Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    A Comparative Analysis of "Profits in Lieu of Salary" Under the New Tax Regime: Clause 18 of Income ...
    A Comparative Analysis of Perquisite Provisions: Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs Income Tax Act, 1961
    A Comparative Analysis of Salary Definition: Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Income-tax Act, 1961
    Analysis of Changes in Deductions from Salaries: Comparing Clause 19 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 with e...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Judicial Recall and Tax Implications in Trust Settlements: Using AI-generated citations without prop...
    Analysis of Salary Taxation: Section 15 of Income Tax Act 1961 vs Clause 15 of Income Tax Bill 2025
    Provisions Relating to Expenditure Disallowance for Non-Taxable Income: comparing Clause 14 of Incom...
    A Comprehensive Analysis of Tax Provisions for Political Parties and Electoral Trusts: From Income T...
    Capital assets or stock in trade: Analysis of Section 9B of Income-tax Act, 1961 and Clause 8 of Inc...
    Analysis of Deemed Accrual of Income in India: A Comprehensive Review of Clause 9 of Income Tax Bill...
    Income Deemed to Accrue or Arise in India: A Comparative Analysis of Current and Proposed Provisions
    Evolution of Deemed Income Provisions: A Comparative Analysis of Income Tax Bill 2025 and Income-tax...
    A Comparative Analysis of Residential Status Provisions: Income Tax Bill 2025 vs Income-tax Act 1961
    Apportionment of Income Between Spouses Under Portuguese Civil Code: A Comparative Analysis of Incom...
    A Comparative Analysis of Scope of Total Income: Section 5 of Income-tax Act, 1961 and Clause 5 of I...
    Regulatory Framework for Commercial Activities by Non-Profit Organizations: A Comparative Analysis o...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Corporate Mergers and Tax Assessment: Navigating Legal Entity Changes and rectification u/s 292B
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reconciling Procedural Timelines with Limitation Periods in Income Tax Reassessments
    Effective Date of Amendment in GST: Analyzing the Conflict Between Circular No. 247/04/2025 and Noti...
    NewsBills
    Rates of income-tax in respect of income liable to tax for the assessment year 2025-26.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Profits in lieu of salary redefined to separate termination, modification, and fund payments with schedule-based exclusions.
    The provision redefines profits in lieu of salary into two subsections: one defining taxable receipts-distinguishing termination payments, modification payments, pre and post employment lump sums, and employer/fund/keyman insurance payments-and the other listing exclusions via schedules. The schedule-based exclusions replace prior cross references to exemption clauses, simplifying identification of non taxable receipts and improving classification and compliance for taxpayers and employers.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Perquisite taxation modernisation streamlines valuation, standardises employer contribution limits and revises accommodation and medical exemptions.
    The Bill reorganises and simplifies perquisite provisions by consolidating accommodation rules, removing detailed computation methods in favour of prescribed approaches, and eliminating distinct treatment for furnished and hotel accommodation. It streamlines benefits and amenities by replacing a monetary threshold with prescribed-amount determinations, unifies fund-related rules with a uniform cap on aggregate employer contributions and annual accretion calculations, and retains but modifies medical exemptions by removing the previous reimbursement ceiling and clarifying overseas treatment conditions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Salary definition reform clarifies component categories and statutory references, enhancing transparency and compliance in compensation taxation.
    Clause 16 redefines salary by converting a nine-part scheme into twelve distinct sub-clauses, separating previously combined items like fees, commissions, perquisites and profits in lieu of salary, relocating leave encashment and provident fund references to updated schedules, and updating section cross-references while retaining the substantive tax treatment and adding modern compensation elements such as contributions to the Agniveer Corpus Fund.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Deductions from salaries consolidated: restructured standard deduction tiers and unified gratuity, pension and VRS provisions for clarity.
    Clause 19 consolidates salary-related deductions into a single tabular framework, instituting a two-tier standard deduction aligned with a specified tax regime, grouping gratuity types under numbered entries with categorisation and calculation guidance, centralising pension and leave salary provisions with detailed computation rules, consolidating retrenchment compensation with specified limits and conditions, and streamlining Voluntary Retirement Scheme benefits with a defined monetary ceiling and eligible employer criteria to enhance administrative efficiency and taxpayer clarity.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Trust settlement taxation: broadened construction of shares and securities may capture partnership interests, prompting citation verification.
    The tribunal examined whether a trust permitting benefits beyond relatives falls within Section 56(2)(x), construed "shares and securities" to broaden taxable scope, and treated partnership interests as property under the provision. The earlier order was recalled after reliance on non-existent citations, highlighting the need for rigorous verification of precedents and research safeguards in trust taxation matters.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Salaries taxation clarified: structural reorganisation and retention of substantive tax treatment simplifies employer scope and advance salary rules.
    Clause 15 reorganises salary taxation into discrete subsections, modernises terminology by adopting "tax year," and converts explanations into operative provisions. It limits main clauses to "employer" while separately providing that "employer includes former employer," and elevates the treatments of advance salary and partner remuneration to standalone subsections, preserving existing substantive tax effects while improving statutory clarity.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Disallowance of expenditure related to non-taxable income clarified and assessing officer powers streamlined under the new income tax bill.
    Clause 14 preserves the principle that expenditure related to income not forming part of total income is disallowed, sets out a three-part structure-basic disallowance rule, assessing officer authority to verify or apply a prescribed method, and a tax year temporal application-and streamlines language by incorporating the former Explanation into the main provision while omitting provisions on reassessment, rectification references, and retrospective application.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax exemption for political funding consolidated with stricter documentation, audit and distribution conditions under new clause.
    Clause 12 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 consolidates exemption rules for political parties and electoral trusts, retaining existing excluded income categories while reorganising eligibility and conditions into Schedule VIII's tabular format. It strengthens documentation, retains the cash-donation cap, expands acceptable non-cash payment modes to account-payee and electronic methods and electoral instruments, mandates timely return filing and enhanced audits, requires electoral trusts to distribute the bulk of aggregate donations to registered parties, and provides for taxation of exempt income where statutory conditions are not met.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed transfer of assets triggers tax; Clause 8 adds guideline timelines and enhanced parliamentary oversight for valuation.
    Deemed transfer of capital assets or stock-in-trade on distribution during dissolution or reconstitution constitutes a taxable event with gains measured by fair market value, taxed as business income or capital gains. Clause 8 clarifies terminology, prescribes a limited period for issuing implementation guidelines, introduces parliamentary review and modification procedures, modifies cross-references, and is less explicit about the binding nature of guidelines; specified entities must recognize the deemed transfer and specified persons must maintain valuation documentation.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed accrual of income expands India's tax nexus to digital activities and indirect transfers, affecting cross-border taxpayers.
    Clause 9 establishes when income is deemed to accrue or arise in India, categorising taxable flows from Indian assets/sources, property, business connections and transfers of capital assets situated in India, and prescribing specific rules for salary, dividends, interest, royalty and technical service fees, with tailored definitions for software and digital rights, while introducing Significant Economic Presence and attribution rules plus indirect transfer tests and exemptions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Territorial nexus expanded to include significant economic presence, broadening tax scope for digital and cross-border business activities.
    The proposed Clause 9 expands the territorial nexus and refines business connection to include significant economic presence, adds targeted rules for online advertising, data monetization and digital services, and integrates investment fund management rules, creating new compliance obligations for businesses, non-residents and fund managers while aligning with international tax guidelines.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed income consolidation simplifies timing and treatment of employee benefits and dividends under the new bill, improving clarity.
    The Bill consolidates rules treating certain receipts as income into one clause, preserving employee-related deemed income categories and provident fund treatment while refining employer-contribution language and updating cross-references. It integrates dividend provisions, maintains the declared versus interim dividend distinction, broadens the dividend definition through updated references, and clarifies unconditional availability of interim distributions, aiming to simplify timing and computation of these receipts and reduce interpretive disputes for tax administration.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Residential status reform refines residency tests and deemed resident rules, strengthening clarity for high income individuals and companies.
    The Bill restructures residential status rules to clarify the day count residency framework, refine temporal definitions and exceptions, and expand deemed residency and not ordinarily resident criteria. It adds targeted provisions for high income individuals with a distinct presence test and develops company residency guidance by elaborating the place of effective management and management control factors, aiming to align with international standards and reduce disputes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Apportionment of spousal income: equal division of non-salary income with salary attributed to the earning spouse under Portuguese Civil Code.
    Income of spouses under the Portuguese Civil Code is not assessed as community property; non-salary income is divided equally between spouses while salary income is attributed solely to the earning spouse. Section 5A and Clause 10 maintain individual assessment, require separate inclusion of apportioned shares in each spouse's return, and call for clear income segregation and documentation. Clause 10 simplifies language and removes prior references to classification as an association of persons or body of individuals.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Scope of total income clarified: residency tests and foreign income treatment reorganised to improve clarity and administration.
    Clause 5 reorganises the scope of total income by substituting "previous year" with tax year, moving not ordinarily resident treatment into the main clause, and elevating former Explanations into subsections. The Bill preserves the core rules on income received or deemed received in India, income accruing or arising in India, and income accruing outside India, while separately articulating prevention of double inclusion and foreign income treatment to improve clarity and administrative coherence.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Commercial activities by non-profits face a revenue cap and mandatory separate accounting, tightening compliance and transparency.
    Clause 346 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 requires commercial activities by registered non-profit organisations to be directly related to charitable objectives, subjects receipts from such activities to a statutory revenue cap, and mandates separate accounting for those activities. This contrasts with Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which conditions tax-exempt status on activities being integral to the charitable purpose and a similar receipts ceiling but lacks an explicit separate accounting requirement. The clause emphasizes transparency, documentation, and clearer compliance parameters.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Rectification of assessment orders cannot cure jurisdictional errors where orders name non-existent entities after mergers.
    An assessment order issued in the name of a non-existent entity after a disclosed corporate amalgamation was held to be a fundamental, jurisdictional error not correctable under Section 154 or Section 292B; prior disclosure of the merger and absence of misleading conduct distinguished the case from precedents permitting clerical correction.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation periods: reassessment procedures must be completed within the overarching statutory period, else notices are time-barred.
    The decision construes the interaction between procedural timelines for reassessment and the overarching limitation period, treating the mandatory pre-notice procedure requiring provision of material and an opportunity to respond as part of the reassessment process that must be completed within the ultimate limitation period; if the authority does not complete both the procedural order and issue the reassessment notice within the residual time remaining after statutory exclusions and extensions, the notice is time-barred.
    CircularsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Effective date conflict between circular and statutory notification underscores primacy of notification over administrative guidance.
    A conflict between Circular No. 247/04/2025 and Notification No. 03/2023 arises from differing statements on the effective date of GST amendments. The circular provides classification and rate clarifications for specified goods and refers to an operative date that diverges from the notification's expressly stated effective date. Because Notification No. 03/2023 is issued under statutory authority and carries legal force, the notification's specified effective date governs where inconsistency with administrative circulars occurs, producing compliance and enforcement uncertainty that warrants authoritative clarification.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Section 115BAC tax regime retained as default; surcharge tiers and caps specified, with marginal relief safeguards.
    The Finance Bill, 2025 retains existing income-tax rates for assessment year 2025-26 and keeps special concessional regimes unchanged. Section 115BAC operates as the default regime for eligible individuals and similar entities unless an option is chosen, with prescribed slab rates applying. The Bill specifies tiered surcharge rates on tax under section 115BAC for higher incomes, caps surcharge on dividend and certain categorized income and for associations of companies, and provides marginal relief. Part III First Schedule provisions for advance tax and withholding are reallocated to Part I for 2025-26.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 282 "Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      These texts reproduce Clause/Section 282 of the Income Tax Bill/Act, 2025, setting time limits for issuance of notices u/ss 280 and 281 (notices and show-cause notices in cases of income escaping assessment). The provisions delineate outer limits (four years; up to six years in specified circumstances) and a one-year minimum waiting period. The rule affects taxpayers, assessing officers and the Department; effective/decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: references within the text are to sections 280 and 281 of the same enactment (Procedure for assessment). The provision governs temporal jurisdiction to issue notices where income is alleged to have escaped assessment. Definitions: the text does not supply definitions (for example, of "relevant tax year", "books of account", "other documents", "income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment" or "Assessing Officer"). Not stated in the document. Scope: applies to notices u/ss 280 (notice to assess) and 281 (notice to show cause) for the relevant tax year; sets both outer and inner temporal cut-offs and an exception where certain evidentiary thresholds are met or information indicates escaped income likely aggregating to fifty lakh rupees or more.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause/Section 282 provides a three-part temporal scheme.

      • Clause (1) - Notices u/s 280 (presumably a notice initiating proceedings for assessment of escaped income): barred after four years and three months from the end of the relevant tax year, unless a narrower exception in (1)(b) applies. A secondary window permits issuance between four years and three months and six years and three months only where the Assessing Officer possesses books of account or other documents/evidence related to an asset, expenditure, transaction or entry which shows that income chargeable to tax, which has escaped assessment, amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (2) - Notices u/s 281 (notice to show cause): barred if four years have elapsed from the end of the relevant tax year, unless the case falls under (2)(b). An extended window up to six years is allowed where, as per information with the Assessing Officer, the income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (3) - A minimum waiting period: no notice u/s 280 or 281 shall be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The provision seeks to balance finality for taxpayers with the Department's interest in pursuing substantial cases of escaped income. The four-year rule (and four-year rule with three months for section 280) provides a general limitation period; the extension to six years is conditional on the presence of evidence or information indicating significant escaped income (threshold: fifty lakh rupees). The separate one-year bar suggests a cooling-off or administrative window during which notices cannot be issued, possibly to allow other processes (filing, assessment) to conclude; however, the document does not explain the policy reasons. Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The text contains two express exceptions/provisos:

      • For section 280 - the extension up to six years applies only where the Assessing Officer "has in his possession" (in the Act text) books of account or other documents or evidence related to an asset/expenditure/transaction/entry showing escaped income likely amounting to Rs. 50,00,000 or more.
      • For section 281 - the extension up to six years applies where, "as per the information with the Assessing Officer", the escaped income amounts to or is likely to amount to Rs. 50,00,000 or more. The text does not require possession of the documents; it requires information indicating the quantum.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A tax year ending 31 March 2025. Under clause (2)(a), a notice u/s 281 cannot be issued after 31 March 2029 (four years). However, if on 1 April 2028 the Assessing Officer has information that escaped income of Rs. 60 lakh is likely, a notice can still be issued up to 31 March 2031 (six years). These dates are illustrative arithmetic consistent with the text; the document does not provide calendar examples. Not stated in the document.
      • Example 2: For section 280, the four years and three months cut-off: for the same year ending 31 March 2025, the ordinary bar would apply after 30 June 2029; but between 1 July 2029 and 30 June 2031 a notice may be issued only if the AO has in his possession books/documents showing escaped income of at least Rs. 50 lakh. The document does not define the nature of acceptable documents. Not stated in the document.

      Interplay

      Interaction with other provisions: the text refers to sections 280 and 281. The clause differentiates tests for extension between those two sections: possession of documentary evidence is expressly required for section 280 extension, whereas for section 281 an information-based standard suffices. The provision does not reference any Rules, Notifications or Circulars. Not stated in the document: any linkage to penalty provisions, prosecution timelines, or assessment/revision provisions; nor any transitional or retrospective application rules.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers should note that general finality arises at four years (or four years and three months for section 280), but the Department can reopen or issue notices up to six years where the threshold of Rs. 50 lakh is met. The divergence in the evidentiary standard between section 280 and 281 is material: possession of documentary evidence is required for section 280; for section 281, information in the AO's possession may suffice. This affects where and when taxpayers must preserve books and documents and when to expect notices.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Given the statutory reliance on "books of account or other documents or evidence" (for section 280) and "information with the Assessing Officer" (for section 281), stakeholders should preserve contemporaneous records that establish the nature, quantum and timing of assets, expenditures and transactions. The text, however, does not specify formats, retention periods beyond the statutory timelines, or proof standards for "possession" or "information". Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause/Section 282 establishes a general four-year limitation for notices u/ss 280 and 281, with differing technical adjustments.
      • Section 280 is subject to a four-years-and-three-months outer limit; extension up to six years and three months requires the AO to have "in his possession" books/documents/evidence showing escaped income of Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • Section 281 has a four-year cut-off; extension up to six years is permissible where, per the information with the AO, escaped income is or is likely to be Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • A mandatory minimum: no notice u/s 280 or 281 can be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.
      • The text does not define key terms, explain thresholds' rationale, describe evidentiary standards, or state effective date or transitional rules. Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Two Versions and Practical Impact

      TopicClause 282 (Bill, Old Version)Section 282 (Income-tax Act, 2025)Practical Impact
      Form/SourcePresented as Clause 282 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version); accompanied by a brief explanatory line: "Clause 282 of the Bill provides for time limit for notices..."Presented as Section 282 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (enacted text).Substantive wording largely identical; enactment confirms legislative finality. The explanatory note in the Bill is removed in the Act; no substantive legal effect.
      Phrasing regarding AO's materials (section 280)States the AO "has books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."States the AO "has in his possession books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."The Act adds "in his possession", which emphasises physical or constructive control of documents by the AO at the time of issuing the notice. This could affect whether third-party information or mere leads suffice for a section 280 extension; the Act language arguably tightens the requirement to actual possession, potentially raising a procedural threshold for the Department.
      Minor temporal wordingUses same temporal markers (four years; four years and three months; up to six years).Same.No practical change.
      Explanatory sentenceIncludes a one-line explanatory sentence summarising purpose.Does not include that explanatory sentence, but otherwise identical.Cosmetic only; no change in operative law.

      Concluding Observations

      The enacted Section 282 and the Bill's Clause 282 are substantively congruent. The main drafting divergence is the Act's insertion of "in his possession" for the section 280 exception; this may be significant in practice as it highlights an evidentiary/possession requirement for the extended six-year window u/s 280. Otherwise, the provision sets a two-tier limitation approach (general four-year rule; extendable to six years in substantial cases of escaped income) and a one-year minimum bar, with a monetary threshold of fifty lakh rupees. The text omits definitions, evidentiary standards, procedural rules for proving "possession" or "information", effective date, and transitional provisions. Not stated in the document.


      Full Text:

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax