Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Can ICDS apply to a person following cash system of accounting and to the person whose books of acco...
    Switching from normal payment of tax composition scheme - Whether the assessee is liable to reverse ...
    Switching from composition scheme to normal scheme of payment of tax - Whether the assessee is eligi...
    Can a registered person, who purchases goods from a composition manufacturer / trader (dealer / supp...
    In case of a person who is/was availing composition scheme u/s 10. What will be the due date of paym...
    What is the due date of payment of Tax under GST? What is the due date for payment of tax (GST) and ...
    Whether a person who is opting for Composition u/s 10 of the GST, is required to pay GST at composit...
    A person who was making inter-state supplies during the previous year but not making inter-state sup...
    How to determine Turnover limit for availing the benefit of composition scheme? Is it required to be...
    What is the validity of composition levy? Whether intimation is required to be submitted each year f...
    Can the option to pay tax under composition levy be exercised at any time of the year?
    Can a person paying tax under composition levy, withdraw voluntarily from the scheme? If so, how?
    Can an Importer of goods or services opt to pay tax under composition scheme under GST?
    Can an exporter of goods opt to pay tax under composition scheme under GST?
    Can a person paying tax under composition scheme under GST make supplies of goods to SEZ?
    Whether a person having turnover much below ₹ 75 Lakhs (Rs. 50 lakhs as the case may be) as on...
    A person availing benefit of composition scheme under GST, want to be a casual dealer in another sta...
    Who are not eligible to opt for composition scheme? Whether certain manufacturers (like Ice cream, P...
    A person availing composition scheme during a financial year crosses the turnover of ₹ 75 Lakh...
    Whether a person supplying goods through Electronic Commerce Operator, is eligible to opt compositio...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS applicability limited to mercantile accounting; excludes cash-accounting and individuals/HUFs not subject to tax audit.
    ICDS applies to persons following the mercantile system of accounting and does not apply to those following the cash system. For individuals and HUFs, ICDS is applicable only if they carry on business or profession and their books are required to be audited under the tax audit provisions; it does not apply where there is no business or professional income even if mercantile accounting is followed for other heads.
    ManualsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Reversal of Input Tax Credit on switching to composition scheme; capital goods credit prorated by remaining useful life.
    Switching to the composition scheme requires reversal of Input Tax Credit on inputs, inputs in semi finished or finished goods held in stock, and capital goods held in stock as on the day before the option is exercised, by payment from the electronic credit or cash ledger after prescribed reductions. For capital goods, reversal is prorated by remaining useful life using an assumed five year useful life, with the credit attributable to remaining months computed as original credit multiplied by remaining months divided by sixty.
    ManualsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input tax credit eligibility on switching from composition to normal scheme - capital goods credit reduced over time, subject to time bar.
    A taxpayer switching from the composition scheme to the normal scheme may claim Input Tax Credit for inputs, inputs in goods held in stock, and capital goods held immediately before liability to pay tax, but credit for capital goods must be reduced by the prescribed periodic reduction measured from the invoice or receipt date, and no credit may be claimed for supplies after one year from the tax invoice date.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit denial: purchases from composition taxpayers are ineligible for ITC under the GST regime.
    A composition scheme taxpayer is excluded from the input tax credit chain, cannot issue a tax invoice or collect tax, and must state that no credit is available. Consequently, a registered person purchasing from a composition dealer cannot claim Input Tax Credit because the supplier does not charge GST in a manner that would enable the recipient to treat the payment as tax paid for ITC purposes.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme threshold triggers monthly tax payment and monthly returns requirement for the affected taxpayer.
    A taxpayer under the Composition Scheme may pay and file on the quarterly schedule (guidance noting payment on the 18th and quarterly return on the 18th after quarter-end). If the taxpayer crosses the threshold or withdraws from composition, they become a regular taxable person and must pay tax and furnish returns monthly by the 20th of the following month for the remainder of the financial year and subsequent years.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    GST payment due date: monthly filers pay with next-month return; composition filers pay with quarterly return.
    Tax under GST must be paid not later than the return's due date. Monthly filers must file GSTR-3 and pay tax by the twentieth day of the month following the tax month. Composition taxpayers under the composition scheme file quarterly in GSTR-4 and must pay tax by the eighteenth day after the quarter ends.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition levy on exempt supplies raises eligibility ambiguity due to turnover inclusion versus ineligibility for non leviable supplies.
    The composition levy's tax base, as defined by turnover, expressly includes exempt supplies, indicating that composition tax is payable having regard to exempted goods; however, Section 10(2)(b) disqualifies persons making supplies "not leviable to tax," creating an ambiguity whether exempt supplies (which definitionally includes nil rated and wholly exempt supplies and non taxable supplies) render a person ineligible for composition. Commentators note this tension and call for clarification or amendment to reconcile the turnover inclusion with the eligibility restriction.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Eligibility for composition scheme may be barred by prior inter state supplies, even if current turnover is below threshold.
    A registered person who made inter state supplies during the previous year is ineligible to opt for the composition scheme in the current year, because eligibility under Section 10 is determined with reference to the preceding financial year; thus the absence of inter state supplies must be assessed for the previous year even if turnover remains below the threshold.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme eligibility: turnover in preceding financial year determines entitlement; aggregate turnover is all-India and fresh declaration required.
    Eligibility for the composition scheme depends on aggregate turnover in the preceding financial year not exceeding the prescribed threshold; aggregate turnover is computed on an all India basis and includes taxable supplies (excluding inward reverse charge supplies), exempt supplies, exports and inter State supplies by the same PAN, while excluding GST and cess. Eligibility is reassessed each year; a fresh declaration is required to opt into the scheme after becoming eligible.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme validity continues while statutory conditions are met; annual intimation is not required for eligible taxpayers.
    The composition levy remains valid so long as statutory eligibility conditions and applicable CGST Rules are complied with; no fresh annual intimation is required if those conditions continue to be met.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition levy option must be elected before the financial year begins; prior electronic intimation required.
    The option to pay tax under the composition levy must be exercised by giving electronic intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 prior to the commencement of the relevant financial year under the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition levy withdrawal: file FORM GST CMP-04 and submit FORM GST ITC-01 detailing stock within the prescribed period.
    Withdrawal from the composition scheme is effected by filing a duly signed or verified application in FORM GST CMP-04, and the applicant must electronically furnish FORM GST ITC-01 detailing stock of inputs and inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held on the date of withdrawal within thirty days of withdrawal.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme: importers may remain in composition though IGST on imports may not yield input tax credit, service providers excluded.
    Importers can opt for the composition scheme where otherwise eligible; there is no categorical bar on importers availing composition levy. IGST is payable on import and such tax may not yield input tax credit for a composition taxpayer. Pure service providers remain ineligible for composition, and importing services for business or captive consumption does not automatically make a person a service provider or disqualify composition eligibility.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme eligibility: exporters cannot use composition tax where their supplies are treated as inter State, barring such option.
    Exports are treated as inter State supplies for GST purposes. The composition levy prohibits a taxpayer from making inter State outward supplies of goods while paying tax under the composition scheme. Therefore, an exporter whose transactions are classified as inter State supplies cannot opt to pay tax under the composition scheme in respect of those export supplies.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme: suppliers cannot make inter State outward supplies to SEZ while remaining in the scheme.
    Supplies from the domestic tariff area to an SEZ are treated as inter State supplies, and Rule 5/Section 10 conditions for the composition levy prohibit a composition taxpayer from making inter State outward supplies; therefore a person paying tax under the composition scheme cannot make outward supplies of goods to an SEZ while remaining in the scheme.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme eligibility denied where stock on appointed day was purchased inter state, imported, or received from outside State.
    Persons below the turnover threshold who hold stock on the appointed day cannot opt for the composition scheme if that stock was purchased inter state, imported, or received from an out of State branch, agent or principal; possession of such goods on the appointed day disqualifies a registered person from the composition levy.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme eligibility barred for casual and non-resident taxable persons; cannot claim composition as casual dealer.
    A taxpayer acting as a casual taxable person or a non-resident taxable person is expressly excluded from the composition levy; therefore casual dealers and non-resident taxable persons cannot avail the composition scheme while operating in that capacity.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme ineligibility: manufacturers of ice cream, pan masala and tobacco and certain suppliers cannot opt.
    Section 10(2) excludes five categories from the composition scheme: suppliers of services (except restaurant services), suppliers of non taxable goods, inter State suppliers, persons supplying through electronic commerce operators, and manufacturers of notified goods. Rule 5 adds further ineligible classes. A notification further specifies that manufacturers of ice cream, pan masala, and all tobacco and manufactured tobacco substitutes are not eligible for composition levy.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme lapse triggers transition to regular tax liability and requires issuing tax invoices and filing withdrawal notice promptly.
    Crossing the aggregate turnover threshold causes the composition option to lapse from the day the threshold is exceeded; the person is liable to pay tax under section 9 from that day and must issue tax invoices for every taxable supply made thereafter. The person must also file an intimation for withdrawal from the scheme in FORM GST CMP-04 within seven days of the occurrence of such event.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Composition scheme eligibility may be available for suppliers using e-commerce operators while TDS/TCS provisions remain inoperative.
    Eligibility for the composition scheme is negated for suppliers making supplies through an electronic commerce operator required to collect tax at source; however, because the TDS/TCS provisions are not yet operative and ECOs are not required to collect tax, suppliers using ECOs may currently opt for the composition scheme until the collection provisions are brought into force, and an administrative clarification from the government is recommended to remove uncertainty.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 66 "Interpretation" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      29 August, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 66 Interpretation.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 66 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) - interpretative definitions for sections 26-66 dealing with "Profits and gains of business or profession". It matters because these definitions determine the scope and application of multiple substantive provisions in Chapter IV-D; affected parties include taxpayers carrying on business or profession, financial institutions, exchanges, and certain classes of enterprises.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 66 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) provides interpretive definitions for terms used "In sections 26 to 66" of the Bill, dealing with Profits and gains of business or profession. It contains a catalogue of defined expressions - including "agreement", "banking company", "commission or brokerage", "commodity derivative", "commodities transaction tax", "fees for technical services", "housing finance company", "Indian Institute of Technology", "Keyman insurance policy", "limited liability partnership", "long-term finance", "micro enterprise", "mineral oil", "moneys payable", "National Housing Bank", "non-scheduled bank", "paid", "permanent establishment", "plant", "predecessor entity", "primary agricultural credit society", "primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank", "professional services", "public company", "public financial institution", "rate of exchange", "recognised commodity exchange", "rent" (for s.35(b)(i)), "royalty", "rural branch", "scientific research", "securities transaction tax", "service" (for s.26(2)(h)), "small enterprise", "speculative transaction", "Specified Banking or Online Mode", "specified derivative transaction", "State Government undertaking", "State Industrial Investment Corporation", "State Financial Corporation", "successor entity", "taxable commodities transaction", "taxable securities transaction", "University" and "work" (for s.35(b)(i)).

      Interpretation

      The text primarily assigns meanings by cross-reference to other statutes (e.g., Banking Regulation Act, Companies Act, Finance Acts) or by descriptive definition. Legislative intent, as discernible from the text, is to standardise terminology used across the chapters and to reduce ambiguity by aligning tax definitions with sectoral statutes and financial legislation. The Bill uses inclusive definitions (e.g., "includes any arrangement... whether or not ... formal or in writing") to capture informal commercial arrangements within tax net. The "specified derivative transaction" and "speculative transaction" definitions use functional tests (electronic trading, contract settlement mechanics) to delineate tax treatment boundaries.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Where the Bill carves out exceptions, it does so within particular definitions. For example, "speculative transaction" excludes (a) specified derivative transactions; (b) certain hedging contracts in the course of manufacturing/merchandising; (c) contracts by dealers/investors in stocks/shares for hedging; and (d) forward-market or stock-exchange member transactions in jobbing/arbitrage. These subclauses act as express carve-outs to prevent ordinary commercial hedging or certain exchange activities from being treated as speculative for tax purposes. No general provisos outside definition-specific qualifiers are present. Other conditional definitions (e.g., "long-term finance" requiring repayment terms of not less than five years) set clear thresholds.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A loan with a repayment schedule of six years qualifies as "long-term finance" for s.32(e) under the Bill, because repayment with interest occurs over a period not less than five years. Not stated in the document whether interest-only or bullet repayments have any effect.

      • Example 2: A contract for forward purchase of raw materials by a manufacturer to hedge price risk is carved out from "speculative transaction" and therefore will not be treated as speculative under the Bill. Not stated in the document how documentation must be maintained to evidence the hedging purpose.

      • Example 3: Trading in derivatives carried out electronically on a recognised commodity exchange and supported by a time-stamped contract note with UCI and PAN would meet the clause's requirement for a "specified derivative transaction". Not stated in the document whether off-exchange bilateral derivatives cleared through a recognised clearing corporation are covered.

      Interplay

      The Bill explicitly cross-references multiple fora of subordinate and other primary legislation - e.g., the Banking Regulation Act, Companies Act, Finance Act(s), the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, SEBI Act and the Depositories Act. This signals intended interoperability: tax definitions are to be interpreted in light of sectoral legislation. The Bill relies on prescribed conditions and notifications (e.g., "recognised commodity exchange" to be notified and to fulfil conditions "as prescribed"). Interaction with rules and notifications is anticipated but the Bill often leaves specifics to delegated law (prescription/notification).

      Differences between Section 66 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 66 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version)

      • Scope language: Section 66 applies "For the purposes of Part D of this Chapter" (i.e., Chapter IV-D), whereas Clause 66 (Old Version) states "In sections 26 to 66," - a broader textual hook in the Bill version. 
        • Practical impact: potential difference in statutory application scope - the Act text narrows the interpretive provisions to Part D explicitly; the Bill text suggests definitions apply across sections 26-66. This narrows or widens reach depending on the cross-references in the surrounding code.
      • Terminology difference - "commodity derivative" vs "commodities transaction": The Bill (Old) at clause (4) defines "commodity derivative" (as in Finance Act) while the Act (Section 66) replaces that item with a clause (4) defining "commodities transaction tax" and retains a later clause for "specified derivative transaction" with a different structure.
        • Practical impact: change in focus from defining the derivative instrument to defining the tax/transaction type; may affect which term governs specific tax computations and interpretive cross-references.
      • National Housing Bank: Clause 66 (Old) contains a specific definition of "National Housing Bank" at clause (15). Section 66 (Act) omits that definition and instead includes "banking company" definition at (2) and "State Financial Corporation" related items; it includes "Keyman insurance policy" and other items.
        • Practical impact: removal of express "National Housing Bank" definition in the enacted provision could affect application of provisions where that entity was singled out in the Bill; reliance would shift to general definitions or other provisions.
      • Micro/small enterprise cross-references: Clause 66 (Old) defines "micro enterprise" as assigned in section 2(h) of the MSME Act and "small enterprise" as in section 2(m). Section 66 (Act) instead states both "micro enterprise" and "small enterprise" shall be "classified as such under the notification in this behalf by the Central Government under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006."
        • Practical impact: Act moves from direct cross-reference to specific statutory subsections to a reference to notification-based classification; this grants greater administrative flexibility and ties the definition to executive notifications rather than to fixed statutory clause numbers.
      • Terminology and numbering changes for derivative/speculative definitions: The Bill's "specified derivative transaction" definition (clause (37)) is structured as three conjunctive requirements (electronic on recognised exchanges; carried out by bank/mutual fund/other through intermediary; supported by time-stamped contract note). The Act's corresponding clause (33) sets out a different two-part formulation and explicitly includes trading in commodity derivatives chargeable to commodities transaction tax or trading in agricultural commodity derivatives subject to specified conditions, and provides alternative carrying-out methods (through stock broker/intermediary or by banks or mutual funds electronically).
        • Practical impact: Act broadens or alters the qualifying modes of specified derivatives and the entities that may carry them out; this may affect the classification of transactions for taxability and compliance (contract-note requirements remain but text differs).
      • Inclusion/omission of successor/predecessor/succession of sole proprietorship: Clause 66 (Old) at predecessor entity includes an extra clause (e) for "sole proprietary concern" succession (70(1)(zf)); Section 66 (Act) predecessor entity omits that (no clause (e) under predecessor) but successor entity in Section 66 includes conversion to LLP etc.
        • Practical impact: divergence as to whether succession of sole proprietorship by a company is captured in predecessor/successor definitions; could affect tax continuity provisions on succession and carry-overs.
      • "Recognised commodity exchange" appears in the Bill (Old) (clause (27)) but is absent from the enacted Section 66.
        • Practical impact: removal may require reliance on other definitions or create ambiguity where the Bill relied on this term; stakeholders in commodity derivatives may need to seek alternative statutory anchors.
      • Placement and wording of "service" for section 26(2)(h): Both texts define "service" with an illustrative list. The list is substantially the same but the Act positions this at clause (29) and the Bill at (33).
        • Practical impact: principally drafting/numbering; substantively similar.
      • Minor reordering and rewording: Many items are present in both texts but with changed numbering, slightly different cross-references (e.g., references to Finance (No. 2) Act numbering), and occasional substitutions (e.g., "commodity derivative" v. "commodities transaction tax").
        • Practical impact: requires careful cross-referencing in tax opinions and compliance documents; numbering changes may affect citations in subordinate rules, circulars, and litigation if not harmonised.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers engaging in derivative trading or commodity transactions must ensure trading occurs through prescribed channels (recognised exchanges/intermediaries) and maintain time-stamped contract notes with UCI and PAN details to satisfy the "specified derivative transaction" criteria. Failure to satisfy documentary or platform conditions risks reclassification as speculative or non-specified, altering tax treatment.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The Bill emphasises documentary support (time-stamped contract notes, unique client identity numbers, PAN), and in carve-outs (e.g., hedging for manufacturers) suggests that contemporaneous evidence of commercial purpose will be material. Not stated in the document are retention periods or formats for such records; those will be governed by other provisions or rules.

      Key Takeaways

      • The Bill centralises and aligns tax definitions with sectoral statutes and marketplace practices, using cross-references to existing Acts and requiring prescribed/platform-based conditions for derivative classification.
      • Definitions include inclusive language to capture informal arrangements (e.g., "agreement" includes arrangements not in writing or legally enforceable), broadening tax net for certain anti-avoidance contexts.
      • Specified thresholds and documentary requirements (e.g., repayment period of five years, time-stamped contract notes with UCI and PAN) create clear compliance triggers; absence of these may change tax characterisation.
      • Several terms are left to notification/prescription (e.g., "recognised commodity exchange", "Specified Banking or Online Mode"), indicating reliance on delegated legislation for operational clarity.
      • Carve-outs for legitimate commercial hedging and exchange-related activities reduce the risk of routine business transactions being taxed as speculative, but evidentiary burden is implied.

      Full Text:

      Section 66 Interpretation.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax