Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    A Comparative Analysis of "Profits in Lieu of Salary" Under the New Tax Regime: Clause 18 of Income ...
    A Comparative Analysis of Perquisite Provisions: Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs Income Tax Act, 1961
    A Comparative Analysis of Salary Definition: Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Income-tax Act, 1961
    Analysis of Changes in Deductions from Salaries: Comparing Clause 19 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 with e...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Judicial Recall and Tax Implications in Trust Settlements: Using AI-generated citations without prop...
    Analysis of Salary Taxation: Section 15 of Income Tax Act 1961 vs Clause 15 of Income Tax Bill 2025
    Provisions Relating to Expenditure Disallowance for Non-Taxable Income: comparing Clause 14 of Incom...
    A Comprehensive Analysis of Tax Provisions for Political Parties and Electoral Trusts: From Income T...
    Capital assets or stock in trade: Analysis of Section 9B of Income-tax Act, 1961 and Clause 8 of Inc...
    Analysis of Deemed Accrual of Income in India: A Comprehensive Review of Clause 9 of Income Tax Bill...
    Income Deemed to Accrue or Arise in India: A Comparative Analysis of Current and Proposed Provisions
    Evolution of Deemed Income Provisions: A Comparative Analysis of Income Tax Bill 2025 and Income-tax...
    A Comparative Analysis of Residential Status Provisions: Income Tax Bill 2025 vs Income-tax Act 1961
    Apportionment of Income Between Spouses Under Portuguese Civil Code: A Comparative Analysis of Incom...
    A Comparative Analysis of Scope of Total Income: Section 5 of Income-tax Act, 1961 and Clause 5 of I...
    Regulatory Framework for Commercial Activities by Non-Profit Organizations: A Comparative Analysis o...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Corporate Mergers and Tax Assessment: Navigating Legal Entity Changes and rectification u/s 292B
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reconciling Procedural Timelines with Limitation Periods in Income Tax Reassessments
    Effective Date of Amendment in GST: Analyzing the Conflict Between Circular No. 247/04/2025 and Noti...
    NewsBills
    Rates of income-tax in respect of income liable to tax for the assessment year 2025-26.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Profits in lieu of salary redefined to separate termination, modification, and fund payments with schedule-based exclusions.
    The provision redefines profits in lieu of salary into two subsections: one defining taxable receipts-distinguishing termination payments, modification payments, pre and post employment lump sums, and employer/fund/keyman insurance payments-and the other listing exclusions via schedules. The schedule-based exclusions replace prior cross references to exemption clauses, simplifying identification of non taxable receipts and improving classification and compliance for taxpayers and employers.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Perquisite taxation modernisation streamlines valuation, standardises employer contribution limits and revises accommodation and medical exemptions.
    The Bill reorganises and simplifies perquisite provisions by consolidating accommodation rules, removing detailed computation methods in favour of prescribed approaches, and eliminating distinct treatment for furnished and hotel accommodation. It streamlines benefits and amenities by replacing a monetary threshold with prescribed-amount determinations, unifies fund-related rules with a uniform cap on aggregate employer contributions and annual accretion calculations, and retains but modifies medical exemptions by removing the previous reimbursement ceiling and clarifying overseas treatment conditions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Salary definition reform clarifies component categories and statutory references, enhancing transparency and compliance in compensation taxation.
    Clause 16 redefines salary by converting a nine-part scheme into twelve distinct sub-clauses, separating previously combined items like fees, commissions, perquisites and profits in lieu of salary, relocating leave encashment and provident fund references to updated schedules, and updating section cross-references while retaining the substantive tax treatment and adding modern compensation elements such as contributions to the Agniveer Corpus Fund.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Deductions from salaries consolidated: restructured standard deduction tiers and unified gratuity, pension and VRS provisions for clarity.
    Clause 19 consolidates salary-related deductions into a single tabular framework, instituting a two-tier standard deduction aligned with a specified tax regime, grouping gratuity types under numbered entries with categorisation and calculation guidance, centralising pension and leave salary provisions with detailed computation rules, consolidating retrenchment compensation with specified limits and conditions, and streamlining Voluntary Retirement Scheme benefits with a defined monetary ceiling and eligible employer criteria to enhance administrative efficiency and taxpayer clarity.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Trust settlement taxation: broadened construction of shares and securities may capture partnership interests, prompting citation verification.
    The tribunal examined whether a trust permitting benefits beyond relatives falls within Section 56(2)(x), construed "shares and securities" to broaden taxable scope, and treated partnership interests as property under the provision. The earlier order was recalled after reliance on non-existent citations, highlighting the need for rigorous verification of precedents and research safeguards in trust taxation matters.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Salaries taxation clarified: structural reorganisation and retention of substantive tax treatment simplifies employer scope and advance salary rules.
    Clause 15 reorganises salary taxation into discrete subsections, modernises terminology by adopting "tax year," and converts explanations into operative provisions. It limits main clauses to "employer" while separately providing that "employer includes former employer," and elevates the treatments of advance salary and partner remuneration to standalone subsections, preserving existing substantive tax effects while improving statutory clarity.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Disallowance of expenditure related to non-taxable income clarified and assessing officer powers streamlined under the new income tax bill.
    Clause 14 preserves the principle that expenditure related to income not forming part of total income is disallowed, sets out a three-part structure-basic disallowance rule, assessing officer authority to verify or apply a prescribed method, and a tax year temporal application-and streamlines language by incorporating the former Explanation into the main provision while omitting provisions on reassessment, rectification references, and retrospective application.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax exemption for political funding consolidated with stricter documentation, audit and distribution conditions under new clause.
    Clause 12 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 consolidates exemption rules for political parties and electoral trusts, retaining existing excluded income categories while reorganising eligibility and conditions into Schedule VIII's tabular format. It strengthens documentation, retains the cash-donation cap, expands acceptable non-cash payment modes to account-payee and electronic methods and electoral instruments, mandates timely return filing and enhanced audits, requires electoral trusts to distribute the bulk of aggregate donations to registered parties, and provides for taxation of exempt income where statutory conditions are not met.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed transfer of assets triggers tax; Clause 8 adds guideline timelines and enhanced parliamentary oversight for valuation.
    Deemed transfer of capital assets or stock-in-trade on distribution during dissolution or reconstitution constitutes a taxable event with gains measured by fair market value, taxed as business income or capital gains. Clause 8 clarifies terminology, prescribes a limited period for issuing implementation guidelines, introduces parliamentary review and modification procedures, modifies cross-references, and is less explicit about the binding nature of guidelines; specified entities must recognize the deemed transfer and specified persons must maintain valuation documentation.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed accrual of income expands India's tax nexus to digital activities and indirect transfers, affecting cross-border taxpayers.
    Clause 9 establishes when income is deemed to accrue or arise in India, categorising taxable flows from Indian assets/sources, property, business connections and transfers of capital assets situated in India, and prescribing specific rules for salary, dividends, interest, royalty and technical service fees, with tailored definitions for software and digital rights, while introducing Significant Economic Presence and attribution rules plus indirect transfer tests and exemptions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Territorial nexus expanded to include significant economic presence, broadening tax scope for digital and cross-border business activities.
    The proposed Clause 9 expands the territorial nexus and refines business connection to include significant economic presence, adds targeted rules for online advertising, data monetization and digital services, and integrates investment fund management rules, creating new compliance obligations for businesses, non-residents and fund managers while aligning with international tax guidelines.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed income consolidation simplifies timing and treatment of employee benefits and dividends under the new bill, improving clarity.
    The Bill consolidates rules treating certain receipts as income into one clause, preserving employee-related deemed income categories and provident fund treatment while refining employer-contribution language and updating cross-references. It integrates dividend provisions, maintains the declared versus interim dividend distinction, broadens the dividend definition through updated references, and clarifies unconditional availability of interim distributions, aiming to simplify timing and computation of these receipts and reduce interpretive disputes for tax administration.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Residential status reform refines residency tests and deemed resident rules, strengthening clarity for high income individuals and companies.
    The Bill restructures residential status rules to clarify the day count residency framework, refine temporal definitions and exceptions, and expand deemed residency and not ordinarily resident criteria. It adds targeted provisions for high income individuals with a distinct presence test and develops company residency guidance by elaborating the place of effective management and management control factors, aiming to align with international standards and reduce disputes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Apportionment of spousal income: equal division of non-salary income with salary attributed to the earning spouse under Portuguese Civil Code.
    Income of spouses under the Portuguese Civil Code is not assessed as community property; non-salary income is divided equally between spouses while salary income is attributed solely to the earning spouse. Section 5A and Clause 10 maintain individual assessment, require separate inclusion of apportioned shares in each spouse's return, and call for clear income segregation and documentation. Clause 10 simplifies language and removes prior references to classification as an association of persons or body of individuals.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Scope of total income clarified: residency tests and foreign income treatment reorganised to improve clarity and administration.
    Clause 5 reorganises the scope of total income by substituting "previous year" with tax year, moving not ordinarily resident treatment into the main clause, and elevating former Explanations into subsections. The Bill preserves the core rules on income received or deemed received in India, income accruing or arising in India, and income accruing outside India, while separately articulating prevention of double inclusion and foreign income treatment to improve clarity and administrative coherence.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Commercial activities by non-profits face a revenue cap and mandatory separate accounting, tightening compliance and transparency.
    Clause 346 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 requires commercial activities by registered non-profit organisations to be directly related to charitable objectives, subjects receipts from such activities to a statutory revenue cap, and mandates separate accounting for those activities. This contrasts with Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which conditions tax-exempt status on activities being integral to the charitable purpose and a similar receipts ceiling but lacks an explicit separate accounting requirement. The clause emphasizes transparency, documentation, and clearer compliance parameters.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Rectification of assessment orders cannot cure jurisdictional errors where orders name non-existent entities after mergers.
    An assessment order issued in the name of a non-existent entity after a disclosed corporate amalgamation was held to be a fundamental, jurisdictional error not correctable under Section 154 or Section 292B; prior disclosure of the merger and absence of misleading conduct distinguished the case from precedents permitting clerical correction.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation periods: reassessment procedures must be completed within the overarching statutory period, else notices are time-barred.
    The decision construes the interaction between procedural timelines for reassessment and the overarching limitation period, treating the mandatory pre-notice procedure requiring provision of material and an opportunity to respond as part of the reassessment process that must be completed within the ultimate limitation period; if the authority does not complete both the procedural order and issue the reassessment notice within the residual time remaining after statutory exclusions and extensions, the notice is time-barred.
    CircularsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Effective date conflict between circular and statutory notification underscores primacy of notification over administrative guidance.
    A conflict between Circular No. 247/04/2025 and Notification No. 03/2023 arises from differing statements on the effective date of GST amendments. The circular provides classification and rate clarifications for specified goods and refers to an operative date that diverges from the notification's expressly stated effective date. Because Notification No. 03/2023 is issued under statutory authority and carries legal force, the notification's specified effective date governs where inconsistency with administrative circulars occurs, producing compliance and enforcement uncertainty that warrants authoritative clarification.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Section 115BAC tax regime retained as default; surcharge tiers and caps specified, with marginal relief safeguards.
    The Finance Bill, 2025 retains existing income-tax rates for assessment year 2025-26 and keeps special concessional regimes unchanged. Section 115BAC operates as the default regime for eligible individuals and similar entities unless an option is chosen, with prescribed slab rates applying. The Bill specifies tiered surcharge rates on tax under section 115BAC for higher incomes, caps surcharge on dividend and certain categorized income and for associations of companies, and provides marginal relief. Part III First Schedule provisions for advance tax and withholding are reallocated to Part I for 2025-26.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 110 "Carry forward and set off of loss from house property." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      1 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 110 Carry forward and set off of loss from house property.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 110 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) provides for the carry forward and set off of unabsorbed loss from house property. It confines set-off of carried losses to future income from house property and limits carry forward to eight subsequent tax years. It affects taxpayers with losses under the head "Income from house property" and the income-tax administration; effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 110 is in the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) under the heading "SET OFF, OR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF LOSSES." The clause addresses the treatment of losses arising under the head "Income from house property." The clause contains three subsections. Subsection (1) mandates carry forward of the unabsorbed loss and restricts set-off to income from house property in subsequent years. Subsection (2) prescribes the temporal limit for carry forward ("not being more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which such loss was first computed"). Subsection (3) defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" as the loss computed under that head which has not been, or is not wholly, set off against income from any other head u/s 107 for that tax year. Context: Not stated in the document beyond the clause text. Coverage: losses under "Income from house property" only.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The clause applies where a loss is computed under the specific head "Income from house property" for a tax year but is not wholly set off against income under other heads in that year. Such unabsorbed loss shall be carried forward to the subsequent tax year and may be set off only against income from house property computed for that subsequent tax year. This process may be continued ("and so on") subject to the overall temporal limit. The carry-forward is restricted to a maximum of eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed. The clause also supplies a definition: "unabsorbed loss from house property" means the loss under that head which has not been, or is not wholly, set off against income from any other head u/s 107 for the said tax year.

      Interpretation

      The textual intent is to limit cross-head utilization of house property losses and to preserve them for future house property income. The restriction "set off only against income from house property" indicates a legislative policy that losses originating in the house property head are to be ring-fenced to similar income streams, preventing their absorption against other types of income in subsequent years. The "and so on" phrase signals iterative carry forward until the loss is fully absorbed or the eight-year ceiling is reached. The definition in subsection (3) signals that the clause applies only where the loss remains, in whole or in part, after application of set-off rules u/s 107 for that tax year.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Not stated in the document: any specific provisos, exceptions, or special cases (for example, treatment on transfer of property, amalgamation, or conversion of business) are not included in the clause text provided. No proviso concerning modification, waiver, or alternative treatment is present.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Tax year T1 - loss from house property = Rs X; set off against other heads u/s 107 = Rs Y; residual unabsorbed loss = Rs (X-Y). In tax year T2, the unabsorbed loss Rs (X-Y) may be set off only against house property income for T2. (All numeric specifics Not stated in the document.)

      • Example 2: If after set-off in year T2 some residual loss remains, it may be carried forward to T3 and set off only against house property income in T3, continuing up to eight succeeding tax years from T1.

      Interplay

      The clause explicitly references section 107 for the definition of "unabsorbed loss from house property" - suggesting interplay with the provisions governing intra-year set-off of losses. No other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are mentioned in the clause. Any interpretive interaction with other sections of the income tax statute (beyond section 107) is Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Section 110 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 110 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)

      • Structural wording and terminology: The Act's Section 110 (Document 1) uses the phrasing "Where for any tax year, loss computed under the head 'Income from house property' cannot be wholly set off against the income under any other head as per section 109," and specifies carry forward and iterative set-off mechanics in two subsections (1)(a) and (1)(b). The Bill's Clause 110 (Document 2) refers to "The unabsorbed loss from house property for any tax year" and defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" in subsection (3).
      • Definition provision: Clause 110 (Bill) expressly defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" in subsection (3). Section 110 (Act) does not include an explicit definition clause for that term in the provided text.
      • Reference to set-off against other heads: The Act's text explicitly references section 109 for the prior set-off rule ("as per section 109"). The Bill's clause refers to set-off u/s 107 in its definition of "unabsorbed loss" (subsection (3)). Thus each version cross-references a different section number in the provided texts.
      • Division of carry-forward operation: The Act separates the carry-forward rule and the mechanics into (1)(a) (set off only against income from house property) and (1)(b) (if not wholly set off carry forward further). The Bill states the rule in one sentence and uses "and so on" to indicate repetition; it is simpler and the iterative mechanism is not broken into discrete clauses.
      • Temporal phrasing for time-limit: Both texts limit carry forward to eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed. The Act states "No loss shall be carried forward under this section for more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year for which the loss was first computed." The Bill states, "not being more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which such loss was first computed." Substantively the time-limit appears identical.

      Practical impact of each difference

      • Presence of explicit definition in the Bill: Clause 110's explicit definition of "unabsorbed loss from house property" clarifies the reference point for what may be carried forward and avoids interpretive ambiguity about whether partial set-off against other heads at the same year affects carry forward. The Act's omission of an explicit definition in the provided text may require reliance on other sections or ordinary meaning to determine the same concept, potentially creating minor drafting uncertainty.
      • Different cross-references (section 109 vs section 107): The Act's reference to section 109 and the Bill's reference to section 107 (in the definition) may reflect renumbering or a substantive difference in the set-off scheme elsewhere in the code. Practically, if the referenced section differs in content, taxpayers and departments must consult the correct cross-referenced provision to determine prior set-off rules; mismatches could cause compliance errors until clarified.
      • Drafting clarity and enforcement: The Act's division into (a) and (b) more explicitly mandates that carry-forward losses are only to be set off against house property income and that any remainder must be carried forward, reducing interpretive questions. The Bill's compact wording accomplishes the same effect but with less granular punctuation; in practice both convey the same operational outcome but the Act's structure may be marginally clearer for compliance and adjudication.
      • No substantive change to the eight-year limit: Both texts impose the same eight-year ceiling; therefore, no practical change arises on the temporal limit for carry forward.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers must track the computation year of house property losses and the portion that remains unabsorbed after application of section 107 in that year, since only the unabsorbed portion qualifies for carry forward. Misapplication of set-off against non-house-property income in subsequent years would be contrary to the explicit limitation and could attract reassessment risk. Record-keeping to evidence prior-year set-off u/s 107 is essential.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Maintain clear records of yearwise computation of house property loss, particulars of set-off applied u/s 107 in the year of computation, and yearwise set-off against house property income in subsequent years showing progressive absorption. Documentation demonstrating the origin year of the loss will be necessary to enforce the eight-year limit and to support position in assessments or appeals.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 110 confines carry-forwarded house property losses to set-off only against future house property income.
      • Carry forward is permitted for up to eight tax years immediately succeeding the year of computation.
      • The clause defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" by cross-reference to set-off u/s 107 for the year of computation.
      • No exceptions, provisos, or interactions with other statutory mechanisms (beyond section 107) are specified in the clause.
      • Taxpayers must carefully document the computation and set-off chronology to comply and to preserve the ability to claim carry forward within the eight-year window.

      Full Text:

      Section 110 Carry forward and set off of loss from house property.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax