Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    NewsBills
    Section 194B - Winnings from lottery or crossword puzzle
    NewsBills
    Section 194BB - Winnings from horse race
    NewsBills
    Section 194D – Insurance commission
    NewsBills
    Section 194G - Commission, etc., on sale of lottery tickets.
    NewsBills
    Section 194H - Commission or brokerage.
    NewsBills
    Section 194-I – Rent
    NewsBills
    Section 194J - Fees for professional or technical services.
    NewsBills
    Section 194K – Income in respect of units
    NewsBills
    Section 194LA - Payment of compensation on acquisition of certain immovable property.
    NewsBills
    Definition of “forest produce” rationalised
    NewsBills
    Reduction in compliance burden by omission of TCS on sale of specified goods
    NewsBills
    Amendments proposed in provisions of Block assessment for search and requisition cases under Chapter...
    NewsBills
    Non-applicability of Section 271AAB of the Act
    NewsBills
    Amendments proposed in sections 132 and 132B for rationalising provisions
    NewsBills
    Time limit to impose penalties rationalised
    NewsBills
    Clarification regarding commencement date and the end date of the period stayed by the Court
    NewsBills
    Rationalisation of provisions related to carry forward of losses in case of amalgamation
    NewsBills
    Rationalisation of transfer pricing provisions for carrying out multi-year arm’s length price dete...
    NewsBills
    Removal of higher TDS/TCS for non-filers of return of income
    NewsBills
    SOCIO ECONOMIC WELFARE MEASURES - Increase in the limits on the income of the employees for the purp...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax deduction on lottery winnings now triggers per single transaction rather than by annual aggregation.
    The Finance Bill, 2025 amends Section 194B to remove the aggregate-year threshold and instead require tax withholding on each single transaction that exceeds the statutory threshold, changing the trigger for deduction from annual aggregation to per-transaction basis; this amendment takes effect from 1 April 2025 (Clause 54).
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax deduction on horse race winnings: threshold now applies per single payout, altering withholding obligation at payment.
    Section 194BB requires a bookmaker or licensed person paying horse-race winnings to deduct tax at source at the rates in force at the time of payment. The Finance Bill 2025 removes the aggregate-year threshold and makes the deduction requirement apply where a single transaction exceeds the threshold, shifting the test from annual aggregation to single-transaction application.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Insurance commission TDS threshold raised, reducing mandatory withholding on smaller commission payments from the Bill's effective financial year.
    Section 194D requires deduction of income-tax at source on remuneration or reward for soliciting or procuring insurance business paid to a resident where payments in a financial year exceed a prescribed threshold. The Finance Bill, 2025 raises that threshold, reducing the instances where TDS is required, and makes the amendment effective from the commencement of the specified financial year.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on lottery commissions: threshold raised, reducing instances of deduction at source; new rule effective next fiscal year.
    Amendment to Section 194G raises the monetary threshold that triggers a two percent TDS obligation on commission, remuneration or prize payments to persons engaged in stocking, distributing, purchasing or selling lottery tickets, thereby reducing instances where tax must be deducted at source. The two percent deduction rate remains unchanged, and the amendment takes effect from the commencement of the next fiscal year.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on commission: threshold for deduction raised, narrowing scope of withholding for small payees next fiscal year
    Persons other than individuals and HUFs paying commission or brokerage to resident payees must deduct tax at source at a two percent rate where annual payments exceed the prescribed threshold; the Finance Bill proposes to raise that threshold, reducing the number of payments subject to deduction while excluding insurance commission treated under a separate provision, effective from the commencement of the relevant fiscal year.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on rent threshold lowered, expanding deduction requirement to monthly rent payments effective next fiscal year.
    The amendment expands the requirement to deduct tax at source on rent by replacing the prior annual exemption with a monthly (or part-month) threshold for payers other than individuals and HUFs; rent exceeding the specified monthly amount will attract withholding, and the change is effective from the start of the next fiscal year.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on professional and technical fees: higher thresholds reduce mandatory withholding obligations from the next financial year.
    The Finance Bill increases the threshold for tax deduction at source on payments characterised as fees for professional services, fees for technical services, royalty and other specified sums made by persons other than individuals or HUFs; deductions are required only when aggregate payments in a financial year exceed the revised thresholds, with the amendment effective from the start of the specified financial year.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on mutual fund unit income: threshold for mandatory deduction increased, narrowing instances where withholding is required.
    Persons paying income in respect of mutual fund units, administrators of specified undertakings, or specified companies must deduct tax at source at the prescribed rate only when the payee's income from such units exceeds the revised threshold; the amendment narrows the circumstances requiring deduction and applies prospectively from the effective date specified in the Finance Bill.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on compensation for compulsory acquisition: deduction threshold raised while the deduction rate is retained, effective next fiscal April.
    Section 194LA requires tax deduction at source on compensation or enhanced compensation and consideration for compulsory acquisition of immovable property (other than agricultural land) where amounts in a financial year exceed the prescribed threshold. The Finance Bill, 2025 proposes to raise that threshold while retaining the existing deduction rate and mechanism; the amendment is to take effect from 1 April 2025.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Definition of forest produce clarified to align with State Acts or Indian Forest Act, narrowing TCS scope to leased produce.
    The Finance Bill aligns the definition of forest produce with any State Act or the Indian Forest Act, 1927, to clarify TCS coverage; it confines TCS on "other forest produce" (excluding timber and tendu leaves) to items obtained under a forest lease, and sets TCS at two per cent for timber or other forest produce under lease and two per cent for timber obtained otherwise, effective from 1 April 2025.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Collection at Source exemption removes duplicate TCS/TDS obligation, streamlining seller and buyer compliance from April 1, 2025.
    The Finance Bill proposes omission of the sub section imposing Tax Collection at Source by sellers on sale of specified goods where the buyer is liable to deduct Tax Deduction at Source, to prevent overlapping TCS/TDS obligations and ease compliance; the amendment takes effect from 1 April 2025.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Block assessment scope expanded to include virtual digital assets; computation, revival and timeline rules updated.
    Amendments bring virtual digital asset within the definition of undisclosed income for Chapter XIV-B; add "recomputation", "reference" and "order" to the list of proceedings that may revive if a Chapter XIV-B proceeding is annulled; replace "pending" with assessments "required to be made" for subsequent searches; amend computation rules to recognise undisclosed income declared in return and include returns filed before search or requisition for credit; exclude income from international or specified domestic transactions from block period income; and change the block assessment time limit to twelve months from the end of the quarter of the last authorisation.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Non-applicability of penalty under section 271AAB clarified for searches under section 132 after block assessment introduction.
    The amendment provides that section 271AAB shall not apply to an assessee in whose case a search under section 132 was initiated on or after 1 September 2024, aligning the penalty provision with the block assessment regime introduced by the Finance Act, 2024 and removing any ambiguity about applicability; the amendment takes effect from 1 September 2024.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Search and seizure: uniform quarterly-based time limit for retention approvals and updated cross-references for execution definitions.
    The Bill amends section 132 to provide that the time limit for taking approval for retention of seized books of account or documents will be one month from the end of the quarter in which the assessment, reassessment or recomputation order is made, addressing administrative difficulties in group search cases. It also modifies Explanation 1 to section 132 to substitute "authorisation" with "authorisations", and updates Explanation 1 to section 132B to reference section 158B for the meaning of "execution of an authorisation for search or requisition".
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation on penalty imposition extended to a uniform quarterly deadline after completion of connected proceedings or receipt of appeals.
    The amendment standardises the limitation for imposing penalties under Chapter XXI so that no penalty order may be passed after the expiry of six months from the end of the quarter in which the connected proceedings are completed, the appellate order is received by the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, an order of revision is passed, or the notice for imposition of penalty is issued. A consequential amendment updates the cross-reference in section 246A. These changes take effect from 1 April 2025.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Stay period exclusion clarified: computation excludes from date stay granted until certified vacatur received by tax Commissioner.
    The amendment excludes from computation of statutory time limits the period beginning on the date a court stay is granted and ending on the date a certified copy of the order vacating that stay is received by the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner (or the Approving Panel where applicable).
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Carryforward of losses limited to eight assessment years for predecessor losses in amalgamations, preventing loss evergreening.
    Sections 72A and 72AA are amended to provide that any accumulated loss of an original predecessor entity deemed to be the loss of the successor entity may be carried forward only for eight assessment years immediately succeeding the assessment year in which that loss was first computed for the original predecessor, aligning these provisions with section 72 and preventing evergreening through successive amalgamations.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Multi-year transfer pricing: one ALP can apply to consecutive years, with TPO validation and AO recomputation.
    A voluntary multi-year transfer pricing option permits an ALP determined by the TPO for a transaction in a given previous year to apply to similar transactions in the immediately following consecutive years; the assessee must exercise a prescribed option, the TPO must validate it within a set period, and on validation the AO shall recompute total income for those years in conformity with the TPO's ALP while no fresh references for those transactions shall be permitted.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Higher TDS/TCS for non-filers removed, easing withholding obligations and reducing verification and compliance burden for payors.
    The proposal omits provisions imposing higher rates of deduction and collection for non-filers of income-tax returns, responding to stakeholder concerns that payors face difficulty verifying filing status and bear increased compliance and capital blockage; the amendment is intended to simplify withholding obligations and reduce verification burdens, effective from the first day of April, 2025.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Perquisite income threshold increase: employer-provided amenities and foreign medical travel may be exempt from perquisite treatment.
    Proposed amendment to section 17 would grant rulemaking power to increase the gross total income ceilings for treating employer-provided amenities and benefits as non-perquisites, and to raise the income limit excluding employer-funded foreign medical travel from perquisite treatment; the changes take effect from 1 April 2026 and apply to the subsequent assessment year.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 311 "Charge of tax where shares of members in association of persons or body of individuals unknown, etc." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      11 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 311 Charge of tax where shares of members in association of persons or body of individuals unknown, etc.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 311 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) (hereafter "Clause 311 (Bill)"), concerning taxation where members' shares in an association of persons (AOP) or body of individuals (BOI) are indeterminate or known. This matters to AOPs/BOIs, their members and the tax department because it prescribes the rate at which such aggregate entities are taxed in absence or presence of identifiable member shares. Effective date or enactment timing: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 311 (Bill) addresses the charge of income-tax on associations of persons and bodies of individuals. It mirrors and is substantively comparable to Section 311 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (Document 1). Coverage: taxation of the total income of an AOP/BOI depending on whether individual members' shares in whole or part of the income are indeterminate/unknown or determinate/known. Definitions or explanatory notes: Not stated in the document beyond the deeming provision in sub-section (3) concerning when shares are to be treated as indeterminate or unknown.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 311 prescribes the method of charging tax on the total income of an association of persons or body of individuals when the individual members' shares in whole or part of that income are either indeterminate/unknown or determinate/known.

      Ingredients/elements derived from the text:

      • Trigger 1 (sub-section 1): Where member shares in whole or any part of the income are indeterminate or unknown.
      • Consequence under Trigger 1: Either (a) tax on the total income of the association/body at the maximum marginal rate; or (b) where any member's total income is chargeable at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate, tax on the total income at that higher rate.
      • Trigger 2 (sub-section 2): Where member shares in whole or any part of the income are determinate or known.
      • Consequences under Trigger 2: (a) If a member's total income excluding his share from the AOP/BOI exceeds the maximum non-taxable amount under the Finance Act for the relevant year, the association/body's total income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate; (b) If any member(s) is/are chargeable at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate, the portions of the AOP/BOI income relatable to those members are taxed at the higher rate(s) and the balance at the maximum marginal rate.
      • Deeming provision (sub-section 3): Shares shall be deemed indeterminate/unknown if they are indeterminate/unknown at formation or at any time thereafter.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The clause seeks to prevent rate-arbitrage or avoidance by ensuring that where individual entitlement cannot be ascertained, the AOP/BOI is taxed at the highest applicable personal rate (maximum marginal rate) unless a member's own total income attracts an even higher rate. Where shares are known, the clause aims at equitable allocation: members who are already taxed at higher personal rates bear tax on the income attributable to them at those higher rates; remaining income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate. The statute signals an intent to protect the revenue and align taxation of aggregate entities with members' rates in transparent cases. No legislative history or policy rationale beyond the text is stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The clause contains operational distinctions rather than explicit provisos: the principal carve-outs are (i) where a member's own total income is taxed at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate then the higher rate applies to the AOP/BOI total income under the indeterminate scenario; and (ii) where shares are known, portions related to higher-rate members are taxed at their rates. Threshold conditions (e.g., definition of "maximum marginal rate") and procedural details are not provided in the clause. Specific exceptions beyond these allocations: Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: An AOP's internal profit sharing is not recorded and member shares are unknown; the AOP's total income will be taxed at the maximum marginal rate unless a member's total personal income is taxed at a higher rate, in which case that higher rate applies. (This follows directly from sub-section (1)(a)/(b).)
      • Example 2: Member shares are formalized. A member's other taxable income exceeds the non-taxable limit under the Finance Act for the year; the AOP's total income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate. (Follows sub-section (2)(a).)
      • Example 3: Shares known; one member is taxed at a higher rate than the maximum marginal rate. The portion of AOP income attributable to that member is taxed at the higher rate; remaining AOP income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate. (Follows sub-section (2)(b)(i) & (ii).)

      Interplay

      Interaction with other legislation or administrative instruments: Clause 311 explicitly references "the Finance Act of the relevant year" for determining the "maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax" in relation to a member. Beyond that cross-reference, the text does not mention rules, notifications or circulars. Practical application will therefore require recourse to the Finance Act and possibly to other provisions of the Income-tax law for rate definitions and aggregator rules. Specific cross-references to Rules/Notifications/Circulars: Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Clause 311 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) and Section 311 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

      • Structural ordering: Clause 311 (Bill) places the scenario where shares are indeterminate/unknown as sub-section (1) with alternative (a)/(b); Section 311 (Act) states a primary rule in sub-section (1) (tax at maximum marginal rate) and then in sub-section (2) provides the exception when a member's individual rate is higher.
        • Practical impact: No substantive change in outcome; only syntactic/organizational difference that may affect ease of reading but not tax consequence.
      • Reference to exempt threshold language: Clause 311(2)(a) refers to "the maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax in the case of that member under the Finance Act of the relevant year"; Section 311(3)(a) refers to "the maximum amount which is not chargeable to, tax" (text broken) but context indicates the exempt threshold.
        • Practical impact: Clause 311's phrasing more precisely links the exemption amount to the Finance Act of the relevant year; Section 311's language is slightly less explicit. Practically this clarifies that current year exemption limits under the Finance Act govern the test for applying maximum marginal rate to the AOP/BOI.
      • Sub-section numbering and cross-referencing differences: Section 311 (Act) contains an express sub-section (2) dealing with cases where a member's total income is chargeable at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate and then a separate sub-section (3) dealing with determinate shares with sub-clauses (a)/(b). Clause 311 (Bill) presents indeterminate shares in sub-section (1), determinate in sub-section (2), and the deeming provision in (3).
        • Practical impact: No substantive change; differences are organizational only but could affect citation precision during debate or drafting amendments.
      • Terminology concerning "maximum marginal rate": Both documents use the term; neither defines it.
        • Practical impact: Because both texts leave the term undefined within the clause, reliance on external provisions (e.g., Finance Act) will be necessary. Clause 311 explicitly ties the taxability test for a member's exempt threshold to the Finance Act; Section 311 is less explicit. This renders Clause 311 marginally clearer for application.
      • Overall substantive effect: The charge mechanics are consistent between the two texts: (i) if shares unknown -> tax the AOP/BOI at maximum marginal rate or higher rate if any member's total income is taxed at a higher rate; (ii) if shares known -> test each member's other income against exempt threshold and apportion taxation between portions attributable to higher-rate members and remaining income taxed at maximum marginal rate.
        • Practical impact: No change in the underlying tax policy; Clause 311 (Bill) and Section 311 (Act) are materially aligned, with only drafting and phrasing differences that affect interpretive clarity rather than substantive tax outcomes.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Entities should maintain and be able to produce contemporaneous documentation evidencing the distribution/sharing pattern among members. Where shares are not determinable, the AOP/BOI faces taxation at the maximum marginal rate which may be higher than typical corporate or aggregate rates. If any member has a higher personal tax rate, the AOP/BOI may attract that higher rate on its total income in indeterminate cases.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: The clause's dichotomy between determinable and indeterminate shares places a premium on records establishing members' shares from formation and thereafter. Evidence of written partnership/AOP/BOI agreements, minutes, accounting records allocating income, and communications showing entitlements will be material to avoid the indeterminate classification. The clause's deeming rule shows that indeterminacy at formation or at any later time is sufficient to invoke the indeterminate regime.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 311 governs taxation of an AOP/BOI's total income based on whether members' shares are determinable.
      • If shares are indeterminate/unknown, the AOP/BOI's income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate or at any higher rate applicable to a member's total income.
      • If shares are known, test each member's other income against the non-taxable threshold under the Finance Act; portions attributable to higher-rate members taxed at their rates, balance at maximum marginal rate.
      • The clause contains a deeming provision that treats indeterminacy at formation or thereafter as sufficient to trigger the indeterminate regime.
      • Clause 311 (Bill) and Section 311 (Act) are substantively aligned; differences are mostly drafting and cross-reference clarifications, notably the Bill's explicit reference to the Finance Act for the exemption limit.

      Full Text:

      Section 311 Charge of tax where shares of members in association of persons or body of individuals unknown, etc.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax