Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration: Analysis of Delhi High Court’s Ruling in 2024 (1) ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Deciphering Tax Implications on Capital Reduction: Navigating the Complexities of Section 115QA in I...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Navigating Regulatory Compliance: Analysis of a CHA License Revocation and Restoration Case
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting Section 153A: ITAT Delhi's Stand on Incriminating Material in Assessments: Assessments ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reaffirming the Bounds of Section 153A: Analysis of Delhi High Court's Approach: Assessment post sea...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating Rectification and Revised Returns: Legal Insights from ITAT Bangalore's Ruling
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Mutual Fund Gains and Deemed Dividends: Analyzing the Delhi High Court's Landmark Judgment
    Case LawsCustoms
    Judicial Scrutiny of Customs Seizure and Redemption under the Indian Legal Framework: Foreign Curren...
    Case LawsCustoms
    The Duty of Diligence: Understanding the Legal Implications for Customs Brokers
    Case LawsCustoms
    Legal Analysis of a Customs Appeal Case Involving Mandatory Pre-Deposit Requirements
    Case LawsCentral Excise
    Legal Elucidation of Homeopathic Product Classification under Central Excise Tariff Act: Medicament ...
    The Supreme Court's In-Depth Ruling on Corporate Insolvency: Legal Implications Explored
    Money Laundering and Bail: Supreme Court's Interpretation of Section 45 PMLA
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reassessing Income under Section 147 Post-Quashment of Sections 153A/153C: The Waiver of Limitation ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 153A of the Income Tax Act: A Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court's Interpretation in the...
    The Intersection of Politics, Corruption, and Judicial Review: A Case Study: Validity of order of Hi...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Clarity and Precision in Tax Penalty Proceedings: Insights from a High Court Judgment
    NCLAT's Authority to Recall Judgments: The Intersection of Tribunal Authority and Justice
    Detention and Release of Goods under CGST Act: Discrepancies in the CGST registration of the consign...
    The Detention of Goods under GST Law: Doubts regarding the genuineness of the consignee
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Retrospective GST cancellation: court limits retroactive effect, stressing objective grounds and hearing rights for taxpayers.
    The court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration cannot be applied mechanically and must be supported by objective grounds; mere non-filing does not automatically justify cancelling registration for earlier compliant periods. Procedural fairness requires an opportunity of being heard before imposing retrospective cancellation, and the temporal effect of cancellation should align with the taxpayer's cancellation application rather than an earlier retrospective date, given potential impacts such as denial of input tax credit.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capital reduction transactions treated outside buyback levy when executed pre amendment; buyback tax not attracted.
    The Tribunal held that the capital reduction did not qualify as a buyback for purposes of the buyback tax provision because the transaction was completed before the amendment that broadened the provision's definition; relying on precedents distinguishing capital reduction from buybacks, the Tribunal rejected the revenue's tax avoidance contention and emphasised that the transaction date governs applicability of the amended definition.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Non transferability of CHA license: unauthorized sub letting triggered revocation, later reconsidered due to appellant hardship.
    A licensed CHA was found to have contravened CHALR by effectively transferring operational control to a Mumbai office through a Power of Attorney, breaching non transferability, CHA obligations to obtain authorisations and exercise due diligence, and supervision duties over employees; the firm was held accountable where the licence was used for financial gain.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Incriminating material requirement: Section 153A assessments require material specific to the assessee, not unrelated third party statements.
    Assessments following search operations must be grounded on incriminating material specifically linked to the assessee; material or statements derived from separate or third party search proceedings cannot, alone, serve as incriminating material against an unrelated assessee. Absent assesseespecific incriminating material, additions and disallowances in such assessments lack justification and cannot properly form the basis of adverse tax adjustments.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Admissibility of search statements: corroborative evidence required before additions in post-search tax assessments.
    Statements recorded under Section 132(4) have evidentiary value but cannot alone justify additions under Section 153A; corroborative material discovered during the search is required, and taxpayers must be afforded the opportunity to cross-examine and rebut adverse statements before assessments under Section 153A are finalized.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Rectification under Section 154: procedural lapses should not bar correction of apparent errors in tax returns.
    Interpretation of Section 154 treats misplacement of figures in an original return as a mistake apparent from the record, qualifying for statutory rectification; a revised return filed as a genuine corrective attempt may be recognised despite procedural lapses, and tax authorities should balance procedural compliance with the need to remedy apparent errors and assist taxpayers in claiming corrections.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Classification of Mutual Fund Gains: affirmed as capital gains, clarifies tests distinguishing business income and scope of deemed dividends.
    Classification of gains from mutual fund redemptions turns on intent, transaction frequency, holding period, accounting treatment and the factual matrix to determine capital gains versus business income. Distinguishing genuine capital contributions from transactions that function as distributions is essential before treating receipts as deemed dividends; absent characteristics of a loan or advance against profits, capital infusions should not be recharacterised as dividends.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Redemption under Customs Act: deemed payment recognized as exercising the redemption option despite pandemic-related delay.
    The judgment analyzes the redemption option under the Customs Act allowing fine payment in lieu of confiscation, focusing on the prescribed timeframe and on how actions by a petitioner while seized currency remains with the department can constitute exercise of that option. Considering pandemic-related disruption, the court applied purposive interpretation and concluded the department's refusal to accept a deemed payment was unjustified and that the petitioner's steps effectively availed the statutory redemption alternative.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Duty to exercise due diligence: strict licensing compliance can justify administrative revocation and security forfeiture for brokers.
    The headnote focuses on the duty of diligence under the CBLR 2018, identifying failures to advise clients, to verify information, and to supervise employees as breaches that can attract administrative penalties against a customs broker's licence. It also confirms that regulatory action may be initiated at the broker's registered location regardless of where the underlying transactions occurred, and highlights the need for compliance programs, client advisory practices, and employee training.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Mandatory pre-deposit requirement: payments made during investigation can be counted toward the appeal pre-deposit, protecting access to appeal.
    Interpretation of the pre-deposit requirement focuses on counting payments made during investigation toward the mandatory deposit for appellate admissibility; authorities must account for investigation-stage deposits when assessing compliance to avoid denying appeal rights on technical grounds and to give effect to substantive payment.
    Case LawsCentral Excise
    Show AI Summary
    Medicament classification confirmed for a homeopathic hair oil based on ingredients and ordinary perception under tariff law.
    Classification of a homeopathic hair oil as a medicament depends on the ingredients test and the common parlance test. The Tribunal treated AHAHO as a medicament because it contained recognised homeopathic constituents and was labelled under the homeopathic schedule; the Supreme Court affirmed that those medicinal ingredients and the product's perception as a homeopathic medicine outweigh cosmetic imagery and over the counter availability, and that tariff amendments did not change the classificatory result.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Resolution applicant eligibility under insolvency law can be disqualified by trust and company conflicts affecting CIRP participation.
    The judgment finds that valuation disclosures and newspaper publication of Form G met CIRP regulatory requirements despite website upload issues; materially revised resolution plans must be placed before the Committee of Creditors or are procedurally irregular; commercial wisdom of the CoC governs differential treatment of creditors subject to legal compliance; promoter settlement offers and Section 12-A applications require demonstrable CoC consideration; and resolution applicant eligibility is governed by Trusts Act and Companies Act conflicts, not by assumed disqualifications absent specific disqualification orders.
    Case LawsPMLA
    Show AI Summary
    Section 45 PMLA bail standard: stringent satisfaction required on non guilt and low risk of reoffence before granting bail.
    Interpretation of Section 45 PMLA requires a stringent bail standard: courts must be satisfied on reasonable grounds that the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. An Enforcement Directorate investigation under the PMLA is distinct from predicate offence inquiries, so completion of predicate investigations does not substitute for the specific assessment required under the PMLA; courts must therefore evaluate the seriousness of allegations and the stage and character of the ED probe when considering bail.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Reopening assessments under Section 147 requires proper review when Section 150(2) waiver is contested, not clarification.
    Reopening of assessments under Section 147 concerns whether the Assessing Officer has a reason to believe that income has escaped assessment and is subject to procedural safeguards including issuance of a statutory notice. Where prior assessments made in consequence of a search under provisions for search-based assessment were quashed, the question arises whether fresh proceedings may be initiated for income not arising from incriminating material found in the search and whether the limitation period can be waived under Section 150(2) to permit issuance of a notice for reassessment.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Scope of assessment post-search: completed assessments permit additions only from incriminating material found during searches.
    The Supreme Court clarified that for assessments completed before a search, the Assessing Officer's power to reassess within the retrospective period is constrained: any additions in such completed assessments must be based on incriminating material discovered during the search, thereby limiting use of search powers to matters tied to the unearthed evidence and preventing expansion of assessments on unrelated material.
    Case LawsPMLA
    Show AI Summary
    Judicial oversight of criminal investigations must be cautious to avoid unwarranted de novo probes that disrupt investigative progress.
    The commentary critiques a High Court-ordered de novo investigation into recruitment corruption, treating such measures as extraordinary remedies that should not unsettle substantial prior investigative work. It stresses judicial discipline and adherence to precedent, warns against collusion and political interference in inquiries, recognises expanded locus standi for third parties in complex cases, affirms confidentiality of confession material with limited exceptions, and outlines the Enforcement Directorate's powers in probing and recovering proceeds of money laundering.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Specificity in penalty notices: requirement to identify exact charge prevents defective proceedings and safeguards procedural fairness.
    Applicability of penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars requires the assessing officer to specify the exact limb under which proceedings are initiated; absence of that specificity renders the penalty notice defective, undermines procedural fairness, and justifies setting aside the penalty, thereby obliging tax authorities to adhere to precise notice requirements when invoking penal provisions.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Inherent jurisdiction to recall judgments affirms tribunals can correct proceedings tainted by procedural vitiation or jurisdictional defect.
    The tribunal recognised its inherent jurisdiction to recall judgments distinct from review, holding that recall is available where procedural vitiation, fraud, lack of jurisdiction or failure of natural justice renders a proceeding a nullity. Drawing on the tribunal rules analogue to residual civil-procedure power and higher-court authority, the tribunal treated recall as an incidental order to prevent abuse of process and to correct proceedings affected by jurisdictional defect or gross procedural lapse.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Detention and release under Section 129: proper tax invoice and e way bill establish owner status and permit release.
    Where goods intercepted in transit show a proper tax invoice and a valid e way bill identifying the consignor/consignee, those documents establish ownership for purposes of Section 129 and direct application of the release provision applicable when the owner comes forward; documentary compliance thus determines which release regime applies where GST registration discrepancies are alleged.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Detention of goods under GST: enforcement must assess consignee genuineness and documentary compliance before imposing penalties.
    Detention of goods in transit was contested where authorities suspected the consignee's genuineness despite production of a tax invoice and an E way bill; the Court directed that enforcement action distinguish between penalty provisions and alternative statutory mechanisms, require strict procedural fairness, assess documentary evidence and consignee identity, and remit the matter for fresh administrative consideration accordingly.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 335 "Regular income." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      11 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 335 Regular income.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Section 335 as appearing in the Income-tax Act, 2025 (Document 1), and Clause 335 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version (Document 2). Both define "regular income" of a registered non-profit organisation, but they differ in wording, structure and certain substantive inclusions/exclusions. The changes affect how receipts/income from charitable activities, property/investments, voluntary contributions and commercial activity gains are characterised for tax purposes and therefore affect taxpayers (registered non-profit organisations), the tax department, and advisors. Effective date or enactment status: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause/Section 335 (as labelled) dealing with "Regular income" of a registered non-profit organisation. The Bill text (Document 2) provides the definition in the Bill's old version; Document 1 presents a Section 335 in the enacted Act form. Both texts concern the coverage of income/receipts that constitute the regular income of a registered non-profit organisation. Definitions beyond the clause text (e.g., definition of "registered non-profit organisation", "charitable or religious activity", or "commercial activity") are Not stated in the document. Any cross-references to other provisions: Document 2 refers to sections 345 and 346 (as restrictions); Document 1 refers to sections 344, 345 and 346 and to section 332(2)(b)(ii) for part-held property. No further definitions or explanatory notes are provided in the materials supplied.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 335 (Old Bill version) defines "regular income of any tax year of a registered non-profit organisation" to include four categories: (a) receipts from the charitable or religious activity for which the organisation is registered and carried out in that tax year; (b) receipts (other than those in clause (d)), whether capital or revenue, derived from any property or investment held by the organisation in that tax year; (c) voluntary contributions received in that tax year; and (d) gains of any commercial activity, other than commercial activities restricted u/ss 345 and 346, carried out in that tax year, computed in such manner as prescribed. The clause is a definitional provision setting out the heads of regular income; further detail on computation is delegated to rules/regulations ("as prescribed").

      Interpretation

      The text frames "regular income" as encompassing both operational charitable/religious receipts and returns from assets/investments, contributions, and certain commercial gains. The Bill expressly treats receipts from property/investment as possibly capital or revenue in nature, indicating an intent to capture both types. The exclusion clause for commercial activities (i.e., activities restricted u/ss 345 and 346) shows a legislative design to permit some commercial activities while excluding others: the boundary is to be found in those cross-referenced sections. Legislative intent beyond the text (policy rationale, taxpayer burden relief, or revenue objectives) is Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The sole express exception in the Bill text is that receipts described in clause (b) exclude those specified in clause (d), i.e., receipts that are gains of commercial activity (clause (d)). Additionally, clause (d) itself excludes commercial activities that are restricted by sections 345 and 346. No other provisos, thresholds or carve-outs are provided in this clause. Any monetary thresholds, detailed exclusions, or special computation rules are Not stated in the document beyond the general "computed in such manner, as prescribed" for commercial gains.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A registered non-profit running an educational programme receives fees for that programme in the tax year. Under clause (a) such fees are receipts from the charitable activity for which it is registered and therefore form part of regular income.
      • Example 2: A registered non-profit owns an office building from which it gets rental income. Those receipts, whether regarded as capital or revenue, fall under clause (b) (unless they are gains of a commercial activity excluded by clause (d)).
      • Example 3: The organisation undertakes a commercial venture whose gains are permitted (i.e., not restricted u/ss 345 and 346). Those gains are regular income under clause (d) and are subject to prescribed computation. Specific computation method: Not stated in the document.

      Interplay

      Clause 335 interacts by reference with sections 345 and 346 (restricting certain commercial activities). The clause contemplates prescribed computation for commercial gains, indicating interplay with subordinate legislation. Any interaction with other statutory provisions (for example, sections concerning registration, exemptions, or the treatment of voluntary contributions) is Not stated in the document except as noted.

      Differences Between the Section 335 as appearing in the Income-tax Act, 2025 (Document 1), and Clause 335 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version (Document 2)

      Principal textual and structural differences (comparison based strictly on the two supplied texts):

      • Terminology: Document 2 (Bill) uses "receipts"; Document 1 (Act) uses "income".
        • Practical impact: "Income" is a broader accounting/tax term than "receipts" and may incorporate notional gains or accruals, whereas "receipts" could be read more narrowly as cash or tangible receipts. The change may expand the taxable base or affect timing/recognition, depending on interpretation; the Bill does not itself explain the intended scope: Not stated in the document.
      • Property/Investment language: Document 2's clause (b) speaks of "receipts, other than those specified in clause (d), whether capital or revenue, derived from any property or investment held by such registered non-profit organisation". Document 1 separates wholly held property/deposit/investment (clause (b)) and part-held property/deposit/investment (clause (c)) and introduces express exclusion "other than income covered in clause (e)". It also introduces the term "deposit" and refers to section 332(2)(b)(ii) for part-held assets.
        • Practical impact: The Act's text is more granular-distinguishing wholly vs part-held assets and explicitly excluding commercial gains (clause (e)) from these heads-thus offering greater precision as to what counts as regular income from investments. This could reduce ambiguity about mixed-use assets and allocation of returns between charitable and non-charitable purposes.
      • Voluntary contributions: In Document 2 voluntary contributions are clause (c); in Document 1 they are clause (d). Substantive text is largely similar.
        • Practical impact: Purely structural; no substantive difference except placement.
      • Commercial activity gains: Document 2's clause (d) includes "gains of any commercial activity, other than the commercial activities restricted u/ss 345 and 346". Document 1's clause (e) refers to "gains of any commercial activity permissible u/ss 344, 345 and 346" (and is to be "computed in such manner, as may be prescribed").
        • Practical impact: The Act expands cross-references (adds section 344) and shifts the framing from "other than restricted under 345 and 346" to "permissible under 344, 345 and 346". This could change the scope of permissible commercial activities and the point of reference for restriction/permissibility. Exact practical consequences require reading sections 344-346: Not stated in the document.
      • Capital/revenue qualification: Document 2 explicitly states "whether capital or revenue" for property/investment receipts; Document 1 omits that language.
        • Practical impact: Removal of the explicit "capital or revenue" qualification may create interpretive questions about capital receipts from property/investments; whether such receipts are regular income will rest on interpretation of "income" and other provisions: Not stated in the document.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Registered non-profit organisations must identify and classify receipts into the four heads. Particular areas of risk include (a) distinguishing charitable activity receipts from commercial activity gains, (b) classifying receipts from property/investments as capital or revenue, and (c) determining whether a commercial activity is "restricted" u/ss 345 and 346. The Bill requires prescribed computation for commercial gains; lack of published rules may create uncertainty until such rules are issued: Not stated in the document.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The text implies the need for clear records segregating receipts from charitable operations, voluntary contributions, investment returns (with evidence to support capital vs revenue nature) and accounts for commercial activities (supporting computation as prescribed). The exact form of records or prescribed documentation: Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 335 (Old Bill) defines regular income in four heads: charitable activity receipts; receipts from property/investment (capital or revenue); voluntary contributions; and gains from permitted commercial activities (subject to prescribed computation).
      • Difference in later Act text: the Act uses "income" (not "receipts"), distinguishes wholly vs part-held assets, adds "deposit", and references sections 344-346 and section 332(2)(b)(ii); these are substantive drafting changes with practical effects on classification and scope.
      • The Bill expressly captures both capital and revenue receipts from property/investments; the Act omits that express wording, potentially altering interpretive emphasis.
      • Commercial gains are included but limited by cross-references to other sections; precise scope depends on those sections and on prescribed computation rules, which are not in the clause itself.
      • Many operational details-computation methods, registration implications, and the boundary between charitable and commercial activities-are left to other provisions or subordinate rules and are Not stated in the document.

      Full Text:

      Section 335 Regular income.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax