    The court refused condonation of delay for filing an appeal where a best judgment assessment treated cash bank deposits as unexplained after the assessee failed to file returns or participate in proceedings; reliance on transition to a faceless e filing regime and lack of alerts was held insufficient, as the assessee's evasive and habitual non participation did not amount to sufficient cause warranting condonation under the applicable doctrine.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Sufficient cause for delay in filing appeals rejected where faceless scheme migration did not excuse prolonged inaction.
    The court held that migration to a faceless appeal system did not, without persuasive evidence, constitute sufficient cause to condone a lengthy delay in filing an appeal, finding the explanation reflective of litigant inaction rather than unavoidable impediment. On tax deduction, the court applied authority that a non-obstante clause does not negate the employer's obligation to deposit employees' statutory contributions by the due date as a condition for claiming the deduction, and treated the appeal as meritless and barred by limitation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Source of source doctrine used to pierce the corporate veil where share capital appears round tripped among related entities.
    The assessee must prove identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of investors under section 68; examination extends to the true origin of funds where bank records show circular transfers, related party directorships, lack of business operations, and arbitrary share premium, permitting lifting the corporate veil and application of the source of source doctrine to treat such receipts as not satisfactorily explained.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 345 "Restriction on commercial activities by a registered non-profit organisation." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      11 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 345 Restriction on commercial activities by a registered non-profit organisation.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      The documents comprise (1) Section 345 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (as enacted) and (2) Clause 345 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version. Both deal with restrictions on commercial activities by a registered non-profit organisation. The provision affects registered non-profits (charitable/other institutions) engaged in commercial activity; it sets conditions under which such activity may be undertaken. Effective date or commencement is Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Income-tax Act, 2025 / Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Clause 345 / Section 345). Both texts are short statutory provisions regulating commercial activities of a registered non-profit organisation. The Bill (Old Version) contains an explicit additional clause excluding registered non-profit organisations "carrying out advancement of any other object of general public utility" from the restriction; the enacted Act version omits that qualifying exception and instead explicitly excludes organisations mentioned in section 346. The texts provide two conditions under which a registered non-profit organisation may carry out commercial activity: (a) the activity is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the registered non-profit organisation; and (b) separate books of account are maintained for such activities. Definitions, scope of "commercial activity", definition of "incidental", thresholds, penalties, registration procedures, and effective date are Not stated in the document.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Coverage: Both texts apply to "registered non-profit organisation[s]". The operative prohibition is that a registered non-profit organisation shall not carry out any commercial activity unless two conditions are met. In the Bill (Old Version) the prohibition contains an express carve-out: "other than a registered non-profit organisation, carrying out advancement of any other object of general public utility" - meaning organisations engaged in advancement of objects of general public utility (as phrased) were excluded from the initial negative. In the enacted Section 345, the exclusion references "registered non-profit organisation mentioned in section 346" - pointing to a statutory cross-reference rather than the generic phrase used in the Bill.

      Ingredients/elements:

      • Subject: registered non-profit organisation.
      • Prohibition: shall not carry out any commercial activity unless conditions (a) and (b) are satisfied.
      • Condition (a): the commercial activity is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the registered non-profit organisation.
      • Condition (b): separate books of account are maintained for such activities.

      Interpretation

      • Legislative intent and interpretive signals are minimal in the text. The provision seeks to limit commercial activities by registered non-profits to those that are incidental to their objectives and to require accounting segregation of such activities. The Bill's phrasing suggests an intent to exclude organisations advancing objects of general public utility from restriction; the enacted provision replaces that descriptive exclusion with a cross-reference to section 346, indicating a legislative choice to rely on a defined category established elsewhere in the Act. The text does not define "commercial activity", "incidental", "registered non-profit organisation", or "advancement of any other object of general public utility" - all are Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      • Bill (Old Version): Exception expressed in-line - "No registered non-profit organisation, other than a registered non-profit organisation, carrying out advancement of any other object of general public utility, shall carry out any commercial activity unless..." - i.e., organisations carrying out advancement of objects of general public utility seemed excepted from the prohibition.
      • Act (Section 345): Exception/reference to "registered non-profit organisation mentioned in section 346" - the clause excludes entities specified in section 346 from the restriction. The exact contents and scope of section 346 are Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A registered non-profit operating a canteen to provide subsidised meals incidental to a school's objective - under the text, this could qualify as incidental commercial activity provided separate books of account are maintained. (The document does not supply specific examples; this example is a literal application of the text.)
      • Example 2: A registered non-profit primarily conducting commercial retail unrelated to its charitable objectives - such activity would be prohibited unless it can be shown to be incidental and separate books are maintained. (Not stated in the document whether further tests apply.)
      • Example 3: A registered non-profit described in the Bill as "carrying out advancement of any other object of general public utility" - under the Bill it would have been excluded from the restriction; under the enacted Act such an entity would be governed by section 346 (contents Not stated in the document).

      Interplay

      The Act text expressly references section 346, creating an interplay that depends on the content of that section. The Bill used an open-ended descriptive exclusion ("advancement of any other object of general public utility") whereas the Act ties the exclusion to a specific statutory category (section 346). Any Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are Not stated in the document. The requirement to maintain separate books may interact with record-keeping provisions elsewhere in the Act - such cross-references are Not stated in the document.

      Differences Between the Provisions and Practical Impact of Each Change

      • Exception language: The Bill (Old Version) used a descriptive exception for entities "carrying out advancement of any other object of general public utility." The Act replaces that descriptive wording with an express cross-reference to "registered non-profit organisation mentioned in section 346."
        • Practical impact: The Bill's language would have relied on an open-textured description that might invite broad interpretation; the Act confines the exclusion to entities defined by section 346, thereby centralising the determination of the excluded category in that specific provision. This can narrow or clarify applicability, depending on section 346's content (Not stated in the document). The change reduces ambiguity by pointing to a statutory definition rather than a generic descriptor, but it transfers the uncertainty to the content of section 346.
      • Form of drafting: The Bill's clause reads as a standalone prohibition with an in-line exception; the Act's drafting adopts a cross-referential structure.
        • Practical impact: Cross-referencing promotes coherence within the statute, allows uniformity of treatment for a class of organisations, and enables centralised modification via section 346. It also obliges practitioners to consult additional provisions to determine applicability, increasing the compliance perimeter that must be checked.
      • Substantive conditions: Both texts retain identical substantive conditions (incidental nexus; separate books).
        • Practical impact: No substantive change on these fronts. The consistent retention means existing compliance focus on demonstrating incidental connection and maintaining segregated accounting remains central. However, whether a given organisation is within the scope depends on the changed exception/cross-reference.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Registered non-profits must assess whether a commercial activity is "incidental" to their objectives. The text imposes a dual compliance obligation - substantive (incidental nexus) and procedural (separate books). Lack of definition of "incidental" and "commercial activity" creates interpretive risk. Organisations that do not maintain separate books for commercial activities risk falling foul of the prohibition. The Bill's broader descriptive exclusion (objects of general public utility) would have permitted a class of organisations to engage in commercial activity without these constraints; the Act substitutes a cross-reference to section 346, making applicability contingent on that section's terms (Not stated in the document what those terms are).
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The explicit requirement for separate books of account means that non-profits must segregate receipts, payments, assets and liabilities related to commercial activities. This suggests contemporaneous accounting entries and ledger segregation; supporting vouchers and reconciliations would be material evidence if the separation is challenged. The document does not specify format, retention periods, or audit requirements - Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Both the Bill (Old Version) and the enacted Section 345 restrict commercial activities by registered non-profit organisations unless the activity is incidental to organisational objectives and separate books are maintained.
      • The Bill's Old Version contained an in-text descriptive exclusion for organisations "carrying out advancement of any other object of general public utility"; the enacted Section 345 instead excludes organisations mentioned in section 346, shifting the delimitation from descriptive language to a statutory cross-reference.
      • The insertion of a cross-reference to section 346 in the Act implies reliance on a defined statutory category rather than the Bill's broader phrasing; the practical scope of that change depends on section 346 (Not stated in the document).
      • The dual conditions - incidental nexus and separate accounting - place both substantive and procedural obligations on registered non-profits engaging in commercial activities.
      • Key definitions, thresholds, penalties, audit requirements, and commencement details are Not stated in the document, leaving interpretive and compliance uncertainties to be resolved by other provisions, guidance, or judicial interpretation.

        Full Text:

        Section 345 Restriction on commercial activities by a registered non-profit organisation.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax