Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Maximum Marginal Rate and Surcharge for Discretionary Trusts: ITAT Special Bench Clarifies Slab-Base...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Classification of Quicklime under the Customs Tariff: CESTAT Bangalore's Reaffirmation of HSN-Based ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of Reassessment Notices Post-Ashish Agarwal and TOLA: Limitation and Sanction u/ss 149 and ...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Seizure, Provisional Release and Limitation: Supreme Court on the Interplay of Sections 110(2), 110A...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Prima Facie Adjustments v. Substantive Adjudication: Procedural Boundaries in Return Processing (CPC...
    Survey, Unaccounted Stock (Eye-Estimates) and the Limits of Section 130: Statutory Primacy of Sectio...
    Input Tax Credit Abuse (ITC Fraud) and Judicial Review: Delhi High Court on Natural Justice, RUDs an...
    Writ Jurisdiction and Statutory Appeal in GST Fraud Investigations: A Judicial Re-affirmation
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 11(3) Post-Amendment, Accumulated Income and the Sixth Year: Legal Interpretation, Procedura...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Form No.10B & Section 119(2)(b): Condonation of Delay in Tax Exemption Claims: Principles, Precedent...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Regulatory Ambit of Import of Second-Hand Electronic Capital Goods: Classification, Exemption and Pr...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 195, DTAAs and Software Licences: A Practical Framework for Withholding Tax
    Provisional Attachment under GST: Draconian Powers, Statutory Time-Bars and the Rule of Law: Interpr...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 263 Revisited: Jurisdictional Boundaries Where AO Takes a Plausible View on 80G Claims
    Case LawsCustoms
    Provisional Release in Customs Law: Balancing Revenue Protection and Commercial Fairness - A Compara...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Conditional Re-export and Revenue Safeguards: Judicially Crafted Remedies in Customs Adjudication
    GST Limitation Regime vs Executive Notifications: Judicial Review of Time-Limit Notifications under ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 11(3) After Finance Act, 2022: Utilization of Accumulated Income - Deemed Income, Vesting an...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    When Can an ITAT Reopen a Decision? Distinguishing Prior Binding Precedent from Subsequent Case-Law
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Faceless Assessment and Jurisdiction: Reconciling JAO Roles with NFAC u/ss 144B & 151A (JAO / FAO)
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Discretionary trusts taxed at maximum marginal rate must have surcharge computed under slab and threshold rules, not automatically at top rate.
    For private discretionary trusts taxed at the maximum marginal rate under sections 164/167B, the term denotes the highest basic slab rate under the Finance Act, but surcharge on that tax must be computed according to the Finance Act's slab- and threshold-based surcharge provisions; if the trust's total income does not cross the statutory surcharge threshold, no surcharge is leviable despite basic tax being at the top slab rate.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Quicklime classification: impure lime falls under specific tariff heading, not high purity calcium oxide, per HSN purity standard.
    The imported material, chemically tested as impure calcium oxide (about 92.2% CaO with mineral impurities), is classifiable under Heading 2522 10 00 as Quicklime. Chapter Note 1 to Chapter 25 must be read contextually and does not disqualify quicklime from Chapter 25 where the tariff text and HSN Explanatory Notes expressly contemplate calcined quicklime. Heading 2825 is confined to chemically pure calcium oxide (approximately 98% CaO) and its residuary sub-heading cannot displace the specific Heading 2522 unless that purity threshold and absence of impurities are met.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Reassessment notices: surviving-time computation under COVID-era relief and new limitation rules renders late notices time-barred.
    The court held that in transitional reassessment cases the appropriate sanctioning authority is determined by when the original three-year expiry fell within the COVID-era relief window, so approval by the ordinarily specified authority for within-three-year cases suffices; limitation is governed by a two-step surviving-time computation measured from the original notice as of the relief-window terminal date, excluding stayed periods and the time allowed to reply, and any later notice issued beyond that surviving time is time-barred under the substituted limitation regime read with the time-relief statute and the legal-fiction continuity.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Seizure of goods: six month statutory limit for issuing show cause notice is mandatory despite provisional release.
    The six month limit in Section 110(2) for issuing a show cause notice after seizure under Section 110(1) is mandatory; only a single six month extension under the first proviso is permissible. Provisional release under Section 110A does not suspend, extend or neutralise that time bar. The 2018 second proviso making the six month rule inapplicable where provisional release is ordered is a substantive change and does not validate pre amendment seizures prolonged without notice.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Prima facie adjustments cannot decide debatable legal claims in return processing; contested deductions require scrutiny procedures.
    When a claimed deduction depends on timely deposit of employee welfare contributions and the legal question is debatable or pending higher adjudication, summary processing adjustments cannot be used to resolve the dispute; such matters require scrutiny or reassessment procedures and the validity of any processing-stage action must be judged by the law and facts existing at the time of processing.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Survey discovered unaccounted stock must be assessed under sections 35(6) and 73/74, not via section 130.
    Tax liability for unaccounted goods found in a survey must be determined under section 35(6) read with sections 73/74 of the GST Act; section 130 cannot be used to quantify tax or levy penalty in such cases. The statutory cross reference to sections 73/74 requires adherence to their procedural safeguards, and quantification based solely on eye estimates during survey is insufficient without proper weighment or verification.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit fraud: writ relief limited where appeals exist; hearings and raw RUDs generally suffice absent prejudice.
    The High Court held that writ jurisdiction must be exercised with restraint in complex ITC fraud matters appealable under Section 107; at least one personal hearing and provision of RUDs as collected by the Department generally suffice absent demonstrable prejudice; detailed allocation of penal liability under Sections 73/74/75(13)/122 requires adjudicatory or appellate factfinding and cannot be resolved in writ proceedings.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Writ jurisdiction limited where statutory appeal exists for fact intensive GST fraud investigations; appellate forum preferred for evidentiary disputes.
    The High Court reaffirmed that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is generally inappropriate where a statutory appeal exists for fact intensive GST investigations alleging fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit through fake invoices. Courts should confine review to jurisdictional defects or breaches of natural justice; detailed evidentiary disputes involving voluminous Relied Upon Documents, recorded statements and transaction chains are better resolved by the specialised appellate forum, which should hear appeals on merits and avoid dismissing on limitation grounds where appropriate.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Prospectivity of tax amendments: changes to accumulation rules apply from their effective date, not to prior accruals.
    Interpretation of section 11(3) concludes that, under the pre-amendment text, accumulated charitable funds could be applied in the year immediately following the five-year accumulation period; the 2022/2023 amendment removing that year was treated as prospective under the presumption against retrospective tax imposition. Separately, corrections by the Centralised Processing Centre under section 143(1) are confined to mechanistic errors and should not resolve debatable substantive questions of statutory interpretation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of delay in tax exemption claims should favor substantive rights over mere technical filing defects when bona fide.
    Equitable application of the Condonation Power requires authorities to admit late Form No.10B filings when short delays or credible explanations would otherwise strip claimants of substantive exemption rights; procedural defects such as digital-signature technicalities must be tested against documentary e-filing evidence and substantial compliance, while administrative safeguards permit subsequent verification of the audit report.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Imported second hand MFDs meeting HSE technical criteria can be exempt from BIS registration and obtain conditional provisional release.
    Where importers produce prima facie evidence that imported second hand MFDs meet the Highly Specialized Equipment (HSE) criteria (limited units per model and physical thresholds such as weight >80 kg), those devices are exempt from compulsory BIS registration under the CRO and fall within the FTP residuary category for second hand capital goods; accordingly, provisional release may be granted on conditions (bond/guarantee and document verification) without prejudice to final adjudication.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Royalty characterisation for software determines withholding-non exclusive copies/licenses generally not subject to TDS unless income is chargeable.
    Payments for off the shelf/shrink wrapped software or hardware embedded software that constitute a resale of a copyrighted article or a grant of a non exclusive, restricted licence for internal use do not ordinarily constitute royalty under section 9(1)(vi) or typical DTAA provisions; withholding under section 195 arises only where the non resident's receipts are chargeable to tax in India (e.g., due to a PE or transfer of substantive copyright rights), and retrospective domestic amendments cannot be used to impose past withholding obligations on payors who lacked notice of the expanded definition.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional attachment limits: fixed statutory expiry prevents re-issuance of lapsed attachment orders on same property.
    A provisional attachment under the CGST scheme automatically ceases on expiry of the statutory time limit; once it has lapsed by operation of law, tax authorities have no power to re issue or renew a fresh provisional attachment over the same property on substantially the same grounds, and any such fresh order is void. Procedural rules or executive instructions cannot be used to circumvent this statutory safeguard and must be aligned with the primary legislation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revisional jurisdiction cannot overturn a plausible assessment on charitable deductions where donation conditions are met.
    Tribunals held that Explanation 2 limiting CSR expenditure as a business deduction operates within the business income chapter and does not ipso facto bar claims under the donations regime; specific statutory exceptions indicate Parliament's choice to restrict only certain items. A mandatory CSR outlay does not automatically negate donation character where there is no material return, provided donee approval and documentary evidence are established. On revisional power, section 263 cannot be invoked to overturn an assessing officer's tenable, precedent backed view where enquiries were made; revision is justified only if the AO's conclusion is legally untenable or there was no inquiry.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional release of seized imports permitted subject to proportionate security, favouring bonds over bank guarantees before adjudication.
    Provisional release under Section 110 is permitted subject to proportionate protections: payment of duties as self-assessed; payment of a substantive portion (commonly fifty percent) of any departmental differential; and execution of enforceable bonds for the balance. Bank guarantees or cash security for speculative fines prior to adjudication are often disproportionate and may be replaced by bonds, though deliberate mis-declaration, concealment or prohibited imports justify stricter protective measures.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Conditional re-export of detained imports permitted when revenue is secured by enforceable financial guarantees and timelines.
    Courts may permit re-export of detained imports where the anticipated departmental remedy is monetary, provided the importer furnishes enforceable financial safeguards-typically a bond quantifying revenue exposure and a bank guarantee for a calibrated portion of the redetermined value-and complies with prescribed timelines; such orders are without prejudice to the Department's right to complete investigations, adjudicate, assess differential duties, and impose penalties.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Force majeure causation in GST limitation: proximate cause and mandatory council recommendation govern valid time limit extensions.
    Section 168A empowers executive modification of GST limitation periods but operates as delegated legislation subject to strict construction: valid exercise requires (i) a qualifying force majeure event, (ii) inability to complete prescribed actions, and (iii) proximate causation by that event; GST Council recommendation is a mandatory precondition and GIC substitution or post-facto ratification does not cure statutory defect.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Accumulated trust income: Tribunal rulings treat the 2022 amendment as prospective, preserving the prior six year utilisation window.
    Two Tribunal benches held that the Finance Act, 2022 amendment to the accumulation provision is prospective; accumulations made before 1 April 2022 remain governed by the prior law including the additional one year grace, and utilisation within that six year window cannot be taxed for AY 2023 24. The Tribunals relied on the presumption against retrospectivity, the Finance Bill memorandum stating an effective date of 1 April 2023, and fairness doctrines to conclude Parliament did not intend to curtail vested rights retroactively.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tribunal recall power limited: later judicial overruling alone cannot reopen finalized tax orders under review rules.
    The tribunal's power to amend is limited to rectifying a mistake apparent from the record existing at the time of the original order or to taking into account contemporaneous binding precedent not placed before it; a subsequent overruling or clarification by a superior court cannot alone justify recall, in light of the explanatory bar in Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC and related authorities.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Concurrent jurisdiction between JAO and faceless authorities affirmed; JAO may initiate reassessment followed by faceless assessment.
    The faceless scheme and RMS produce information that may be surfaced to the JAO, permitting the JAO to conduct the pre-notice inquiry and form satisfaction to issue a notice initiating reassessment; thereafter records may be transmitted for faceless assessment via automated allocation, embodying a two-stage model that preserves both JAO initiation authority and central faceless assessment.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 209 "Tax on income from bonds or Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising from their transfer." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      5 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 209 Tax on income from bonds or Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising from their transfer.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      These documents reproduce Clause 209 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) and Section 209 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 as enacted. Both provisions impose special tax treatment for non-residents on income from certain bonds and Global Depository Receipts (GDRs) purchased in foreign currency and on capital gains arising on their transfer. The changes between the Bill and the enacted Section are primarily textual, reference-based and procedural in nature; they affect computation wording, cross-references to other sections, and a minor definitional cross-reference. Affected parties: non-resident investors, financial intermediaries (approved intermediaries), Indian issuing companies and tax administration. Effective date or enactment date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause/Section 209, appearing in the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (old version) and in the Income-tax Act, 2025 respectively. The provision is located within the special provisions relating to non-residents and foreign companies. The text covers income from (i) interest on specified bonds issued by Indian companies or public sector companies and purchased in foreign currency; (ii) dividends on Global Depository Receipts acquired in foreign currency through an approved intermediary; and (iii) long-term capital gains on transfer of those bonds or GDRs. The enacted section also contains procedural provisions governing deductions, returns, and certain transitional/amalgamation situations. Definitions provided in the enacted section include 'approved intermediary' (as per a Central Government-notified scheme) and a cross-reference defining 'Global Depository Receipts' (section 193(4)(a) in the Act). The Bill version contains similar material but uses a different cross-reference for GDRs (section 190(4)(a)).

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The provision applies to an assessee who is a non-resident and whose total income includes any of the incomes specified in the statutory Table. The Table enumerates four entries:

      • Interest on (a) bonds of an Indian company issued under a Central Government notified scheme, or (b) bonds of a public sector company sold by the Government, when purchased in foreign currency - taxed at 10%.
      • Dividends on Global Depository Receipts - where the GDRs are issued/re-issued under notified schemes and purchased in foreign currency through an approved intermediary - taxed at 10%.
      • Long-term capital gains on transfer of the bonds or GDRs referred to above - taxed at 12.5%.
      • The remainder: total income as reduced by the incomes in items 1-3 - in the enacted section described as "Rates in force"; in the Bill as "Income-tax chargeable on such income."

      Interpretation

      The enacted text frames the tax liability of a non-resident as "the aggregate of income-tax computed at the rate specified in column C applied on the corresponding income specified in column B." This language emphasises a rate-applied computation for each head listed. The Bill phrasing (aggregate of the amounts mentioned in column C) is functionally similar but less explicit about the computation methodology. The enacted provision also expressly excludes application of section 72(6) for computation of long-term capital gains on these specified assets.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Several limiting or procedural provisions are present:

      • Where a non-resident's gross total income consists only of interest and/or dividends as specified (items 1 and 2), no deductions are allowed under enumerated provisions (enacted section cites sections 28 to 58, 60 and 61; Bill cited sections 26 to 61).
      • Where the gross total income includes any of items 1-3, the gross total income is to be reduced by such income and deductions under Chapter VIII are to be allowed as if the reduced gross total income were the gross total income of the assessee.
      • A non-resident need not furnish a return u/s 263(1) if total income in the year consisted only of the interest/dividend incomes in items 1-2 and tax was deducted at source under Chapter XIX-B.
      • Transitional/amalgamation rule: where GDRs or bonds are acquired by an assessee in an amalgamated or resulting company by virtue of holding such instruments in the amalgamating or demerged company, the same provisions apply to such GDRs or bonds.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A non-resident holds interest-bearing bonds of an Indian company purchased in foreign currency and receives interest of X in the year. The interest is taxed at 10% under item 1. Not stated in the document whether grossing up, surcharges or cesses apply beyond the stated rate.
      • Example 2: A non-resident sells long-term GDRs (acquired in foreign currency through an approved intermediary) and realises capital gain Y. The long-term capital gain is taxed at 12.5% as per item 3. Not stated in the document whether indexation or specific computation method for capital gain is modified beyond the exclusion of section 72(6).

      Interplay

      The enacted section cross-references other statutory provisions: Chapters and sections governing deductions (Sections 28-58, 60, 61), Chapter VIII deductions, section 72(6) (specifically excluded), the return filing provision referenced (section 263(1) in the texts), Chapter XIX-B (TDS provisions) and the definition of GDRs (section 193(4)(a) in the Act text; Bill referenced section 190(4)(a)). The documents do not reproduce the content of those cross-referenced provisions; therefore detailed interaction mechanics are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Clause 209 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) and Section 209 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

      TopicBill (Clause 209 Old Version)Enacted Section 209Practical impact
      Computation wording"aggregate of the amounts mentioned in column C thereof.""aggregate of income-tax computed at the rate specified in the column C applied on the corresponding income specified in column B."clearer computational method in the enacted text ensuring rates are applied to corresponding income heads rather than potentially interpreted as flat sums.
      Residual income wording (Table item 4)"Income-tax chargeable on such income.""Rates in force."enacted text signals application of prevailing tax rates to the residual income; the Bill phrase might have invited alternative interpretations of chargeability. Exact fiscal consequences Not stated in the document.
      Cross-references to deduction sectionsExcludes deductions u/ss 26 to 61 (and certain sub-clauses) and under Chapter VIII.Excludes deductions u/ss 28 to 58, 60 and 61 (and certain sub-clauses) and under Chapter VIII.the enacted text alters the catalogue of excluded deduction sections; which specific deductions are affected is Not stated in the document.
      Definition cross-reference for "Global Depository Receipts"Cross-refers to section 190(4)(a).Cross-refers to section 193(4)(a).depends on the substantive definitions in those sections-Not stated in the document.
      Minor drafting/typo correctionsContains editorial notes/corrections in the Bill (e.g., "as per with" corrected to "as per").Polished enacted language ("as may be notified by the Central Government").reduces ambiguity; no substantive policy change apparent from document.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Non-resident taxpayers receiving the enumerated incomes must ensure correct application of the specified rates (10% for interest/dividend; 12.5% for long-term capital gains) and must verify whether their gross total income consists solely of those heads to determine deductibility limits and return filing obligations. The enacted text's explicit computation language reduces ambiguity when computing aggregate tax on the heads in the Table.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: The provision emphasises acquisition "in foreign currency" and purchase "through an approved intermediary" for GDRs; therefore investors and intermediaries should retain evidence of currency of purchase and intermediary approval status under a Central Government-notified scheme. Not stated in the document are the particulars of the scheme or the certification/documentation required by the approved intermediary; those details are Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Both texts impose special fixed rates for non-residents on interest (10%), dividends on GDRs (10%) and long-term capital gains on transfer of such assets (12.5%).
      • The enacted section clarifies computation language - "income-tax computed at the rate specified" - whereas the Bill used a less explicit phrase "aggregate of the amounts mentioned". Practical effect: clearer computational instruction in the enacted text.
      • Cross-reference differences: enacted section cites deduction sections as 28-58, 60 and 61; the Bill cited 26-61. This narrows the list of excluded deductions in the enacted text relative to the Bill; practical impact depends on which specific provisions were moved/excluded (details Not stated in the document).
      • The enacted section uses a different cross-reference for the statutory definition of "Global Depository Receipts" (section 193(4)(a)) versus the Bill's section 190(4)(a). The practical significance depends on the definitions in those sections (Not stated in the document).
      • The enacted provision replaces the Bill's phrase "Income-tax chargeable on such income" for the residual income with "Rates in force", which suggests that the balance of income will be taxed under prevailing rates rather than by reference to a specific computation language in the Table. The exact fiscal effect is Not stated in the document.
      • Procedural provisions on returns and applicability on amalgamation are retained in substance; they require documentary corroboration for threshold compliance (Not stated in the document as to the precise documentary standards).

      Full Text:

      Section 209 Tax on income from bonds or Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising from their transfer.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax