Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS to the Government
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    A Landmark Judgment on Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS ...
    A Case of Coerced Input Tax Credit Reversal - GST recovery during search and seizure proceedings.
    Manner of compliance of conditions of pre-deposit - Debit of amount from electronic credit ledger (E...
    The need for clarity and concrete reasons in the cancellation of GST registrations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of reopening of assessment - need for a direct link between the portal's information and th...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Application of provisions of section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 ...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Provisional release of imported goods (apples) - The dispute centers on the valuation of the import...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Applicability of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of expenses - need for tax authorities to have a practical understanding of the nature ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of the assessee's business expenditure claims related to the purchase of sugarcane from...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Additions made u/s 69 and Section 56 in the absence of direct incriminating evidence linking the ass...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Whether penalty is to be imposed when the appellant has accepted the classification and paid the ent...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Liability for payment of customs duty on sale of excess liquor from the duty-free shop
    Case LawsCustoms
    Demand of customs duty beyond normal period of limitation on the ground of change in classification ...
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Stringent approach towards ensuring compliance with auditing standards - importance of auditors' res...
    Whether the appellant's claim can be classified as a Financial Debt or Operational Debt under the In...
    Scope of Approval of resolution plan - Allegations of undervaluation of the Corporate Debtor's asset...
    Denial of Input Tax Credit since the GST registration of the Supplier of Goods has been Cancelled wi...
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a vested right or concession - Can government impose conditions or restric...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    TDS credit entitlement affirmed: deductee entitled to credit despite deductor's non-deposit, preventing indirect recovery.
    Credit for tax deducted at source on interest payments is to be treated as tax paid on the deductee's behalf and does not depend on the deductor's remittance; statutory protections against indirect recovery prevent the revenue from seeking the same tax from the deductee when the deductor fails to deposit the deducted amount, and the deposit requirement in the applicable provisions does not negate the deductee's entitlement to such credit.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax credit for TDS: deductee entitled to credit even if deductor failed to deposit the retained tax with government.
    The Court treats amounts retained by a deductor as remaining tax and concludes the statutory credit mechanism for tax deducted at source does not condition a deductee's entitlement on the deductor having deposited the retained amount with the government, thereby barring indirect recovery or adjustment against the deductee where tax has been deducted at source.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Coercive tax collection prohibited; forced reversal of input tax credit during search deemed impermissible, with investigatory remedies preserved.
    Dispute involved a search under Section 67 and an alleged coerced reversal of Input Tax Credit from the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger for supplies from a supplier with retrospectively cancelled registration; the court found such coercive recovery during search impermissible and directed restoration of the ITC while preserving the department's power to investigate and, if ineligible or fraudulent ITC is found, pass appropriate protective orders.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Pre-deposit payment method: Electronic credit ledger debit does not satisfy pre-deposit; cash ledger payment required for appeals.
    Pre-deposit for appeals under the CGST/BGST regime must be paid from the cash ledger; debit from the electronic credit ledger does not satisfy the statutory pre-deposit requirement. A revenue circular restricting ECRL use to certain output tax payments and excluding reverse charge, interest, penalties, fees, and similar amounts supports that ECRL cannot be used for pre-deposit. The court emphasized the statutory payment scheme and strict appeal filing timelines, rejecting arguments that ECRL debit could substitute for cash ledger payment.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Requirement of clear reasons in GST cancellation: retrospective deregistration must be reasoned and consider input tax credit effects.
    Cancellation of GST registration must be supported by clear reasons and concrete factual findings in show cause notices and cancellation orders; labels that a registration is "liable to be cancelled" without specifying dues or factual basis constitute mechanical action. Retrospective cancellation cannot be applied routinely; authorities must follow statutory procedure, assess causes for non-filing, consider exceptional disruptions to business operations, and account for the impact on input tax credit before fixing an effective date of cancellation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Use of portal data: digital information needs a direct evidential link before reopening income tax assessments.
    Reopening assessments requires a direct evidential link between portal-derived information and the income alleged to have escaped assessment; portal data alone is insufficient without documentary support for transactions or gifts, and a show cause notice must provide adequate particulars and reflect proper consideration of the taxpayer's response before reassessment proceeds.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Non retrospective application of punitive benami provisions affirmed, limiting enforcement to post amendment transactions.
    Application of Section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 concerns whether punitive provisions enacted in 2016 apply to transactions predating the amendment. The Appellate Tribunal relied on Supreme Court precedent that such punitive provisions must be applied prospectively, and the High Court emphasized adherence to that interpretation while allowing parties to pursue further remedies pending the Supreme Court review.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional release of perishable imports allowed pending valuation, subject to provisional assessment and bond to protect revenue interests.
    The dispute concerns provisional release of perishable imported apples amid a valuation contest tied to a stayed minimum import price notification. The instrument requires provisional assessment of the Bill of Entry within a brief timeframe and permits conditional provisional release upon the importer furnishing a bond and meeting terms set by customs, thereby reconciling the protection of revenue interests with the practical need to avoid loss to perishable consignments pending final resolution of the notification's applicability.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Prospective application of punitive benami amendment upheld, limiting reach to post-enactment transactions and preserving pre-enactment protections.
    The Madras High Court affirmed that the enhanced punitive provision introduced by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 is substantive and applies prospectively; it endorsed the Tribunal's reliance on the Supreme Court's Ganapati Dealcom decision, treated a pending Supreme Court review petition as not displacing that precedent, and disposed of the appeals while allowing further proceedings consistent with prospectivity and prior constitutional findings.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Disallowance of expenses must rest on specific documentation defects, not on blanket percentage adjustments.
    Disallowance of business expenses on a summary or estimate basis requires specific, pointed deficiencies and cannot rest on generalized conclusions about excessiveness; in businesses with routine small transactions, tax authorities must examine the nature of operations and identify particular defects in documentation before applying blanket percentage disallowances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Statutory Minimum Price interpretation: excess cane payments treated as appropriation of profits, not deductible business expense.
    The core issue is whether payments for sugarcane in excess of the Statutory Minimum Price (SMP) are deductible business expenditures or constitute an appropriation of profits. The Assessing Officer relied on standard accounting practice requiring provisions for liabilities at year end and treated post closing excess payments as distributions of operational surplus. The appellate view upheld that cooperative status does not alter the tax analysis and that payments beyond the SMP do not qualify as allowable business expenses absent proper provisioning within the accounting period.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Direct incriminating evidence requirement: third party search materials alone cannot sustain unexplained investment additions.
    Additions alleged as unexplained investments and undisclosed interest income based on third party search materials require a demonstrable direct nexus between those seized records and the assessee; absent such direct incriminating evidence, reliance on third party statements or documents is insufficient. Procedural safeguards and transactional indicia-such as cross examination opportunities, banking records, documentary support, and TDS-reduce the probative value of seized material when direct linkage is lacking.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty under Section 114A: no justification where importer accepted correct classification and paid differential duty before notice.
    Issue: imposition of a penalty for alleged suppression when the importer accepted correct tariff classification and paid the differential duty with interest before issuance of a show cause notice. The importer attributed the earlier misclassification to an agent error and denied intent to evade duty. The authority observed the accurate product description, admission of correct classification and prompt payment, concluded absence of suppression of facts and determined that the statutory penalty provision was not justified on these facts.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Liability under Section 72: duty rests with duty-free shop licence-holder when trade facility conditions are breached.
    Duty arises where a duty-free shop licence-holder breaches voucher and recordkeeping conditions under the trade facility; the licence-holder bears responsibility for payment of duty and interest when procedural requirements are violated, while penalty depends on culpability and may be disallowed where no intent to evade duty is established and customs were aware of the transactions.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Extended limitation in customs demands inapplicable where no suppression, limiting reassessment for CVD on undeclared MRP entries.
    Reassessment and CVD demand arose from a post-clearance change in classification and retrospective reliance on MRP for past entries; the tribunal held that items described were essential refrigeration parts rather than accessories, that MRP-based reassessment requires clear factual basis, and that the Extended Period of Limitation is inapplicable where no suppression is established, although penalty issues may still be considered where omissions occur.
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Auditor responsibility reinforced: regulatory findings against audit failures stress strict adherence to auditing standards and sanctions.
    NFRA found a statutory auditor guilty of professional misconduct for failures to comply with Standards on Auditing, including inadequate procedures to verify revenue, lack of physical inventory verification, insufficient going concern assessment, deficient materiality application, and inadequate communication with Those Charged with Governance, and applied regulatory sanctions to reinforce auditor responsibilities in preserving financial reporting integrity.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Operational debt classification confirmed for supplier's claim based on the transaction's nature under the insolvency framework.
    Whether a claim from a supply arrangement is a Financial Debt or an Operational Debt depends on the transaction's substantive character. The tribunal examined contractual terms-penalties for non-delivery, interest, and security cheques-and applied precedents on the financial-versus-operational distinction. It characterised the supplier's claim, filed under Section 9, as arising from the supply of goods and therefore as an operational debt, sustaining the Resolution Professional's and Adjudicating Authority's classification.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Commercial wisdom of committee of creditors governs resolution plan approval, limiting valuation and standing challenges by promoters.
    Exclusion of the creditor was non irregular as no claim was filed; undervaluation allegations were rejected since opportunities to raise them during the CIRP were not used; the resolution plan satisfied Committee approval requirements and reflected the Committee's commercial wisdom; and a suspended director/promoter lacked standing to challenge the approved plan, underscoring limited judicial interference post approval.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input tax credit denial over supplier deregistration; remanded for document verification and fresh adjudication to determine genuineness.
    Denial of Input Tax Credit was challenged where the supplier's registration was retrospectively cancelled; the petitioner paid through bank and the supplier appeared on records at the time. The High Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the appellate authority to reconsider the petitioner's documentary evidence, hold a hearing, and pass a reasoned order verifying genuineness and timing of transactions; if purchases are genuine and occurred prior to cancellation, ITC is to be considered per precedent.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit as legislative concession: entitlement subject to statutory conditions, but retrospective deprivation of vested accruals is vulnerable.
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a legislative concession, not a vested right, so the legislature may lawfully prescribe eligibility conditions and procedural limits which taxpayers must strictly satisfy; however, retrospective amendments that destroy or diminish an already accrued entitlement are susceptible to challenge and have been treated as impermissible when they impair rights that vested before the amendment.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 266 "Self-assessment." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 266 Self-assessment.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Document is Clause 266 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) titled "Self-assessment." It prescribes the liabilities and procedural requirements for payment of tax, interest and fee when a return of income (u/ss 263, 268, 280 or 294) shows tax payable. The provision affects assessees required to file such returns and the revenue where collection and adjustment of credits arise. Effective date or enactment date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause 266 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version), captioned "Self-assessment." Context: deals with payment obligations that arise when a return of income shows tax payable after accounting for various payments, deductions and credits. Coverage extends to returns required u/ss 263, 268, 280 or 294. Definitions: the clause supplies a definition for "assessed tax" in sub-section (6) by reference to the tax as declared in the return reduced by certain amounts. No other definitions or explanatory notes are provided in the text. Relevant cross-references within the clause include sections 157, 159(1), 159(2), 160, 206 and 391(2); Chapter XIX-B is referenced for source deduction/collection. Further legislative context or objectives: Not stated in the document.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      • Clause 266 imposes pre-filing payment obligations where, after accounting for amounts listed in sub-section (2), any tax is payable on the basis of a return required u/ss 263, 268, 280 or 294. Two primary obligations follow:
        • (a) the assessee must pay the tax payable together with applicable interest and fee under any provision of the Act for delays in filing or defaults in advance tax payment before filing the return; and
        • (b) the return must be accompanied by proof of payment of the tax, interest and fee.
      • Sub-section (2) enumerates the amounts to be taken into account in arriving at tax payable:
        • (a) any tax already paid under the Act;
        • (b) taxes deducted or collected at source;
        • (c) relief claimed u/s 157;
        • (d) relief or deduction u/s 159(1) or section 160 for tax paid in a foreign country;
        • (e) relief u/s 159(2) for tax paid in any specified territory outside India;
        • (f) any tax credit claimed to be set off as per section 206(13); and
        • (g) any tax or interest payable according to section 391(2).
      • Sub-section (3) prescribes the order of adjustment where the amount paid under sub-section (1) is insufficient: first applied to the fee payable, thereafter to interest, and the balance, if any, towards tax.
      • Sub-section (4) says interest u/s 423 shall be computed on tax on total income declared in the return reduced by listed items:
        • (a) advance tax paid;
        • (b) tax deducted/collected at source;
        • (c) relief u/s 157;
        • (d) relief u/s 159(1) or 160 for tax paid abroad;
        • (e) relief u/s 159(2); and
        • (f) any tax credit claimed to be set off as per section 206(13).
      • Sub-section (5) provides that interest u/s 424 shall be computed on an amount equal to the "assessed tax" or the shortfall in advance tax against assessed tax.
      • Sub-section (6) defines "assessed tax" for purposes of sub-section (5) as tax on total income declared in return reduced by:
        • (a) tax deducted/collected at source under Chapter XIX-B on income taken into account;
        • (b) relief u/s 157;
        • (c) relief u/s 159(1) or 160 for tax paid abroad;
        • (d) relief u/s 159(2) for specified territories; and
        • (e) any tax credit claimed to be set off as per section 206(13).
      • Sub-sections (7)-(9) address post-assessment treatment and consequences: payments made under sub-section (1) shall be deemed paid towards a subsequent regular assessment u/ss 270 or 271 or an assessment u/s 294 (sub-section (7)); failure to pay in full renders the assessee an "assessee in default" with all consequences under the Act (sub-section (8)); and sub-section (8) applies without prejudice to any other consequences (sub-section (9)).

      Interpretation

      The clause embodies a self-assessment model that conditions filing on payment of tax, interest and fees reflected in the return after accounting for specified credits and reliefs. The legislative intent, as indicated by the text, appears to be to prevent returns being filed without contemporaneous payment and to ensure that computation of interest (sections 423 and 424) is based on a post-credit tax amount. The text indicates a hierarchical approach to adjusting short payments (fee first, then interest, then tax), signalling a policy choice to prioritise recovery of fee and interest. The clause also integrates international tax relief provisions (sections 159/160) and source taxation mechanisms (Chapter XIX-B) into the self-assessment computation. No explicit legislative statement of purpose or policy rationale is included in the clause.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      No additional provisos or carve-outs are stated in the clause. Specific thresholds, exemptions or procedural exceptions are Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A taxpayer files a return u/s 268 showing taxable income and computed tax of INR X after accounting for TDS and reliefs listed in sub-section (2). If additional tax payable is Y, the taxpayer must pay Y together with any interest and fee before filing and attach proof of payment. If payment made is short by Z, it will be first applied to fee, then interest, then tax.
      • Example 2: For interest computation u/s 423, if the declared tax on total income is A and the taxpayer has advance tax B and a tax credit claimed u/s 206(13) of C, interest will be computed on A reduced by (B + C) and other listed reliefs as applicable.

      Interplay

      The clause expressly interacts with a range of provisions: sections 157, 159, 160, 206 (specifically section 206(13) in this text), sections 263, 268, 270, 271, 280, 291(?), 294, 391(2), and Chapters XIX-B. The text anticipates adjustments to tax liability for foreign tax reliefs and tax credits claimed u/s 206(13). There is no mention of Rules, Notifications or Circulars that further clarify implementation. Any potential conflicts or interpretive issues with other provisions of the Bill/Act are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the two provided provisions and practical impact

      Comparison basis: Document 1 (Section 266, Income-tax Act, 2025) versus Document 2 (Clause 266 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)).

      • Tax credit cross-references: Document 2 repeatedly refers to "section 206(13)" as the provision governing tax credits to be set off (sub-sections (2)(f), (4)(f), (6)(e)). Document 1, by contrast, specifies a range of provisions: "sections 206(1)(m) to (p) and 206(2)(e) to (h)" in the corresponding places.
        • Practical impact: the Act version (Document 1) expressly broadens and specifies the categories of tax credit provisions available for set-off; the Bill old version (Document 2) uses a single internal reference (206(13)) which, depending on the content of section 206(13), could be narrower or less precise. Where the Act text enumerates multiple sub-clauses of section 206, it reduces ambiguity about which tax credits may be applied; the Bill text may create uncertainty if section 206(13) does not encompass all intended credits. This difference has practical consequences for taxpayers asserting particular tax credits when computing payable tax and interest.
      • Drafting/typographical variances: Document 2 contains minor drafting artifacts (e.g., an extra comma and a trailing "and." in sub-section (6) list).
        • Practical impact: such drafting defects could give rise to interpretive queries or require clarificatory amendments; however, substantive effect depends on the larger legislative context. The enacted text in Document 1 appears to have corrected and expanded the cross-references.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Assessees required to furnish returns under the listed sections must ensure contemporaneous payment of any tax, interest and fee shown as payable after accounting for specified credits and reliefs. Failure to attach proof of payment will contravene the filing requirement and may trigger "assessee in default" consequences. The ordering of application of short payments (fee -> interest -> tax) creates a compliance risk where taxpayers intending to reduce principal tax liability may find payments applied primarily to fees and interest.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The provision mandating that returns be accompanied by proof of payment requires taxpayers to retain and present verifiable payment evidence. Records evidencing claimed reliefs (sections 157, 159, 160) and tax credit documentation u/s 206(13) should be maintained to support the reductions used for interest computation and assessed tax determination.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 266 conditions filing of specified returns on pre-payment of tax, interest and fee as shown in the return after accounting for listed credits and reliefs.
      • Detailed list of items to be deducted from declared tax includes advance tax, TDS/TCS, specified foreign tax reliefs and tax credit u/s 206(13).
      • Short payments are adjusted in a prescribed order: fee first, then interest, then tax.
      • Interest u/s 423 is computed on tax reduced by specific credits and reliefs; interest u/s 424 is computed on "assessed tax" or the shortfall in advance tax.
      • Payments made prior to assessment will be treated as payments towards a later regular assessment; non-payment renders the assessee an assessee in default with statutory consequences.
      • Document lacks effective date, legislative history, administrative guidance and specifics on procedural implementation-those are Not stated in the document.

      Full Text:

      Section 266 Self-assessment.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax