Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    The Legal Contours of Input Tax Credit Eligibility: Procedural Aspects of GST and ITC
    Case LawsService Tax
    Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM): Service Tax Implications for Exporters: A Legal Perspective on Forei...
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Cheque Dishonour and Corporate Responsibility: Analyzing the Supreme Court's Latest Judgment
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of Notices / orders without DIN. The Critical Role of Procedural Compliance in Tax Administ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Tax Exemptions: Capitation Fees in Educational Institutions: A Legal Quagmire
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Procedural Technicalities vs. Substantive Justice in Tax Administration: A High Court Perspective
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Revision u/s 263 and denial of deduction u/s 80IA: A Critical Analysis of the Delhi High Court's Jud...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Condonation of Delay and Jurisdictional Challenges: A Case Analysis of ITAT Kolkata's Decision
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Legal Analysis: Scrutiny of Share Capital and Premium Under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Judicial Scrutiny of Retrospective Cancellation of Charitable Trust Registration: A Case Analysis of...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Office and Prosecution under Income Tax Act: Jurisdiction of Trial Court - Decision in a High Profil...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Taxation of Unexplained Income at Higher Rate of tax u/s 115BBE : A Comprehensive Analysis of the IT...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Analysis of ITAT Mumbai Judgment - Transfer Pricing Adjustment Dispute: Period of limitation u/s 144...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    In-Depth Analysis of Key Issues in the ITAT Chennai Judgement
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Doctrine of Merger in Income Tax Assessment: An Analysis of ITAT Chennai's Recent Judgment
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Delay in refund processing, the petitioner's entitlement to interest, and the court's decision to gr...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Rejection of revision application u/s 264 in favor of assessee: A beneficial provision of Income Tax...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    An Analysis of ITAT Decision on International Taxation, Capital Gains, and DTAA
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Taxability of CSR fund: Treatment of certain funds received by an entity, particularly focusing on w...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Legal Analysis of ESOP Deduction and allowability in the Revised Return of income: An ITAT decision.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit eligibility: procedural limits on reversing claims without supplier inquiry and GSTR-2A non-reflection not dispositive.
    Section 16(2) sets the statutory conditions for Input Tax Credit-tax invoice, receipt, tax payment, and return filing-and GSTR-2A serves only as a facilitator; non-reflection there does not automatically negate eligibility. Tax authorities must inquire into supplier conduct and observe procedural safeguards before reversing ITC or recovering tax from the recipient, with judicial precedents and CBIC clarifications shaping when exceptions may apply.
    Case LawsService Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Reverse charge mechanism: exporter not liable for foreign bank charges when Indian bank is the direct service recipient.
    The core issue is whether an exporter is liable under the Reverse Charge Mechanism for foreign bank charges deducted from export proceeds when those charges are imposed on and paid by an Indian intermediary bank. The Tribunal's analysis focuses on the definition of service recipient and territorial scope, concluding that the direct recipient-the Indian bank-is the party liable to discharge service tax while the exporter, as an indirect beneficiary without direct dealings with the foreign bank, is not subject to reverse charge.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Directorial liability: strict averment requirement prevents presuming directors' responsibility without specific allegation, leading to quashing.
    The Court held that directorial liability requires specific averment that the director was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business at the time of the offence; mere titular position or awareness of cheque issuance is insufficient. It emphasized the necessity of serving the statutory notice prerequisite and rejected liberal construction to cure absent statutory averments, quashing proceedings against directors for non-compliance.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    DIN requirement in tax administration: absence of mandatory DIN can invalidate assessment orders unless exceptional circumstances apply.
    Failure to quote the mandatory computer-generated Document Identification Number (DIN) in assessment orders, as required by the CBDT Circular from 1 October 2019, constitutes a procedural defect that can render the order invalid unless the revenue demonstrates that the issuance fell within the Circular's narrowly drawn exceptional circumstances; the Tribunal found such non-compliance in the order dated 15 October 2019 and the High Court affirmed, while the Supreme Court granted interim stay for further consideration.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capitation fee allegations challenge admissibility and attribution of seized evidence in charitable trust tax exemption inquiries.
    Alleged collection of capitation fees by a registered charitable trust threatens its exemption under Section 11; most evidence was seized from employees' residences, invoking the presumption under Section 132(4A) and raising attribution issues. Employee admissions later retracted, similar statement drafting, declarations under the Income Declaration Scheme 2016, and trustees' acknowledgments create contradictory evidentiary threads that complicate admissibility, credibility, and whether the seized funds can be treated as trust income.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of delay in tax compliance: liberal interpretation protects bona fide taxpayers from technical disqualification.
    The court analysed whether delay in filing Form 10 could be condoned, considering the petitioner's unawareness of post 2016 amendments, CBDT circulars and precedent, and applying principles that each case be judged on its facts; it stressed that failure to claim accumulation does not by itself show absence of intent to comply and urged a liberal approach to mitigate genuine hardship and prevent procedural technicalities from defeating substantive justice.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 263 limited to substantial legal errors; mere differences of opinion don't justify revisional tax action.
    Scope of Section 263 is confined to instances where an assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue in a substantial way, not mere differences of opinion. Migration of licences from IP VPN to NLD ILD does not, by itself, create a new undertaking defeating entitlement to deduction under Section 80IA(4)(ii), particularly where identical deductions were previously allowed; administrative migration requires clear proof of substantive change before re characterising eligibility.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Delay condonation based on sufficient cause upheld where illness, relocation and pandemic disruption justified late filing and jurisdictional challenge.
    The tribunal applied a purposive construction of sufficient cause to condone substantial delay where cumulative factors-serious illness, change of residence and pandemic disruption-made filing untimely. It also found the assessment infirm for want of territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction because the taxpayer had established residence and filing history in a different territorial unit and administrative guidance allocated jurisdiction accordingly, underscoring that proper vesting of authority is a condition precedent to valid assessment.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Unexplained cash credits under Section 68 require taxpayers to prove investor identity and genuineness; authorities must rebut with evidence.
    Applicability of Section 68 requires the assessee to establish investor identity, creditworthiness and transaction genuineness-via PAN, tax returns, audited accounts and bank statements-and once this initial burden is satisfied, the burden shifts to the revenue to rebut with concrete evidence; mere suspicion or inability to trace an ultimate source does not alone justify additions if investments are reasonable relative to investors' net worth and effected through banking channels.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Retrospective cancellation of charitable trust registration invalidated due to lack of competent jurisdiction and procedural non compliance.
    The Tribunal invalidated the cancellation of a charitable trust's registration because the regional authority lacked competence to cancel under the statutory scheme and the transfer used to reassign the matter was improper; it further held that applying the newer cancellation provision retrospectively to deprive the trust of its recognized status was not legally tenable, emphasizing required notice, hearing and adherence to principled statutory interpretation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdiction in multi locational offences governs venue determination; magistrate discretion and supervisory thresholds shape tax prosecution forums under criminal procedure.
    The judgment analyses Cr.P.C. place of offence principles in multi locational tax prosecutions, assessing whether procedural acts like recording statements under the Income Tax Act determine venue. It evaluates the magistrate's discretion in taking cognizance where alleged offences span jurisdictions and outlines the threshold for superior court supervisory intervention, emphasising that extraordinary petitions require demonstration of abuse of process or exceptional circumstances before altering magistrate venue determinations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Taxation of unexplained income: higher-rate treatment applies, and deductions including partner salary are disallowed.
    The tribunal held that excess unrecorded stock and cash found on survey were assessable as unexplained investment and unexplained money, and that the special higher-rate taxation provision applies to such income, taxing it at a higher fixed rate and disallowing any deduction; consequently the claimed partner's salary relating to the unexplained investment was disallowed.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation under section 144C: assessment issued beyond statutory period, leaving transfer pricing adjustment unresolved on procedural grounds.
    The tribunal focused on the statutory time limit under Section 144C(13) for passing assessment orders after DRP directions, treated the order as barred by limitation and therefore did not adjudicate substantive transfer pricing challenges raised under Section 92CA. Consequently, technical disputes over comparability, exclusion/inclusion of comparables, and the profit level indicator computation were left unexamined.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capitalization of interest: tribunal scrutinised whether interest and forex on capital projects form capital cost or permit revenue deduction.
    The tribunal analyzed four core taxation questions: whether interest and foreign exchange fluctuations written off from Capital Work in Progress are capital or revenue in nature and their nexus to business operations; whether write off of a DG set component should be treated within the block of assets for depreciation or as a revenue repair; the applicability of Section 36(1)(iii) to proportionate interest on interest free advances to related concerns and the presumption from mixed funds; and the evidentiary requirements to establish that inter corporate deposits were funded from own funds rather than borrowed monies for interest deduction purposes.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Doctrine of merger limits revisional jurisdiction under appeals, preventing collateral review of identical legal issues.
    The Doctrine of Merger operates to treat legal issues from an assessment as merged into appeal proceedings before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), thereby constraining subsequent revisional jurisdiction over those same issues; applied where initial assessment, reassessment notices and search-related assessment steps overlap, and supported by judicial precedent limiting collateral revision.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on delayed tax refunds where delay is not attributable to the taxpayer under Section 244A.
    Entitlement to interest under Section 244A arises when refund payment is delayed for reasons not attributable to the assessee. The petitioner, a foreign company, faced delays caused by technical issues and incorrect guidance regarding banking details; the court treated the delay as the respondents' responsibility and applied Section 244A to award interest for the period of delay, directing payment according to the statutory rate.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revision application under Section 264: remand for fresh merits review when alternative remedies were improperly relied upon.
    Whether a revision under Section 264 may be denied solely because alternative remedies existed and whether appeal provisions applied to DDT-related treaty claims; the court found that rejecting revision on the mere availability of other remedies was untenable and that the appealed provision was inapplicable, directing fresh merits consideration of treaty relief and related tax computation by the Principal Commissioner.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    DTAA interpretation clarifies capital gains tax treatment for cross-border share sales under residency and grandfathering conditions.
    Taxation of capital gains from a Mauritius-based entity's sale of Indian company shares is analysed against the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, focusing on DTAA allocation of taxing rights, timing of acquisition and transfer, and applicability of grandfathering provisions. The Tribunal assessed tax residency and treaty entitlement by examining corporate structure and commercial substance, applying the substance over form principle to determine whether treaty benefits were appropriate.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Fiduciary funds not treated as taxable income when entity acts as facilitator; earmarked project funds excluded from income.
    The Tribunal examined whether earmarked receipts should be included in taxable income or treated on the balance sheet, focusing on jurisdictional validity of scrutiny notices, whether amounts were routed through the income and expenditure account or retained as earmarked funds, and whether receipts held in a fiduciary capacity for disaster relief were excluded from the entity's income because the entity acted only as facilitator without beneficial ownership.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ESOP deduction in revised returns - tribunal permits claim within revision window, stressing valuation, timing and documentary consistency.
    Deductibility of ESOP-related costs in a revised return hinges on compliance with the statutory time limit for revision and on accounting and evidentiary consistency: correct year of recognition, reliable grant date valuation (e.g., Black Scholes), concordant employee records, and disclosure in audited accounts. The tribunal found the claim allowable within the revision window but emphasised documentary proof, valuation method and timing of liability as central to acceptability.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 205 "Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      4 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 205 Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 205 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) sets conditions for concessional tax treatment under specified clauses (sections 199, 200, 201, 203 and 204) by prescribing that total income be computed without specified deductions/exemptions, and by laying down eligibility conditions and administrative safeguards. It matters to companies and co-operative societies seeking concessional tax rates under the cited provisions, and to revenue authorities supervising compliance. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      The provision sits within the Bill's "New tax regime" and is a statutory hook for concessions referenced in sections 199(1)(c)(i)(C), 200(1)(a)(iii), 201(3)(a)(iii), 203(1)(a)(ii) and 204(3)(a)(ii). Clause 205 prescribes how "total income" is to be computed for these purposes by excluding certain deductions or exemptions (narrowly identifying sections from the principal Act such as sections 33(8), 45(3), 46, 47(1)(a), 48, 49 and 144). It also sets eligibility conditions for assessees claiming rates u/s 201 (and allied provisions), empowers the Board (with Central Government approval) to issue guidelines to address difficulties in meeting conditions, includes parliamentary laying requirements for such guidelines, and gives the Assessing Officer (AO) a power to recharacterise profits where inter-party arrangements produce more than ordinary profits. Definitions and specific exclusions to the meaning of "manufacture or production" are provided.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 205 operates in three principal veins: (1) mechanical computation rule for "total income" when concessional clauses apply; (2) eligibility conditions for availing the concessional computation; and (3) administrative/assessorial powers to adjust profits and to issue guidelines. The listed provisions that must not be allowed as deductions or exemptions for computing total income are: section 33(8) (as prescribed), section 45(3)(a)/(b)/(c), section 46, section 47(1)(a), section 48, section 49 and section 144. The clause then sets four conditions (sub-section (2)(a)-(d)) concerning origin of the business (no split-up/reconstruction except subject to section 140(4) carve-out), restriction on used plant/machinery (with a 20% value cap and permitted foreign-used machinery exception), prohibition on using buildings previously used as hotels/convention centres (in respect of which section 80-ID deduction was claimed), and limitation of business activity to manufacture/production (plus related research/distribution). The AO is authorised, for purposes of section 201, to determine deemed profits where related-party or other arrangements yield more than ordinary profits, and where such arrangements involve a specified domestic transaction (section 164), the arm's length principle (section 173(a)) applies.

      Interpretation

      The text manifests a legislative intent to restrict the scope of preferential taxation by (a) mandating computation of total income without several specific deductions or exemptions, and (b) placing qualitative/quantitative conditions on the nature and origin of the business and on the use of assets. The inclusion of an AO power to determine "profits as may be reasonably deemed" and to apply arm's length principles for specified domestic transactions indicates an intent to deter related-party arrangements engineered to obtain concessional rates. The Board-with-Central-Government guideline mechanism is intended to provide administrative flexibility to resolve difficulties in meeting the enumerated conditions.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The Bill contains explicit carve-outs: businesses formed by re-establishment/reconstruction/revival pursuant to section 140(4) are permitted; foreign-used machinery imported into India that was not previously used in India and in respect of which no depreciation had been allowed is exempted as "permitted machinery or plant used outside India"; and the 20% cap permits limited use of previously used machinery/plant. The definition of "manufacture or production" explicitly excludes certain activities (e.g., development of computer software, mining, conversion of marble blocks into slabs, bottling of gas into cylinders, printing of books or production of cinematograph films) and allows the Central Government to notify other exclusions.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A domestic company set up by splitting an existing undertaking would be ineligible to claim the concessional computation unless it qualifies as a re-establishment within section 140(4). (Derived from sub-section (2)(a).)
      • Example 2: An assessee imports second-hand machinery that was used outside India and had never been used in India; no depreciation was previously claimed for that machinery anywhere - it falls within "permitted machinery or plant used outside India." (Derived from sub-section (6)(b)(ii) as numbered in the Bill.)
      • Example 3: A group arranges intra-group transactions yielding above-ordinary profits; the AO may determine deemed excess profits and treat that excess as income chargeable u/s 201 at the specified concessional rate, applying arm's length pricing if the transaction is a specified domestic transaction. (Derived from sub-section (5).)

      Interplay

      The clause cross-references multiple provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961: sections 33(8), 45(3), 46, 47(1)(a), 48, 49, 80-ID(6) meanings for "hotel" and "convention centre," section 140(4) for revival/reconstruction carve-out, section 164 for specified domestic transactions, section 173(a) for arm's length price, and section 116(13)(e) for "unabsorbed depreciation." It also references the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 for the meaning of "Unit." The Board's guideline power requires previous approval of the Central Government and is subject to parliamentary laying (procedural oversight). No rules or notifications beyond these cross-references are reproduced in the Bill text.

      Differences between the two provisions and practical impact

      • Sunset clause for issuance of guidelines: The Bill (Document 2) contained an express time-limit: "No guideline under sub-section (2) shall be issued after the expiration of two years from the 1st April, 2026." The Act (Document 1) omits this proviso and instead provides procedural parliamentary laying (now placed as sub-section (3) in the Act).
        • Practical impact: removal of the two-year sunset in the Act gives the Board-with-Central-Government approval continuing discretion to issue guidelines beyond 1 April 2028; administrative flexibility is increased and industry may face an indefinite period of potential guideline issuance.
      • Locus and scope of assessing officer power: In the Bill the provision conferring power on the Assessing Officer to determine deemed excess profits is located in sub-section (5) and explicitly applies "for the purposes of section 201." The Act places a substantively similar provision in sub-section (4) and expressly states it applies "for the purposes of sections 201 and 204."
        • Practical impact: in the Act the assessing officer's power to compute deemed profits is extended to both sections 201 and 204, broadening the circumstances where the AO may attribute excess profits and charge them at the specified concessional rates; taxpayers facing assessments u/s 204 may therefore be subject to these transfer-pricing style adjustments.
      • Reordering and numbering: Substantive topics (guidelines, parliamentary laying, AO powers, definitions) are presented in different sub-section order between the Bill and the Act.
        • Practical impact: reordering does not change substance (aside from the differences above) but may affect ease of reference.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Claimants of concessional taxation must ensure the business is not a prohibited re-creation of an existing business (absent section 140(4) coverage), must monitor the provenance and aggregate value of previously used machinery (20% ceiling), must avoid using buildings previously qualifying u/s 80-ID for hotel/convention centre deductions, and must ensure their activity falls within the statutory definition of manufacture/production (subject to enumerated exclusions). Related-party arrangements should be structured mindful of the AO's power to recharacterise profits and apply arm's length pricing for specified domestic transactions.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: taxpayers should retain documentary evidence proving origin of business (formation/reconstruction records), invoices and import documentation for foreign-used machinery (showing non-use in India and date of import), valuation records demonstrating the 20% threshold calculation, and contemporaneous transfer-pricing/arm's-length documentation for intra-group transactions to counter AO adjustments. Evidence of prior claims of section 80-ID deductions for buildings will be relevant.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 205 prescribes that, for certain concessional tax clauses, total income must be computed ignoring specific deductions/exemptions listed in the text.
      • Eligibility is conditioned on non-splitting/reconstruction (with a narrow section 140(4) exception), limits on previously used machinery (20% value cap), prohibition on certain previously used buildings, and restriction to manufacturing/production (with enumerated exclusions).
      • The Board may issue guidelines (with Central Government approval) to resolve difficulties in meeting these conditions; such guidelines must be laid before Parliament.
      • The Assessing Officer is empowered to determine and charge as income profits deemed to be in excess of ordinary profits where related arrangements inflate profits; arm's length principles apply to specified domestic transactions.
      • Extensive cross-references to existing Income-tax Act provisions and the SEZ Act indicate interaction with transfer-pricing, depreciation, and past incentives (section 80-ID).

      Full Text:

      Section 205 Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax