Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    NotificationsIncome Tax
    Manner of disposal of application for advance ruling under Income Tax Act, 1961
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Computation of Turnover for the purpose of tax audit u/s 44AB - Speculation Business or Derivatives,...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - Section 9
    GST on offline/online games such as Rummy - game of skill versus game of chance - principle of nomen...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Current Repairs - ‘Nature & Treatment’ of expense
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Addition u/s 69A - ambit of the word "owner" and "valuable article" for the purpose of additions as ...
    Act RulesMoney Laundering
    Role and Responsibilities of Reporting Entities under PMLA
    Act RulesMoney Laundering
    Reporting Entity under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Pharmaceutical companies’ gifting freebies to doctors, etc. - whether Allowable Business expenditu...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Impact of belated deposit of employees’ contribution towards the EPF and ESI under Income Tax
    NewsBills
    RATES OF INCOME-TAX for the PY 2022-23 i.e. AY 2023-24 [As per previous year Budget and comparison w...
    NewsBills
    TDS - Rates for deduction of income-tax at source during the financial year (FY) 2023- 24 from certa...
    NewsBills
    Rate of TDS on Salaries and Computation of Income for Advance Tax for FY 2023-24 / Assessment Year 2...
    NewsBills
    Rate of Income Tax - Individual, HUF, association of persons, body of individuals, artificial juridi...
    NewsBills
    Co-operative Societies - Rate of Income Tax
    NewsBills
    Firms – Rate of Income Tax on Firms / Partnership Firm
    NewsBills
    Local authorities - Rate of Income Tax
    NewsBills
    Companies – Rate of Income Tax / Corporate Tax
    NewsBills
    Income Tax - Rebate under section 87A
    NewsBills
    AMENDMENTS IN THE CGST ACT, 2017 and IGST Act, 2017
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    NotificationsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Majority decision with third member nomination resolves member disagreements in advance ruling panels, enabling electronic pronouncement and communication.
    Amendments to the e advance rulings Scheme require the Board for Advance Rulings to consider responses, provide an opportunity of being heard by video conferencing or video telephony, pronounce the advance ruling and send it to the applicant and relevant authority. If Members differ on any point, the Principal Chief Commissioner (International Taxation) will nominate a Member from another Board and the majority opinion, including the nominated Member, will prevail in deciding the disputed point or points.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Turnover computation for derivatives and speculation: include absolute differences and option premiums under tax audit rules.
    Turnover for tax audit purposes differs by transaction type: speculative transactions use the aggregate of realised favourable and unfavourable differences; derivatives, futures and options use the absolute total of favourable and unfavourable differences with option premium included unless already counted in net profit; reverse trade differences are included; delivery based transactions use total sales value as turnover.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Income deemed to accrue in India when linked to an Indian business connection, property, services, or specified payments.
    Section 9 deems income arising outside India to accrue in India where it is derived directly or indirectly from a business connection in India, from property or a source of income in India, or from transfer of a capital asset situated in India. It also treats salary for services rendered in India, government-paid salary to Indian citizens for foreign services, dividends by Indian companies to non-residents, and specified interest, royalties and technical fees (subject to exceptions based on use outside India) as deemed to accrue in India. Gifts by residents to non-residents after 5 July 2019 are similarly deemed.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Game of skill excludes gambling under GST; nomen juris applied to classify Rummy as skill based for tax purposes.
    The classification of Rummy under GST depends on whether skill predominates over chance; applying the principle of nomen juris, judicially established meanings of "gambling," "game of chance," and "game of skill" must be used. Rummy requires memorisation and strategic holding and discarding of cards and has been regarded as a game of skill. Consequently, the terms betting and gambling in the GST context should not be read to include games of skill, and selective reliance on stray judicial language to levy tax on such games is impermissible.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Current repairs classification distinguishes capital expenditure from revenue deductions for building and machinery repairs under income tax rules.
    Classification of current repairs determines whether expenditures on buildings and on plant and machinery are revenue deductions or capitalised: enduring benefit or substantial enhancement is capital, while routine restorative or replacement outlays that merely maintain existing earning capacity are revenue; Sections 30 and 31 provide the statutory context for rent, rates, taxes, repairs and insurance for buildings and for machinery, plant and furniture.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Ownership for unexplained articles must reflect real ownership rights, not mere carrier possession, to trigger tax implications.
    Section 69A applies only where the assessee can properly be regarded as the owner of the item and the item is an other valuable article; a carrier or bailee lacks ownership rights unless wrongful retention or misappropriation confers exclusive control akin to ownership, and an article qualifies as "valuable" by per unit marketability and premium price rather than aggregate value of ordinary low cost goods such as bitumen.
    Act RulesMoney Laundering
    Show AI Summary
    Reporting entity obligations require identity verification, enhanced due diligence and prescribed recordkeeping to support regulatory oversight.
    Reporting entities must verify client identity and beneficial ownership, perform enhanced due diligence on specified transactions including examining ownership, financial position and sources of funds, and record transaction purpose and intended relationship. They must maintain and furnish records in the prescribed manner for a prescribed retention period, respond to Director requests for records and information while maintaining confidentiality, and comply with rules on record maintenance and furnishing.
    Act RulesMoney Laundering
    Show AI Summary
    Reporting entity designation expands under PMLA, bringing new activities and professionals within AML obligations.
    The PMLA targets prevention of money laundering and confiscation of proceeds; money laundering encompasses concealment, possession, acquisition, use or projection of proceeds as untainted property through placement, layering and integration. A reporting entity-including banks, financial institutions, intermediaries and persons carrying on designated businesses or professions-is subject to AML obligations. Central Government notifications expand the definition of designated businesses to include specified professionals, real estate agents, dealers in precious metals, virtual digital asset service activities and provider functions such as company formation agents, nominee shareholders and registered office providers, with prescribed exclusions.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax deduction denial for pharmaceutical freebies: expenses excluded under Explanation 1 to Section 37(1) as prohibited by law.
    Whether expenditures by pharmaceutical companies for distribution of incentives to medical practitioners are allowable under Section 37(1) depends on Explanation 1 to Section 37(1), which disallows deductions for purposes that are an offence or are prohibited by law; because medical ethics regulations prohibit doctors from accepting such freebies and attach punishments, donors' provision of those incentives is treated as participation in proscribed conduct and such expenses are not allowable as business deductions.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Belated employees' contribution: deduction disallowed when not deposited by prescribed statutory due date; employer contribution treated differently.
    Non-deposit of employees' contribution within the due date prescribed under the respective provident/insurance statute results in disallowance of the employer's deduction, whereas employer contributions are subject to a separate payment-based rule that defers deduction until actual payment. The statutory scheme preserves distinct treatment: employee contributions must be credited by the statutory due date to qualify as deduction, while employer contributions may be allowed on a payment basis when actually paid.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Optional personal tax regime clarified with default slab rules, restricted deductions, and surcharge plus cess implications.
    Existing special-rate provisions for companies and cooperative societies remain unchanged for AY 2023-24 while Part I of the First Schedule prescribes standard slab rates for other assessees; the optional personal tax regime permits eligible individuals and HUFs to elect alternative slab rates with disallowance of most deductions except specified allowances, procedural rules govern exercise and revocation of the option, and surcharge, marginal relief and a fixed health and education cess apply with specified caps and computation rules.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS rates and surcharge framework for the fiscal year set; winnings from online games are subject to withholding at a specified rate.
    TDS rates for non-salary incomes for FY 2023-24 remain as in the prior schedule and apply under the specified withholding provisions; the schedule now also covers withholding on online gaming winnings at the rate set in the Bill. Prescribed section rates govern deduction. A multi-tier surcharge regime increases deducted tax by differing rates across taxpayer categories and income bands, with caps limiting surcharge on dividend and specified capital-gains income and an alternative-regime surcharge restriction. Health and Education Cess of four percent applies on tax including surcharge where applicable.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on salaries: prescribed deduction rates and advance-tax computation clarified, with limited change for incomes under section 115BAC.
    Part III of the Finance Bill prescribes rates for TDS on salaries and the computation of advance tax for the fiscal year, and those rates also apply when charging tax in provisional or accelerated assessments. The schedules apply across categories of taxpayers-individuals, cooperatives, firms, local authorities and companies-and the overall rate structure remains unchanged except for incomes governed by the alternative optional tax regime; the Bill also notes the continuing framework for tax rebate entitlement.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    New Default Tax Regime: revised slab rates apply for individuals and HUFs, with optional alternative regime and surcharge caps.
    Default tax rates under section 115BAC(1A) govern income-tax computation for individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs and specified artificial juridical persons for FY 2023-24, with a progressive slab structure; taxpayers may opt under proposed section 115BAC(6) to instead be taxed under the alternative rates in Part III, which set different exemption limits for ordinary residents and senior citizens. The Bill includes a graduated surcharge regime for higher incomes, provides caps on surcharge where income includes dividends or specified capital gains, limits surcharge for AOPs consisting only of companies, and restricts surcharge rates for persons taxed under section 115BAC(1A); marginal relief is provided at surcharge thresholds.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Co-operative society tax rates updated: surcharge tiers retained; new concessional options introduced for qualifying manufacturing societies.
    Co-operative societies will continue under the existing income-tax rate structure with a tiered surcharge framework for higher total income and marginal relief. Resident societies satisfying statutory conditions may opt for an optional reduced tax regime with a specified surcharge. Newly established manufacturing co-operative societies that commence production within a prescribed window and do not claim specified incentives may opt into a concessional tax regime for subsequent assessment years, subject to surcharge.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Surcharge on firms applies beyond income threshold, with an upper cap limiting excess tax liability.
    The Finance Bill 2023 maintains the existing rate of income-tax for firms and imposes a surcharge on firms whose total income exceeds the statutory threshold; the surcharge is added to income-tax but is capped so that the total tax plus surcharge on income above the threshold does not exceed, by more than the excess income, the income-tax payable on income at the threshold level.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Local authority income-tax rate retained, with a capped surcharge limiting additional liability above the income threshold.
    The Finance Bill maintains the existing specified income-tax rate for local authorities and imposes a surcharge on income-tax where total income exceeds a threshold; it caps the combined income-tax and surcharge liability so that the total payable on income above the threshold does not exceed the tax on the threshold amount by more than the excess income.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Company tax rates revised with reduced options for eligible domestic firms, surcharge slabs retained and health and education cess applied.
    The Finance Bill 2023 sets primary corporate tax regimes: specified base rates for domestic companies depending on turnover and election into concessional regimes; optional lower-rate regimes remain available subject to conditions. Surcharge rates for domestic and non domestic companies persist at prescribed slabs with marginal relief provided for surcharge; a Health and Education Cess is levied on tax inclusive of surcharge without marginal relief. A new provision fixes its own tax rate while surcharge is applied according to taxpayer status.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Rebate under section 87A expanded to raise the exempt-income threshold for resident individuals under the new tax regime.
    Rebate under section 87A grants a 100% rebate of income-tax payable to resident individuals whose total income does not exceed the specified threshold. From assessment year 2024-25 the rebate is extended to resident individuals whose income is chargeable under the proposed new tax regime provision (proposed sub section (1A) of section 115BAC), making them eligible for a full rebate where their total income falls within the revised threshold.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    GST Amendments broaden OIDAR taxability, impose statutory time limits for returns/statements, and decriminalise select offences.
    The Finance Bill amends the CGST Act to permit composition levy for suppliers transacting through electronic commerce operators, restrict input tax credit by treating specified Schedule III transactions as exempt-supply value and excluding CSR-related credits, clarify retrospective registration exemptions, impose statutory time limits (with conditional extensions) for furnishing outward-supply details, periodic and annual returns and monthly statements by e-commerce operators, introduce penal liability for E-commerce operators for unregistered/composition supplier contraventions, decriminalise certain offences and raise prosecution thresholds, and give retrospective non-supply treatment to specified Schedule III activities; IGST changes broaden OIDAR taxability and revise place-of-supply rules.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 282 "Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      These texts reproduce Clause/Section 282 of the Income Tax Bill/Act, 2025, setting time limits for issuance of notices u/ss 280 and 281 (notices and show-cause notices in cases of income escaping assessment). The provisions delineate outer limits (four years; up to six years in specified circumstances) and a one-year minimum waiting period. The rule affects taxpayers, assessing officers and the Department; effective/decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: references within the text are to sections 280 and 281 of the same enactment (Procedure for assessment). The provision governs temporal jurisdiction to issue notices where income is alleged to have escaped assessment. Definitions: the text does not supply definitions (for example, of "relevant tax year", "books of account", "other documents", "income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment" or "Assessing Officer"). Not stated in the document. Scope: applies to notices u/ss 280 (notice to assess) and 281 (notice to show cause) for the relevant tax year; sets both outer and inner temporal cut-offs and an exception where certain evidentiary thresholds are met or information indicates escaped income likely aggregating to fifty lakh rupees or more.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause/Section 282 provides a three-part temporal scheme.

      • Clause (1) - Notices u/s 280 (presumably a notice initiating proceedings for assessment of escaped income): barred after four years and three months from the end of the relevant tax year, unless a narrower exception in (1)(b) applies. A secondary window permits issuance between four years and three months and six years and three months only where the Assessing Officer possesses books of account or other documents/evidence related to an asset, expenditure, transaction or entry which shows that income chargeable to tax, which has escaped assessment, amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (2) - Notices u/s 281 (notice to show cause): barred if four years have elapsed from the end of the relevant tax year, unless the case falls under (2)(b). An extended window up to six years is allowed where, as per information with the Assessing Officer, the income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (3) - A minimum waiting period: no notice u/s 280 or 281 shall be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The provision seeks to balance finality for taxpayers with the Department's interest in pursuing substantial cases of escaped income. The four-year rule (and four-year rule with three months for section 280) provides a general limitation period; the extension to six years is conditional on the presence of evidence or information indicating significant escaped income (threshold: fifty lakh rupees). The separate one-year bar suggests a cooling-off or administrative window during which notices cannot be issued, possibly to allow other processes (filing, assessment) to conclude; however, the document does not explain the policy reasons. Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The text contains two express exceptions/provisos:

      • For section 280 - the extension up to six years applies only where the Assessing Officer "has in his possession" (in the Act text) books of account or other documents or evidence related to an asset/expenditure/transaction/entry showing escaped income likely amounting to Rs. 50,00,000 or more.
      • For section 281 - the extension up to six years applies where, "as per the information with the Assessing Officer", the escaped income amounts to or is likely to amount to Rs. 50,00,000 or more. The text does not require possession of the documents; it requires information indicating the quantum.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A tax year ending 31 March 2025. Under clause (2)(a), a notice u/s 281 cannot be issued after 31 March 2029 (four years). However, if on 1 April 2028 the Assessing Officer has information that escaped income of Rs. 60 lakh is likely, a notice can still be issued up to 31 March 2031 (six years). These dates are illustrative arithmetic consistent with the text; the document does not provide calendar examples. Not stated in the document.
      • Example 2: For section 280, the four years and three months cut-off: for the same year ending 31 March 2025, the ordinary bar would apply after 30 June 2029; but between 1 July 2029 and 30 June 2031 a notice may be issued only if the AO has in his possession books/documents showing escaped income of at least Rs. 50 lakh. The document does not define the nature of acceptable documents. Not stated in the document.

      Interplay

      Interaction with other provisions: the text refers to sections 280 and 281. The clause differentiates tests for extension between those two sections: possession of documentary evidence is expressly required for section 280 extension, whereas for section 281 an information-based standard suffices. The provision does not reference any Rules, Notifications or Circulars. Not stated in the document: any linkage to penalty provisions, prosecution timelines, or assessment/revision provisions; nor any transitional or retrospective application rules.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers should note that general finality arises at four years (or four years and three months for section 280), but the Department can reopen or issue notices up to six years where the threshold of Rs. 50 lakh is met. The divergence in the evidentiary standard between section 280 and 281 is material: possession of documentary evidence is required for section 280; for section 281, information in the AO's possession may suffice. This affects where and when taxpayers must preserve books and documents and when to expect notices.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Given the statutory reliance on "books of account or other documents or evidence" (for section 280) and "information with the Assessing Officer" (for section 281), stakeholders should preserve contemporaneous records that establish the nature, quantum and timing of assets, expenditures and transactions. The text, however, does not specify formats, retention periods beyond the statutory timelines, or proof standards for "possession" or "information". Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause/Section 282 establishes a general four-year limitation for notices u/ss 280 and 281, with differing technical adjustments.
      • Section 280 is subject to a four-years-and-three-months outer limit; extension up to six years and three months requires the AO to have "in his possession" books/documents/evidence showing escaped income of Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • Section 281 has a four-year cut-off; extension up to six years is permissible where, per the information with the AO, escaped income is or is likely to be Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • A mandatory minimum: no notice u/s 280 or 281 can be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.
      • The text does not define key terms, explain thresholds' rationale, describe evidentiary standards, or state effective date or transitional rules. Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Two Versions and Practical Impact

      TopicClause 282 (Bill, Old Version)Section 282 (Income-tax Act, 2025)Practical Impact
      Form/SourcePresented as Clause 282 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version); accompanied by a brief explanatory line: "Clause 282 of the Bill provides for time limit for notices..."Presented as Section 282 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (enacted text).Substantive wording largely identical; enactment confirms legislative finality. The explanatory note in the Bill is removed in the Act; no substantive legal effect.
      Phrasing regarding AO's materials (section 280)States the AO "has books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."States the AO "has in his possession books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."The Act adds "in his possession", which emphasises physical or constructive control of documents by the AO at the time of issuing the notice. This could affect whether third-party information or mere leads suffice for a section 280 extension; the Act language arguably tightens the requirement to actual possession, potentially raising a procedural threshold for the Department.
      Minor temporal wordingUses same temporal markers (four years; four years and three months; up to six years).Same.No practical change.
      Explanatory sentenceIncludes a one-line explanatory sentence summarising purpose.Does not include that explanatory sentence, but otherwise identical.Cosmetic only; no change in operative law.

      Concluding Observations

      The enacted Section 282 and the Bill's Clause 282 are substantively congruent. The main drafting divergence is the Act's insertion of "in his possession" for the section 280 exception; this may be significant in practice as it highlights an evidentiary/possession requirement for the extended six-year window u/s 280. Otherwise, the provision sets a two-tier limitation approach (general four-year rule; extendable to six years in substantial cases of escaped income) and a one-year minimum bar, with a monetary threshold of fifty lakh rupees. The text omits definitions, evidentiary standards, procedural rules for proving "possession" or "information", effective date, and transitional provisions. Not stated in the document.


      Full Text:

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax