Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    NewsBills
    Section 194B - Winnings from lottery or crossword puzzle
    NewsBills
    Section 194BB - Winnings from horse race
    NewsBills
    Section 194D – Insurance commission
    NewsBills
    Section 194G - Commission, etc., on sale of lottery tickets.
    NewsBills
    Section 194H - Commission or brokerage.
    NewsBills
    Section 194-I – Rent
    NewsBills
    Section 194J - Fees for professional or technical services.
    NewsBills
    Section 194K – Income in respect of units
    NewsBills
    Section 194LA - Payment of compensation on acquisition of certain immovable property.
    NewsBills
    Definition of “forest produce” rationalised
    NewsBills
    Reduction in compliance burden by omission of TCS on sale of specified goods
    NewsBills
    Amendments proposed in provisions of Block assessment for search and requisition cases under Chapter...
    NewsBills
    Non-applicability of Section 271AAB of the Act
    NewsBills
    Amendments proposed in sections 132 and 132B for rationalising provisions
    NewsBills
    Time limit to impose penalties rationalised
    NewsBills
    Clarification regarding commencement date and the end date of the period stayed by the Court
    NewsBills
    Rationalisation of provisions related to carry forward of losses in case of amalgamation
    NewsBills
    Rationalisation of transfer pricing provisions for carrying out multi-year arm’s length price dete...
    NewsBills
    Removal of higher TDS/TCS for non-filers of return of income
    NewsBills
    SOCIO ECONOMIC WELFARE MEASURES - Increase in the limits on the income of the employees for the purp...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax deduction on lottery winnings now triggers per single transaction rather than by annual aggregation.
    The Finance Bill, 2025 amends Section 194B to remove the aggregate-year threshold and instead require tax withholding on each single transaction that exceeds the statutory threshold, changing the trigger for deduction from annual aggregation to per-transaction basis; this amendment takes effect from 1 April 2025 (Clause 54).
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax deduction on horse race winnings: threshold now applies per single payout, altering withholding obligation at payment.
    Section 194BB requires a bookmaker or licensed person paying horse-race winnings to deduct tax at source at the rates in force at the time of payment. The Finance Bill 2025 removes the aggregate-year threshold and makes the deduction requirement apply where a single transaction exceeds the threshold, shifting the test from annual aggregation to single-transaction application.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Insurance commission TDS threshold raised, reducing mandatory withholding on smaller commission payments from the Bill's effective financial year.
    Section 194D requires deduction of income-tax at source on remuneration or reward for soliciting or procuring insurance business paid to a resident where payments in a financial year exceed a prescribed threshold. The Finance Bill, 2025 raises that threshold, reducing the instances where TDS is required, and makes the amendment effective from the commencement of the specified financial year.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on lottery commissions: threshold raised, reducing instances of deduction at source; new rule effective next fiscal year.
    Amendment to Section 194G raises the monetary threshold that triggers a two percent TDS obligation on commission, remuneration or prize payments to persons engaged in stocking, distributing, purchasing or selling lottery tickets, thereby reducing instances where tax must be deducted at source. The two percent deduction rate remains unchanged, and the amendment takes effect from the commencement of the next fiscal year.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on commission: threshold for deduction raised, narrowing scope of withholding for small payees next fiscal year
    Persons other than individuals and HUFs paying commission or brokerage to resident payees must deduct tax at source at a two percent rate where annual payments exceed the prescribed threshold; the Finance Bill proposes to raise that threshold, reducing the number of payments subject to deduction while excluding insurance commission treated under a separate provision, effective from the commencement of the relevant fiscal year.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on rent threshold lowered, expanding deduction requirement to monthly rent payments effective next fiscal year.
    The amendment expands the requirement to deduct tax at source on rent by replacing the prior annual exemption with a monthly (or part-month) threshold for payers other than individuals and HUFs; rent exceeding the specified monthly amount will attract withholding, and the change is effective from the start of the next fiscal year.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on professional and technical fees: higher thresholds reduce mandatory withholding obligations from the next financial year.
    The Finance Bill increases the threshold for tax deduction at source on payments characterised as fees for professional services, fees for technical services, royalty and other specified sums made by persons other than individuals or HUFs; deductions are required only when aggregate payments in a financial year exceed the revised thresholds, with the amendment effective from the start of the specified financial year.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on mutual fund unit income: threshold for mandatory deduction increased, narrowing instances where withholding is required.
    Persons paying income in respect of mutual fund units, administrators of specified undertakings, or specified companies must deduct tax at source at the prescribed rate only when the payee's income from such units exceeds the revised threshold; the amendment narrows the circumstances requiring deduction and applies prospectively from the effective date specified in the Finance Bill.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on compensation for compulsory acquisition: deduction threshold raised while the deduction rate is retained, effective next fiscal April.
    Section 194LA requires tax deduction at source on compensation or enhanced compensation and consideration for compulsory acquisition of immovable property (other than agricultural land) where amounts in a financial year exceed the prescribed threshold. The Finance Bill, 2025 proposes to raise that threshold while retaining the existing deduction rate and mechanism; the amendment is to take effect from 1 April 2025.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Definition of forest produce clarified to align with State Acts or Indian Forest Act, narrowing TCS scope to leased produce.
    The Finance Bill aligns the definition of forest produce with any State Act or the Indian Forest Act, 1927, to clarify TCS coverage; it confines TCS on "other forest produce" (excluding timber and tendu leaves) to items obtained under a forest lease, and sets TCS at two per cent for timber or other forest produce under lease and two per cent for timber obtained otherwise, effective from 1 April 2025.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Collection at Source exemption removes duplicate TCS/TDS obligation, streamlining seller and buyer compliance from April 1, 2025.
    The Finance Bill proposes omission of the sub section imposing Tax Collection at Source by sellers on sale of specified goods where the buyer is liable to deduct Tax Deduction at Source, to prevent overlapping TCS/TDS obligations and ease compliance; the amendment takes effect from 1 April 2025.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Block assessment scope expanded to include virtual digital assets; computation, revival and timeline rules updated.
    Amendments bring virtual digital asset within the definition of undisclosed income for Chapter XIV-B; add "recomputation", "reference" and "order" to the list of proceedings that may revive if a Chapter XIV-B proceeding is annulled; replace "pending" with assessments "required to be made" for subsequent searches; amend computation rules to recognise undisclosed income declared in return and include returns filed before search or requisition for credit; exclude income from international or specified domestic transactions from block period income; and change the block assessment time limit to twelve months from the end of the quarter of the last authorisation.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Non-applicability of penalty under section 271AAB clarified for searches under section 132 after block assessment introduction.
    The amendment provides that section 271AAB shall not apply to an assessee in whose case a search under section 132 was initiated on or after 1 September 2024, aligning the penalty provision with the block assessment regime introduced by the Finance Act, 2024 and removing any ambiguity about applicability; the amendment takes effect from 1 September 2024.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Search and seizure: uniform quarterly-based time limit for retention approvals and updated cross-references for execution definitions.
    The Bill amends section 132 to provide that the time limit for taking approval for retention of seized books of account or documents will be one month from the end of the quarter in which the assessment, reassessment or recomputation order is made, addressing administrative difficulties in group search cases. It also modifies Explanation 1 to section 132 to substitute "authorisation" with "authorisations", and updates Explanation 1 to section 132B to reference section 158B for the meaning of "execution of an authorisation for search or requisition".
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation on penalty imposition extended to a uniform quarterly deadline after completion of connected proceedings or receipt of appeals.
    The amendment standardises the limitation for imposing penalties under Chapter XXI so that no penalty order may be passed after the expiry of six months from the end of the quarter in which the connected proceedings are completed, the appellate order is received by the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, an order of revision is passed, or the notice for imposition of penalty is issued. A consequential amendment updates the cross-reference in section 246A. These changes take effect from 1 April 2025.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Stay period exclusion clarified: computation excludes from date stay granted until certified vacatur received by tax Commissioner.
    The amendment excludes from computation of statutory time limits the period beginning on the date a court stay is granted and ending on the date a certified copy of the order vacating that stay is received by the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner (or the Approving Panel where applicable).
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Carryforward of losses limited to eight assessment years for predecessor losses in amalgamations, preventing loss evergreening.
    Sections 72A and 72AA are amended to provide that any accumulated loss of an original predecessor entity deemed to be the loss of the successor entity may be carried forward only for eight assessment years immediately succeeding the assessment year in which that loss was first computed for the original predecessor, aligning these provisions with section 72 and preventing evergreening through successive amalgamations.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Multi-year transfer pricing: one ALP can apply to consecutive years, with TPO validation and AO recomputation.
    A voluntary multi-year transfer pricing option permits an ALP determined by the TPO for a transaction in a given previous year to apply to similar transactions in the immediately following consecutive years; the assessee must exercise a prescribed option, the TPO must validate it within a set period, and on validation the AO shall recompute total income for those years in conformity with the TPO's ALP while no fresh references for those transactions shall be permitted.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Higher TDS/TCS for non-filers removed, easing withholding obligations and reducing verification and compliance burden for payors.
    The proposal omits provisions imposing higher rates of deduction and collection for non-filers of income-tax returns, responding to stakeholder concerns that payors face difficulty verifying filing status and bear increased compliance and capital blockage; the amendment is intended to simplify withholding obligations and reduce verification burdens, effective from the first day of April, 2025.
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Perquisite income threshold increase: employer-provided amenities and foreign medical travel may be exempt from perquisite treatment.
    Proposed amendment to section 17 would grant rulemaking power to increase the gross total income ceilings for treating employer-provided amenities and benefits as non-perquisites, and to raise the income limit excluding employer-funded foreign medical travel from perquisite treatment; the changes take effect from 1 April 2026 and apply to the subsequent assessment year.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 66 "Interpretation" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      29 August, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 66 Interpretation.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 66 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) - interpretative definitions for sections 26-66 dealing with "Profits and gains of business or profession". It matters because these definitions determine the scope and application of multiple substantive provisions in Chapter IV-D; affected parties include taxpayers carrying on business or profession, financial institutions, exchanges, and certain classes of enterprises.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 66 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) provides interpretive definitions for terms used "In sections 26 to 66" of the Bill, dealing with Profits and gains of business or profession. It contains a catalogue of defined expressions - including "agreement", "banking company", "commission or brokerage", "commodity derivative", "commodities transaction tax", "fees for technical services", "housing finance company", "Indian Institute of Technology", "Keyman insurance policy", "limited liability partnership", "long-term finance", "micro enterprise", "mineral oil", "moneys payable", "National Housing Bank", "non-scheduled bank", "paid", "permanent establishment", "plant", "predecessor entity", "primary agricultural credit society", "primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank", "professional services", "public company", "public financial institution", "rate of exchange", "recognised commodity exchange", "rent" (for s.35(b)(i)), "royalty", "rural branch", "scientific research", "securities transaction tax", "service" (for s.26(2)(h)), "small enterprise", "speculative transaction", "Specified Banking or Online Mode", "specified derivative transaction", "State Government undertaking", "State Industrial Investment Corporation", "State Financial Corporation", "successor entity", "taxable commodities transaction", "taxable securities transaction", "University" and "work" (for s.35(b)(i)).

      Interpretation

      The text primarily assigns meanings by cross-reference to other statutes (e.g., Banking Regulation Act, Companies Act, Finance Acts) or by descriptive definition. Legislative intent, as discernible from the text, is to standardise terminology used across the chapters and to reduce ambiguity by aligning tax definitions with sectoral statutes and financial legislation. The Bill uses inclusive definitions (e.g., "includes any arrangement... whether or not ... formal or in writing") to capture informal commercial arrangements within tax net. The "specified derivative transaction" and "speculative transaction" definitions use functional tests (electronic trading, contract settlement mechanics) to delineate tax treatment boundaries.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Where the Bill carves out exceptions, it does so within particular definitions. For example, "speculative transaction" excludes (a) specified derivative transactions; (b) certain hedging contracts in the course of manufacturing/merchandising; (c) contracts by dealers/investors in stocks/shares for hedging; and (d) forward-market or stock-exchange member transactions in jobbing/arbitrage. These subclauses act as express carve-outs to prevent ordinary commercial hedging or certain exchange activities from being treated as speculative for tax purposes. No general provisos outside definition-specific qualifiers are present. Other conditional definitions (e.g., "long-term finance" requiring repayment terms of not less than five years) set clear thresholds.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A loan with a repayment schedule of six years qualifies as "long-term finance" for s.32(e) under the Bill, because repayment with interest occurs over a period not less than five years. Not stated in the document whether interest-only or bullet repayments have any effect.

      • Example 2: A contract for forward purchase of raw materials by a manufacturer to hedge price risk is carved out from "speculative transaction" and therefore will not be treated as speculative under the Bill. Not stated in the document how documentation must be maintained to evidence the hedging purpose.

      • Example 3: Trading in derivatives carried out electronically on a recognised commodity exchange and supported by a time-stamped contract note with UCI and PAN would meet the clause's requirement for a "specified derivative transaction". Not stated in the document whether off-exchange bilateral derivatives cleared through a recognised clearing corporation are covered.

      Interplay

      The Bill explicitly cross-references multiple fora of subordinate and other primary legislation - e.g., the Banking Regulation Act, Companies Act, Finance Act(s), the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, SEBI Act and the Depositories Act. This signals intended interoperability: tax definitions are to be interpreted in light of sectoral legislation. The Bill relies on prescribed conditions and notifications (e.g., "recognised commodity exchange" to be notified and to fulfil conditions "as prescribed"). Interaction with rules and notifications is anticipated but the Bill often leaves specifics to delegated law (prescription/notification).

      Differences between Section 66 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 66 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version)

      • Scope language: Section 66 applies "For the purposes of Part D of this Chapter" (i.e., Chapter IV-D), whereas Clause 66 (Old Version) states "In sections 26 to 66," - a broader textual hook in the Bill version. 
        • Practical impact: potential difference in statutory application scope - the Act text narrows the interpretive provisions to Part D explicitly; the Bill text suggests definitions apply across sections 26-66. This narrows or widens reach depending on the cross-references in the surrounding code.
      • Terminology difference - "commodity derivative" vs "commodities transaction": The Bill (Old) at clause (4) defines "commodity derivative" (as in Finance Act) while the Act (Section 66) replaces that item with a clause (4) defining "commodities transaction tax" and retains a later clause for "specified derivative transaction" with a different structure.
        • Practical impact: change in focus from defining the derivative instrument to defining the tax/transaction type; may affect which term governs specific tax computations and interpretive cross-references.
      • National Housing Bank: Clause 66 (Old) contains a specific definition of "National Housing Bank" at clause (15). Section 66 (Act) omits that definition and instead includes "banking company" definition at (2) and "State Financial Corporation" related items; it includes "Keyman insurance policy" and other items.
        • Practical impact: removal of express "National Housing Bank" definition in the enacted provision could affect application of provisions where that entity was singled out in the Bill; reliance would shift to general definitions or other provisions.
      • Micro/small enterprise cross-references: Clause 66 (Old) defines "micro enterprise" as assigned in section 2(h) of the MSME Act and "small enterprise" as in section 2(m). Section 66 (Act) instead states both "micro enterprise" and "small enterprise" shall be "classified as such under the notification in this behalf by the Central Government under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006."
        • Practical impact: Act moves from direct cross-reference to specific statutory subsections to a reference to notification-based classification; this grants greater administrative flexibility and ties the definition to executive notifications rather than to fixed statutory clause numbers.
      • Terminology and numbering changes for derivative/speculative definitions: The Bill's "specified derivative transaction" definition (clause (37)) is structured as three conjunctive requirements (electronic on recognised exchanges; carried out by bank/mutual fund/other through intermediary; supported by time-stamped contract note). The Act's corresponding clause (33) sets out a different two-part formulation and explicitly includes trading in commodity derivatives chargeable to commodities transaction tax or trading in agricultural commodity derivatives subject to specified conditions, and provides alternative carrying-out methods (through stock broker/intermediary or by banks or mutual funds electronically).
        • Practical impact: Act broadens or alters the qualifying modes of specified derivatives and the entities that may carry them out; this may affect the classification of transactions for taxability and compliance (contract-note requirements remain but text differs).
      • Inclusion/omission of successor/predecessor/succession of sole proprietorship: Clause 66 (Old) at predecessor entity includes an extra clause (e) for "sole proprietary concern" succession (70(1)(zf)); Section 66 (Act) predecessor entity omits that (no clause (e) under predecessor) but successor entity in Section 66 includes conversion to LLP etc.
        • Practical impact: divergence as to whether succession of sole proprietorship by a company is captured in predecessor/successor definitions; could affect tax continuity provisions on succession and carry-overs.
      • "Recognised commodity exchange" appears in the Bill (Old) (clause (27)) but is absent from the enacted Section 66.
        • Practical impact: removal may require reliance on other definitions or create ambiguity where the Bill relied on this term; stakeholders in commodity derivatives may need to seek alternative statutory anchors.
      • Placement and wording of "service" for section 26(2)(h): Both texts define "service" with an illustrative list. The list is substantially the same but the Act positions this at clause (29) and the Bill at (33).
        • Practical impact: principally drafting/numbering; substantively similar.
      • Minor reordering and rewording: Many items are present in both texts but with changed numbering, slightly different cross-references (e.g., references to Finance (No. 2) Act numbering), and occasional substitutions (e.g., "commodity derivative" v. "commodities transaction tax").
        • Practical impact: requires careful cross-referencing in tax opinions and compliance documents; numbering changes may affect citations in subordinate rules, circulars, and litigation if not harmonised.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers engaging in derivative trading or commodity transactions must ensure trading occurs through prescribed channels (recognised exchanges/intermediaries) and maintain time-stamped contract notes with UCI and PAN details to satisfy the "specified derivative transaction" criteria. Failure to satisfy documentary or platform conditions risks reclassification as speculative or non-specified, altering tax treatment.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The Bill emphasises documentary support (time-stamped contract notes, unique client identity numbers, PAN), and in carve-outs (e.g., hedging for manufacturers) suggests that contemporaneous evidence of commercial purpose will be material. Not stated in the document are retention periods or formats for such records; those will be governed by other provisions or rules.

      Key Takeaways

      • The Bill centralises and aligns tax definitions with sectoral statutes and marketplace practices, using cross-references to existing Acts and requiring prescribed/platform-based conditions for derivative classification.
      • Definitions include inclusive language to capture informal arrangements (e.g., "agreement" includes arrangements not in writing or legally enforceable), broadening tax net for certain anti-avoidance contexts.
      • Specified thresholds and documentary requirements (e.g., repayment period of five years, time-stamped contract notes with UCI and PAN) create clear compliance triggers; absence of these may change tax characterisation.
      • Several terms are left to notification/prescription (e.g., "recognised commodity exchange", "Specified Banking or Online Mode"), indicating reliance on delegated legislation for operational clarity.
      • Carve-outs for legitimate commercial hedging and exchange-related activities reduce the risk of routine business transactions being taxed as speculative, but evidentiary burden is implied.

      Full Text:

      Section 66 Interpretation.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax