Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Circulars Central Excise
    Authority to inspect the prosecution work and performance? FOR EVASION OF SERVICE TAX OR CENTRAL EXC...
    Circulars Central Excise
    Whether prosecution once launched can be compound ? FOR EVASION OF SERVICE TAX OR CENTRAL EXCISE :
    Circulars Central Excise
    What is the impact of prosecution under this Circular No. 1009/16/2015-CX - Dated: 23-10-2015 - Cent...
    Circulars Central Excise
    Can withdrawal of sanction order of prosecution is possible. If yes, then what the procedure men...
    Circulars Central Excise
    What is the term of publication of name of person convicted as per this Circular No. 1009/16/2015-CX...
    Circulars Central Excise
    Who will be responsible to monitor cases of prosecution as per this reasons include and how? FOR EVA...
    Circulars Central Excise
    what is the procedure of prosecution? FOR EVASION OF SERVICE TAX OR CENTRAL EXCISE :
    Circulars Central Excise
    Who has authority to sanction prosecution ? FOR EVASION OF SERVICE TAX OR CENTRAL EXCISE :
    Circulars Central Excise
    What is the meaning of term “Habitual Evaders” in terms of prosecution? FOR EVASION OF SERVICE T...
    Circulars Central Excise
    What is the prescribed limit for prosecution proceeding ? FOR EVASION OF SERVICE TAX OR CENTRAL EXCI...
    Circulars Central Excise
    The person who are liable to prosecuted ?-FOR EVASION OF SERVICE TAX OR CENTRAL EXCISE
    Circulars Service Tax
    Whether SBC is levied on all or selected services?
    Circulars Service Tax
    Does a person providing both exempted and taxable service and reversing credit @ 7% of value of exem...
    Circulars Service Tax
    How would liability be determined in case of reverse charge services where services have been receiv...
    Circulars Service Tax
    Whether SBC would be applicable on services covered by Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules (i.e. air travel ...
    Circulars Service Tax
    How would the service tax and Swachh Bharat Cess (SBC) be calculated on restaurant services covered ...
    Circulars Service Tax
    How would the tax (Service Tax and SBC) be calculated on services covered under Rule 2A, 2B or 2C of...
    Circulars Service Tax
    What would be the point of taxation for Swachh Bharat Cess?
    Circulars Service Tax
    Whether Cenvat Credit of the SBC is available?
    Circulars Service Tax
    How will SBC be calculated for services where abatement is allowed?
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Inspection of prosecution work: ensure compliance with prosecution guidelines and address pendency and non-compliance in tax enforcement.
Inspection of prosecution work requires the Director General, Directorate of Performance Management and Chief Commissioners to inspect Commissionerates to verify scrupulous compliance with the Circular's guidelines for launching prosecution. Inspections must examine reasons for pendency and non-compliance in prosecution cases and ensure recording of statistical data during field visits to support oversight of prosecution performance.
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Compounding of offences: administrative authorities may permit settlement by payment and written offer when prosecution is initiated.
Compounding of offences for evasion under central excise and service tax allows the Principal Chief/Chief Commissioner to compound offences on payment of the compounding amount; Section 9A(2) of the Central Excise Act as applied to service tax via section 83 of the Finance Act authorises this, and circulars require that persons against whom prosecution is initiated or contemplated be informed in writing of the offer to compound.
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Prosecution guidelines: sanctions granted after the circular govern cases regardless of offence date, with sanctioned cases reviewed.
Prosecution guidelines apply to all cases where sanction for prosecution is accorded after the circular's issue date, and such cases must be prosecuted according to the circular regardless of the offence date. Sanctioning authorities must review cases in which prosecution has been sanctioned but no complaint filed, reassessing them against the circular's provisions before any complaint is presented.
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Withdrawal of prosecution permitted after final exoneration in parallel quasi judicial proceedings; formal application required to seek withdrawal.
Withdrawal of prosecution is permitted where identical allegations led to the noticee's exoneration in quasi judicial proceedings and that order is final; the senior tax or investigative leadership shall direct the commissionerate to file an application through the public prosecutor requesting judicial permission to withdraw the complaint in accordance with law and prosecution guidelines.
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Publication of convicted persons' names may be sought by the department through courts under central excise and service tax law.
Power exists under the Central Excise statutory framework, as applied to service tax by the Finance Act, to publish the name and place of business of persons convicted under the relevant enactments; courts have exercised this power sparingly, and the department is directed to request courts to invoke this publication power in deserving cases for all convicted persons.
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Prosecution monitoring: Principal Commissioners must track and review cases monthly to ensure satisfactory progress.
The Principal Commissioner/Commissioner must monitor prosecution files monthly, take corrective action where necessary, and inspect the prosecution register in the Prosecution Cell at least once every quarter. Designated supervisors in zonal investigative units must oversee prosecution work. Prosecution registers in prescribed formats are to be maintained, regularly updated and kept in the Commissionerate Prosecution Cell and in zonal units to enable systematic tracking of prosecution cases.
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Prosecution Sanction: mens rea and evidentiary sufficiency determine whether tax evasion prosecution proceeds.
Prosecution proposals for service tax or excise evasion must be examined and forwarded by the adjudicating authority to the sanctioning Principal Chief/Chief Commissioner or Principal/Director General; prosecution requires evidence of mens rea and should not be launched in purely technical or interpretation disputes. Criminal standards (beyond reasonable doubt) must be weighed separately from adjudication findings; prosecution may be initiated before adjudication in serious cases. Investigation reports must be prepared within one month and sanction obtained prior to filing; authorised officers must secure exhibits and coordinate with public prosecutors, with reporting obligations for delays and monthly updates to the sanctioning authority.
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Sanction for prosecution: designated senior authorities must authorize and formalize prosecution before filing criminal complaints.
Sanction for prosecution is required before initiating criminal complaints in service tax and central excise matters. The Principal Chief/Chief Commissioner must sanction routine cases, while the Principal Director General/Director General, CEI must sanction cases investigated by the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence. The sanctioning authority issues a written order and forwards it to the Commissionerate for expeditious filing of the complaint.
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Habitual evasion: prosecution permitted where repeated confirmed demands and substantial cumulative tax evasion or credit misuse.
Prosecution may be initiated against a company or assessee classified as a habitual evader where multiple confirmed demands (at first appellate level or above) for Central Excise duty or Service Tax, or findings of Cenvat credit misuse arising from fraud or suppression, occur within a prior period and the cumulative duty or tax evaded or credit misused meets a substantial monetary threshold; the Offence Register (335J) may be used to identify such assessees.
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Prosecution threshold: prosecution requires evasion exceeding the prescribed monetary limit before proceeding for excise or service tax offences.
Prosecution for evasion of Central Excise duty or Service Tax, or misuse of Cenvat credit in relation to offences specified under sub section (1) of Section 9 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or sub section (1) of Section 89 of the Finance Act, 1994 should normally not be launched unless the evasion meets or exceeds the prescribed monetary threshold set out in the departmental guideline.
Circulars Central Excise
Show AI Summary
Corporate criminal liability: officers and partners can be prosecuted for company service tax or excise evasion.
Persons in charge of and responsible for a company's business are prosecutable alongside the company for service tax or central excise evasion; where an offence by a company is shown to involve the consent, connivance or neglect of a director, manager, secretary or other officer, that individual is deemed guilty. The statutory definition of company includes firms and associations and treats a partner as a director, extending corporate liability principles to service tax prosecutions.
Circulars Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Swachh Bharat Cess applicability: applies to all taxable services except services fully exempt or not leviable to service tax.
Swachh Bharat Cess applies to all taxable services except those that are fully exempt under a statutory notification or are otherwise not leviable to service tax; the cess was imposed by government authority to cover the taxable service base while preserving existing exemptions and non leviability rules.
Circulars Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Cenvat credit reversal does not require separate reversal of Swachh Bharat Cess under the applicable rule per FAQ.
The circular states that Swachh Bharat Cess is not integrated into the Cenvat credit chain; the reversal under Rule 6 requires payment based on the value of exempted services, and therefore a separate reversal of Swachh Bharat Cess is not required when reversing credit under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules.
Circulars Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Point of taxation determines Swachh Bharat Cess liability; payment date triggers reverse charge cess on taxable service.
Point of taxation governs SBC liability for reverse-charge services: the date of payment is the point of taxation and SBC is payable on the value of the taxable service at the prescribed rate when consideration is paid to the service provider.
Circulars Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Swachh Bharat Cess option for services under specified service-tax rule; SBC computed by prescribed formula and fixed for financial year.
Persons liable to pay service tax under the sub rules of rule 6 may elect to discharge Swachh Bharat Cess by applying a prescribed computation to their Service Tax liability; once exercised the election must be applied uniformly to such services and cannot be changed during the financial year.
Circulars Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Swachh Bharat Cess on restaurant services is calculated on the value determined under Service Tax valuation rules, creating a combined levy.
Swachh Bharat Cess on restaurant services is payable on the taxable value determined under the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006; for restaurants, eating joints or messes with any air-conditioning or central heating, the cess and service tax are each applied to the portion of the total charge treated as taxable under those rules, and the combined levy is the sum of the service tax rate and the cess rate applied to that taxable portion.
Circulars Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Service tax calculation for services under Rule 2A/2B/2C: apply combined service tax and SBC to the rule determined value.
Service tax and Swachh Bharat Cess on services governed by Rule 2A, 2B or 2C are computed by multiplying the combined service tax plus SBC rate by the value determined under the relevant rule. For works contract services, applying the combined rate to the rule specified taxable fraction of the contract value produces the operative tax liability; the same approach applies to restaurant and outdoor catering services.
Circulars Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Point of taxation for Swachh Bharat Cess: levy applies where service, invoice and payment occur on or after commencement date.
Because SBC is a new levy on taxable services not in the Negative List or wholly exempt, the Point of Taxation Rules determine liability. SBC does not arise where payment and invoice are issued before the levy's commencement or where payment precedes commencement but invoice is issued within the short prescribed period. SBC is chargeable where service provision, invoice issuance and payment occur on or after the commencement date; it also applies if service is provided on or after commencement but payment was received earlier and invoice is not issued within the short post-commencement period.
Circulars Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Cenvat credit of Swachh Bharat Cess disallowed; SBC not in Cenvat credit chain and not payable using credits.
Cenvat credit for the Swachh Bharat Cess (SBC) is not available because SBC is not integrated into the Cenvat credit chain; consequently SBC cannot be claimed as input credit nor paid using credits of any other duty or tax.
Circulars Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Swachh Bharat Cess calculation: SBC applies same abatement percentage as service tax, on combined taxable rate.
Swachh Bharat Cess is to be levied on the same abatement percentage that applies to service tax; the notification prescribing abatement for service tax applies equally to SBC, so the combined rate (service tax plus SBC) is applied to the abated value to determine the effective levy.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Comparison of section 257 "Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

9 September, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Section 257 Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings.

Income-tax Act, 2025

At a Glance

The documents are two textual versions of Clause/Section 257 concerning proceedings before income-tax authorities: (1) Section 257 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (final/enacted text as presented) and (2) Clause 257 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version. Both declare proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings and treat income-tax authorities as civil courts for certain statutory purposes. The primary difference is the insertion, in the enacted text, of a limiting phrase in subsection (2) - "but not for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." This matters for taxpayers, tax authorities and courts because it adjusts the scope of civil-court status conferred on income-tax authorities. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

Background & Scope

Statutory hooks: Section/Clause 257 is located within the Income-tax Act/Bill, 2025 and references specific provisions of two recently enacted central statutes: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (45 of 2023) - sections 229, 233 and 267 - and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023) - section 215 and, in the enacted text, Chapter XXVIII. Coverage: the provision addresses the legal character of proceedings before income-tax authorities by declaring them "judicial proceedings" for certain penal/statutory purposes and by deeming income-tax authorities to be "Civil Court[s]" for a specified statutory purpose. Definitions or explanations: Not stated in the document beyond the cross-references to the cited sections/Chapter in the other statutes.

Statutory Provision Mode

Text & Scope

Section/Clause 257 contains two subsections. Subsection (1) declares that "any proceeding under this Act before an income-tax authority shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding" for the meaning of sections 229 and 267 and "for the purposes of section 233" of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (45 of 2023). Subsection (2) deems every income-tax authority to be a Civil Court for the purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023). The enacted text further qualifies subsection (2) by excluding Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The provision thus creates cross-statutory recognition: tax proceedings acquire the legal status of "judicial proceedings" and income-tax authorities acquire "civil court" status for certain specified statutory references.

Interpretation

The text indicates a legislative intent to align procedural and evidentiary characterisations of tax proceedings with provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and to confer certain civil-court attributes under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The explicit citation of particular sections suggests a targeted application rather than a wholesale importation of all features of judicial or civil-court status. The insertion of the negative qualification regarding Chapter XXVIII indicates a deliberate limitation to avoid extending civil-court status into that Chapter. The provision does not expressly list the consequences that follow from deeming tax proceedings "judicial proceedings" or income-tax authorities "Civil Courts" beyond the cross-references.

Exceptions/Provisos

The only express proviso in the enacted version is the carve-out in subsection (2): income-tax authorities are not to be considered civil courts "for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." No other exceptions, thresholds, or conditions are set out in the text. If further exceptions exist in Rules or other provisions, they are Not stated in the document.

Illustrations

  • Example 1: A proceeding before an income-tax authority involving assessment or penalty will be treated as a "judicial proceeding" for the application of sections 229 and 267 and for section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The precise consequences depend on those sections' content (Not stated in the document).
  • Example 2: An income-tax authority exercising powers referenced in section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita will be treated as a Civil Court for that limited purpose. However, any procedural entitlement or sanction located in Chapter XXVIII of that statute cannot be invoked against or by the income-tax authority under this deeming (details of Chapter XXVIII: Not stated in the document).

Interplay

The provision expressly interacts with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by adopting their terminology and conferring specified legal character on tax proceedings and authorities. The enacted text narrows the interaction with the latter Act by excluding Chapter XXVIII. Any interaction with other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars is Not stated in the document.

Differences between the Bill (Old Version) and the Enacted Section

Two substantive differences are visible between the texts provided:

  • Non-application carve-out: The enacted Section 257 adds a proviso that income-tax authorities are deemed to be Civil Courts for the purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, "but not for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." The Bill version included only the deeming to be a Civil Court without this exclusion.

  • Stylistic/enactment status: The Bill is labeled "Clause 257 - Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version"; the enacted text is labeled "Section 257 - Income-tax Act, 2025." This reflects passage into law rather than a substantive textual difference beyond the added exclusion. Any other drafting changes: Not stated in the document.

Practical impact of each change:

  • The added exclusion narrows the deeming effect by preventing the Civil Court characterization from extending to Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Practically, this limits the rights, remedies, or procedural effects conferred by Chapter XXVIII (whatever those may be under the 2023 statute) from attaching to income-tax authorities; conversely, it preserves those Chapter XXVIII provisions as inapplicable to tax authorities. The specific consequences depend on the subject-matter of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (e.g., special powers, procedures, or sanctions), which the document does not explicate. Therefore the operational impact: narrower application of the Civil Court deeming. Details of Chapter XXVIII's content: Not stated in the document.

  • The change from "Clause" to "Section" signals enactment and legal force; the addition of the exclusion therefore reflects parliamentary intent to circumscribe the practical scope of Civil Court status for tax authorities. Any legislative history or reasons for insertion of the exclusion: Not stated in the document.

Practical Implications

  • Compliance and risk areas: Tax practitioners should take cognisance that proceedings before income-tax authorities are judicial proceedings for the cited sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; this may affect admissibility of evidence, obligations to maintain records, or procedural safeguards where those sections apply. The enacted exclusion of Chapter XXVIII reduces uncertainty as to whether certain civil-court regimes apply; specific risk implications depend on the content of Chapter XXVIII (Not stated in the document).
  • Record-keeping/evidence points: The deeming as "judicial proceedings" may impose or trigger evidentiary consequences under the referenced sections (for example, penalties for false statements or obstruction under those statutes may apply), so maintaining contemporaneous, accurate records is impliedly important. The text does not prescribe specific record retention timelines or forms (Not stated in the document).

Key Takeaways

  • Both versions treat proceedings before income-tax authorities as "judicial proceedings" for specified provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Both versions deem income-tax authorities to be "Civil Court[s]" for purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
  • The enacted Section adds a limitation: income-tax authorities are not to be treated as civil courts for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - a narrowing absent from the Bill's Old Version.
  • The limiting clause reduces potential scope creep and clarifies that certain provisions in Chapter XXVIII do not attach to income-tax authorities by virtue of this deeming.
  • Details as to the substantive consequences flowing from the cited sections or from Chapter XXVIII are Not stated in the document; implications therefore depend on those external texts.

Full Text:

Section 257 Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings.

Topics

Acts Income Tax