Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether the recognition of retention money, receipt of which is contingent on the satisfaction of ce...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Is it correct that even service providers are now required to record inventory?
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Does ICDS II apply to the trader or dealer of livestock, agriculture and forest products mineral oil...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Does provisions of ICDS II apply to shares of a company in which public are not substantially intere...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Does the provisions of ICDS II apply on derivatives.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific discl...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    As per ICDS-I the Marked to Market loss or an expected loss shall not he recognized unless the recog...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Since ICDS is not applicable for the purposes of maintenance of books of account, then what is the p...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations g...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Mini...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governi...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Does ICDS apply to the applicability aspect of the TDS.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How will ICDS apply to companies which adopted Ind-AS. (Indian accounting standards)
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether the provisions of ICDS shall apply to Banks, Non-banking financial institutions, Insurance ...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether ICDS is applicable to Non-Residents whose income is liable to be taxed at a flat rate of tax...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Can a assessee opt to change his method of accounting from mercantile to cash basis.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Can ICDS would apply to other categories of taxpayers whose income is taxed under presumptive tax sc...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Can a assessee can follow different methods of accounting for different sources of income under the ...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Retention money recognition as revenue requires reasonable certainty of ultimate collection under ICDS on construction contracts.
    Retention money, as part of overall contract revenue under the ICDS on construction contracts, shall be recognised as revenue only when the contingency tied to performance is satisfied or there is reasonable certainty of its ultimate collection.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Inventory recording requirement under ICDS II now mandates service providers to maintain inventories and disclose valuation for tax purposes.
    Service providers are required to maintain records of inventories under the ICDS II standard on valuation of inventories, extending mandatory inventory recognition, valuation and disclosure obligations to entities providing services for purposes of income computation.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Valuation of Inventories: ICDS II applies to traders and dealers of primary commodities while excluding producers.
    ICDS II governs valuation of inventories for income computation and disclosure. The standard is excluded for a producer of primary goods like livestock, agricultural and forest products, mineral oils, ores and gases, but it applies to persons who trade or deal in those commodities; therefore the producer/dealer distinction determines whether ICDS II applies.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS II valuation excluded for closely held company shares when ICDS VIII classifies them as securities outside its scope.
    Shares of a company in which the public are not substantially interested are excluded from ICDS II valuation even if held as inventory, because ICDS VIII's definition of securities expressly includes such shares, placing them outside ICDS II's scope.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS II applicability to derivatives: derivatives held as inventory fall under ICDS II because securities exclusion applies.
    Where an assessee holds derivatives as part of inventory, the valuation and related provisions of ICDS II apply because the definition of securities in ICDS VIII expressly excludes derivatives, so such instruments are governed by the inventory valuation standard rather than the securities disclosure regime.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Disclosure of accounting policies: ICDS requires taxpayers to disclose net ICDS effect in returns and tax audit report.
    ICDS I mandates disclosure of significant accounting policies and requires the net effect on taxable income from application of ICDS to be disclosed in the Return of Income; ICDS disclosures are to be made in the tax audit report in Form 3CD, with no separate disclosure requirement for persons not liable to tax audit.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Marked-to-market gain recognition: ICDS I's non-recognition rule for MTM loss applies equally to gains.
    Recognition of marked-to-market losses or expected loss is disallowed under ICDS I unless permitted by other ICDS provisions; the same conditional rule applies mutatis mutandis to recognition of marked-to-market gains or expected profit, so gains or anticipated income may not be recognised for income computation unless another ICDS expressly authorises recognition.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Accounting Policies: treat ICDS I as computation policies affecting taxable income computation, not books of account.
    ICDS I should be read as prescribing computation policies for taxable income so that accrual, going concern, consistency, substance over form and non recognition of mark to market losses apply to income computation under business or other sources, and the disclosure requirement concerns the policies used in computing income rather than the policies used for maintaining books of account.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Interpretation of undefined tax terms: ICDS provisions generally govern unless declared ultra vires by a competent authority.
    Where a term in the ICDS coincides with terminology in Accounting Standards, the AS interpretation generally applies; where no AS analogue exists, judicial tax-law interpretations ordinarily govern. If a current ICDS provision conflicts with earlier AS or judicial interpretations, the ICDS provision will prevail for tax computation and disclosure unless declared ultra vires by a competent court or authority.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS applicability: ICDS do not apply to MAT on book profit but apply to AMT on adjusted total income.
    ICDS do not apply to MAT because MAT is computed on book profit as per the Profit and Loss Account under company law, with specific statutory adjustments; ICDS are not incorporated into that book profit basis. ICDS apply to AMT because AMT is calculated on adjusted total income derived from total income determined under the regular tax provisions, and ICDS affect that regular computation.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Income Computation standards: specific tax-rule provisions prevail over general ICDS when the two provisions conflict.
    ICDS are subordinate general principles for computing income and do not override specific provisions of the Income-tax Rules; where a specific rule governs a particular circumstance, that rule prevails over any inconsistent ICDS guidance.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS applicability may govern specified transactional tax issues, raising whether prior judicial precedents remain operative.
    The ICDS, notified under section 145(2), are intended to standardise computation of business and other income for the transactional issues they address and apply to assessment years following notification. They were framed after reviewing judicial views to supply authoritative guidance where earlier judicial decisions arose without statutory standards; nevertheless, some ICDS provisions may conflict with those precedents, posing a question about which authority should prevail.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS application: accounting standards govern business income computation for exempt trusts, triggering ICDS when commercial books are maintained.
    ICDS do not apply to the standalone computation of exemption for charitable entities based on the commercial concept of income; however, when income is taxed under the regular heads, ICDS apply to income classified under Profits and Gains of Business or Profession and Income from Other Sources if books are kept on the mercantile system. If a trust carries on incidental business with separate books, business income must be computed on a commercial basis and ICDS apply to that business income despite entitlement to charitable exemption.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Applicability of ICDS may indirectly determine whether TDS provisions apply by altering gross receipts/turnover calculations.
    ICDS influence the computation of gross receipts/turnover used to determine whether statutory TDS provisions apply; while ICDS govern income computation and not TDS rules, their application to receipts can indirectly change whether individuals, HUFs or presumptive taxpayers cross the turnover benchmarks that attract TDS obligations.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS applicability: applies to taxable income computation under business or other income irrespective of Ind AS adoption.
    For computing taxable income under the heads Profits and Gains of Business or Profession and Income from Other Sources, ICDS provisions govern determination of income irrespective of whether an entity follows erstwhile Accounting Standards or Ind AS for financial reporting; companies adopting Ind AS must apply ICDS adjustments when computing taxable income under those heads.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS applicability clarified: sector-specific provisions and statutory overrides determine application to banks, insurers and financial firms.
    ICDS apply generally for income computation unless an ICDS contains sector-specific provisions or the substantive law provides a special regime; ICDS VIII addresses banks and certain financial institutions, while statutory and regulatory accounting requirements for insurance business prevail over general ICDS provisions.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS applicability to non-residents ensures income is determined under ICDS before flat-rate tax treatment on passive receipts.
    ICDS applies to non-resident income taxed at a flat rate-such as interest, royalty and fees for technical services-because the flat tax is applied after determination of income, so Income Computation and Disclosure Standards govern measurement and recognition for computing taxable income.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Change of accounting method: an assessee may adopt cash basis if the change is bona fide and consistently applied thereafter.
    An assessee may change the method of accounting from mercantile to cash basis if the change is bona fide and is followed regularly thereafter; such a change is distinct from a change in accounting policy and must be consistently applied to support proper income computation and disclosure.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS revenue recognition applies to presumptive tax schemes computing income from gross receipts or turnover.
    ICDS on revenue recognition applies to taxpayers under presumptive tax schemes when such schemes compute income by reference to gross receipts, turnover or similar revenue measures; absent an express exclusion, ICDS principles govern the computation of those receipts or turnover for income-tax computation and disclosure.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Accounting method application: ICDS governs sources using the mercantile system but not sources accounted on a cash basis.
    ICDS applies at the source level: it governs only those sources where the assessee follows the mercantile (accrual) system of accounting and does not apply to sources maintained on the cash system, a distinction intended to prevent escapement of income caused by heterogeneous accounting across an assessee's activities.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 282 "Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      These texts reproduce Clause/Section 282 of the Income Tax Bill/Act, 2025, setting time limits for issuance of notices u/ss 280 and 281 (notices and show-cause notices in cases of income escaping assessment). The provisions delineate outer limits (four years; up to six years in specified circumstances) and a one-year minimum waiting period. The rule affects taxpayers, assessing officers and the Department; effective/decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: references within the text are to sections 280 and 281 of the same enactment (Procedure for assessment). The provision governs temporal jurisdiction to issue notices where income is alleged to have escaped assessment. Definitions: the text does not supply definitions (for example, of "relevant tax year", "books of account", "other documents", "income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment" or "Assessing Officer"). Not stated in the document. Scope: applies to notices u/ss 280 (notice to assess) and 281 (notice to show cause) for the relevant tax year; sets both outer and inner temporal cut-offs and an exception where certain evidentiary thresholds are met or information indicates escaped income likely aggregating to fifty lakh rupees or more.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause/Section 282 provides a three-part temporal scheme.

      • Clause (1) - Notices u/s 280 (presumably a notice initiating proceedings for assessment of escaped income): barred after four years and three months from the end of the relevant tax year, unless a narrower exception in (1)(b) applies. A secondary window permits issuance between four years and three months and six years and three months only where the Assessing Officer possesses books of account or other documents/evidence related to an asset, expenditure, transaction or entry which shows that income chargeable to tax, which has escaped assessment, amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (2) - Notices u/s 281 (notice to show cause): barred if four years have elapsed from the end of the relevant tax year, unless the case falls under (2)(b). An extended window up to six years is allowed where, as per information with the Assessing Officer, the income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (3) - A minimum waiting period: no notice u/s 280 or 281 shall be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The provision seeks to balance finality for taxpayers with the Department's interest in pursuing substantial cases of escaped income. The four-year rule (and four-year rule with three months for section 280) provides a general limitation period; the extension to six years is conditional on the presence of evidence or information indicating significant escaped income (threshold: fifty lakh rupees). The separate one-year bar suggests a cooling-off or administrative window during which notices cannot be issued, possibly to allow other processes (filing, assessment) to conclude; however, the document does not explain the policy reasons. Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The text contains two express exceptions/provisos:

      • For section 280 - the extension up to six years applies only where the Assessing Officer "has in his possession" (in the Act text) books of account or other documents or evidence related to an asset/expenditure/transaction/entry showing escaped income likely amounting to Rs. 50,00,000 or more.
      • For section 281 - the extension up to six years applies where, "as per the information with the Assessing Officer", the escaped income amounts to or is likely to amount to Rs. 50,00,000 or more. The text does not require possession of the documents; it requires information indicating the quantum.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A tax year ending 31 March 2025. Under clause (2)(a), a notice u/s 281 cannot be issued after 31 March 2029 (four years). However, if on 1 April 2028 the Assessing Officer has information that escaped income of Rs. 60 lakh is likely, a notice can still be issued up to 31 March 2031 (six years). These dates are illustrative arithmetic consistent with the text; the document does not provide calendar examples. Not stated in the document.
      • Example 2: For section 280, the four years and three months cut-off: for the same year ending 31 March 2025, the ordinary bar would apply after 30 June 2029; but between 1 July 2029 and 30 June 2031 a notice may be issued only if the AO has in his possession books/documents showing escaped income of at least Rs. 50 lakh. The document does not define the nature of acceptable documents. Not stated in the document.

      Interplay

      Interaction with other provisions: the text refers to sections 280 and 281. The clause differentiates tests for extension between those two sections: possession of documentary evidence is expressly required for section 280 extension, whereas for section 281 an information-based standard suffices. The provision does not reference any Rules, Notifications or Circulars. Not stated in the document: any linkage to penalty provisions, prosecution timelines, or assessment/revision provisions; nor any transitional or retrospective application rules.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers should note that general finality arises at four years (or four years and three months for section 280), but the Department can reopen or issue notices up to six years where the threshold of Rs. 50 lakh is met. The divergence in the evidentiary standard between section 280 and 281 is material: possession of documentary evidence is required for section 280; for section 281, information in the AO's possession may suffice. This affects where and when taxpayers must preserve books and documents and when to expect notices.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Given the statutory reliance on "books of account or other documents or evidence" (for section 280) and "information with the Assessing Officer" (for section 281), stakeholders should preserve contemporaneous records that establish the nature, quantum and timing of assets, expenditures and transactions. The text, however, does not specify formats, retention periods beyond the statutory timelines, or proof standards for "possession" or "information". Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause/Section 282 establishes a general four-year limitation for notices u/ss 280 and 281, with differing technical adjustments.
      • Section 280 is subject to a four-years-and-three-months outer limit; extension up to six years and three months requires the AO to have "in his possession" books/documents/evidence showing escaped income of Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • Section 281 has a four-year cut-off; extension up to six years is permissible where, per the information with the AO, escaped income is or is likely to be Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • A mandatory minimum: no notice u/s 280 or 281 can be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.
      • The text does not define key terms, explain thresholds' rationale, describe evidentiary standards, or state effective date or transitional rules. Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Two Versions and Practical Impact

      TopicClause 282 (Bill, Old Version)Section 282 (Income-tax Act, 2025)Practical Impact
      Form/SourcePresented as Clause 282 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version); accompanied by a brief explanatory line: "Clause 282 of the Bill provides for time limit for notices..."Presented as Section 282 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (enacted text).Substantive wording largely identical; enactment confirms legislative finality. The explanatory note in the Bill is removed in the Act; no substantive legal effect.
      Phrasing regarding AO's materials (section 280)States the AO "has books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."States the AO "has in his possession books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."The Act adds "in his possession", which emphasises physical or constructive control of documents by the AO at the time of issuing the notice. This could affect whether third-party information or mere leads suffice for a section 280 extension; the Act language arguably tightens the requirement to actual possession, potentially raising a procedural threshold for the Department.
      Minor temporal wordingUses same temporal markers (four years; four years and three months; up to six years).Same.No practical change.
      Explanatory sentenceIncludes a one-line explanatory sentence summarising purpose.Does not include that explanatory sentence, but otherwise identical.Cosmetic only; no change in operative law.

      Concluding Observations

      The enacted Section 282 and the Bill's Clause 282 are substantively congruent. The main drafting divergence is the Act's insertion of "in his possession" for the section 280 exception; this may be significant in practice as it highlights an evidentiary/possession requirement for the extended six-year window u/s 280. Otherwise, the provision sets a two-tier limitation approach (general four-year rule; extendable to six years in substantial cases of escaped income) and a one-year minimum bar, with a monetary threshold of fifty lakh rupees. The text omits definitions, evidentiary standards, procedural rules for proving "possession" or "information", effective date, and transitional provisions. Not stated in the document.


      Full Text:

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax