Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    TDS and International Transactions: Categorization of Payments under the ambit of "royalty" or "fees...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Assessment u/s 153C and Unexplained Investments: A Case Study in Legal Reasoning
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Delhi High Court Elucidates on the Scope of Section 80IA in the Context of Business Expansion: Inter...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Penalty Limitations and Reasonable Cause: Navigating the Nuances of Tax Penalties
    Joint Insolvency Applications in Real Estate and Fulfillment of Threshold under IBC: Limitation and ...
    Digital Authentication in Tax Notices and the Interplay of Sections 61 and 74 in GST Law: Exploring ...
    Confirmation of GST demand by adjudicating Show Cause notice u/s 73: Procedural Requirements and Fai...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Customs Duty of an EOU and the Fate of Obsolete Imports: Destroying Obsolete Goods without Paying Du...
    Understanding the Bail Denial: Case Analysis of a Money Laundering Offense
    When Taxpayers Make Mistakes in Filing GST Returns: Understanding the Legal Aspect of GST Rectificat...
    Navigating Insolvency Proceedings: Understanding CoC's Role and Section 65 of IBC in Corporate Liqu...
    In-depth Legal Examination of a High-Profile Tax Evasion and Forgery Case: Bail Application Denied
    Unraveling the Inverted Duty Structure: Complexities of ITC Refunds in GST
    Case LawsCentral Excise
    Reasonable Time for Adjudication of Show Cause Notice (SCN): The law requires authorities to exercis...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Navigating the Legal Labyrinth of Second-Hand Goods Import: The Intersection of Trade Policy and Jud...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Income Tax Return Delays: High Court Rules on Tax Authority's Decision-Making Boundaries
    Navigating Tax Law Complexities: judicial approach towards the adjudication and appeal process
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    The Interplay of Sales and Bogus Purchases in Tax Evasion Cases: Assessing Tax Evasion Allegations
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Proportionality and Evidence in Tax Assessments: Accommodation entries, Bogus Purchase and Estimatio...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Judicial Scrutiny of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) Non-Deposit: Protecting the Rights of Taxpayers Ag...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Royalty vs fees for included services: classification of cross border lead generation payments determines TDS obligation under tax treaty.
    Categorisation of cross border payments as royalty or fees for included services under the India US DTAA determines withholding under Section 195. Royalties cover payments for use of intellectual property; fees for included services require that technical knowledge, skill, or know how be made available. Services limited to lead generation, databases, or market facilitation without transfer of proprietary technical content do not qualify as either category and therefore fall outside the DTAA based TDS obligation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Search-based assessment jurisdiction governs treatment of unexplained investments when records are absent, shifting the burden of proof to the assessee.
    Assessment based on search-derived incriminating material applies when jurisdiction under search-based assessment is not contested, and unexplained investments are taxed depending on whether amounts are recorded in books of account. The assessee bears the onus to explain investments; absence of records, non-filing of returns and non-cooperation justify adverse inferences. Procedural elements such as delay condonation, set-aside orders and cooperation in reassessment affect the assessment process, while interest for non-furnishing of returns is tied to the timing of the regular assessment.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Scope of Section 80IA: expansion within the same undertaking does not automatically forfeit tax holiday eligibility.
    The court considered whether adding services and acquiring additional licenses by a telecommunications company created a new "undertaking" for tax holiday purposes. Finding that the company continued its original business using largely the same infrastructure and manpower, the court endorsed the Tribunal's conclusion that expansion within the same operational framework does not automatically constitute a separate undertaking and should not defeat eligibility for the tax holiday intended to encourage capital intensive projects.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation for tax penalties: emphasis on initiation of action preserves enforcement; reasonable cause evaluated by business realities.
    Applicability of the limitation period is determined by the initiation of action rather than the formal start of penalty proceedings, making the triggering of enforcement activity the operative moment for limitation. The reasonable cause doctrine is applied with attention to the appellant's bank like operations despite its cooperative structure, recognizing long standing practices and business realities as bearing on culpability for transaction handling contraventions.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Joint application maintainability under IBC: interconnected real estate defaults can meet allottee threshold despite limitation objections.
    Maintainability of a joint application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is supported where separate corporate participants in a real estate project have interconnected obligations, allowing joinder in a single filing. The creditor threshold for initiating insolvency by allottees can include claims affected by limitation when the default is a continuous breach, producing a continuing cause of action under the Limitation Act and thereby supporting counting such claims toward the allottee threshold.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Digital authentication of tax notices enables enforcement despite verification procedures not being an absolute prerequisite for punitive action.
    The analysis focuses on the legal effect of digitally authenticated GST portal notices, the sufficiency of portal-based service for triggering taxpayer obligations, and the distinction between routine verification of returns and discretionary enforcement actions for suspected fraudulent defaults; it observes that verification is not an absolute prerequisite to initiate enforcement where officers reasonably suspect fraud, and that failure to engage with portal notices weakens natural justice claims.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Natural justice breach: non self contained, short notice show cause demands require reissuance with fair opportunity.
    A show cause notice initiating an adjudicatory demand must be self contained, supply sufficient material for response, and afford a reasonable opportunity to reply; an inadequate content and an unreasonably short response period (well below the preferred thirty days and below a minimum of fifteen days) violate audi alteram partem and procedural fairness. Defective notices warrant issuance of a fresh, legally valid notice rectifying the procedural defects, and may attract costs consequences against the issuing authority.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Destruction of obsolete imports: destruction with Customs permission can relieve full customs duty subject to procedural compliance.
    Whether imported raw materials and components rendered obsolete may be destroyed without paying customs duty where the unit obtains Customs permission and offers to pay duty on scrap value; reliance was placed on the Foreign Trade Policy, Circular No. 60/1999 Cus and an amendment to the governing Notification which exempts duty when goods are destroyed with Customs' permission, balanced against the Revenue's contention that non use within prescribed time attracts duty.
    Case LawsPMLA
    Show AI Summary
    Money laundering offence: bail refused where admissible witness statements and accused failed to discharge burden showing non involvement.
    Bail was refused where admissible witness statements provided a prima facie basis to implicate the appellant in money laundering and the accused failed to show non involvement or low risk of reoffending. Money laundering was treated as an independent offence tied to dealings in proceeds, admissible statements supported inferences from financial transactions and concealment, parity was held non automatic, and discretionary release for trial delay does not guarantee bail in serious economic offences.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    GST rectification: inadvertent filing errors may be amended when no revenue loss, encouraging taxpayer-friendly compliance.
    Rectification of GST return entries is permissible where errors are inadvertent and do not cause revenue loss. The court interprets CGST/MGST filing and correction provisions purposively, recognising practical difficulties faced by taxpayers and the central importance of accurate returns for downstream GST processes. Authorities are urged to permit amendments by online or manual means in cases of genuine mistake without fiscal prejudice, promoting a taxpayer friendly and pragmatic approach consistent with other high court decisions.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    CoC autonomy in insolvency: CoC may decide liquidation prior to plan confirmation and section 65 targets malicious filings.
    Committee of Creditors autonomy over liquidation is recognized: the CoC may lawfully decide liquidation under Section 33(2) before confirmation of a resolution plan, and Section 65 requires clear evidence of filings made for purposes other than insolvency resolution before imposing penal consequences.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Bail considerations: Serious economic offence allegations constrain pretrial liberty when evidence tampering and investigative integrity risks exist.
    Bail considerations focus on the seriousness of alleged tax evasion, forgery and conspiracy under the IPC, the risk of evidence tampering or witness influence, and the accused's antecedents; ongoing investigation complexity and public interest in protecting the exchequer weigh against interim release. Arguments relying on GST compounding or procedural non-compliance are distinguished from IPC offences, and precedents concerning customs or GST matters are treated as contextually different when assessing pretrial liberty.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit refund: prior IGST refunds do not bar unutilized ITC claims; supporting evidence required for reconsideration.
    The court analysed entitlement to refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit under an inverted duty structure and held that prior IGST refunds for zero-rated supplies do not automatically bar a Section 54 refund claim; absence of debit entries alone cannot justify rejection. The decision emphasises the requirement to submit comprehensive supporting documents distinguishing inputs affected by the inverted duty structure and directs reconsideration allowing additional evidence and a reasoned order consistent with statutory conditions and principles of natural justice.
    Case LawsCentral Excise
    Show AI Summary
    Reasonable Time for Adjudication: undue delay undermines natural justice and precludes indefinite postponement of proceedings.
    Adjudication of an excise Show Cause Notice must occur within a reasonable time so as to preserve evidentiary integrity and witness availability; prolonged inaction between issuance of an SCN and hearing prejudices the respondent, infringes the principles of natural justice, and requires statutory time-limit language to be interpreted to prevent indefinite delay.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Second-hand goods import classification clarified: multifunction capital equipment falls under unrestricted category, subject to compliance and duty measures.
    The court determined that imported second-hand multifunction print and copying machines fall within the Foreign Trade Policy 2023 unrestricted category I(d) for second-hand capital goods and were incorrectly classified as prohibited by customs; it contrasted the 2023 and 2019 policies, relied on precedent, and directed the customs department to pass appropriate orders within a reasonable time while permitting provisional measures subject to enhanced duty payment.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of delay: focus on admissibility of the request, not the substantive merits of the tax claim.
    The legal principle requires that the authorized officer considering a condonation application under Section 119(2)(b) confine inquiry to the admissibility of the request and the justification for delay; assessment of the substantive merits of the taxpayer's income or loss claim is not part of the condonation exercise, and evidentiary review is limited to matters relevant to excusing the delay.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty under CGST law prompts appeal remedy and partial refund direction, preserving pre-deposit and taxpayer rights.
    The adjudicating officer withdrew the demand for inadmissible input tax credit and related interest and penalty, while separately imposing a penalty under Section 122(1)(vii) of the CGST Act adjusted against amounts paid by the petitioner. The court recognized the petitioner's appellate remedy and directed a partial refund subject to retention as pre-deposit, reflecting the procedural interplay between administrative adjudication and judicial review and safeguarding taxpayer rights during appeal.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Interplay of sales and bogus purchases: sales consistency limits rejection of purchases and favors gross profit alignment for taxation.
    For traders, rejection of purchases cannot proceed in isolation where declared sales exhibit regularity; cost of goods sold must be coherent with recorded sales. Tax adjustments should compare differential gross profit margins and align challenged purchases with genuine GP rates, allowing proportional taxation reconciliations rather than adding the entire value of disputed purchases as income.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Proportionality in tax assessments preserved: additions limited to profit element where sales are accepted, not entire purchase.
    Alleged accommodation entries may be restricted to taxation of the profit element where sales from those purchases are accepted; the tribunal limited an addition accordingly and the court upheld that proportionality. Separately, an enhanced gross profit addition was deleted because there was no concrete evidence to displace the assessee's declared book results; the court agreed that revenue must meet the evidentiary burden before altering declared figures.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Deducted at Source protection: taxpayers not liable for employer's failure to deposit TDS; refunds should not be adjusted.
    The note explains that TDS credit protection bars holding an assessee liable for tax already deducted by an employer who failed to remit it; employers bear the deposit obligation as tax-collecting agents. Adjusting taxpayer refunds or using coercive measures to recover demands arising from employer non-deposit contravenes the protective principle and indirect recovery limits, and authorities should correct credit mismatches rather than treat deductees as liable.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 266 "Self-assessment." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 266 Self-assessment.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Document is Clause 266 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) titled "Self-assessment." It prescribes the liabilities and procedural requirements for payment of tax, interest and fee when a return of income (u/ss 263, 268, 280 or 294) shows tax payable. The provision affects assessees required to file such returns and the revenue where collection and adjustment of credits arise. Effective date or enactment date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause 266 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version), captioned "Self-assessment." Context: deals with payment obligations that arise when a return of income shows tax payable after accounting for various payments, deductions and credits. Coverage extends to returns required u/ss 263, 268, 280 or 294. Definitions: the clause supplies a definition for "assessed tax" in sub-section (6) by reference to the tax as declared in the return reduced by certain amounts. No other definitions or explanatory notes are provided in the text. Relevant cross-references within the clause include sections 157, 159(1), 159(2), 160, 206 and 391(2); Chapter XIX-B is referenced for source deduction/collection. Further legislative context or objectives: Not stated in the document.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      • Clause 266 imposes pre-filing payment obligations where, after accounting for amounts listed in sub-section (2), any tax is payable on the basis of a return required u/ss 263, 268, 280 or 294. Two primary obligations follow:
        • (a) the assessee must pay the tax payable together with applicable interest and fee under any provision of the Act for delays in filing or defaults in advance tax payment before filing the return; and
        • (b) the return must be accompanied by proof of payment of the tax, interest and fee.
      • Sub-section (2) enumerates the amounts to be taken into account in arriving at tax payable:
        • (a) any tax already paid under the Act;
        • (b) taxes deducted or collected at source;
        • (c) relief claimed u/s 157;
        • (d) relief or deduction u/s 159(1) or section 160 for tax paid in a foreign country;
        • (e) relief u/s 159(2) for tax paid in any specified territory outside India;
        • (f) any tax credit claimed to be set off as per section 206(13); and
        • (g) any tax or interest payable according to section 391(2).
      • Sub-section (3) prescribes the order of adjustment where the amount paid under sub-section (1) is insufficient: first applied to the fee payable, thereafter to interest, and the balance, if any, towards tax.
      • Sub-section (4) says interest u/s 423 shall be computed on tax on total income declared in the return reduced by listed items:
        • (a) advance tax paid;
        • (b) tax deducted/collected at source;
        • (c) relief u/s 157;
        • (d) relief u/s 159(1) or 160 for tax paid abroad;
        • (e) relief u/s 159(2); and
        • (f) any tax credit claimed to be set off as per section 206(13).
      • Sub-section (5) provides that interest u/s 424 shall be computed on an amount equal to the "assessed tax" or the shortfall in advance tax against assessed tax.
      • Sub-section (6) defines "assessed tax" for purposes of sub-section (5) as tax on total income declared in return reduced by:
        • (a) tax deducted/collected at source under Chapter XIX-B on income taken into account;
        • (b) relief u/s 157;
        • (c) relief u/s 159(1) or 160 for tax paid abroad;
        • (d) relief u/s 159(2) for specified territories; and
        • (e) any tax credit claimed to be set off as per section 206(13).
      • Sub-sections (7)-(9) address post-assessment treatment and consequences: payments made under sub-section (1) shall be deemed paid towards a subsequent regular assessment u/ss 270 or 271 or an assessment u/s 294 (sub-section (7)); failure to pay in full renders the assessee an "assessee in default" with all consequences under the Act (sub-section (8)); and sub-section (8) applies without prejudice to any other consequences (sub-section (9)).

      Interpretation

      The clause embodies a self-assessment model that conditions filing on payment of tax, interest and fees reflected in the return after accounting for specified credits and reliefs. The legislative intent, as indicated by the text, appears to be to prevent returns being filed without contemporaneous payment and to ensure that computation of interest (sections 423 and 424) is based on a post-credit tax amount. The text indicates a hierarchical approach to adjusting short payments (fee first, then interest, then tax), signalling a policy choice to prioritise recovery of fee and interest. The clause also integrates international tax relief provisions (sections 159/160) and source taxation mechanisms (Chapter XIX-B) into the self-assessment computation. No explicit legislative statement of purpose or policy rationale is included in the clause.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      No additional provisos or carve-outs are stated in the clause. Specific thresholds, exemptions or procedural exceptions are Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A taxpayer files a return u/s 268 showing taxable income and computed tax of INR X after accounting for TDS and reliefs listed in sub-section (2). If additional tax payable is Y, the taxpayer must pay Y together with any interest and fee before filing and attach proof of payment. If payment made is short by Z, it will be first applied to fee, then interest, then tax.
      • Example 2: For interest computation u/s 423, if the declared tax on total income is A and the taxpayer has advance tax B and a tax credit claimed u/s 206(13) of C, interest will be computed on A reduced by (B + C) and other listed reliefs as applicable.

      Interplay

      The clause expressly interacts with a range of provisions: sections 157, 159, 160, 206 (specifically section 206(13) in this text), sections 263, 268, 270, 271, 280, 291(?), 294, 391(2), and Chapters XIX-B. The text anticipates adjustments to tax liability for foreign tax reliefs and tax credits claimed u/s 206(13). There is no mention of Rules, Notifications or Circulars that further clarify implementation. Any potential conflicts or interpretive issues with other provisions of the Bill/Act are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the two provided provisions and practical impact

      Comparison basis: Document 1 (Section 266, Income-tax Act, 2025) versus Document 2 (Clause 266 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)).

      • Tax credit cross-references: Document 2 repeatedly refers to "section 206(13)" as the provision governing tax credits to be set off (sub-sections (2)(f), (4)(f), (6)(e)). Document 1, by contrast, specifies a range of provisions: "sections 206(1)(m) to (p) and 206(2)(e) to (h)" in the corresponding places.
        • Practical impact: the Act version (Document 1) expressly broadens and specifies the categories of tax credit provisions available for set-off; the Bill old version (Document 2) uses a single internal reference (206(13)) which, depending on the content of section 206(13), could be narrower or less precise. Where the Act text enumerates multiple sub-clauses of section 206, it reduces ambiguity about which tax credits may be applied; the Bill text may create uncertainty if section 206(13) does not encompass all intended credits. This difference has practical consequences for taxpayers asserting particular tax credits when computing payable tax and interest.
      • Drafting/typographical variances: Document 2 contains minor drafting artifacts (e.g., an extra comma and a trailing "and." in sub-section (6) list).
        • Practical impact: such drafting defects could give rise to interpretive queries or require clarificatory amendments; however, substantive effect depends on the larger legislative context. The enacted text in Document 1 appears to have corrected and expanded the cross-references.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Assessees required to furnish returns under the listed sections must ensure contemporaneous payment of any tax, interest and fee shown as payable after accounting for specified credits and reliefs. Failure to attach proof of payment will contravene the filing requirement and may trigger "assessee in default" consequences. The ordering of application of short payments (fee -> interest -> tax) creates a compliance risk where taxpayers intending to reduce principal tax liability may find payments applied primarily to fees and interest.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The provision mandating that returns be accompanied by proof of payment requires taxpayers to retain and present verifiable payment evidence. Records evidencing claimed reliefs (sections 157, 159, 160) and tax credit documentation u/s 206(13) should be maintained to support the reductions used for interest computation and assessed tax determination.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 266 conditions filing of specified returns on pre-payment of tax, interest and fee as shown in the return after accounting for listed credits and reliefs.
      • Detailed list of items to be deducted from declared tax includes advance tax, TDS/TCS, specified foreign tax reliefs and tax credit u/s 206(13).
      • Short payments are adjusted in a prescribed order: fee first, then interest, then tax.
      • Interest u/s 423 is computed on tax reduced by specific credits and reliefs; interest u/s 424 is computed on "assessed tax" or the shortfall in advance tax.
      • Payments made prior to assessment will be treated as payments towards a later regular assessment; non-payment renders the assessee an assessee in default with statutory consequences.
      • Document lacks effective date, legislative history, administrative guidance and specifics on procedural implementation-those are Not stated in the document.

      Full Text:

      Section 266 Self-assessment.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax