Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    The Legal Contours of Input Tax Credit Eligibility: Procedural Aspects of GST and ITC
    Case LawsService Tax
    Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM): Service Tax Implications for Exporters: A Legal Perspective on Forei...
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Cheque Dishonour and Corporate Responsibility: Analyzing the Supreme Court's Latest Judgment
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of Notices / orders without DIN. The Critical Role of Procedural Compliance in Tax Administ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Tax Exemptions: Capitation Fees in Educational Institutions: A Legal Quagmire
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Procedural Technicalities vs. Substantive Justice in Tax Administration: A High Court Perspective
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Revision u/s 263 and denial of deduction u/s 80IA: A Critical Analysis of the Delhi High Court's Jud...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Condonation of Delay and Jurisdictional Challenges: A Case Analysis of ITAT Kolkata's Decision
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Legal Analysis: Scrutiny of Share Capital and Premium Under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Judicial Scrutiny of Retrospective Cancellation of Charitable Trust Registration: A Case Analysis of...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Office and Prosecution under Income Tax Act: Jurisdiction of Trial Court - Decision in a High Profil...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Taxation of Unexplained Income at Higher Rate of tax u/s 115BBE : A Comprehensive Analysis of the IT...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Analysis of ITAT Mumbai Judgment - Transfer Pricing Adjustment Dispute: Period of limitation u/s 144...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    In-Depth Analysis of Key Issues in the ITAT Chennai Judgement
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Doctrine of Merger in Income Tax Assessment: An Analysis of ITAT Chennai's Recent Judgment
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Delay in refund processing, the petitioner's entitlement to interest, and the court's decision to gr...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Rejection of revision application u/s 264 in favor of assessee: A beneficial provision of Income Tax...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    An Analysis of ITAT Decision on International Taxation, Capital Gains, and DTAA
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Taxability of CSR fund: Treatment of certain funds received by an entity, particularly focusing on w...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Legal Analysis of ESOP Deduction and allowability in the Revised Return of income: An ITAT decision.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit eligibility: procedural limits on reversing claims without supplier inquiry and GSTR-2A non-reflection not dispositive.
    Section 16(2) sets the statutory conditions for Input Tax Credit-tax invoice, receipt, tax payment, and return filing-and GSTR-2A serves only as a facilitator; non-reflection there does not automatically negate eligibility. Tax authorities must inquire into supplier conduct and observe procedural safeguards before reversing ITC or recovering tax from the recipient, with judicial precedents and CBIC clarifications shaping when exceptions may apply.
    Case LawsService Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Reverse charge mechanism: exporter not liable for foreign bank charges when Indian bank is the direct service recipient.
    The core issue is whether an exporter is liable under the Reverse Charge Mechanism for foreign bank charges deducted from export proceeds when those charges are imposed on and paid by an Indian intermediary bank. The Tribunal's analysis focuses on the definition of service recipient and territorial scope, concluding that the direct recipient-the Indian bank-is the party liable to discharge service tax while the exporter, as an indirect beneficiary without direct dealings with the foreign bank, is not subject to reverse charge.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Directorial liability: strict averment requirement prevents presuming directors' responsibility without specific allegation, leading to quashing.
    The Court held that directorial liability requires specific averment that the director was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business at the time of the offence; mere titular position or awareness of cheque issuance is insufficient. It emphasized the necessity of serving the statutory notice prerequisite and rejected liberal construction to cure absent statutory averments, quashing proceedings against directors for non-compliance.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    DIN requirement in tax administration: absence of mandatory DIN can invalidate assessment orders unless exceptional circumstances apply.
    Failure to quote the mandatory computer-generated Document Identification Number (DIN) in assessment orders, as required by the CBDT Circular from 1 October 2019, constitutes a procedural defect that can render the order invalid unless the revenue demonstrates that the issuance fell within the Circular's narrowly drawn exceptional circumstances; the Tribunal found such non-compliance in the order dated 15 October 2019 and the High Court affirmed, while the Supreme Court granted interim stay for further consideration.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capitation fee allegations challenge admissibility and attribution of seized evidence in charitable trust tax exemption inquiries.
    Alleged collection of capitation fees by a registered charitable trust threatens its exemption under Section 11; most evidence was seized from employees' residences, invoking the presumption under Section 132(4A) and raising attribution issues. Employee admissions later retracted, similar statement drafting, declarations under the Income Declaration Scheme 2016, and trustees' acknowledgments create contradictory evidentiary threads that complicate admissibility, credibility, and whether the seized funds can be treated as trust income.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of delay in tax compliance: liberal interpretation protects bona fide taxpayers from technical disqualification.
    The court analysed whether delay in filing Form 10 could be condoned, considering the petitioner's unawareness of post 2016 amendments, CBDT circulars and precedent, and applying principles that each case be judged on its facts; it stressed that failure to claim accumulation does not by itself show absence of intent to comply and urged a liberal approach to mitigate genuine hardship and prevent procedural technicalities from defeating substantive justice.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 263 limited to substantial legal errors; mere differences of opinion don't justify revisional tax action.
    Scope of Section 263 is confined to instances where an assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue in a substantial way, not mere differences of opinion. Migration of licences from IP VPN to NLD ILD does not, by itself, create a new undertaking defeating entitlement to deduction under Section 80IA(4)(ii), particularly where identical deductions were previously allowed; administrative migration requires clear proof of substantive change before re characterising eligibility.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Delay condonation based on sufficient cause upheld where illness, relocation and pandemic disruption justified late filing and jurisdictional challenge.
    The tribunal applied a purposive construction of sufficient cause to condone substantial delay where cumulative factors-serious illness, change of residence and pandemic disruption-made filing untimely. It also found the assessment infirm for want of territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction because the taxpayer had established residence and filing history in a different territorial unit and administrative guidance allocated jurisdiction accordingly, underscoring that proper vesting of authority is a condition precedent to valid assessment.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Unexplained cash credits under Section 68 require taxpayers to prove investor identity and genuineness; authorities must rebut with evidence.
    Applicability of Section 68 requires the assessee to establish investor identity, creditworthiness and transaction genuineness-via PAN, tax returns, audited accounts and bank statements-and once this initial burden is satisfied, the burden shifts to the revenue to rebut with concrete evidence; mere suspicion or inability to trace an ultimate source does not alone justify additions if investments are reasonable relative to investors' net worth and effected through banking channels.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Retrospective cancellation of charitable trust registration invalidated due to lack of competent jurisdiction and procedural non compliance.
    The Tribunal invalidated the cancellation of a charitable trust's registration because the regional authority lacked competence to cancel under the statutory scheme and the transfer used to reassign the matter was improper; it further held that applying the newer cancellation provision retrospectively to deprive the trust of its recognized status was not legally tenable, emphasizing required notice, hearing and adherence to principled statutory interpretation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdiction in multi locational offences governs venue determination; magistrate discretion and supervisory thresholds shape tax prosecution forums under criminal procedure.
    The judgment analyses Cr.P.C. place of offence principles in multi locational tax prosecutions, assessing whether procedural acts like recording statements under the Income Tax Act determine venue. It evaluates the magistrate's discretion in taking cognizance where alleged offences span jurisdictions and outlines the threshold for superior court supervisory intervention, emphasising that extraordinary petitions require demonstration of abuse of process or exceptional circumstances before altering magistrate venue determinations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Taxation of unexplained income: higher-rate treatment applies, and deductions including partner salary are disallowed.
    The tribunal held that excess unrecorded stock and cash found on survey were assessable as unexplained investment and unexplained money, and that the special higher-rate taxation provision applies to such income, taxing it at a higher fixed rate and disallowing any deduction; consequently the claimed partner's salary relating to the unexplained investment was disallowed.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation under section 144C: assessment issued beyond statutory period, leaving transfer pricing adjustment unresolved on procedural grounds.
    The tribunal focused on the statutory time limit under Section 144C(13) for passing assessment orders after DRP directions, treated the order as barred by limitation and therefore did not adjudicate substantive transfer pricing challenges raised under Section 92CA. Consequently, technical disputes over comparability, exclusion/inclusion of comparables, and the profit level indicator computation were left unexamined.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capitalization of interest: tribunal scrutinised whether interest and forex on capital projects form capital cost or permit revenue deduction.
    The tribunal analyzed four core taxation questions: whether interest and foreign exchange fluctuations written off from Capital Work in Progress are capital or revenue in nature and their nexus to business operations; whether write off of a DG set component should be treated within the block of assets for depreciation or as a revenue repair; the applicability of Section 36(1)(iii) to proportionate interest on interest free advances to related concerns and the presumption from mixed funds; and the evidentiary requirements to establish that inter corporate deposits were funded from own funds rather than borrowed monies for interest deduction purposes.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Doctrine of merger limits revisional jurisdiction under appeals, preventing collateral review of identical legal issues.
    The Doctrine of Merger operates to treat legal issues from an assessment as merged into appeal proceedings before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), thereby constraining subsequent revisional jurisdiction over those same issues; applied where initial assessment, reassessment notices and search-related assessment steps overlap, and supported by judicial precedent limiting collateral revision.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on delayed tax refunds where delay is not attributable to the taxpayer under Section 244A.
    Entitlement to interest under Section 244A arises when refund payment is delayed for reasons not attributable to the assessee. The petitioner, a foreign company, faced delays caused by technical issues and incorrect guidance regarding banking details; the court treated the delay as the respondents' responsibility and applied Section 244A to award interest for the period of delay, directing payment according to the statutory rate.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revision application under Section 264: remand for fresh merits review when alternative remedies were improperly relied upon.
    Whether a revision under Section 264 may be denied solely because alternative remedies existed and whether appeal provisions applied to DDT-related treaty claims; the court found that rejecting revision on the mere availability of other remedies was untenable and that the appealed provision was inapplicable, directing fresh merits consideration of treaty relief and related tax computation by the Principal Commissioner.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    DTAA interpretation clarifies capital gains tax treatment for cross-border share sales under residency and grandfathering conditions.
    Taxation of capital gains from a Mauritius-based entity's sale of Indian company shares is analysed against the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, focusing on DTAA allocation of taxing rights, timing of acquisition and transfer, and applicability of grandfathering provisions. The Tribunal assessed tax residency and treaty entitlement by examining corporate structure and commercial substance, applying the substance over form principle to determine whether treaty benefits were appropriate.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Fiduciary funds not treated as taxable income when entity acts as facilitator; earmarked project funds excluded from income.
    The Tribunal examined whether earmarked receipts should be included in taxable income or treated on the balance sheet, focusing on jurisdictional validity of scrutiny notices, whether amounts were routed through the income and expenditure account or retained as earmarked funds, and whether receipts held in a fiduciary capacity for disaster relief were excluded from the entity's income because the entity acted only as facilitator without beneficial ownership.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ESOP deduction in revised returns - tribunal permits claim within revision window, stressing valuation, timing and documentary consistency.
    Deductibility of ESOP-related costs in a revised return hinges on compliance with the statutory time limit for revision and on accounting and evidentiary consistency: correct year of recognition, reliable grant date valuation (e.g., Black Scholes), concordant employee records, and disclosure in audited accounts. The tribunal found the claim allowable within the revision window but emphasised documentary proof, valuation method and timing of liability as central to acceptability.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 266 "Self-assessment." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 266 Self-assessment.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Document is Clause 266 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) titled "Self-assessment." It prescribes the liabilities and procedural requirements for payment of tax, interest and fee when a return of income (u/ss 263, 268, 280 or 294) shows tax payable. The provision affects assessees required to file such returns and the revenue where collection and adjustment of credits arise. Effective date or enactment date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause 266 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version), captioned "Self-assessment." Context: deals with payment obligations that arise when a return of income shows tax payable after accounting for various payments, deductions and credits. Coverage extends to returns required u/ss 263, 268, 280 or 294. Definitions: the clause supplies a definition for "assessed tax" in sub-section (6) by reference to the tax as declared in the return reduced by certain amounts. No other definitions or explanatory notes are provided in the text. Relevant cross-references within the clause include sections 157, 159(1), 159(2), 160, 206 and 391(2); Chapter XIX-B is referenced for source deduction/collection. Further legislative context or objectives: Not stated in the document.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      • Clause 266 imposes pre-filing payment obligations where, after accounting for amounts listed in sub-section (2), any tax is payable on the basis of a return required u/ss 263, 268, 280 or 294. Two primary obligations follow:
        • (a) the assessee must pay the tax payable together with applicable interest and fee under any provision of the Act for delays in filing or defaults in advance tax payment before filing the return; and
        • (b) the return must be accompanied by proof of payment of the tax, interest and fee.
      • Sub-section (2) enumerates the amounts to be taken into account in arriving at tax payable:
        • (a) any tax already paid under the Act;
        • (b) taxes deducted or collected at source;
        • (c) relief claimed u/s 157;
        • (d) relief or deduction u/s 159(1) or section 160 for tax paid in a foreign country;
        • (e) relief u/s 159(2) for tax paid in any specified territory outside India;
        • (f) any tax credit claimed to be set off as per section 206(13); and
        • (g) any tax or interest payable according to section 391(2).
      • Sub-section (3) prescribes the order of adjustment where the amount paid under sub-section (1) is insufficient: first applied to the fee payable, thereafter to interest, and the balance, if any, towards tax.
      • Sub-section (4) says interest u/s 423 shall be computed on tax on total income declared in the return reduced by listed items:
        • (a) advance tax paid;
        • (b) tax deducted/collected at source;
        • (c) relief u/s 157;
        • (d) relief u/s 159(1) or 160 for tax paid abroad;
        • (e) relief u/s 159(2); and
        • (f) any tax credit claimed to be set off as per section 206(13).
      • Sub-section (5) provides that interest u/s 424 shall be computed on an amount equal to the "assessed tax" or the shortfall in advance tax against assessed tax.
      • Sub-section (6) defines "assessed tax" for purposes of sub-section (5) as tax on total income declared in return reduced by:
        • (a) tax deducted/collected at source under Chapter XIX-B on income taken into account;
        • (b) relief u/s 157;
        • (c) relief u/s 159(1) or 160 for tax paid abroad;
        • (d) relief u/s 159(2) for specified territories; and
        • (e) any tax credit claimed to be set off as per section 206(13).
      • Sub-sections (7)-(9) address post-assessment treatment and consequences: payments made under sub-section (1) shall be deemed paid towards a subsequent regular assessment u/ss 270 or 271 or an assessment u/s 294 (sub-section (7)); failure to pay in full renders the assessee an "assessee in default" with all consequences under the Act (sub-section (8)); and sub-section (8) applies without prejudice to any other consequences (sub-section (9)).

      Interpretation

      The clause embodies a self-assessment model that conditions filing on payment of tax, interest and fees reflected in the return after accounting for specified credits and reliefs. The legislative intent, as indicated by the text, appears to be to prevent returns being filed without contemporaneous payment and to ensure that computation of interest (sections 423 and 424) is based on a post-credit tax amount. The text indicates a hierarchical approach to adjusting short payments (fee first, then interest, then tax), signalling a policy choice to prioritise recovery of fee and interest. The clause also integrates international tax relief provisions (sections 159/160) and source taxation mechanisms (Chapter XIX-B) into the self-assessment computation. No explicit legislative statement of purpose or policy rationale is included in the clause.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      No additional provisos or carve-outs are stated in the clause. Specific thresholds, exemptions or procedural exceptions are Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A taxpayer files a return u/s 268 showing taxable income and computed tax of INR X after accounting for TDS and reliefs listed in sub-section (2). If additional tax payable is Y, the taxpayer must pay Y together with any interest and fee before filing and attach proof of payment. If payment made is short by Z, it will be first applied to fee, then interest, then tax.
      • Example 2: For interest computation u/s 423, if the declared tax on total income is A and the taxpayer has advance tax B and a tax credit claimed u/s 206(13) of C, interest will be computed on A reduced by (B + C) and other listed reliefs as applicable.

      Interplay

      The clause expressly interacts with a range of provisions: sections 157, 159, 160, 206 (specifically section 206(13) in this text), sections 263, 268, 270, 271, 280, 291(?), 294, 391(2), and Chapters XIX-B. The text anticipates adjustments to tax liability for foreign tax reliefs and tax credits claimed u/s 206(13). There is no mention of Rules, Notifications or Circulars that further clarify implementation. Any potential conflicts or interpretive issues with other provisions of the Bill/Act are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the two provided provisions and practical impact

      Comparison basis: Document 1 (Section 266, Income-tax Act, 2025) versus Document 2 (Clause 266 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)).

      • Tax credit cross-references: Document 2 repeatedly refers to "section 206(13)" as the provision governing tax credits to be set off (sub-sections (2)(f), (4)(f), (6)(e)). Document 1, by contrast, specifies a range of provisions: "sections 206(1)(m) to (p) and 206(2)(e) to (h)" in the corresponding places.
        • Practical impact: the Act version (Document 1) expressly broadens and specifies the categories of tax credit provisions available for set-off; the Bill old version (Document 2) uses a single internal reference (206(13)) which, depending on the content of section 206(13), could be narrower or less precise. Where the Act text enumerates multiple sub-clauses of section 206, it reduces ambiguity about which tax credits may be applied; the Bill text may create uncertainty if section 206(13) does not encompass all intended credits. This difference has practical consequences for taxpayers asserting particular tax credits when computing payable tax and interest.
      • Drafting/typographical variances: Document 2 contains minor drafting artifacts (e.g., an extra comma and a trailing "and." in sub-section (6) list).
        • Practical impact: such drafting defects could give rise to interpretive queries or require clarificatory amendments; however, substantive effect depends on the larger legislative context. The enacted text in Document 1 appears to have corrected and expanded the cross-references.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Assessees required to furnish returns under the listed sections must ensure contemporaneous payment of any tax, interest and fee shown as payable after accounting for specified credits and reliefs. Failure to attach proof of payment will contravene the filing requirement and may trigger "assessee in default" consequences. The ordering of application of short payments (fee -> interest -> tax) creates a compliance risk where taxpayers intending to reduce principal tax liability may find payments applied primarily to fees and interest.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The provision mandating that returns be accompanied by proof of payment requires taxpayers to retain and present verifiable payment evidence. Records evidencing claimed reliefs (sections 157, 159, 160) and tax credit documentation u/s 206(13) should be maintained to support the reductions used for interest computation and assessed tax determination.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 266 conditions filing of specified returns on pre-payment of tax, interest and fee as shown in the return after accounting for listed credits and reliefs.
      • Detailed list of items to be deducted from declared tax includes advance tax, TDS/TCS, specified foreign tax reliefs and tax credit u/s 206(13).
      • Short payments are adjusted in a prescribed order: fee first, then interest, then tax.
      • Interest u/s 423 is computed on tax reduced by specific credits and reliefs; interest u/s 424 is computed on "assessed tax" or the shortfall in advance tax.
      • Payments made prior to assessment will be treated as payments towards a later regular assessment; non-payment renders the assessee an assessee in default with statutory consequences.
      • Document lacks effective date, legislative history, administrative guidance and specifics on procedural implementation-those are Not stated in the document.

      Full Text:

      Section 266 Self-assessment.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax