Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    A Critical Analysis of the Constitutional Validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST/BGST Act and the exp...
    Scrutiny of Procedural Flaws in GST Registration Cancellation: Insights from a High Court Judgment
    Input Tax Credit Claims under GST: A Case Study of the Kerala High Court Ruling
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Complexities of Residential Status and Tax Liability
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating International Taxation Waters
    Resolution Applicant Eligibility in Corporate Insolvency: former director/ promotor of the corporate...
    CircularsCustoms
    Easing Export Procedures: A Detailed Analysis of India's New Customs Guidelines
    CircularsCustoms
    Streamlining Export Grievances in India: The Launch of 'e-SAMADHAAN' Portal
    CircularsCustoms
    Revamping Export Standards: India's New Directive on Quality Control for Milk and Milk Products
    Empowering Investors: SEBI's New Framework for Enhanced Trading Account Security
    Extended Validity of Pre-Shipment Inspection Agencies
    Revising Foreign Investment Norms in Alternative Investment Funds: A Critical Analysis of SEBI's Lat...
    SEBI's New Mandates for AIFs: Dematerialization of Investments and Custodian Appointment - Implicati...
    Navigating the Evolving Landscape of IT Hardware Import Regulations in India: Analyzing the DGFT Cir...
    CircularsGST - States
    GST on Imitation Zari Thread
    CircularsGST - States
    Deciphering the GST Framework: Key Clarifications on (1) Passenger Transport and Motor Vehicle Renti...
    CircularsGST - States
    Place of Supply: Key Clarifications for 3 items
    CircularsCustoms
    Regularization of Bills of Entry and Waiver of Interest in Indian Customs
    CircularsCustoms
    Enhancing Maritime Security and Transparency: The Introduction of Body-Worn Cameras for Customs Boar...
    Renewal of Recognition for AMC Repo Clearing Limited: SEBI's Decision and its Implications
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit entitlement: statutory conditions and return deadlines can legitimately limit vesting of the benefit.
    The court held that Input Tax Credit is a conditional statutory benefit that vests only upon fulfilment of prescribed conditions; therefore temporal restrictions tied to return filing are legitimate legislative qualifications and do not constitute deprivation of property without authority of law or violation of equality and trade-freedom guarantees.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Procedural fairness in GST registration: defective show cause notices invalidate cancellation and require fresh lawful proceedings.
    The court held the show cause notice and cancellation of GST registration were procedurally defective: the notice lacked material reasons depriving the taxpayer of an effective response, and the cancellation order demonstrated non-application of mind. Reasons contained in a reply affidavit could not retrospectively validate the defective notice. The authority may initiate fresh proceedings only by issuing a properly reasoned show cause notice, permitting the taxpayer to place all contentions and granting a personal hearing, with adjudication thereafter.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit eligibility: absence from GSTR 2A alone cannot bar credit; reassessment with evidentiary opportunity required
    The ruling emphasizes that Form GSTR 2A is a facilitative reconciliation tool and that denial of Input Tax Credit solely because an entry does not appear in GSTR 2A is not sufficient. The claimant bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by producing evidence of tax payment, valid invoices and transactional genuineness. The assessing authority must afford the taxpayer an opportunity to produce evidence and independently reassess the ITC claim, consistent with the self assessment framework of GST.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Residential status: extended employment definition can preserve non-resident tax status for cross-border business migrants abroad.
    The tribunal addressed whether an individual who stayed 176 days in India and then moved to Mauritius on an occupation permit qualified as non-resident under Explanation 1(a) to the residence provision; after reviewing the occupation permit and appointment documentation and relying on precedent that construes "employment" to include self-employment and business activity, the tribunal found the explanatory extension applicable and excluded offshore receipts from Indian taxation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 172 shipping reimbursements govern TDS treatment, displacing Section 195 withholding for cross border damage payments.
    The core operative finding is that cross border payments characterised as reimbursements for vessel damage fall within the specialised shipping income regime under Section 172, so the general non resident withholding approach under Section 195 (and higher rates applied due to documentation gaps under Section 206AA) was not the appropriate mechanism; classification by legal character governs the applicable withholding treatment.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Resolution applicant eligibility: former promoters not automatically disqualified under Section 29A; clause-specific disqualifiers control.
    Whether a former promoter or director is ineligible under Section 29A turned on clause-specific disqualifiers rather than promoter status alone; the tribunal found no evidence that the statutory disqualifying conditions, including account classification as non-performing, applied to the applicant, and emphasized that eligibility requires a fact-specific application of the provision's clauses.
    CircularsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Back to Town export procedures revised to streamline staged re routing and ease compliance for certified exporters.
    The notice amends procedures for Back to Town (BTT) of export cargo, setting distinct workflows for self sealed cargo from CPP, port-to-CPP-to-town movements, and CFS-origin BTT. It differentiates obligations before registration, after registration but prior to LEO, and after LEO, and provides special provisions for AEO and DGFT status holders. Hazardous cargo and part cargo shut out scenarios are addressed, and the circular prescribes customs operational duties, reporting requirements, and discrepancy investigation protocols to streamline export re routing.
    CircularsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Export grievance redressal via e-SAMADHAAN portal provides structured online mechanism and interim replies for stakeholder issues.
    The e-SAMADHAAN portal centralises export-related grievance redressal for Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House stakeholders by providing FAQs and a mechanism to lodge grievances; NS-II (Export) will address submissions promptly and issue interim replies with timelines when external agency intervention is required. The portal is intended for public facilitation, not for legal use, and JNCH disclaims liability for use or misuse; stakeholders are encouraged to provide feedback and report implementation difficulties to the Commissioner of Customs, NS-II JNCH.
    CircularsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Quality control for milk exports now requires pre-export inspection and approval, aligning exports with international health standards.
    Pre-export quality control and inspection for milk and milk products are mandated under the Milk and Milk Products (Quality Control, Inspection & Monitoring) Rules, 2020. Exporters must obtain establishment approval based on a Food Safety Management System; certain consignments require consignment-wise inspection. A health certificate is required only if the importing country demands it. Customs must verify the Export Inspection Council approval or a Certificate of Inspection. Authorities are directed to sensitize officers and to align earlier orders with current international health and trade standards.
    CircularsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Voluntary trading account freeze empowers investors to request account blocking to prevent fraudulent trading under a regulatory framework.
    The circular requires trading members to provide a voluntary freezing/blocking facility allowing clients to request account suspension, with specified request modes, acknowledgement procedures, processing timeframes, and mechanics for implementing and lifting freezes. Stock exchanges must ensure implementation, amend rules where necessary, establish reporting requirements for trading members, and report compliance to the regulator. The measure is issued under Section 11(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act and Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Stock Brokers) Regulations to enhance investor control and prevent fraudulent trading activity.
    CircularsDGFT
    Show AI Summary
    Extension of validity of Pre-Shipment Inspection Agencies allows continued recognition under Foreign Trade Policy provisions and Handbook relaxation.
    Extension of recognition validity for Pre-Shipment Inspection Agencies under the Foreign Trade Policy 2023, relaxing Para 2.52(c) of the Handbook of Procedures and preserving recognition status for agencies listed in the policy appendices and Aayat Niryal Forms that were due to complete their three-year tenure at the end of 2023.
    CircularsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign investment restrictions in AIFs require exclusion of sanctioned or high AML risk beneficial owners, limiting further capital contributions.
    The circular tightens investor eligibility for Alternative Investment Funds by redefining beneficial ownership thresholds and imposing disqualifications: investors or beneficial owners must not be on the United Nations Security Council Sanctions List and must not be residents of jurisdictions identified by the Financial Action Task Force as having strategic AML/CFT deficiencies. AIF managers are prohibited from accepting further capital contributions from investors who fail these conditions, with immediate effect, thereby necessitating enhanced due diligence and ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance.
    CircularsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Dematerialization of AIF investments required, with custodians and standardized custody reporting to enhance transparency and oversight.
    SEBI mandates dematerialization of AIF investments and the appointment of custodians, with specified conditions for associates acting as custodians, and requires standardized reporting of investments under custody to enhance transparency, reduce risks associated with physical securities, and strengthen oversight through operational and technological adjustments by AIFs and managers.
    CircularsDGFT
    Show AI Summary
    Import restrictions on specified IT hardware require valid import authorisation, while parts and certain exemptions remain available.
    The DGFT classified laptops, tablets, all in one PCs, ultra small form factor computers and servers under HSN 8471 as restricted, permitting import only against a valid Import Authorization; exclusions include desktop computers under the same chapter, spare parts and components, SEZ captive use imports, and IT hardware strictly incidental to capital goods, while importers may obtain multiple authorisations and amend quantities within value constraints.
    CircularsGST - States
    Show AI Summary
    GST rate classification on imitation zari yarn clarified to cover metallised film-based yarns while excluding refunds on specified film inputs.
    Imitation zari thread or yarn manufactured from metallised polyester film or metallised plastic film, whether used alone or blended with other fibres, is classified within the reduced GST rate category for imitation zari; however, polyester (metallised) film and plastic film inputs are not eligible for refund on account of rate inversion.
    CircularsGST - States
    Show AI Summary
    GST applicability on transport, composite supply and pure agent treatments clarified, plus job work and governmental exemptions defined.
    Services of passenger transport and renting of motor vehicles with operators where fuel is included attract GST at 5% with input tax credit within the same line of business; electricity bundled with renting or maintenance is a composite supply taxed with the principal supply while electricity supplied as a pure agent is excluded from the supplier's value; job work for processing barley into malt attracts 5% GST; exemptions for DMFTs and horticulture services/supplies to the public works department are addressed under governmental-authority exemption criteria.
    CircularsGST - States
    Show AI Summary
    Place of supply clarifications alter GST treatment for cross border transport, advertising spaces and co location services.
    Clarification sets out revised criteria for determining the place of supply for transportation of goods, advertising services involving physical spaces, and co location (server/hosting) services; the omission of a prior IGST provision requires reassessment of place of supply rules for cross border transportation, while the circular also specifies treatment for outdoor advertising and IT hosting to ensure uniform GST chargeability, invoicing and compliance across field formations.
    CircularsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Electronic Cash Ledger interest waiver enables regularization of manually cleared Bills of Entry after payment integration is completed.
    The notice requires stakeholders to identify unpaid challans associated with manually issued Out of Charge Bills of Entry, pay the requisite duty through the Electronic Cash Ledger within prescribed timeframes, and enable system reconciliation so that Bills of Entry are regularized. It provides for waiver and refund of interest paid, conditional on compliance with payment deadlines and successful integration of payments into the customs systems.
    CircularsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Body-worn cameras for customs boarding officers mandated; recording from gangway to de-boarding, with safety exceptions and pre-notice.
    Mandate requires Boarding Officers to wear a jacket bearing name and badges and a right side Body Worn Camera that records audio visual footage from approach at the gangway until de boarding; officers must notify the Shipping Agent/Line in advance, devices are standalone without wireless/SIM, and vessel Safety Officers may designate unsafe areas for non use subject to endorsement and cross verification by higher customs authorities.
    NotificationsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Renewal of recognition secures conditional authorisation for clearing and settlement of repo and reverse repo transactions in debt securities.
    Renewal of recognition is granted to AMC Repo Clearing Limited for a one year period, authorising it to clear and settle repo and reverse repo transactions in debt securities traded on a recognized stock exchange. The renewal is conditioned on compliance with regulatory rules and directions and restricts the Clearing Corporation to activities solely related to clearing and settlement of eligible repo and reverse repo transactions.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 110 "Carry forward and set off of loss from house property." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      1 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 110 Carry forward and set off of loss from house property.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 110 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) provides for the carry forward and set off of unabsorbed loss from house property. It confines set-off of carried losses to future income from house property and limits carry forward to eight subsequent tax years. It affects taxpayers with losses under the head "Income from house property" and the income-tax administration; effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 110 is in the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) under the heading "SET OFF, OR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF LOSSES." The clause addresses the treatment of losses arising under the head "Income from house property." The clause contains three subsections. Subsection (1) mandates carry forward of the unabsorbed loss and restricts set-off to income from house property in subsequent years. Subsection (2) prescribes the temporal limit for carry forward ("not being more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which such loss was first computed"). Subsection (3) defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" as the loss computed under that head which has not been, or is not wholly, set off against income from any other head u/s 107 for that tax year. Context: Not stated in the document beyond the clause text. Coverage: losses under "Income from house property" only.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The clause applies where a loss is computed under the specific head "Income from house property" for a tax year but is not wholly set off against income under other heads in that year. Such unabsorbed loss shall be carried forward to the subsequent tax year and may be set off only against income from house property computed for that subsequent tax year. This process may be continued ("and so on") subject to the overall temporal limit. The carry-forward is restricted to a maximum of eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed. The clause also supplies a definition: "unabsorbed loss from house property" means the loss under that head which has not been, or is not wholly, set off against income from any other head u/s 107 for the said tax year.

      Interpretation

      The textual intent is to limit cross-head utilization of house property losses and to preserve them for future house property income. The restriction "set off only against income from house property" indicates a legislative policy that losses originating in the house property head are to be ring-fenced to similar income streams, preventing their absorption against other types of income in subsequent years. The "and so on" phrase signals iterative carry forward until the loss is fully absorbed or the eight-year ceiling is reached. The definition in subsection (3) signals that the clause applies only where the loss remains, in whole or in part, after application of set-off rules u/s 107 for that tax year.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Not stated in the document: any specific provisos, exceptions, or special cases (for example, treatment on transfer of property, amalgamation, or conversion of business) are not included in the clause text provided. No proviso concerning modification, waiver, or alternative treatment is present.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Tax year T1 - loss from house property = Rs X; set off against other heads u/s 107 = Rs Y; residual unabsorbed loss = Rs (X-Y). In tax year T2, the unabsorbed loss Rs (X-Y) may be set off only against house property income for T2. (All numeric specifics Not stated in the document.)

      • Example 2: If after set-off in year T2 some residual loss remains, it may be carried forward to T3 and set off only against house property income in T3, continuing up to eight succeeding tax years from T1.

      Interplay

      The clause explicitly references section 107 for the definition of "unabsorbed loss from house property" - suggesting interplay with the provisions governing intra-year set-off of losses. No other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are mentioned in the clause. Any interpretive interaction with other sections of the income tax statute (beyond section 107) is Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Section 110 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 110 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)

      • Structural wording and terminology: The Act's Section 110 (Document 1) uses the phrasing "Where for any tax year, loss computed under the head 'Income from house property' cannot be wholly set off against the income under any other head as per section 109," and specifies carry forward and iterative set-off mechanics in two subsections (1)(a) and (1)(b). The Bill's Clause 110 (Document 2) refers to "The unabsorbed loss from house property for any tax year" and defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" in subsection (3).
      • Definition provision: Clause 110 (Bill) expressly defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" in subsection (3). Section 110 (Act) does not include an explicit definition clause for that term in the provided text.
      • Reference to set-off against other heads: The Act's text explicitly references section 109 for the prior set-off rule ("as per section 109"). The Bill's clause refers to set-off u/s 107 in its definition of "unabsorbed loss" (subsection (3)). Thus each version cross-references a different section number in the provided texts.
      • Division of carry-forward operation: The Act separates the carry-forward rule and the mechanics into (1)(a) (set off only against income from house property) and (1)(b) (if not wholly set off carry forward further). The Bill states the rule in one sentence and uses "and so on" to indicate repetition; it is simpler and the iterative mechanism is not broken into discrete clauses.
      • Temporal phrasing for time-limit: Both texts limit carry forward to eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed. The Act states "No loss shall be carried forward under this section for more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year for which the loss was first computed." The Bill states, "not being more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which such loss was first computed." Substantively the time-limit appears identical.

      Practical impact of each difference

      • Presence of explicit definition in the Bill: Clause 110's explicit definition of "unabsorbed loss from house property" clarifies the reference point for what may be carried forward and avoids interpretive ambiguity about whether partial set-off against other heads at the same year affects carry forward. The Act's omission of an explicit definition in the provided text may require reliance on other sections or ordinary meaning to determine the same concept, potentially creating minor drafting uncertainty.
      • Different cross-references (section 109 vs section 107): The Act's reference to section 109 and the Bill's reference to section 107 (in the definition) may reflect renumbering or a substantive difference in the set-off scheme elsewhere in the code. Practically, if the referenced section differs in content, taxpayers and departments must consult the correct cross-referenced provision to determine prior set-off rules; mismatches could cause compliance errors until clarified.
      • Drafting clarity and enforcement: The Act's division into (a) and (b) more explicitly mandates that carry-forward losses are only to be set off against house property income and that any remainder must be carried forward, reducing interpretive questions. The Bill's compact wording accomplishes the same effect but with less granular punctuation; in practice both convey the same operational outcome but the Act's structure may be marginally clearer for compliance and adjudication.
      • No substantive change to the eight-year limit: Both texts impose the same eight-year ceiling; therefore, no practical change arises on the temporal limit for carry forward.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers must track the computation year of house property losses and the portion that remains unabsorbed after application of section 107 in that year, since only the unabsorbed portion qualifies for carry forward. Misapplication of set-off against non-house-property income in subsequent years would be contrary to the explicit limitation and could attract reassessment risk. Record-keeping to evidence prior-year set-off u/s 107 is essential.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Maintain clear records of yearwise computation of house property loss, particulars of set-off applied u/s 107 in the year of computation, and yearwise set-off against house property income in subsequent years showing progressive absorption. Documentation demonstrating the origin year of the loss will be necessary to enforce the eight-year limit and to support position in assessments or appeals.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 110 confines carry-forwarded house property losses to set-off only against future house property income.
      • Carry forward is permitted for up to eight tax years immediately succeeding the year of computation.
      • The clause defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" by cross-reference to set-off u/s 107 for the year of computation.
      • No exceptions, provisos, or interactions with other statutory mechanisms (beyond section 107) are specified in the clause.
      • Taxpayers must carefully document the computation and set-off chronology to comply and to preserve the ability to claim carry forward within the eight-year window.

      Full Text:

      Section 110 Carry forward and set off of loss from house property.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax