Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Jurisdictional Prerequisites for Initiating Reassessment u/s 148: Non-Depoist of TDS by the Employer
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Revisiting the Scope of "Record" u/s 263: Embracing Subsequent Records
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting "Record": Revisiting the Scope of Revision Powers u/s 264 and Rectification of Mistake ...
    The Doctrine of Natural Justice in GST Proceedings: A Case Study on Show Cause Notice u/s 74"
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) and the Concept of "Plant" under GST: Supreme Court
    Case LawsCustoms
    Inordinate Delay in Adjudication: High Court's Stance on Quashing Show Cause Notices
    Case LawsCustoms
    Inordinate Delay in Adjudication: Upholding the Principles of Natural Justice
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Re-Assessment Notices Issued During COVID-19 Lockdown
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Unraveling the Mineral Rights Regime: The Supreme Court's Landmark Judgment
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Faceless Assessment Regime: A Judicial Perspective
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Evidentiary Value of Statements Recorded During Income Tax Surveys: A Judicial Analysis
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Faceless Assessment: Ensuring Compliance with Statutory Provisions
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Faceless Assessment Mechanism: Jurisdictional Limits in Income Tax Proceedings
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reassessment Notices for AY 2013-14: Upholding the Doctrine of Limitation
    Principles of Tax Fairness and Mens Rea: Quashes Penalty for Mere Technical Errors
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Decoding the Mandatory Timelines: A Thorough Examination of the Income Tax Assessment Order Nullific...
    Expiry of E-Way Bill AND Mens Rea: Technical Violation Alone Insufficient for Penalty Imposition
    Maintainability of Appeals: High Court Upholds Strict Interpretation of Limitation Provisions in GST...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Stay of Tax Demand: Interpreting the Discretionary Power u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting "Technical Services" under Tax Treaties: A Comprehensive Analysis
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdictional prerequisite: notice in the name of a deceased person invalidates reassessment initiation under Section 148.
    A notice under Section 148 issued in the name of a deceased person is a jurisdictional defect because a valid notice to the correct person is a condition precedent to reopening an assessment; legal representatives have no statutory duty to intimate death; where salary tax has been deducted at source, reassessment cannot be pursued against the deceased or their representatives, and employer non-deposit of TDS does not create an outstanding demand against the assessee or their legal representatives.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revisional power: Commissioner may consider subsequent records available at time of examination in tax proceedings.
    The Court construed the Commissioner's revisional power to permit consideration of all materials relating to the proceeding that are available at the time of his examination, including documents and valuation reports that came on the file after the assessment order; the Explanation to the provision was read as clarificatory, giving an inclusive meaning to "record" rather than restricting it to what the Assessing Officer had when passing the assessment.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revision powers under section 264: Commissioner must consider expanded record and rehear revision petitions on merits.
    The Court held that the Commissioner must consider a revision petition on its merits and that the term record in revision proceedings extends beyond the return and assessment order to include material from other sources and prior assessments. It emphasised consistency in treatment of continuing transactions and required the Principal Commissioner to take into account all relevant materials, identify any apparent mistakes, afford a personal hearing, and pass a reasoned order within a short timeframe.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Natural justice in tax proceedings: show cause notices must allege fraud or concealment before enhanced recovery is invoked.
    The court quashed the enhanced-provision show cause notice for failing to allege the essential elements of fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts and held that the enhanced regime may be invoked only when the adjudicating authority is prima facie satisfied of those elements and records that satisfaction in the notice; absent such express allegations the proceedings are without jurisdiction though fresh proceedings may be initiated with a proper notice.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Plant classification under GST: functionality test determines ITC eligibility for buildings serving special technical requirements.
    The expression plant or machinery in Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act must be interpreted by reference to functionality rather than by equating it with the statutory definition of "plant and machinery." A building qualifies as a plant for ITC purposes if, on the facts, it was planned and constructed to serve the assessee's special technical or operational requirements. The functionality test is fact-specific and requires case-by-case analysis of the building's role in the assessee's business.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Inordinate delay in adjudication bars further proceedings on stale show cause notices absent a reasonable explanation.
    The court found the delay from 2008 to 2021 inordinate and unexplained, concluding the respondents did not provide a reasonable explanation; the delayed transfer to the call book without intimation breached statutory intimation requirements, and established precedent limits reliance on higher authority to excuse gross unexplained delays in adjudication of show cause notices.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Inordinate delay in adjudication undermines procedural fairness and bars continuation of prolonged, unexplained proceedings.
    The court found that prolonged, unexplained delay in adjudicating a show cause notice breached procedural fairness and natural justice, causing irretrievable prejudice by impairing evidence preservation and business planning. Delay attributable to the revenue authorities, contrary to Tribunal directions for timely disposal, rendered continuance of proceedings unsustainable and emphasized the necessity of justifying delay and ensuring timely adjudication.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Pandemic relief legislation upheld: re-assessment notices issued during lockdown remain valid despite later procedural rule.
    The court interpreted the pandemic relief legislation as providing comprehensive relief that extended to procedural obligations in force at the time of issuance, not confined solely to extensions of time. It applied the principle that statutes operate prospectively and concluded the later-introduced procedural provision does not apply retrospectively to invalidate earlier-issued re-assessment notices, limiting its analysis to the validity of issuance and not the merits of re-assessment proceedings.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Central legislative competence over mineral regulation affirmed; royalties characterised as compensation for resource depletion, limiting state levies.
    The Court concluded that the central legislative framework occupies the field of mineral regulation and that royalties are compensation for depletion of state-owned natural resources, not conventional taxes; consequently the Centre may impose such levies while States remain constrained from imposing royalties in the nature of compensation that would encroach on the Centre's exclusive regulatory domain.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Faceless assessment mechanism requires reassessment steps to follow a centralized faceless procedure, otherwise territorial officer lacks jurisdiction.
    The Scheme framed under the enabling provision must be read to include preliminary proceedings linked to reassessment, so that reassessment initiation and related steps follow the faceless mechanism; concurrent exercise of territorial and faceless functions would undermine the Scheme's purpose and render steps taken outside the faceless protocol inconsistent with the statutory framework.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Evidentiary value of survey statements: survey disclosures lack conclusive weight and require independent corroboration.
    Statements recorded during a tax survey are permissive and not taken on oath, so they are not conclusive evidence by themselves; they cannot be treated as inherently incriminating material to justify reopening assessments or making additions without independent corroboration, and must be recorded free of coercion in line with administrative instructions and judicial precedents.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Faceless assessment jurisdiction: JAO lacked authority under the statutory faceless procedure, invalidating improperly issued notices.
    The court determined that reassessment notices and related proceedings were inconsistent with the statutory faceless assessment framework because they were issued without following the prescribed allocation of jurisdiction and procedural sequence under the faceless mechanism; administrative orders purportedly exempting cases were not read to displace the statutory requirements and earlier precedent interpreting the faceless provisions was applied.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Faceless Assessment: statutory scheme governs jurisdiction and extends to central and international taxation proceedings.
    The court analysed Section 151A read with Sections 144B and 148A and held that administrative instructions dated March 31, 2021 and September 6, 2021 issued under section 119 apply only to assessment orders and do not extend to proceedings under Sections 148A and 148; those instructions cannot be read into the scheme notified on March 29, 2022. The mandatory faceless procedure under Sections 144B and 151A applies to notices and proceedings, including central charges and international taxation charges, and notices issued outside that mechanism fall outside the statutory jurisdictional framework.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Doctrine of limitation prevents revival of lapsed reassessment powers; administrative instructions cannot "travel back in time."
    The court held that when the right to reopen assessment had already lapsed under the pre amended limitation regime, subsequent amendments or administrative instructions could not revive that right; administrative attempts to "travel back in time" and extend limitation were invalid, assessees retain the defence of limitation, and pandemic era notifications did not cover years whose limitation had already expired.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Mens rea requirement in tax penalties: technical errors without intent cannot justify penalty imposition under GST compliance.
    Requirement of mens rea for imposition of tax penalties is central where e Way Bill compliance is questioned. Mere procedural or timing inconsistencies, without evidence of intent to evade tax and where valid tax invoices accompany the goods and tax has been charged, do not justify penal action. Authorities must establish culpable intent with cogent reasoning and comply with procedural and natural justice safeguards before imposing penalties.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Mandatory timelines under Section 144C require assessments to be completed within the prescribed month after DRP direction, else invalid.
    Once the DRP framed directions, the Assessing Officer was obliged to complete the assessment in conformity with those directions within one month from the end of the month in which the DRP's direction was served; service by uploading the DRP directive on the ITBA portal constitutes valid service for computing that period. The procedure does not envisage further involvement of the Transfer Pricing Officer once the DRP's direction is issued and an order under the transfer pricing provision has been remitted to the AO.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Mens rea requirement: technical expiry of an e way bill alone cannot justify a tax penalty without intent to evade.
    The court held that a purely technical lapse in E Way Bill formalities - where goods were otherwise covered by two e invoices and two E Way Bills and there was no dispute on consignor, consignee or goods - does not demonstrate the mens rea necessary to impose a penalty under the tax penal provision; authorities' focus on the expired E Way Bill alone was legally insufficient given documentary explanations and absence of intent to evade tax.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Exclusion of Limitation Act: GST Act's specific appellate time limits operate as a self contained code, barring general extensions.
    The court analysed whether the GST Act's appellate limitation regime operates as a complete code excluding the general Limitation Act. It applied the principle that fiscal statutes with detailed procedural and temporal rules are to be strictly construed, treating the special statute's limitation provision as implying exclusion of the Limitation Act's extension mechanism, and emphasised policy aims of expeditious dispute resolution, revenue certainty and administrative finality.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Assessing Officer discretion in granting stay of tax demand cannot be rigidly constrained by administrative OMs, requiring case specific consideration.
    The Assessing Officer's discretionary power under section 220(6) to grant stay of tax demand is not fettered by CBDT Office Memorandums; those OMs are administrative guidelines and do not mandate a uniform pre deposit. The AO must consider prima facie case, likelihood of success, and undue hardship and may require a higher, lower or no deposit depending on case specific facts. Administrative adjustment of refunds without considering a pending stay application was held arbitrary and the matter was remitted for reconsideration applying these principles.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Technical services interpretation requires specialized expertise and a demonstrable link to payments for withholding tax consequences.
    Interpretation of technical services under the India Ireland DTAA requires the application or transfer of specialized knowledge, skill or expertise; incidental training or assistance enabling a reseller to market standard software does not meet that threshold. The Reseller Agreement did not contemplate technology transfer or bespoke solutions, payments were tied to reseller net revenue, and the record lacked material linking remittances to customized technical services. Authorities must establish an evidentiary and contractual nexus between payments and provision of specialized technical services before applying withholding tax under the treaty.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 209 "Tax on income from bonds or Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising from their transfer." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      5 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 209 Tax on income from bonds or Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising from their transfer.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      These documents reproduce Clause 209 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) and Section 209 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 as enacted. Both provisions impose special tax treatment for non-residents on income from certain bonds and Global Depository Receipts (GDRs) purchased in foreign currency and on capital gains arising on their transfer. The changes between the Bill and the enacted Section are primarily textual, reference-based and procedural in nature; they affect computation wording, cross-references to other sections, and a minor definitional cross-reference. Affected parties: non-resident investors, financial intermediaries (approved intermediaries), Indian issuing companies and tax administration. Effective date or enactment date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause/Section 209, appearing in the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (old version) and in the Income-tax Act, 2025 respectively. The provision is located within the special provisions relating to non-residents and foreign companies. The text covers income from (i) interest on specified bonds issued by Indian companies or public sector companies and purchased in foreign currency; (ii) dividends on Global Depository Receipts acquired in foreign currency through an approved intermediary; and (iii) long-term capital gains on transfer of those bonds or GDRs. The enacted section also contains procedural provisions governing deductions, returns, and certain transitional/amalgamation situations. Definitions provided in the enacted section include 'approved intermediary' (as per a Central Government-notified scheme) and a cross-reference defining 'Global Depository Receipts' (section 193(4)(a) in the Act). The Bill version contains similar material but uses a different cross-reference for GDRs (section 190(4)(a)).

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The provision applies to an assessee who is a non-resident and whose total income includes any of the incomes specified in the statutory Table. The Table enumerates four entries:

      • Interest on (a) bonds of an Indian company issued under a Central Government notified scheme, or (b) bonds of a public sector company sold by the Government, when purchased in foreign currency - taxed at 10%.
      • Dividends on Global Depository Receipts - where the GDRs are issued/re-issued under notified schemes and purchased in foreign currency through an approved intermediary - taxed at 10%.
      • Long-term capital gains on transfer of the bonds or GDRs referred to above - taxed at 12.5%.
      • The remainder: total income as reduced by the incomes in items 1-3 - in the enacted section described as "Rates in force"; in the Bill as "Income-tax chargeable on such income."

      Interpretation

      The enacted text frames the tax liability of a non-resident as "the aggregate of income-tax computed at the rate specified in column C applied on the corresponding income specified in column B." This language emphasises a rate-applied computation for each head listed. The Bill phrasing (aggregate of the amounts mentioned in column C) is functionally similar but less explicit about the computation methodology. The enacted provision also expressly excludes application of section 72(6) for computation of long-term capital gains on these specified assets.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Several limiting or procedural provisions are present:

      • Where a non-resident's gross total income consists only of interest and/or dividends as specified (items 1 and 2), no deductions are allowed under enumerated provisions (enacted section cites sections 28 to 58, 60 and 61; Bill cited sections 26 to 61).
      • Where the gross total income includes any of items 1-3, the gross total income is to be reduced by such income and deductions under Chapter VIII are to be allowed as if the reduced gross total income were the gross total income of the assessee.
      • A non-resident need not furnish a return u/s 263(1) if total income in the year consisted only of the interest/dividend incomes in items 1-2 and tax was deducted at source under Chapter XIX-B.
      • Transitional/amalgamation rule: where GDRs or bonds are acquired by an assessee in an amalgamated or resulting company by virtue of holding such instruments in the amalgamating or demerged company, the same provisions apply to such GDRs or bonds.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A non-resident holds interest-bearing bonds of an Indian company purchased in foreign currency and receives interest of X in the year. The interest is taxed at 10% under item 1. Not stated in the document whether grossing up, surcharges or cesses apply beyond the stated rate.
      • Example 2: A non-resident sells long-term GDRs (acquired in foreign currency through an approved intermediary) and realises capital gain Y. The long-term capital gain is taxed at 12.5% as per item 3. Not stated in the document whether indexation or specific computation method for capital gain is modified beyond the exclusion of section 72(6).

      Interplay

      The enacted section cross-references other statutory provisions: Chapters and sections governing deductions (Sections 28-58, 60, 61), Chapter VIII deductions, section 72(6) (specifically excluded), the return filing provision referenced (section 263(1) in the texts), Chapter XIX-B (TDS provisions) and the definition of GDRs (section 193(4)(a) in the Act text; Bill referenced section 190(4)(a)). The documents do not reproduce the content of those cross-referenced provisions; therefore detailed interaction mechanics are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Clause 209 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) and Section 209 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

      TopicBill (Clause 209 Old Version)Enacted Section 209Practical impact
      Computation wording"aggregate of the amounts mentioned in column C thereof.""aggregate of income-tax computed at the rate specified in the column C applied on the corresponding income specified in column B."clearer computational method in the enacted text ensuring rates are applied to corresponding income heads rather than potentially interpreted as flat sums.
      Residual income wording (Table item 4)"Income-tax chargeable on such income.""Rates in force."enacted text signals application of prevailing tax rates to the residual income; the Bill phrase might have invited alternative interpretations of chargeability. Exact fiscal consequences Not stated in the document.
      Cross-references to deduction sectionsExcludes deductions u/ss 26 to 61 (and certain sub-clauses) and under Chapter VIII.Excludes deductions u/ss 28 to 58, 60 and 61 (and certain sub-clauses) and under Chapter VIII.the enacted text alters the catalogue of excluded deduction sections; which specific deductions are affected is Not stated in the document.
      Definition cross-reference for "Global Depository Receipts"Cross-refers to section 190(4)(a).Cross-refers to section 193(4)(a).depends on the substantive definitions in those sections-Not stated in the document.
      Minor drafting/typo correctionsContains editorial notes/corrections in the Bill (e.g., "as per with" corrected to "as per").Polished enacted language ("as may be notified by the Central Government").reduces ambiguity; no substantive policy change apparent from document.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Non-resident taxpayers receiving the enumerated incomes must ensure correct application of the specified rates (10% for interest/dividend; 12.5% for long-term capital gains) and must verify whether their gross total income consists solely of those heads to determine deductibility limits and return filing obligations. The enacted text's explicit computation language reduces ambiguity when computing aggregate tax on the heads in the Table.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: The provision emphasises acquisition "in foreign currency" and purchase "through an approved intermediary" for GDRs; therefore investors and intermediaries should retain evidence of currency of purchase and intermediary approval status under a Central Government-notified scheme. Not stated in the document are the particulars of the scheme or the certification/documentation required by the approved intermediary; those details are Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Both texts impose special fixed rates for non-residents on interest (10%), dividends on GDRs (10%) and long-term capital gains on transfer of such assets (12.5%).
      • The enacted section clarifies computation language - "income-tax computed at the rate specified" - whereas the Bill used a less explicit phrase "aggregate of the amounts mentioned". Practical effect: clearer computational instruction in the enacted text.
      • Cross-reference differences: enacted section cites deduction sections as 28-58, 60 and 61; the Bill cited 26-61. This narrows the list of excluded deductions in the enacted text relative to the Bill; practical impact depends on which specific provisions were moved/excluded (details Not stated in the document).
      • The enacted section uses a different cross-reference for the statutory definition of "Global Depository Receipts" (section 193(4)(a)) versus the Bill's section 190(4)(a). The practical significance depends on the definitions in those sections (Not stated in the document).
      • The enacted provision replaces the Bill's phrase "Income-tax chargeable on such income" for the residual income with "Rates in force", which suggests that the balance of income will be taxed under prevailing rates rather than by reference to a specific computation language in the Table. The exact fiscal effect is Not stated in the document.
      • Procedural provisions on returns and applicability on amalgamation are retained in substance; they require documentary corroboration for threshold compliance (Not stated in the document as to the precise documentary standards).

      Full Text:

      Section 209 Tax on income from bonds or Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising from their transfer.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax