Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Can ICDS apply to a person following cash system of accounting and to the person whose books of acco...
    Switching from normal payment of tax composition scheme - Whether the assessee is liable to reverse ...
    Switching from composition scheme to normal scheme of payment of tax - Whether the assessee is eligi...
    Can a registered person, who purchases goods from a composition manufacturer / trader (dealer / supp...
    In case of a person who is/was availing composition scheme u/s 10. What will be the due date of paym...
    What is the due date of payment of Tax under GST? What is the due date for payment of tax (GST) and ...
    Whether a person who is opting for Composition u/s 10 of the GST, is required to pay GST at composit...
    A person who was making inter-state supplies during the previous year but not making inter-state sup...
    How to determine Turnover limit for availing the benefit of composition scheme? Is it required to be...
    What is the validity of composition levy? Whether intimation is required to be submitted each year f...
    Can the option to pay tax under composition levy be exercised at any time of the year?
    Can a person paying tax under composition levy, withdraw voluntarily from the scheme? If so, how?
    Can an Importer of goods or services opt to pay tax under composition scheme under GST?
    Can an exporter of goods opt to pay tax under composition scheme under GST?
    Can a person paying tax under composition scheme under GST make supplies of goods to SEZ?
    Whether a person having turnover much below ₹ 75 Lakhs (Rs. 50 lakhs as the case may be) as on...
    A person availing benefit of composition scheme under GST, want to be a casual dealer in another sta...
    Who are not eligible to opt for composition scheme? Whether certain manufacturers (like Ice cream, P...
    A person availing composition scheme during a financial year crosses the turnover of ₹ 75 Lakh...
    Whether a person supplying goods through Electronic Commerce Operator, is eligible to opt compositio...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS applicability limited to mercantile accounting; excludes cash-accounting and individuals/HUFs not subject to tax audit.
    ICDS applies to persons following the mercantile system of accounting and does not apply to those following the cash system. For individuals and HUFs, ICDS is applicable only if they carry on business or profession and their books are required to be audited under the tax audit provisions; it does not apply where there is no business or professional income even if mercantile accounting is followed for other heads.
    ManualsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Reversal of Input Tax Credit on switching to composition scheme; capital goods credit prorated by remaining useful life.
    Switching to the composition scheme requires reversal of Input Tax Credit on inputs, inputs in semi finished or finished goods held in stock, and capital goods held in stock as on the day before the option is exercised, by payment from the electronic credit or cash ledger after prescribed reductions. For capital goods, reversal is prorated by remaining useful life using an assumed five year useful life, with the credit attributable to remaining months computed as original credit multiplied by remaining months divided by sixty.
    ManualsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input tax credit eligibility on switching from composition to normal scheme - capital goods credit reduced over time, subject to time bar.
    A taxpayer switching from the composition scheme to the normal scheme may claim Input Tax Credit for inputs, inputs in goods held in stock, and capital goods held immediately before liability to pay tax, but credit for capital goods must be reduced by the prescribed periodic reduction measured from the invoice or receipt date, and no credit may be claimed for supplies after one year from the tax invoice date.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit denial: purchases from composition taxpayers are ineligible for ITC under the GST regime.
    A composition scheme taxpayer is excluded from the input tax credit chain, cannot issue a tax invoice or collect tax, and must state that no credit is available. Consequently, a registered person purchasing from a composition dealer cannot claim Input Tax Credit because the supplier does not charge GST in a manner that would enable the recipient to treat the payment as tax paid for ITC purposes.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme threshold triggers monthly tax payment and monthly returns requirement for the affected taxpayer.
    A taxpayer under the Composition Scheme may pay and file on the quarterly schedule (guidance noting payment on the 18th and quarterly return on the 18th after quarter-end). If the taxpayer crosses the threshold or withdraws from composition, they become a regular taxable person and must pay tax and furnish returns monthly by the 20th of the following month for the remainder of the financial year and subsequent years.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    GST payment due date: monthly filers pay with next-month return; composition filers pay with quarterly return.
    Tax under GST must be paid not later than the return's due date. Monthly filers must file GSTR-3 and pay tax by the twentieth day of the month following the tax month. Composition taxpayers under the composition scheme file quarterly in GSTR-4 and must pay tax by the eighteenth day after the quarter ends.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition levy on exempt supplies raises eligibility ambiguity due to turnover inclusion versus ineligibility for non leviable supplies.
    The composition levy's tax base, as defined by turnover, expressly includes exempt supplies, indicating that composition tax is payable having regard to exempted goods; however, Section 10(2)(b) disqualifies persons making supplies "not leviable to tax," creating an ambiguity whether exempt supplies (which definitionally includes nil rated and wholly exempt supplies and non taxable supplies) render a person ineligible for composition. Commentators note this tension and call for clarification or amendment to reconcile the turnover inclusion with the eligibility restriction.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Eligibility for composition scheme may be barred by prior inter state supplies, even if current turnover is below threshold.
    A registered person who made inter state supplies during the previous year is ineligible to opt for the composition scheme in the current year, because eligibility under Section 10 is determined with reference to the preceding financial year; thus the absence of inter state supplies must be assessed for the previous year even if turnover remains below the threshold.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme eligibility: turnover in preceding financial year determines entitlement; aggregate turnover is all-India and fresh declaration required.
    Eligibility for the composition scheme depends on aggregate turnover in the preceding financial year not exceeding the prescribed threshold; aggregate turnover is computed on an all India basis and includes taxable supplies (excluding inward reverse charge supplies), exempt supplies, exports and inter State supplies by the same PAN, while excluding GST and cess. Eligibility is reassessed each year; a fresh declaration is required to opt into the scheme after becoming eligible.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme validity continues while statutory conditions are met; annual intimation is not required for eligible taxpayers.
    The composition levy remains valid so long as statutory eligibility conditions and applicable CGST Rules are complied with; no fresh annual intimation is required if those conditions continue to be met.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition levy option must be elected before the financial year begins; prior electronic intimation required.
    The option to pay tax under the composition levy must be exercised by giving electronic intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 prior to the commencement of the relevant financial year under the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition levy withdrawal: file FORM GST CMP-04 and submit FORM GST ITC-01 detailing stock within the prescribed period.
    Withdrawal from the composition scheme is effected by filing a duly signed or verified application in FORM GST CMP-04, and the applicant must electronically furnish FORM GST ITC-01 detailing stock of inputs and inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held on the date of withdrawal within thirty days of withdrawal.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme: importers may remain in composition though IGST on imports may not yield input tax credit, service providers excluded.
    Importers can opt for the composition scheme where otherwise eligible; there is no categorical bar on importers availing composition levy. IGST is payable on import and such tax may not yield input tax credit for a composition taxpayer. Pure service providers remain ineligible for composition, and importing services for business or captive consumption does not automatically make a person a service provider or disqualify composition eligibility.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme eligibility: exporters cannot use composition tax where their supplies are treated as inter State, barring such option.
    Exports are treated as inter State supplies for GST purposes. The composition levy prohibits a taxpayer from making inter State outward supplies of goods while paying tax under the composition scheme. Therefore, an exporter whose transactions are classified as inter State supplies cannot opt to pay tax under the composition scheme in respect of those export supplies.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme: suppliers cannot make inter State outward supplies to SEZ while remaining in the scheme.
    Supplies from the domestic tariff area to an SEZ are treated as inter State supplies, and Rule 5/Section 10 conditions for the composition levy prohibit a composition taxpayer from making inter State outward supplies; therefore a person paying tax under the composition scheme cannot make outward supplies of goods to an SEZ while remaining in the scheme.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme eligibility denied where stock on appointed day was purchased inter state, imported, or received from outside State.
    Persons below the turnover threshold who hold stock on the appointed day cannot opt for the composition scheme if that stock was purchased inter state, imported, or received from an out of State branch, agent or principal; possession of such goods on the appointed day disqualifies a registered person from the composition levy.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme eligibility barred for casual and non-resident taxable persons; cannot claim composition as casual dealer.
    A taxpayer acting as a casual taxable person or a non-resident taxable person is expressly excluded from the composition levy; therefore casual dealers and non-resident taxable persons cannot avail the composition scheme while operating in that capacity.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme ineligibility: manufacturers of ice cream, pan masala and tobacco and certain suppliers cannot opt.
    Section 10(2) excludes five categories from the composition scheme: suppliers of services (except restaurant services), suppliers of non taxable goods, inter State suppliers, persons supplying through electronic commerce operators, and manufacturers of notified goods. Rule 5 adds further ineligible classes. A notification further specifies that manufacturers of ice cream, pan masala, and all tobacco and manufactured tobacco substitutes are not eligible for composition levy.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme lapse triggers transition to regular tax liability and requires issuing tax invoices and filing withdrawal notice promptly.
    Crossing the aggregate turnover threshold causes the composition option to lapse from the day the threshold is exceeded; the person is liable to pay tax under section 9 from that day and must issue tax invoices for every taxable supply made thereafter. The person must also file an intimation for withdrawal from the scheme in FORM GST CMP-04 within seven days of the occurrence of such event.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme eligibility may be available for suppliers using e-commerce operators while TDS/TCS provisions remain inoperative.
    Eligibility for the composition scheme is negated for suppliers making supplies through an electronic commerce operator required to collect tax at source; however, because the TDS/TCS provisions are not yet operative and ECOs are not required to collect tax, suppliers using ECOs may currently opt for the composition scheme until the collection provisions are brought into force, and an administrative clarification from the government is recommended to remove uncertainty.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 311 "Charge of tax where shares of members in association of persons or body of individuals unknown, etc." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      11 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 311 Charge of tax where shares of members in association of persons or body of individuals unknown, etc.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 311 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) (hereafter "Clause 311 (Bill)"), concerning taxation where members' shares in an association of persons (AOP) or body of individuals (BOI) are indeterminate or known. This matters to AOPs/BOIs, their members and the tax department because it prescribes the rate at which such aggregate entities are taxed in absence or presence of identifiable member shares. Effective date or enactment timing: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 311 (Bill) addresses the charge of income-tax on associations of persons and bodies of individuals. It mirrors and is substantively comparable to Section 311 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (Document 1). Coverage: taxation of the total income of an AOP/BOI depending on whether individual members' shares in whole or part of the income are indeterminate/unknown or determinate/known. Definitions or explanatory notes: Not stated in the document beyond the deeming provision in sub-section (3) concerning when shares are to be treated as indeterminate or unknown.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 311 prescribes the method of charging tax on the total income of an association of persons or body of individuals when the individual members' shares in whole or part of that income are either indeterminate/unknown or determinate/known.

      Ingredients/elements derived from the text:

      • Trigger 1 (sub-section 1): Where member shares in whole or any part of the income are indeterminate or unknown.
      • Consequence under Trigger 1: Either (a) tax on the total income of the association/body at the maximum marginal rate; or (b) where any member's total income is chargeable at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate, tax on the total income at that higher rate.
      • Trigger 2 (sub-section 2): Where member shares in whole or any part of the income are determinate or known.
      • Consequences under Trigger 2: (a) If a member's total income excluding his share from the AOP/BOI exceeds the maximum non-taxable amount under the Finance Act for the relevant year, the association/body's total income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate; (b) If any member(s) is/are chargeable at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate, the portions of the AOP/BOI income relatable to those members are taxed at the higher rate(s) and the balance at the maximum marginal rate.
      • Deeming provision (sub-section 3): Shares shall be deemed indeterminate/unknown if they are indeterminate/unknown at formation or at any time thereafter.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The clause seeks to prevent rate-arbitrage or avoidance by ensuring that where individual entitlement cannot be ascertained, the AOP/BOI is taxed at the highest applicable personal rate (maximum marginal rate) unless a member's own total income attracts an even higher rate. Where shares are known, the clause aims at equitable allocation: members who are already taxed at higher personal rates bear tax on the income attributable to them at those higher rates; remaining income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate. The statute signals an intent to protect the revenue and align taxation of aggregate entities with members' rates in transparent cases. No legislative history or policy rationale beyond the text is stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The clause contains operational distinctions rather than explicit provisos: the principal carve-outs are (i) where a member's own total income is taxed at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate then the higher rate applies to the AOP/BOI total income under the indeterminate scenario; and (ii) where shares are known, portions related to higher-rate members are taxed at their rates. Threshold conditions (e.g., definition of "maximum marginal rate") and procedural details are not provided in the clause. Specific exceptions beyond these allocations: Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: An AOP's internal profit sharing is not recorded and member shares are unknown; the AOP's total income will be taxed at the maximum marginal rate unless a member's total personal income is taxed at a higher rate, in which case that higher rate applies. (This follows directly from sub-section (1)(a)/(b).)
      • Example 2: Member shares are formalized. A member's other taxable income exceeds the non-taxable limit under the Finance Act for the year; the AOP's total income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate. (Follows sub-section (2)(a).)
      • Example 3: Shares known; one member is taxed at a higher rate than the maximum marginal rate. The portion of AOP income attributable to that member is taxed at the higher rate; remaining AOP income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate. (Follows sub-section (2)(b)(i) & (ii).)

      Interplay

      Interaction with other legislation or administrative instruments: Clause 311 explicitly references "the Finance Act of the relevant year" for determining the "maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax" in relation to a member. Beyond that cross-reference, the text does not mention rules, notifications or circulars. Practical application will therefore require recourse to the Finance Act and possibly to other provisions of the Income-tax law for rate definitions and aggregator rules. Specific cross-references to Rules/Notifications/Circulars: Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Clause 311 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) and Section 311 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

      • Structural ordering: Clause 311 (Bill) places the scenario where shares are indeterminate/unknown as sub-section (1) with alternative (a)/(b); Section 311 (Act) states a primary rule in sub-section (1) (tax at maximum marginal rate) and then in sub-section (2) provides the exception when a member's individual rate is higher.
        • Practical impact: No substantive change in outcome; only syntactic/organizational difference that may affect ease of reading but not tax consequence.
      • Reference to exempt threshold language: Clause 311(2)(a) refers to "the maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax in the case of that member under the Finance Act of the relevant year"; Section 311(3)(a) refers to "the maximum amount which is not chargeable to, tax" (text broken) but context indicates the exempt threshold.
        • Practical impact: Clause 311's phrasing more precisely links the exemption amount to the Finance Act of the relevant year; Section 311's language is slightly less explicit. Practically this clarifies that current year exemption limits under the Finance Act govern the test for applying maximum marginal rate to the AOP/BOI.
      • Sub-section numbering and cross-referencing differences: Section 311 (Act) contains an express sub-section (2) dealing with cases where a member's total income is chargeable at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate and then a separate sub-section (3) dealing with determinate shares with sub-clauses (a)/(b). Clause 311 (Bill) presents indeterminate shares in sub-section (1), determinate in sub-section (2), and the deeming provision in (3).
        • Practical impact: No substantive change; differences are organizational only but could affect citation precision during debate or drafting amendments.
      • Terminology concerning "maximum marginal rate": Both documents use the term; neither defines it.
        • Practical impact: Because both texts leave the term undefined within the clause, reliance on external provisions (e.g., Finance Act) will be necessary. Clause 311 explicitly ties the taxability test for a member's exempt threshold to the Finance Act; Section 311 is less explicit. This renders Clause 311 marginally clearer for application.
      • Overall substantive effect: The charge mechanics are consistent between the two texts: (i) if shares unknown -> tax the AOP/BOI at maximum marginal rate or higher rate if any member's total income is taxed at a higher rate; (ii) if shares known -> test each member's other income against exempt threshold and apportion taxation between portions attributable to higher-rate members and remaining income taxed at maximum marginal rate.
        • Practical impact: No change in the underlying tax policy; Clause 311 (Bill) and Section 311 (Act) are materially aligned, with only drafting and phrasing differences that affect interpretive clarity rather than substantive tax outcomes.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Entities should maintain and be able to produce contemporaneous documentation evidencing the distribution/sharing pattern among members. Where shares are not determinable, the AOP/BOI faces taxation at the maximum marginal rate which may be higher than typical corporate or aggregate rates. If any member has a higher personal tax rate, the AOP/BOI may attract that higher rate on its total income in indeterminate cases.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: The clause's dichotomy between determinable and indeterminate shares places a premium on records establishing members' shares from formation and thereafter. Evidence of written partnership/AOP/BOI agreements, minutes, accounting records allocating income, and communications showing entitlements will be material to avoid the indeterminate classification. The clause's deeming rule shows that indeterminacy at formation or at any later time is sufficient to invoke the indeterminate regime.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 311 governs taxation of an AOP/BOI's total income based on whether members' shares are determinable.
      • If shares are indeterminate/unknown, the AOP/BOI's income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate or at any higher rate applicable to a member's total income.
      • If shares are known, test each member's other income against the non-taxable threshold under the Finance Act; portions attributable to higher-rate members taxed at their rates, balance at maximum marginal rate.
      • The clause contains a deeming provision that treats indeterminacy at formation or thereafter as sufficient to trigger the indeterminate regime.
      • Clause 311 (Bill) and Section 311 (Act) are substantively aligned; differences are mostly drafting and cross-reference clarifications, notably the Bill's explicit reference to the Finance Act for the exemption limit.

      Full Text:

      Section 311 Charge of tax where shares of members in association of persons or body of individuals unknown, etc.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax