Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Act Rules Bills
    Rate of income-tax in case of companies - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment Yea...
    Act Rules Bills
    Rate of income-tax in case of every local authority - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the As...
    Act Rules Bills
    Rate of income-tax in the case of ever firm (partnership firm) - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates -...
    Act Rules Bills
    Rate of Tax in case of co-operative society - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment...
    Act Rules Bills
    Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment Year 2018-19 and Rates for deduction of tax at source from "Sa...
    Case Laws VAT / Sales Tax
    Classification of goods - Impact of use of punctuation mark
    Case Laws Customs
    Withdrawal of Anti-Dumping Duty - Designated Authority has no power to give retrospective relief
    Meaning and scope of supply under GST (Part 2) - Import of services will be treated as supply and wi...
    Meaning and scope of supply under GST (Part 1) - Since CGST, SGST or IGST will be levied on supply o...
    Case Laws Service Tax
    Whether the vessels or ships that are afloat are not goods and immovable property? - CESTAT says Yes...
    Case Laws Service Tax
    Adjustment of excess paid service tax – rule 6(3) of STR, 1994
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Currency conversion using telegraphic transfer buying rate (‘TTBR...
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Documents to be furnished for availing FTC
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) in case of MAT/ AMT
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Lower of the tax payable under the Act and DTAA
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Cases in which no FTC benefit would be available
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) shall be allowed if evidence & undertaking furnished within 6 months ...
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Meaning of foreign tax
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Benefit on proportionate basis
    Act Rules Income Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - FTC benefit in the year in which income offered to tax
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Corporate tax rate differential for domestic companies introduced, with tiered surcharge rules and specified cess treatment applied.
The Finance Bill revises company tax by setting a lower rate for domestic companies meeting a specified turnover threshold and a higher standard rate otherwise, while maintaining the existing rate for non-domestic companies. Tiered surcharge rates apply differently to domestic companies and to companies other than domestic companies, with marginal relief available. Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess remain generally applicable, but are not levied on tax deducted or collected at source for domestic companies and other residents under specified entries; both cesses still apply to salary TDS and to non-residents and non-domestic companies.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Rate of income-tax for local authorities remains unchanged; surcharge applies and marginal relief available for high-income local authorities.
Rate of income-tax for every local authority is preserved at the level specified for the prior assessment year. Surcharge is imposed on local authorities whose income exceeds the high-income threshold, levied at a specified percentage, and marginal relief is provided to mitigate abrupt liability increases near that threshold.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Firm income-tax rate continues unchanged, with surcharge for higher-income firms and marginal relief available.
The rate of income-tax applicable to every firm continues at the same level as for the preceding assessment year for assessment year 2018-19. For firms with total income exceeding one crore rupees, a surcharge is levied at twelve per cent, and marginal relief is available where applicable.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Co-operative society tax rates remain unchanged for the assessment year; surcharge applies to higher incomes and marginal relief provided.
Rates of income-tax for co-operative society taxpayers remain the same as in the prior assessment year under the First Schedule of the Finance Bill, 2017. A surcharge applies to societies with higher income and marginal relief is provided to mitigate surcharge impact at threshold points.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Income-tax rate structure revised for salaries, advance tax and special cases with senior citizen slabs and surcharge.
Part III of the First Schedule to the Finance Bill, 2017 prescribes the income-tax rates for deduction at source from salaries, advance tax computation and charging of income-tax in special cases for financial year 2017-2018. Tiered progressive rates apply to individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs and specified artificial juridical persons. Distinct nil-tax thresholds and slab treatment are provided for resident individuals aged sixty to less than eighty and for those aged eighty or more. A surcharge of ten per cent applies within a defined high-income range and fifteen per cent above the higher threshold, with marginal relief available.
Case Laws VAT / Sales Tax
Show AI Summary
Punctuation in statutory entries limits tax conditions, so excise levy applies only to specifically linked goods.
Punctuation in statutory entries must be given effect; a colon and conjunctions in the schedule create a break separating "leather cloth and inferior or imitation leather cloth ordinarily used in book binding" from other goods, so the condition imposing additional excise duty in lieu of sales tax applies only to the latter group. Historical layout of the entry corroborates this limited reading, and absence of argument before the Tribunal does not estop application of the statutory construction.
Case Laws Customs
Show AI Summary
Withdrawal of anti dumping duty: Designated Authority lacks power to grant retrospective relief; rescission is prospective.
Designated Authority lacks power to recommend retrospective withdrawal of an anti dumping duty following a mid term review; where domestic producers ceased production and the authority recommended rescission, the government's rescission preserved prior acts, and the tribunal held no rule permits retrospective relief in review proceedings, so withdrawal operates prospectively.
Act Rules GST
Show AI Summary
Importation of services: subject to GST under reverse charge; potential double levy with customs needs exemption.
Importation of services falls within the definition of Supply and is subject to GST under the reverse charge mechanism, creating potential overlap with Customs duty where transactions importing goods are contractually treated as services. Administrative or legislative clarification is needed to prevent concurrent levies, either by Customs exemptions for imports characterised as services or reciprocal GST relief where Customs duties apply. The draft also raises uncertainty about personal use exemptions limited to taxable persons and suggests extension or harmonisation of exemptions for non taxable persons.
Act Rules GST
Show AI Summary
Scope of supply under GST includes consideration-based transactions, importation of services, and specified free supplies.
The statutory definition of supply under the Model GST Law comprises three categories: supplies for consideration in the course or furtherance of business (sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal); importation of services regardless of consideration or business purpose; and specified supplies made without consideration as listed in Schedule I. Clause (a) targets domestic, consideration-based transactions; clause (b) treats importation of services as separately taxable; and clause (c) assimilates certain gratuitous transactions into the tax net via Schedule I.
Case Laws Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Classification of floating vessels as immovable property may exclude their sale from GST law taxation.
The tribunal held that ships and vessels afloat are not 'goods' but are akin to immovable property because they cannot be severed from the waters; ships are goods only before launch, during breaking up, or when specifically the subject of a sale. As immovable property lies outside the GST domain under the constitutional allocation, this classification raises the question whether GST would apply to sale or supply of floating vessels-a point pending higher judicial scrutiny.
Case Laws Service Tax
Show AI Summary
Adjustment of excess service tax permitted as alternative to refund under liberal interpretation of procedural rules.
A liberal reading of Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 permits adjustment of excess service tax paid against future liabilities when facts show an excess payment, rather than restricting the assessee solely to a refund claim, consistent with constitutional limits on taxation and the Revenue's concession of excess payment.
Act Rules Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax credit conversion uses telegraphic transfer buying rate on the last day of preceding month.
Foreign tax credit is determined by converting the currency of the foreign-tax payment at the telegraphic transfer buying rate applicable on the last day of the month immediately preceding the month in which that tax is paid or deducted.
Act Rules Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign Tax Credit documentation: verified income statement plus certificate and payment or deduction proof to claim credit.
Foreign Tax Credit eligibility requires a verified statement of foreign income and foreign tax paid in the prescribed form, plus a certificate or statement specifying the nature of the income and tax deducted or paid issued by the foreign tax authority, the person who deducted the tax, or signed by the taxpayer, accompanied by a tax challan or online payment acknowledgement for payments and proof of deduction where tax was withheld.
Act Rules Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax credit allowed against MAT/AMT like normal tax, but any excess over normal provisions is ignored.
Foreign tax credit under Rule 128 of the Income tax Rules, 1962, is allowable against tax payable under MAT or AMT in the same manner as under the normal provisions; any foreign tax credit available against MAT/AMT that exceeds the credit allowable under normal provisions is ignored when computing MAT/AMT credit.
Act Rules Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax credit: credit limited to lower of domestic tax and foreign tax; treaty excess is disregarded.
Rule 128 of the Income tax Rules, 1962 limits Foreign Tax Credit to the lesser of domestic tax chargeable on the doubly taxed income and the foreign tax actually paid, and directs that any foreign tax paid in excess of the tax payable under the applicable DTAA be ignored for credit computation.
Act Rules Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign Tax Credit denial: no credit for domestic interest, fees or penalties and for disputed foreign taxes.
Rule 128 restricts Foreign Tax Credit by disallowing FTC against interest, fees or penalties payable under the Income-tax Act, and by excluding any foreign tax (or part thereof) that is disputed by the assessee.
Act Rules Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign Tax Credit requires evidence of settlement, proof of payment and an undertaking within six months of dispute resolution.
Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is allowed for disputed foreign tax only if, within six months from the end of the month in which the dispute is finally settled, the assessee furnishes evidence of settlement, evidence that the tax liability has been discharged by the assessee, and an undertaking that no refund in respect of that amount has been or will be claimed.
Act Rules Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax definition determines FTC scope: DTAA-covered taxes apply, otherwise income-tax-type foreign levies qualify for credit.
Definition of foreign tax for Foreign Tax Credit under Rule 128: where a DTAA exists, foreign tax is the tax covered by that DTAA; where no DTAA exists, foreign tax is the tax payable under the foreign country's law in the nature of income-tax as defined in the statutory explanation, including excess profits tax or business profits tax charged on profits by central or local authorities.
Act Rules Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax credit proportionate allocation ensures foreign tax relief is apportioned when income is taxed across multiple years.
Foreign tax credit under the Income tax Rules operates on a proportionate allocation principle when the same income is taxable in more than one year; the credit entitlement must be apportioned across the years in which the income is offered to tax so that relief for foreign taxes corresponds to the portion of income taxed in each year.
Act Rules Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Foreign tax credit allowed when foreign tax corresponds to income offered or assessed to tax in India in the same year.
Foreign tax credit is available to Indian residents for tax paid in a foreign country or specified territory, and is allowed only in the year when the corresponding income is offered to tax or assessed to tax in India, creating a temporal link between domestic taxation of the income and recognition of the foreign tax credit.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Comparison of Section 36 "Expenses or payments not deductible in certain circumstances" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

21 August, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Section 36 Expenses or payments not deductible in certain circumstances.

Income-tax Act, 2025 [As Passed]

At a Glance

Document: Clause 36 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version). It prescribes items not deductible while computing income under "Profits and gains of business or profession," notably allowing Assessing Officer to disallow excessive payments to specified persons and imposing limits on cash payments. It affects taxpayers engaged in business or profession and entities transacting with related/specified persons. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

Background & Scope

Statutory hooks: The provision is titled "Expenses or payments not deductible in certain circmstances" and is framed as Clause 36 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, operating in relation to computation of income under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession". The clause contains a non-obstante provision in sub-section (1) making it effective irrespective of contrary provisions elsewhere in the Act. Definitions and coverage are contained in clause (3).

The text sets out: Assessing Officer's power to disallow excessive/unreasonable payments to "specified person"; a regime for disallowing cash payments exceeding the stated thresholds; exceptions to cash restrictions as to be prescribed; and a non-application of modes of payment in other law or contract when payment is through specified banking/online mode. The Bill text provides definitions of "specified person" and tests for "substantial interest".

Statutory Provision Mode

Text & Scope

The clause applies to computation of business/professional income. Key elements: (1) non-obstante clause; (2) AO power to disallow amounts paid to "specified person" if, in AO's opinion, payments are excessive/unreasonable with reference to fair market value, legitimate business needs, or benefit to the assessee; (3) detailed definition of "specified person" covering relatives, directors, partners, members, entities with substantial interest and associated persons; (4) deeming tests for "substantial interest" - at least 20% beneficial shareholding (company) or 20% beneficial entitlement to profits (other cases); (5) prohibition on allowing expenditure where aggregate of payments in a day to a person exceeds Rs.10,000 and not made through specified banking/online mode; (6) corresponding deeming of such payments as business income where deduction was previously allowed and payment occurs subsequently; (7) higher limit of Rs.35,000 for plying/hiring/leasing of goods carriages; (8) exceptions to cash restriction "as prescribed"; and (9) overriding of other laws/contracts where specified banking/online payment is made.

Interpretation

The Bill gives the Assessing Officer discretionary power to characterise payments to specified persons as excessive or unreasonable, using three yardsticks: fair market value, legitimate needs, and benefit to the assessee. The presence of a non-obstante clause indicates legislative intent to prioritise this provision over any conflicting computation rules. The text uses "in the opinion of the Assessing Officer", signalling an evaluative fact-intensive enquiry; however, the Bill does not specify procedural safeguards or standards for such opinion. "Specified person" is defined broadly to capture related parties and persons with "substantial interest" (20% threshold), indicating an intent to curb transfer of business income to relatives/associates by supra-market transactions.

Exceptions/Provisos

Exceptions are limited: sub-section (7) contemplates prescribed cases/circumstances where sub-sections (4) and (5) (cash payment rules) will not apply, with reference to banking facilities and business expediency; specifics are "as prescribed" and thus contingent on delegated legislation. The clause provides an absolute override of other laws/contracts in respect of mode of payment when the taxpayer complies with specified banking/online mode (sub-section (8)). No other provisos (for example, thresholds for different industries or de minimis exceptions) are specified in the Bill text.

Illustrations

  • Example 1: An assessee pays Rs.12,000 in cash in a single day to a service provider who is a relative. Under the clause, because aggregate cash payment exceeds Rs.10,000 and is not through specified banking/online mode, the expenditure shall not be allowed as a deduction. (This example follows directly from sub-sections (3) and (4).)
  • Example 2: A company pays a director's relative an amount for supply of goods which, in the Assessing Officer's opinion, is substantially above fair market value. The AO may disallow the excess portion as not allowable. (Direct application of sub-section (2) and definition in sub-section (3)(a)(ii)).
  • Example 3: An assessee had earlier claimed deduction for a liability; subsequent payment in the following tax year to the creditor in cash exceeding Rs.10,000 will be treated as income under "Profits and gains of business or profession". (Directly from sub-section (5)).

Interplay

The clause states it applies "irrespective of anything to the contrary" in the Act, indicating primacy over other computation provisions. It contemplates delegated rules ("as prescribed") to carve out exceptions for cash/online rules but does not reference specific existing Rules, Notifications or sections (other than the head of income). Interaction with other statutory provisions (e.g., transfer pricing, section dealing with related-party transactions, or specific provisions on mode of payment elsewhere) is not spelled out in the text. Any interplay with those regimes must be inferred; the Bill does not provide cross-references. Not stated in the document: specifics of interaction with transfer pricing or procedural safeguards for AO opinion.

Differences between Section 36 of the (Income-tax Act, 2025 [As Passed]) and Clause 36 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version)

  • Structure and wording: The two texts are substantially similar in structure and core substance; both make subsection (1) a non-obstante clause and contain provisions on Assessing Officer's power to disallow excessive payments to "specified person", definitions of "specified person" and "substantial interest", restrictions on cash payments exceeding a threshold, a higher threshold for goods carriages, savings/exemptions and non-availability of pleas based on other laws or contracts.
  • Terminology in sub-section (3): The As Passed version (Section 36) uses the phrase "For the purposes of sub-section (2) and this sub-section" whereas the Old Version (Clause 36) states "For the purposes of sub-section (2),".
    • Practical impact: The As Passed version signals that the definitional provision expressly applies both to subsection (2) and to the subsection containing the definition itself (i.e., broader textual application), while the Old Version indicates application only to subsection (2). This is largely drafting nuance with minimal practical difference in ordinary interpretation because definitions typically apply to the section's operative parts; however, the As Passed wording reduces any potential argument that portions of the section other than sub-section (2) were outside the definitional scope.
  • Minor drafting differences in list items: The Old Version frames the entries under clause (3)(a) with repeated "shall mean" language for each clause (ii)-(iv). The As Passed version uses a consolidated parent provision and different punctuation.
    • Practical impact: Drafting clarity improved in As Passed text; no substantive policy change.
  • Scope of sub-section (3)(b) definition of "substantial interest": The Old Version sets the tests as "(i) the beneficial owner of shares ... carrying at least 20% of the voting power" and "(ii) entitled to at least 20% of the profits ... at any time during the tax year." The As Passed version phrases these as "not less than 20%".
    • Practical impact: No substantive change - "at least" and "not less than" are equivalent numerically, but the As Passed phrasing is marginally more conventional in Indian statutory drafting.
  • Sub-section numbering and cross-references: The As Passed Act adds an explicit sub-section (9) stating "No deduction or allowance shall be allowed in respect of marked to market loss or other expected loss, except as allowable u/s 32(1)(h)." This clause is absent from the Old Version.
    • Practical impact: This is a substantive addition in the As Passed Act restricting deductions for marked-to-market or other expected losses except to the extent allowable u/s 32(1)(h). The Old Version does not contain this limitation, so the legislative process inserted a new restriction before enactment. Practically, taxpayers claiming deductions for such expected/MTM losses would face disallowance unless they fall within section 32(1)(h) under the enacted law; under the Old Version there would have been no express prohibition in this section.
  • Application of the exclusion from other laws/contracts (sub-section (8)): Both versions contain this provision. Wording differences are minor and do not create substantive divergence.

Practical impact summary of each change

  • Clarification of definitional reach (As Passed): Marginally strengthens the textual scope of the definitions - lowers risk of semantic challenges to applicability across subsection(s).
  • Presentation of monetary thresholds: No practical change; thresholds remain Rs.10,000 and Rs.35,000 (for goods carriages).
  • Addition of prohibition on deductions for marked-to-market/expected losses in As Passed: Significant substantive change - narrows allowable deductions and creates a specific exclusion that could affect entities (e.g., traders, financial firms) that recognise MTM or anticipated losses; such losses will be allowable only if covered u/s 32(1)(h) as enacted.
  • Overall drafting refinement: As Passed drafting appears more precise and inclusive; reduces interpretive ambiguity but does not alter most taxpayers' obligations beyond the new MTM/expected loss restriction.

Practical Implications

  • Compliance and risk areas: Payments to relatives, directors, partners, members, or other related entities will attract scrutiny. Entities should ensure transactions with specified persons reflect fair market value and legitimate business needs because the AO may disallow excess portions.
  • Mode of payment and documentation: Cash payments exceeding Rs.10,000 (Rs.35,000 for goods carriages) in a day will lead to disallowance if not through specified banking/online mode; where deduction was earlier claimed but payment later made in cash exceeding threshold, the payment will be treated as business income in the year of payment. This creates a risk of reassessment/recapture and underscores the need to document payment modes and maintain bank/online transaction evidence.
  • Record-keeping/evidence points suggested by the text: Evidence of arm's-length pricing, contemporaneous documentation showing legitimate business need, details of beneficial ownership/entitlement to profits to establish absence of "substantial interest", and bank/online payment records. Not stated in the document: required form/format or specific documentary standards; those are left to general tax practice and possible rules.

Key Takeaways

  • Clause 36 empowers the Assessing Officer to disallow payments to specified persons that are excessive or unreasonable against fair market value, business needs, or derived benefit.
  • "Specified person" is broadly defined to capture relatives, directors, partners, members and entities/persons with at least 20% beneficial interest.
  • Cash/non-bank payments exceeding Rs.10,000 in a day are not allowable deductions (Rs.35,000 for goods carriages); such payments may be taxed as income if previously deducted and paid later.
  • Exceptions to the cash restrictions may be prescribed, considering banking availability and business expediency.
  • The clause overrides other Act provisions for computation; it also limits pleas based on other laws/contracts where compliance is by specified banking/online mode.
  • Not stated in the document: effective/applicability date, procedural safeguards for AO discretion, detailed prescribed exceptions, and interaction with transfer pricing or comparable provisions.

Full Text:

Section 36 Expenses or payments not deductible in certain circumstances.

Topics

Acts Income Tax