Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS to the Government
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    A Landmark Judgment on Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS ...
    A Case of Coerced Input Tax Credit Reversal - GST recovery during search and seizure proceedings.
    Manner of compliance of conditions of pre-deposit - Debit of amount from electronic credit ledger (E...
    The need for clarity and concrete reasons in the cancellation of GST registrations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of reopening of assessment - need for a direct link between the portal's information and th...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Application of provisions of section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 ...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Provisional release of imported goods (apples) - The dispute centers on the valuation of the import...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Applicability of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of expenses - need for tax authorities to have a practical understanding of the nature ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of the assessee's business expenditure claims related to the purchase of sugarcane from...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Additions made u/s 69 and Section 56 in the absence of direct incriminating evidence linking the ass...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Whether penalty is to be imposed when the appellant has accepted the classification and paid the ent...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Liability for payment of customs duty on sale of excess liquor from the duty-free shop
    Case LawsCustoms
    Demand of customs duty beyond normal period of limitation on the ground of change in classification ...
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Stringent approach towards ensuring compliance with auditing standards - importance of auditors' res...
    Whether the appellant's claim can be classified as a Financial Debt or Operational Debt under the In...
    Scope of Approval of resolution plan - Allegations of undervaluation of the Corporate Debtor's asset...
    Denial of Input Tax Credit since the GST registration of the Supplier of Goods has been Cancelled wi...
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a vested right or concession - Can government impose conditions or restric...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    TDS credit entitlement affirmed: deductee entitled to credit despite deductor's non-deposit, preventing indirect recovery.
    Credit for tax deducted at source on interest payments is to be treated as tax paid on the deductee's behalf and does not depend on the deductor's remittance; statutory protections against indirect recovery prevent the revenue from seeking the same tax from the deductee when the deductor fails to deposit the deducted amount, and the deposit requirement in the applicable provisions does not negate the deductee's entitlement to such credit.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax credit for TDS: deductee entitled to credit even if deductor failed to deposit the retained tax with government.
    The Court treats amounts retained by a deductor as remaining tax and concludes the statutory credit mechanism for tax deducted at source does not condition a deductee's entitlement on the deductor having deposited the retained amount with the government, thereby barring indirect recovery or adjustment against the deductee where tax has been deducted at source.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Coercive tax collection prohibited; forced reversal of input tax credit during search deemed impermissible, with investigatory remedies preserved.
    Dispute involved a search under Section 67 and an alleged coerced reversal of Input Tax Credit from the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger for supplies from a supplier with retrospectively cancelled registration; the court found such coercive recovery during search impermissible and directed restoration of the ITC while preserving the department's power to investigate and, if ineligible or fraudulent ITC is found, pass appropriate protective orders.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Pre-deposit payment method: Electronic credit ledger debit does not satisfy pre-deposit; cash ledger payment required for appeals.
    Pre-deposit for appeals under the CGST/BGST regime must be paid from the cash ledger; debit from the electronic credit ledger does not satisfy the statutory pre-deposit requirement. A revenue circular restricting ECRL use to certain output tax payments and excluding reverse charge, interest, penalties, fees, and similar amounts supports that ECRL cannot be used for pre-deposit. The court emphasized the statutory payment scheme and strict appeal filing timelines, rejecting arguments that ECRL debit could substitute for cash ledger payment.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Requirement of clear reasons in GST cancellation: retrospective deregistration must be reasoned and consider input tax credit effects.
    Cancellation of GST registration must be supported by clear reasons and concrete factual findings in show cause notices and cancellation orders; labels that a registration is "liable to be cancelled" without specifying dues or factual basis constitute mechanical action. Retrospective cancellation cannot be applied routinely; authorities must follow statutory procedure, assess causes for non-filing, consider exceptional disruptions to business operations, and account for the impact on input tax credit before fixing an effective date of cancellation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Use of portal data: digital information needs a direct evidential link before reopening income tax assessments.
    Reopening assessments requires a direct evidential link between portal-derived information and the income alleged to have escaped assessment; portal data alone is insufficient without documentary support for transactions or gifts, and a show cause notice must provide adequate particulars and reflect proper consideration of the taxpayer's response before reassessment proceeds.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Non retrospective application of punitive benami provisions affirmed, limiting enforcement to post amendment transactions.
    Application of Section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 concerns whether punitive provisions enacted in 2016 apply to transactions predating the amendment. The Appellate Tribunal relied on Supreme Court precedent that such punitive provisions must be applied prospectively, and the High Court emphasized adherence to that interpretation while allowing parties to pursue further remedies pending the Supreme Court review.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional release of perishable imports allowed pending valuation, subject to provisional assessment and bond to protect revenue interests.
    The dispute concerns provisional release of perishable imported apples amid a valuation contest tied to a stayed minimum import price notification. The instrument requires provisional assessment of the Bill of Entry within a brief timeframe and permits conditional provisional release upon the importer furnishing a bond and meeting terms set by customs, thereby reconciling the protection of revenue interests with the practical need to avoid loss to perishable consignments pending final resolution of the notification's applicability.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Prospective application of punitive benami amendment upheld, limiting reach to post-enactment transactions and preserving pre-enactment protections.
    The Madras High Court affirmed that the enhanced punitive provision introduced by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 is substantive and applies prospectively; it endorsed the Tribunal's reliance on the Supreme Court's Ganapati Dealcom decision, treated a pending Supreme Court review petition as not displacing that precedent, and disposed of the appeals while allowing further proceedings consistent with prospectivity and prior constitutional findings.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Disallowance of expenses must rest on specific documentation defects, not on blanket percentage adjustments.
    Disallowance of business expenses on a summary or estimate basis requires specific, pointed deficiencies and cannot rest on generalized conclusions about excessiveness; in businesses with routine small transactions, tax authorities must examine the nature of operations and identify particular defects in documentation before applying blanket percentage disallowances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Statutory Minimum Price interpretation: excess cane payments treated as appropriation of profits, not deductible business expense.
    The core issue is whether payments for sugarcane in excess of the Statutory Minimum Price (SMP) are deductible business expenditures or constitute an appropriation of profits. The Assessing Officer relied on standard accounting practice requiring provisions for liabilities at year end and treated post closing excess payments as distributions of operational surplus. The appellate view upheld that cooperative status does not alter the tax analysis and that payments beyond the SMP do not qualify as allowable business expenses absent proper provisioning within the accounting period.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Direct incriminating evidence requirement: third party search materials alone cannot sustain unexplained investment additions.
    Additions alleged as unexplained investments and undisclosed interest income based on third party search materials require a demonstrable direct nexus between those seized records and the assessee; absent such direct incriminating evidence, reliance on third party statements or documents is insufficient. Procedural safeguards and transactional indicia-such as cross examination opportunities, banking records, documentary support, and TDS-reduce the probative value of seized material when direct linkage is lacking.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty under Section 114A: no justification where importer accepted correct classification and paid differential duty before notice.
    Issue: imposition of a penalty for alleged suppression when the importer accepted correct tariff classification and paid the differential duty with interest before issuance of a show cause notice. The importer attributed the earlier misclassification to an agent error and denied intent to evade duty. The authority observed the accurate product description, admission of correct classification and prompt payment, concluded absence of suppression of facts and determined that the statutory penalty provision was not justified on these facts.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Liability under Section 72: duty rests with duty-free shop licence-holder when trade facility conditions are breached.
    Duty arises where a duty-free shop licence-holder breaches voucher and recordkeeping conditions under the trade facility; the licence-holder bears responsibility for payment of duty and interest when procedural requirements are violated, while penalty depends on culpability and may be disallowed where no intent to evade duty is established and customs were aware of the transactions.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Extended limitation in customs demands inapplicable where no suppression, limiting reassessment for CVD on undeclared MRP entries.
    Reassessment and CVD demand arose from a post-clearance change in classification and retrospective reliance on MRP for past entries; the tribunal held that items described were essential refrigeration parts rather than accessories, that MRP-based reassessment requires clear factual basis, and that the Extended Period of Limitation is inapplicable where no suppression is established, although penalty issues may still be considered where omissions occur.
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Auditor responsibility reinforced: regulatory findings against audit failures stress strict adherence to auditing standards and sanctions.
    NFRA found a statutory auditor guilty of professional misconduct for failures to comply with Standards on Auditing, including inadequate procedures to verify revenue, lack of physical inventory verification, insufficient going concern assessment, deficient materiality application, and inadequate communication with Those Charged with Governance, and applied regulatory sanctions to reinforce auditor responsibilities in preserving financial reporting integrity.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Operational debt classification confirmed for supplier's claim based on the transaction's nature under the insolvency framework.
    Whether a claim from a supply arrangement is a Financial Debt or an Operational Debt depends on the transaction's substantive character. The tribunal examined contractual terms-penalties for non-delivery, interest, and security cheques-and applied precedents on the financial-versus-operational distinction. It characterised the supplier's claim, filed under Section 9, as arising from the supply of goods and therefore as an operational debt, sustaining the Resolution Professional's and Adjudicating Authority's classification.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Commercial wisdom of committee of creditors governs resolution plan approval, limiting valuation and standing challenges by promoters.
    Exclusion of the creditor was non irregular as no claim was filed; undervaluation allegations were rejected since opportunities to raise them during the CIRP were not used; the resolution plan satisfied Committee approval requirements and reflected the Committee's commercial wisdom; and a suspended director/promoter lacked standing to challenge the approved plan, underscoring limited judicial interference post approval.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input tax credit denial over supplier deregistration; remanded for document verification and fresh adjudication to determine genuineness.
    Denial of Input Tax Credit was challenged where the supplier's registration was retrospectively cancelled; the petitioner paid through bank and the supplier appeared on records at the time. The High Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the appellate authority to reconsider the petitioner's documentary evidence, hold a hearing, and pass a reasoned order verifying genuineness and timing of transactions; if purchases are genuine and occurred prior to cancellation, ITC is to be considered per precedent.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit as legislative concession: entitlement subject to statutory conditions, but retrospective deprivation of vested accruals is vulnerable.
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a legislative concession, not a vested right, so the legislature may lawfully prescribe eligibility conditions and procedural limits which taxpayers must strictly satisfy; however, retrospective amendments that destroy or diminish an already accrued entitlement are susceptible to challenge and have been treated as impermissible when they impair rights that vested before the amendment.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 149 "Deduction in respect of income of co-operative societies." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      3 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 149 Deduction in respect of income of co-operative societies.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

        At a Glance

        Clause 149 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) provides specified deductions for co-operative societies in computing total income. It enumerates categories of allowed deductions (business profits for specified activities, certain small-amount business profits, inter-co-operative income, letting of godowns, limited interest/house property income) and conditions relating to voting rights for societies engaged in labour/fishing activities. The provision affects co-operative societies (primary and others); effective date or commencement is Not stated in the document.

        Background & Scope

        Statutory hooks: Clause 149 sits in the chapter dealing with "Deductions in respect of certain incomes" in the Income Tax Bill, 2025. The clause is intended to grant specified tax deductions to co-operative societies on certain classes of income. The text provides coverage of the types of co-operative societies and activities that qualify, thresholds for small-value activities, and special treatment for income from investments in other co-operative societies. Clause 149(6) supplies three definitions: "consumers' co-operative society", "co-operative bank" and "primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank". No further definitions (e.g., of "primary society" or "federal co-operative society") are provided in the clause. Any wider contextual definitions or commencement/notification details are Not stated in the document.

        Statutory Provision Mode

        Text & Scope

        Clause 149(1) establishes that if the gross total income of an assessee that is a co-operative society includes income of the kinds listed in sub-section (2), the sums specified in sub-section (2) shall be allowed as deductions in computing total income "in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section."

        Clause 149(2) enumerates six categories of deductible sums:

        • Clause 149(2)(a): For co-operative societies engaged in specified activities (banking/providing credit to members; cottage industry; marketing of agricultural produce of members; purchase of agricultural implements/seeds/livestock for supply to members; processing without aid of power of members' agricultural produce; collective disposal of members' labour; fishing or allied activities), the whole of the profits and gains attributable to any one or more of such activities are deductible.
        • Clause 149(2)(b): For a primary society supplying milk, oilseeds, fruits or vegetables raised by its members to a federal co-operative society, Government/local authority, or specified Government companies/corporations, the whole of such business profits and gains are deductible.
        • Clause 149(2)(c): For co-operative societies engaged in activities not specified in (a) or (b), an amount of profits and gains attributable to such activities is deductible up to prescribed small thresholds-one lakh rupees for consumers' co-operative societies and fifty thousand rupees for others.
        • Clause 149(2)(d): Income by way of interest or dividends from investments with any other co-operative society is wholly deductible.
        • Clause 149(2)(e): Income derived from letting of godowns or warehouses used for storage, processing, or facilitating marketing of commodities is wholly deductible.
        • Clause 149(2)(f): For co-operative societies that are not housing societies, urban consumers' societies, transport societies, or societies performing manufacturing with aid of power, if gross total income does not exceed twenty thousand rupees, the amounts of income by way of interest on securities or any income from house property chargeable u/s 20 are deductible.

        Interpretation

        The clause adopts a categorical approach: specific activities enumerated in (2)(a) and (2)(b) receive full deduction of attributable business profits and gains. The drafting implies legislative intent to fiscally favour co-operative activities with social, agricultural or rural development character and primary cooperative supply chains. Clause 149(2)(c) recognises incidental or ancillary activities by permitting a capped deduction, signalling that only small-scale non-core business profits receive preferential tax treatment.

        Clause 149(4) provides that deductions under sub-section (1) relating to (2)(a), (b), (c) or sub-section (3) shall be allowed with reference to income after reducing the deduction u/s 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, if the assessee is also entitled to that deduction - indicating an order of computation to avoid double advantage. The clause thereby contemplates interaction with pre-existing industrial/infrastructure related deductions (section 80-IA) and establishes netting off before applying cooperative deductions.

        Exceptions/Provisos

        Clause 149(3) conditions application of the sub-section dealing with collective disposal of labour and fishing/allied activities on the society's rules restricting voting rights to specified classes: (i) individuals who contribute labour or carry on fishing/allied activities; (ii) co-operative credit societies which provide financial assistance; (iii) the State Government. This is a membership/control test to ensure genuine member-based governance.

        Clause 149(2)(f) carves out several categories of societies (housing, urban consumers' societies, transport, manufacturing with power) from the small gross-income relief. The relief under (f) only applies if gross total income does not exceed twenty thousand rupees.

        Illustrations

        • Example 1: A primary milk co-operative supplying milk to a federal co-operative society has business profits of Rs. 500,000 attributable to that activity - under Clause 149(2)(b), the whole amount would be deductible when computing total income.
        • Example 2: A consumers' co-operative retail society derives Rs. 120,000 profit from an ancillary non-specified activity - under Clause 149(2)(c)(i), only Rs. 100,000 is deductible; the remaining Rs. 20,000 is taxable.
        • Example 3: A fishing co-operative's rules permit voting by outside investors - if voting is not restricted to classes listed in Clause 149(3), the special deduction for fishing activities under (2)(a)(vii) would not apply. (Whether this exact circumstance occurs is a fact; the clause makes the control condition explicit.)

        Interplay

        Clause 149 explicitly interacts with section 80-IA (Income-tax Act, 1961) by requiring deduction under 80-IA to be reduced first where applicable. Clause 149(6)(b) ties definitions of "co-operative bank" and "primary agricultural credit society" to Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Other cross-references (e.g., section 20 for house property) are internal to the tax code. No other Rules, Notifications or Circulars are referenced in the clause. Any further interaction with other deductions or eligibility conditions outside the clause is Not stated in the document.

        Differences between Section 149 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 149 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version)

        • Cross-references to other deductions: Clause 149(4) (Bill) expressly refers to reduction of deduction u/s 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, whereas Section 149(4) (Act) refers generically to "section 138".
          • Practical impact: The enacted provision substitutes a different cross-reference (section 138) which likely reflects renumbering/restructuring in the revised Act; taxpayers and practitioners must verify which contemporary provision (section 138) corresponds to former section 80-IA relief before applying the interaction rule.
        • Wording on application condition for certain societies: Clause 149(3) states "provisions of sub-section (2) shall apply when the rules and bye-laws... restrict the voting rights to the following classes of members," while Section 149(3) in the Act states the deduction in sub-section (1) applies only when the rules restrict voting rights to specified classes.
          • Practical impact: The Bill framed the condition as application of sub-section (2); the Act frames it as a condition for deduction under sub-section (1). Substance appears the same, but the enacted text is marginally clearer that the deduction itself is conditional - minimal practical effect except for drafting clarity in litigation or interpretation where reliance on the exact statutory linkage could arise.
        • Definitions: Clause 149(6) in the Bill contains express definitions for "consumers' co-operative society", "co-operative bank" and "primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank". Section 149 in the Act (Document 1) does not include clause (6) or these definitions.
          • Practical impact: The Bill's inclusion of definitions would assist interpretation; their absence in the enacted section may require cross-reference to other statutes (e.g., Banking Regulation Act) or general interpretation principles. This increases potential ambiguity for terms used in the enacted section.
        • Subsection numbering and internal references: Clause 149(3) refers to "provisions of sub-section (2)"; the Act's corresponding subsection reference is to sub-section (1) in one place, and the Act elsewhere has slightly different cross-references (e.g., section 20 in Act corresponds to "section 20" in Bill).
          • Practical impact: Potentially material if internal references were misaligned; practitioners must confirm which sub-section each condition attaches to when applying the enacted text.

        Practical Implications

        • Compliance/risk areas: Co-operative societies must allocate and document profits attributable to qualifying activities (particularly where societies undertake both specified and non-specified activities) to substantiate claims under (2)(a)/(b)/(c). For fishing/labour co-operatives, bye-laws restricting voting are a precondition - compliance requires careful governance documentation and possible amendment of bye-laws where necessary.
        • Interaction with other deductions: Entities claiming both section 80-IA and Clause 149 relief must compute netting as provided; failure to reduce the 80-IA deduction first may invite adjustment. Practitioners should keep explicit working papers showing order of deductions.
        • Record-keeping/evidence: Maintain minutes, registered bye-laws, membership rolls and voting rights records to demonstrate eligibility under Clause 149(3); maintain segmented accounting to show profits attributable to each activity and inter-cooperative investments for (2)(d); keep leases and purpose documentation for godown letting under (2)(e).

        Key Takeaways

        • Clause 149 provides targeted, often full, deduction of profits for co-operative societies engaged in specified agricultural, credit, cottage, marketing, processing (without power), labour-collective and fishing activities.
        • Primary societies supplying agricultural produce to federal co-operatives, government bodies or specified public companies receive full deduction for that business.
        • Non-specified activities qualify only up to modest monetary caps (Rs. 1,00,000 for consumers' co-operatives; Rs. 50,000 for others).
        • Income from investments in other co-operative societies and income from letting godowns used for marketing are fully deductible.
        • Special control/governance conditions apply for labour and fishing co-operatives; bye-laws restricting voting to specified classes are a precondition.
        • Deductions under Clause 149 must be computed after reducing deduction u/s 80-IA where applicable.
        • Definitions for key terms are included in Clause 149(6), aiding interpretation, but other definitional gaps remain and are Not stated in the document.

         


        Full Text:

        Section 149 Deduction in respect of income of co-operative societies.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax