Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Upholding the Transfer of Assessment Proceedings u/s 127: A Judicial Perspective
    Case LawsService Tax
    Navigating the Taxation Labyrinth: The Supreme Court's Guidance on Transfer of Right to Use Goods
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Earnest-Money Deposits under SARFAESI Rules
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    The Generality vs. Enumeration Principle: A Key to Interpreting Delegated Rule-Making Power: Validit...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Share Premium Addition u/s 68: Demystifying Share Premium Transactions
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Intricacies of Income Tax Penalty u/s 271(1)(c): Fairness in Tax Administration
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Ensuring Fair Procedure before declaring Fraud in Bank Loan: Providing Relevant Documents and Opport...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reassessment Proceedings: Navigating the Scope and Limitations under Income Tax Act
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Complexities of Search and Seizure Assessments: Unraveling the Intricacies of Section...
    Decoding the Judgement: Navigating the Complexities of ITC Eligibility under the GST Regime
    Excess stock found during survey: Navigating the Intricacies of UPGST / CGST Act and Invoking Wrong ...
    Striking a Balance: Judicial Interpretation of GST Provisions on Record-Keeping and Penalties
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Interim Orders and the Limits of Article 142: Safeguarding Natural Justice Balancing Judicial Powers...
    Upholding Fairness and Transparency in Insolvency Resolution: A Landmark Judgment on the IBC
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Supreme Court Clarifies Vicarious Liability of Directors in Cheque Dishonour Cases
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Interim Compensation in Cheque Dishonor Cases: Discretion and Due Process, Scope of the word "May"
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Unraveling the Principles of Delay Condonation: A Comprehensive Analysis by the Supreme Court
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting Section 80G Provisions: ITAT's Stance on Charitable Institution Registration
    Case LawsCustoms
    Monetary Limits for Filing Appeals: Analyzing the CESTAT Judgment on Binding Nature of CBIC Instruct...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting the Scope and Limits of Sections 153A and 153C: A Judicial Perspective
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Transfer of assessment proceedings for coordinated investigations and administrative convenience upheld where procedural safeguards and factual links exist.
    The judgment explains that transfers of assessment proceedings pursuant to the statutory transfer power may be justified for coordinated enquiries and administrative convenience, provided the decision is not capricious or mala fide. Authorities must afford an opportunity to be heard and consider objections; where factual indicia exist - for example, disclosed transactions such as unsecured loans with searched persons - centralisation can be sustained. The convenience of the assessee is relevant but subservient to effective adjudication and tax collection, and transfers supported by procedural compliance and factual nexus are not arbitrary.
    Case LawsService Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Transfer of right to use goods: contracts retaining operational control are service arrangements, not deemed sales under VAT.
    The issue is whether supply agreements for cranes, trailers and tank trucks amount to a transfer of the right to use goods under the deemed sale provision. Applying the five BSNL tests-availability of goods, consensus on identity, transferee's legal right to use, exclusivity of use, and non transferability by owner-the contracts failed to meet the criteria. Contractors retained possession, crew, fuel, maintenance and liability, and transferees had only permissive use without effective control, so the arrangements were services, not deemed sales under VAT/sales tax.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Forfeiture of earnest-money deposits under SARFAESI rules stands as a statutory consequence, limiting equitable intervention.
    The analysis affirms that Rule 9(5) of the SARFAESI Rules prescribes an express statutory forfeiture of earnest-money deposits arising from auction terms, and that Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, addressing contractual damages, do not apply to such statutory forfeitures. Unjust enrichment and equitable considerations cannot supplant a clear statutory forfeiture, and subsequent recovery by the secured creditor does not negate the forfeiture, except in narrowly defined exceptional circumstances where equity may justify relief.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Generality vs. enumeration principle affirms broad delegated rule making power, upholding rules that further an Act's statutory purposes.
    The Court held that Rule 9(3) is intra vires because the general delegated rule making power in section 29A(1) authorises rules that carry out the Act's purposes even when not covered by enumerated heads. Applying the generality vs. enumeration principle, the Court found the enumerated matters in section 29A(2) illustrative and not restrictive, and concluded Rule 9(3) furthers the misconduct chapter's object of maintaining ethical standards and preventing wrongful threshold dismissal of genuine complaints.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Burden of proof in share premium cases: failure to prove investor identity and genuineness sustains addition under section 68.
    The assessment of share premium under section 68 requires the assessee to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of investors who subscribe at a premium. The court scrutinised disparate allotments made on consecutive days, examined subscribing companies' financials, and applied the doctrine of "source of source" restrictively, holding that incorporation papers or bank payments alone do not discharge the burden. Absent cogent evidence tracing funds to lawful origin and demonstrating commercial rationale for large premiums, additions under section 68 are supportable.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Strict construction of penalty provisions prevents penalty where taxpayer disclosed omitted income before assessment notice.
    The legal focal point is whether Section 271(1)(c) can be invoked where an assessee disclosed omitted income and paid differential tax before initiation of reassessment. Penal provisions require strict construction, and Explanation 1 treats a pre-notice satisfactory explanation and admission of additional income as accepted, precluding characterization as concealment. Additionally, a penalty notice must specify the particular ground for proceeding; failure to do so renders the notice defective and undermines the basis for penalty.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Right to be heard: affected parties must receive documents underlying fraud allegations and be allowed inspection and rebuttal.
    Classification of a loan account as fraud invokes the Principles of Natural Justice, requiring disclosure of the documents forming the basis of a Show Cause Notice and inspection access to bank and Resolution Professional records so the affected party can identify required documents, receive copies, and submit a meaningful reply within specified timelines, with scope to request a personal hearing.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Scope of reassessment: AO may address newly noticed income but remains constrained by the recorded reasons for reopening.
    Where the AO has recorded reasons to believe income escaped assessment, the AO may assess or reassess issues that come to notice during reassessment, but if no additions or modifications are ultimately made in respect of the issues that formed the basis for reopening, the AO cannot make additions or modifications relating solely to other matters that were part of the original assessment. Explanation 3 applies only after reassessment power is validly invoked and cannot be used to deviate from or supplant the recorded reasons.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Corroboration requirement for search statements: unsupported search statements cannot sustain additions without linked incriminating material and fair cross examination.
    Additions for alleged accommodation entries cannot rest solely on statements recorded during search operations; such statements require corroboration by material found in the search that is specifically linked to the assessee. The assessing officer must articulate a factual nexus between seized group material and the assessee, and procedural fairness-including provision of relevant statements and opportunity for cross-examination-is essential. Cure provisions do not validate jurisdictional defects arising from absence of requisite notice or lack of incriminating material.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit eligibility clarified: refund for unutilised ITC limited to inverted duty where input goods tax exceeds output supplies.
    The court construes Section 54(3) narrowly: refund of unutilised ITC for inverted duty arises only where tax on input goods exceeds tax on output supplies. It upholds the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) and Section 16(4), confirms that ITC is subject to legislatively prescribed conditions and time limits, and clarifies that the non-obstante clause in Section 16(2) does not override separate restrictions such as Section 16(4). Affected petitioners may invoke circulars and have eligible ITC claims processed where returns met the prescribed extended filing position.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Determination of tax on unaccounted stock must proceed under Sections 73 and 74, not Section 130.
    The Court held that tax determination for excess or unaccounted stock discovered in a survey must proceed under the statutory assessment procedures for undisclosed goods rather than by invoking the survey provision. The assessment code prescribes the exclusive mechanism for quantifying and demanding tax, and survey powers cannot be used to supplant the prescribed steps for computation, notice and imposition of tax or penalty on unaccounted goods.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Record-keeping obligations: failure attracts a capped statutory penalty and invalidates arbitrary confiscation without due process.
    The judgment emphasises that registered persons must maintain prescribed books and electronic records under Section 35 and related rules, and that any determination of tax on unaccounted goods must follow the show cause procedures for assessing tax liability. It finds that conditions for confiscation under Section 130 were not met and that penalties must be imposed in accordance with the statutory bifurcation in Section 122, with the offences in question attracting only the capped penalty, thereby underscoring procedural limits on enforcement powers.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Limits on Article 142: extraordinary power cannot automatically vacate interim stays; natural justice and supervisory jurisdiction must be preserved.
    Limits on the Supreme Court's extraordinary jurisdiction were defined to prevent blanket, time based vacation of interim stays; equitable power cannot deprive non parties of substantive benefits or negate the right to be heard. The Court confined vacation rules to cases where interim relief was granted without notice, instructed High Courts to grant limited ad interim relief, prioritise vacation applications, avoid routine time bound disposal directives, and recognised that past automatic vacations that led to concluded trials raise finality concerns while endorsing judicial superintendence and natural justice as constitutional constraints.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Insolvency plan compliance: failure to acknowledge creditor claims or secure approvals undermines approved resolution plans.
    The court held that a recall application grounded in lack of notice and alleged misrepresentation is maintainable under principles of natural justice. It found the resolution plan non-compliant with Section 30(2) read with Regulations 37 and 38-specifically for failing to acknowledge a creditor's claim, misrecording the payable amount, omitting secured creditor classification despite a charge, and proposing use of third-party statutory land without necessary approvals-deficiencies that materially affected the plan's transparency and treatment of creditor classes.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Vicarious liability of directors clarified: specific averments required to link a director to company affairs before liability attaches.
    The Court held that vicarious liability of a director in cheque dishonour cases cannot be invoked by merely reproducing statutory language or alleging directorship; complaints must contain specific factual averments showing how the director was responsible for or in charge of the company's day to day affairs to link the director to issuance or dishonour of negotiable instruments.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Interim compensation discretion: courts must prima facie assess claims and defences before ordering payment under Section 143A.
    The Court interpreted Section 143A(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act as conferring a discretionary power to order interim compensation, holding that the word "may" cannot be read as mandatory. Courts must prima facie assess the complainant's case and the accused's defence; the presumption under section 139 alone does not suffice. Interim compensation may be directed only when a prima facie case is established, with the quantum determined after considering transaction nature, parties' relationship, and the accused's paying capacity, and brief reasons must be recorded.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of delay: courts require sufficient cause, balancing strict limitation rules with liberal remedial discretion.
    Principles of condonation of delay require balancing the Limitation Act's public policy against stale litigation: Section 3 is to be strictly interpreted while Section 5 is to be construed liberally to allow judicial discretion where sufficient cause is shown. Discretion remains limited by considerations such as inordinate delay, negligence, and lack of due diligence, and prior decisions granting condonation do not automatically justify relief unless the factual matrices are substantially similar.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Registration under Section 80G: provisional approval permits subsequent final registration regardless of prior commencement of activities.
    The Tribunal held that institutions granted provisional approval under the First Proviso to Section 80G(5) are entitled to apply for final registration under the proviso's final-registration clause, and that the relevant date of commencement is to be counted from activities undertaken after grant of provisional registration; a prior commencement of activities before provisional grant cannot alone justify rejection of a final-approval application.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Binding nature of departmental instructions vs natural justice: tribunals may prioritize procedural fairness over monetary thresholds.
    The CESTAT held that CBIC instructions bind departmental officers but do not bind courts and tribunals, which must safeguard natural justice. The Tribunal found the appellate order defective for failing to remit valuation reassessment to the proper officer as statutorily required, treated related Bills of Entry as a single transaction for monetary limit calculation, and invoked its procedural power to hear departmental appeals on merits despite the Board's monetary threshold.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Search assessment provisions under Sections 153A and 153C override ordinary reassessment time limits; asset-threshold verification required.
    The judgment holds that search-triggered assessment provisions function as non-obstante clauses displacing ordinary reassessment time limits, distinguishes the enduring liability to tax from the temporal right to assess, prescribes that block periods are computed from the year of search (or date of receipt of seized records for non-searched persons), and treats the asset-represented income threshold as a mandatory, aggregable precondition requiring the assessing officer's recorded satisfaction.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 209 "Tax on income from bonds or Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising from their transfer." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      5 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 209 Tax on income from bonds or Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising from their transfer.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      These documents reproduce Clause 209 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) and Section 209 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 as enacted. Both provisions impose special tax treatment for non-residents on income from certain bonds and Global Depository Receipts (GDRs) purchased in foreign currency and on capital gains arising on their transfer. The changes between the Bill and the enacted Section are primarily textual, reference-based and procedural in nature; they affect computation wording, cross-references to other sections, and a minor definitional cross-reference. Affected parties: non-resident investors, financial intermediaries (approved intermediaries), Indian issuing companies and tax administration. Effective date or enactment date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause/Section 209, appearing in the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (old version) and in the Income-tax Act, 2025 respectively. The provision is located within the special provisions relating to non-residents and foreign companies. The text covers income from (i) interest on specified bonds issued by Indian companies or public sector companies and purchased in foreign currency; (ii) dividends on Global Depository Receipts acquired in foreign currency through an approved intermediary; and (iii) long-term capital gains on transfer of those bonds or GDRs. The enacted section also contains procedural provisions governing deductions, returns, and certain transitional/amalgamation situations. Definitions provided in the enacted section include 'approved intermediary' (as per a Central Government-notified scheme) and a cross-reference defining 'Global Depository Receipts' (section 193(4)(a) in the Act). The Bill version contains similar material but uses a different cross-reference for GDRs (section 190(4)(a)).

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The provision applies to an assessee who is a non-resident and whose total income includes any of the incomes specified in the statutory Table. The Table enumerates four entries:

      • Interest on (a) bonds of an Indian company issued under a Central Government notified scheme, or (b) bonds of a public sector company sold by the Government, when purchased in foreign currency - taxed at 10%.
      • Dividends on Global Depository Receipts - where the GDRs are issued/re-issued under notified schemes and purchased in foreign currency through an approved intermediary - taxed at 10%.
      • Long-term capital gains on transfer of the bonds or GDRs referred to above - taxed at 12.5%.
      • The remainder: total income as reduced by the incomes in items 1-3 - in the enacted section described as "Rates in force"; in the Bill as "Income-tax chargeable on such income."

      Interpretation

      The enacted text frames the tax liability of a non-resident as "the aggregate of income-tax computed at the rate specified in column C applied on the corresponding income specified in column B." This language emphasises a rate-applied computation for each head listed. The Bill phrasing (aggregate of the amounts mentioned in column C) is functionally similar but less explicit about the computation methodology. The enacted provision also expressly excludes application of section 72(6) for computation of long-term capital gains on these specified assets.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Several limiting or procedural provisions are present:

      • Where a non-resident's gross total income consists only of interest and/or dividends as specified (items 1 and 2), no deductions are allowed under enumerated provisions (enacted section cites sections 28 to 58, 60 and 61; Bill cited sections 26 to 61).
      • Where the gross total income includes any of items 1-3, the gross total income is to be reduced by such income and deductions under Chapter VIII are to be allowed as if the reduced gross total income were the gross total income of the assessee.
      • A non-resident need not furnish a return u/s 263(1) if total income in the year consisted only of the interest/dividend incomes in items 1-2 and tax was deducted at source under Chapter XIX-B.
      • Transitional/amalgamation rule: where GDRs or bonds are acquired by an assessee in an amalgamated or resulting company by virtue of holding such instruments in the amalgamating or demerged company, the same provisions apply to such GDRs or bonds.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A non-resident holds interest-bearing bonds of an Indian company purchased in foreign currency and receives interest of X in the year. The interest is taxed at 10% under item 1. Not stated in the document whether grossing up, surcharges or cesses apply beyond the stated rate.
      • Example 2: A non-resident sells long-term GDRs (acquired in foreign currency through an approved intermediary) and realises capital gain Y. The long-term capital gain is taxed at 12.5% as per item 3. Not stated in the document whether indexation or specific computation method for capital gain is modified beyond the exclusion of section 72(6).

      Interplay

      The enacted section cross-references other statutory provisions: Chapters and sections governing deductions (Sections 28-58, 60, 61), Chapter VIII deductions, section 72(6) (specifically excluded), the return filing provision referenced (section 263(1) in the texts), Chapter XIX-B (TDS provisions) and the definition of GDRs (section 193(4)(a) in the Act text; Bill referenced section 190(4)(a)). The documents do not reproduce the content of those cross-referenced provisions; therefore detailed interaction mechanics are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Clause 209 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) and Section 209 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

      TopicBill (Clause 209 Old Version)Enacted Section 209Practical impact
      Computation wording"aggregate of the amounts mentioned in column C thereof.""aggregate of income-tax computed at the rate specified in the column C applied on the corresponding income specified in column B."clearer computational method in the enacted text ensuring rates are applied to corresponding income heads rather than potentially interpreted as flat sums.
      Residual income wording (Table item 4)"Income-tax chargeable on such income.""Rates in force."enacted text signals application of prevailing tax rates to the residual income; the Bill phrase might have invited alternative interpretations of chargeability. Exact fiscal consequences Not stated in the document.
      Cross-references to deduction sectionsExcludes deductions u/ss 26 to 61 (and certain sub-clauses) and under Chapter VIII.Excludes deductions u/ss 28 to 58, 60 and 61 (and certain sub-clauses) and under Chapter VIII.the enacted text alters the catalogue of excluded deduction sections; which specific deductions are affected is Not stated in the document.
      Definition cross-reference for "Global Depository Receipts"Cross-refers to section 190(4)(a).Cross-refers to section 193(4)(a).depends on the substantive definitions in those sections-Not stated in the document.
      Minor drafting/typo correctionsContains editorial notes/corrections in the Bill (e.g., "as per with" corrected to "as per").Polished enacted language ("as may be notified by the Central Government").reduces ambiguity; no substantive policy change apparent from document.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Non-resident taxpayers receiving the enumerated incomes must ensure correct application of the specified rates (10% for interest/dividend; 12.5% for long-term capital gains) and must verify whether their gross total income consists solely of those heads to determine deductibility limits and return filing obligations. The enacted text's explicit computation language reduces ambiguity when computing aggregate tax on the heads in the Table.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: The provision emphasises acquisition "in foreign currency" and purchase "through an approved intermediary" for GDRs; therefore investors and intermediaries should retain evidence of currency of purchase and intermediary approval status under a Central Government-notified scheme. Not stated in the document are the particulars of the scheme or the certification/documentation required by the approved intermediary; those details are Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Both texts impose special fixed rates for non-residents on interest (10%), dividends on GDRs (10%) and long-term capital gains on transfer of such assets (12.5%).
      • The enacted section clarifies computation language - "income-tax computed at the rate specified" - whereas the Bill used a less explicit phrase "aggregate of the amounts mentioned". Practical effect: clearer computational instruction in the enacted text.
      • Cross-reference differences: enacted section cites deduction sections as 28-58, 60 and 61; the Bill cited 26-61. This narrows the list of excluded deductions in the enacted text relative to the Bill; practical impact depends on which specific provisions were moved/excluded (details Not stated in the document).
      • The enacted section uses a different cross-reference for the statutory definition of "Global Depository Receipts" (section 193(4)(a)) versus the Bill's section 190(4)(a). The practical significance depends on the definitions in those sections (Not stated in the document).
      • The enacted provision replaces the Bill's phrase "Income-tax chargeable on such income" for the residual income with "Rates in force", which suggests that the balance of income will be taxed under prevailing rates rather than by reference to a specific computation language in the Table. The exact fiscal effect is Not stated in the document.
      • Procedural provisions on returns and applicability on amalgamation are retained in substance; they require documentary corroboration for threshold compliance (Not stated in the document as to the precise documentary standards).

      Full Text:

      Section 209 Tax on income from bonds or Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising from their transfer.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax