Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    A Critical Analysis of the Constitutional Validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST/BGST Act and the exp...
    Scrutiny of Procedural Flaws in GST Registration Cancellation: Insights from a High Court Judgment
    Input Tax Credit Claims under GST: A Case Study of the Kerala High Court Ruling
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Complexities of Residential Status and Tax Liability
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating International Taxation Waters
    Resolution Applicant Eligibility in Corporate Insolvency: former director/ promotor of the corporate...
    CircularsCustoms
    Easing Export Procedures: A Detailed Analysis of India's New Customs Guidelines
    CircularsCustoms
    Streamlining Export Grievances in India: The Launch of 'e-SAMADHAAN' Portal
    CircularsCustoms
    Revamping Export Standards: India's New Directive on Quality Control for Milk and Milk Products
    Empowering Investors: SEBI's New Framework for Enhanced Trading Account Security
    Extended Validity of Pre-Shipment Inspection Agencies
    Revising Foreign Investment Norms in Alternative Investment Funds: A Critical Analysis of SEBI's Lat...
    SEBI's New Mandates for AIFs: Dematerialization of Investments and Custodian Appointment - Implicati...
    Navigating the Evolving Landscape of IT Hardware Import Regulations in India: Analyzing the DGFT Cir...
    CircularsGST - States
    GST on Imitation Zari Thread
    CircularsGST - States
    Deciphering the GST Framework: Key Clarifications on (1) Passenger Transport and Motor Vehicle Renti...
    CircularsGST - States
    Place of Supply: Key Clarifications for 3 items
    CircularsCustoms
    Regularization of Bills of Entry and Waiver of Interest in Indian Customs
    CircularsCustoms
    Enhancing Maritime Security and Transparency: The Introduction of Body-Worn Cameras for Customs Boar...
    Renewal of Recognition for AMC Repo Clearing Limited: SEBI's Decision and its Implications
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit entitlement: statutory conditions and return deadlines can legitimately limit vesting of the benefit.
    The court held that Input Tax Credit is a conditional statutory benefit that vests only upon fulfilment of prescribed conditions; therefore temporal restrictions tied to return filing are legitimate legislative qualifications and do not constitute deprivation of property without authority of law or violation of equality and trade-freedom guarantees.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Procedural fairness in GST registration: defective show cause notices invalidate cancellation and require fresh lawful proceedings.
    The court held the show cause notice and cancellation of GST registration were procedurally defective: the notice lacked material reasons depriving the taxpayer of an effective response, and the cancellation order demonstrated non-application of mind. Reasons contained in a reply affidavit could not retrospectively validate the defective notice. The authority may initiate fresh proceedings only by issuing a properly reasoned show cause notice, permitting the taxpayer to place all contentions and granting a personal hearing, with adjudication thereafter.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit eligibility: absence from GSTR 2A alone cannot bar credit; reassessment with evidentiary opportunity required
    The ruling emphasizes that Form GSTR 2A is a facilitative reconciliation tool and that denial of Input Tax Credit solely because an entry does not appear in GSTR 2A is not sufficient. The claimant bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by producing evidence of tax payment, valid invoices and transactional genuineness. The assessing authority must afford the taxpayer an opportunity to produce evidence and independently reassess the ITC claim, consistent with the self assessment framework of GST.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Residential status: extended employment definition can preserve non-resident tax status for cross-border business migrants abroad.
    The tribunal addressed whether an individual who stayed 176 days in India and then moved to Mauritius on an occupation permit qualified as non-resident under Explanation 1(a) to the residence provision; after reviewing the occupation permit and appointment documentation and relying on precedent that construes "employment" to include self-employment and business activity, the tribunal found the explanatory extension applicable and excluded offshore receipts from Indian taxation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 172 shipping reimbursements govern TDS treatment, displacing Section 195 withholding for cross border damage payments.
    The core operative finding is that cross border payments characterised as reimbursements for vessel damage fall within the specialised shipping income regime under Section 172, so the general non resident withholding approach under Section 195 (and higher rates applied due to documentation gaps under Section 206AA) was not the appropriate mechanism; classification by legal character governs the applicable withholding treatment.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Resolution applicant eligibility: former promoters not automatically disqualified under Section 29A; clause-specific disqualifiers control.
    Whether a former promoter or director is ineligible under Section 29A turned on clause-specific disqualifiers rather than promoter status alone; the tribunal found no evidence that the statutory disqualifying conditions, including account classification as non-performing, applied to the applicant, and emphasized that eligibility requires a fact-specific application of the provision's clauses.
    CircularsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Back to Town export procedures revised to streamline staged re routing and ease compliance for certified exporters.
    The notice amends procedures for Back to Town (BTT) of export cargo, setting distinct workflows for self sealed cargo from CPP, port-to-CPP-to-town movements, and CFS-origin BTT. It differentiates obligations before registration, after registration but prior to LEO, and after LEO, and provides special provisions for AEO and DGFT status holders. Hazardous cargo and part cargo shut out scenarios are addressed, and the circular prescribes customs operational duties, reporting requirements, and discrepancy investigation protocols to streamline export re routing.
    CircularsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Export grievance redressal via e-SAMADHAAN portal provides structured online mechanism and interim replies for stakeholder issues.
    The e-SAMADHAAN portal centralises export-related grievance redressal for Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House stakeholders by providing FAQs and a mechanism to lodge grievances; NS-II (Export) will address submissions promptly and issue interim replies with timelines when external agency intervention is required. The portal is intended for public facilitation, not for legal use, and JNCH disclaims liability for use or misuse; stakeholders are encouraged to provide feedback and report implementation difficulties to the Commissioner of Customs, NS-II JNCH.
    CircularsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Quality control for milk exports now requires pre-export inspection and approval, aligning exports with international health standards.
    Pre-export quality control and inspection for milk and milk products are mandated under the Milk and Milk Products (Quality Control, Inspection & Monitoring) Rules, 2020. Exporters must obtain establishment approval based on a Food Safety Management System; certain consignments require consignment-wise inspection. A health certificate is required only if the importing country demands it. Customs must verify the Export Inspection Council approval or a Certificate of Inspection. Authorities are directed to sensitize officers and to align earlier orders with current international health and trade standards.
    CircularsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Voluntary trading account freeze empowers investors to request account blocking to prevent fraudulent trading under a regulatory framework.
    The circular requires trading members to provide a voluntary freezing/blocking facility allowing clients to request account suspension, with specified request modes, acknowledgement procedures, processing timeframes, and mechanics for implementing and lifting freezes. Stock exchanges must ensure implementation, amend rules where necessary, establish reporting requirements for trading members, and report compliance to the regulator. The measure is issued under Section 11(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act and Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Stock Brokers) Regulations to enhance investor control and prevent fraudulent trading activity.
    CircularsDGFT
    Show AI Summary
    Extension of validity of Pre-Shipment Inspection Agencies allows continued recognition under Foreign Trade Policy provisions and Handbook relaxation.
    Extension of recognition validity for Pre-Shipment Inspection Agencies under the Foreign Trade Policy 2023, relaxing Para 2.52(c) of the Handbook of Procedures and preserving recognition status for agencies listed in the policy appendices and Aayat Niryal Forms that were due to complete their three-year tenure at the end of 2023.
    CircularsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign investment restrictions in AIFs require exclusion of sanctioned or high AML risk beneficial owners, limiting further capital contributions.
    The circular tightens investor eligibility for Alternative Investment Funds by redefining beneficial ownership thresholds and imposing disqualifications: investors or beneficial owners must not be on the United Nations Security Council Sanctions List and must not be residents of jurisdictions identified by the Financial Action Task Force as having strategic AML/CFT deficiencies. AIF managers are prohibited from accepting further capital contributions from investors who fail these conditions, with immediate effect, thereby necessitating enhanced due diligence and ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance.
    CircularsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Dematerialization of AIF investments required, with custodians and standardized custody reporting to enhance transparency and oversight.
    SEBI mandates dematerialization of AIF investments and the appointment of custodians, with specified conditions for associates acting as custodians, and requires standardized reporting of investments under custody to enhance transparency, reduce risks associated with physical securities, and strengthen oversight through operational and technological adjustments by AIFs and managers.
    CircularsDGFT
    Show AI Summary
    Import restrictions on specified IT hardware require valid import authorisation, while parts and certain exemptions remain available.
    The DGFT classified laptops, tablets, all in one PCs, ultra small form factor computers and servers under HSN 8471 as restricted, permitting import only against a valid Import Authorization; exclusions include desktop computers under the same chapter, spare parts and components, SEZ captive use imports, and IT hardware strictly incidental to capital goods, while importers may obtain multiple authorisations and amend quantities within value constraints.
    CircularsGST - States
    Show AI Summary
    GST rate classification on imitation zari yarn clarified to cover metallised film-based yarns while excluding refunds on specified film inputs.
    Imitation zari thread or yarn manufactured from metallised polyester film or metallised plastic film, whether used alone or blended with other fibres, is classified within the reduced GST rate category for imitation zari; however, polyester (metallised) film and plastic film inputs are not eligible for refund on account of rate inversion.
    CircularsGST - States
    Show AI Summary
    GST applicability on transport, composite supply and pure agent treatments clarified, plus job work and governmental exemptions defined.
    Services of passenger transport and renting of motor vehicles with operators where fuel is included attract GST at 5% with input tax credit within the same line of business; electricity bundled with renting or maintenance is a composite supply taxed with the principal supply while electricity supplied as a pure agent is excluded from the supplier's value; job work for processing barley into malt attracts 5% GST; exemptions for DMFTs and horticulture services/supplies to the public works department are addressed under governmental-authority exemption criteria.
    CircularsGST - States
    Show AI Summary
    Place of supply clarifications alter GST treatment for cross border transport, advertising spaces and co location services.
    Clarification sets out revised criteria for determining the place of supply for transportation of goods, advertising services involving physical spaces, and co location (server/hosting) services; the omission of a prior IGST provision requires reassessment of place of supply rules for cross border transportation, while the circular also specifies treatment for outdoor advertising and IT hosting to ensure uniform GST chargeability, invoicing and compliance across field formations.
    CircularsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Electronic Cash Ledger interest waiver enables regularization of manually cleared Bills of Entry after payment integration is completed.
    The notice requires stakeholders to identify unpaid challans associated with manually issued Out of Charge Bills of Entry, pay the requisite duty through the Electronic Cash Ledger within prescribed timeframes, and enable system reconciliation so that Bills of Entry are regularized. It provides for waiver and refund of interest paid, conditional on compliance with payment deadlines and successful integration of payments into the customs systems.
    CircularsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Body-worn cameras for customs boarding officers mandated; recording from gangway to de-boarding, with safety exceptions and pre-notice.
    Mandate requires Boarding Officers to wear a jacket bearing name and badges and a right side Body Worn Camera that records audio visual footage from approach at the gangway until de boarding; officers must notify the Shipping Agent/Line in advance, devices are standalone without wireless/SIM, and vessel Safety Officers may designate unsafe areas for non use subject to endorsement and cross verification by higher customs authorities.
    NotificationsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Renewal of recognition secures conditional authorisation for clearing and settlement of repo and reverse repo transactions in debt securities.
    Renewal of recognition is granted to AMC Repo Clearing Limited for a one year period, authorising it to clear and settle repo and reverse repo transactions in debt securities traded on a recognized stock exchange. The renewal is conditioned on compliance with regulatory rules and directions and restricts the Clearing Corporation to activities solely related to clearing and settlement of eligible repo and reverse repo transactions.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 257 "Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 257 Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      The documents are two textual versions of Clause/Section 257 concerning proceedings before income-tax authorities: (1) Section 257 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (final/enacted text as presented) and (2) Clause 257 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version. Both declare proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings and treat income-tax authorities as civil courts for certain statutory purposes. The primary difference is the insertion, in the enacted text, of a limiting phrase in subsection (2) - "but not for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." This matters for taxpayers, tax authorities and courts because it adjusts the scope of civil-court status conferred on income-tax authorities. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Section/Clause 257 is located within the Income-tax Act/Bill, 2025 and references specific provisions of two recently enacted central statutes: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (45 of 2023) - sections 229, 233 and 267 - and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023) - section 215 and, in the enacted text, Chapter XXVIII. Coverage: the provision addresses the legal character of proceedings before income-tax authorities by declaring them "judicial proceedings" for certain penal/statutory purposes and by deeming income-tax authorities to be "Civil Court[s]" for a specified statutory purpose. Definitions or explanations: Not stated in the document beyond the cross-references to the cited sections/Chapter in the other statutes.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Section/Clause 257 contains two subsections. Subsection (1) declares that "any proceeding under this Act before an income-tax authority shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding" for the meaning of sections 229 and 267 and "for the purposes of section 233" of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (45 of 2023). Subsection (2) deems every income-tax authority to be a Civil Court for the purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023). The enacted text further qualifies subsection (2) by excluding Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The provision thus creates cross-statutory recognition: tax proceedings acquire the legal status of "judicial proceedings" and income-tax authorities acquire "civil court" status for certain specified statutory references.

      Interpretation

      The text indicates a legislative intent to align procedural and evidentiary characterisations of tax proceedings with provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and to confer certain civil-court attributes under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The explicit citation of particular sections suggests a targeted application rather than a wholesale importation of all features of judicial or civil-court status. The insertion of the negative qualification regarding Chapter XXVIII indicates a deliberate limitation to avoid extending civil-court status into that Chapter. The provision does not expressly list the consequences that follow from deeming tax proceedings "judicial proceedings" or income-tax authorities "Civil Courts" beyond the cross-references.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The only express proviso in the enacted version is the carve-out in subsection (2): income-tax authorities are not to be considered civil courts "for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." No other exceptions, thresholds, or conditions are set out in the text. If further exceptions exist in Rules or other provisions, they are Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A proceeding before an income-tax authority involving assessment or penalty will be treated as a "judicial proceeding" for the application of sections 229 and 267 and for section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The precise consequences depend on those sections' content (Not stated in the document).
      • Example 2: An income-tax authority exercising powers referenced in section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita will be treated as a Civil Court for that limited purpose. However, any procedural entitlement or sanction located in Chapter XXVIII of that statute cannot be invoked against or by the income-tax authority under this deeming (details of Chapter XXVIII: Not stated in the document).

      Interplay

      The provision expressly interacts with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by adopting their terminology and conferring specified legal character on tax proceedings and authorities. The enacted text narrows the interaction with the latter Act by excluding Chapter XXVIII. Any interaction with other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars is Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Bill (Old Version) and the Enacted Section

      Two substantive differences are visible between the texts provided:

      • Non-application carve-out: The enacted Section 257 adds a proviso that income-tax authorities are deemed to be Civil Courts for the purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, "but not for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." The Bill version included only the deeming to be a Civil Court without this exclusion.

      • Stylistic/enactment status: The Bill is labeled "Clause 257 - Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version"; the enacted text is labeled "Section 257 - Income-tax Act, 2025." This reflects passage into law rather than a substantive textual difference beyond the added exclusion. Any other drafting changes: Not stated in the document.

      Practical impact of each change:

      • The added exclusion narrows the deeming effect by preventing the Civil Court characterization from extending to Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Practically, this limits the rights, remedies, or procedural effects conferred by Chapter XXVIII (whatever those may be under the 2023 statute) from attaching to income-tax authorities; conversely, it preserves those Chapter XXVIII provisions as inapplicable to tax authorities. The specific consequences depend on the subject-matter of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (e.g., special powers, procedures, or sanctions), which the document does not explicate. Therefore the operational impact: narrower application of the Civil Court deeming. Details of Chapter XXVIII's content: Not stated in the document.

      • The change from "Clause" to "Section" signals enactment and legal force; the addition of the exclusion therefore reflects parliamentary intent to circumscribe the practical scope of Civil Court status for tax authorities. Any legislative history or reasons for insertion of the exclusion: Not stated in the document.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Tax practitioners should take cognisance that proceedings before income-tax authorities are judicial proceedings for the cited sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; this may affect admissibility of evidence, obligations to maintain records, or procedural safeguards where those sections apply. The enacted exclusion of Chapter XXVIII reduces uncertainty as to whether certain civil-court regimes apply; specific risk implications depend on the content of Chapter XXVIII (Not stated in the document).
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: The deeming as "judicial proceedings" may impose or trigger evidentiary consequences under the referenced sections (for example, penalties for false statements or obstruction under those statutes may apply), so maintaining contemporaneous, accurate records is impliedly important. The text does not prescribe specific record retention timelines or forms (Not stated in the document).

      Key Takeaways

      • Both versions treat proceedings before income-tax authorities as "judicial proceedings" for specified provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
      • Both versions deem income-tax authorities to be "Civil Court[s]" for purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
      • The enacted Section adds a limitation: income-tax authorities are not to be treated as civil courts for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - a narrowing absent from the Bill's Old Version.
      • The limiting clause reduces potential scope creep and clarifies that certain provisions in Chapter XXVIII do not attach to income-tax authorities by virtue of this deeming.
      • Details as to the substantive consequences flowing from the cited sections or from Chapter XXVIII are Not stated in the document; implications therefore depend on those external texts.

      Full Text:

      Section 257 Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax