Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS to the Government
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    A Landmark Judgment on Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS ...
    A Case of Coerced Input Tax Credit Reversal - GST recovery during search and seizure proceedings.
    Manner of compliance of conditions of pre-deposit - Debit of amount from electronic credit ledger (E...
    The need for clarity and concrete reasons in the cancellation of GST registrations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of reopening of assessment - need for a direct link between the portal's information and th...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Application of provisions of section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 ...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Provisional release of imported goods (apples) - The dispute centers on the valuation of the import...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Applicability of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of expenses - need for tax authorities to have a practical understanding of the nature ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of the assessee's business expenditure claims related to the purchase of sugarcane from...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Additions made u/s 69 and Section 56 in the absence of direct incriminating evidence linking the ass...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Whether penalty is to be imposed when the appellant has accepted the classification and paid the ent...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Liability for payment of customs duty on sale of excess liquor from the duty-free shop
    Case LawsCustoms
    Demand of customs duty beyond normal period of limitation on the ground of change in classification ...
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Stringent approach towards ensuring compliance with auditing standards - importance of auditors' res...
    Whether the appellant's claim can be classified as a Financial Debt or Operational Debt under the In...
    Scope of Approval of resolution plan - Allegations of undervaluation of the Corporate Debtor's asset...
    Denial of Input Tax Credit since the GST registration of the Supplier of Goods has been Cancelled wi...
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a vested right or concession - Can government impose conditions or restric...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    TDS credit entitlement affirmed: deductee entitled to credit despite deductor's non-deposit, preventing indirect recovery.
    Credit for tax deducted at source on interest payments is to be treated as tax paid on the deductee's behalf and does not depend on the deductor's remittance; statutory protections against indirect recovery prevent the revenue from seeking the same tax from the deductee when the deductor fails to deposit the deducted amount, and the deposit requirement in the applicable provisions does not negate the deductee's entitlement to such credit.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax credit for TDS: deductee entitled to credit even if deductor failed to deposit the retained tax with government.
    The Court treats amounts retained by a deductor as remaining tax and concludes the statutory credit mechanism for tax deducted at source does not condition a deductee's entitlement on the deductor having deposited the retained amount with the government, thereby barring indirect recovery or adjustment against the deductee where tax has been deducted at source.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Coercive tax collection prohibited; forced reversal of input tax credit during search deemed impermissible, with investigatory remedies preserved.
    Dispute involved a search under Section 67 and an alleged coerced reversal of Input Tax Credit from the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger for supplies from a supplier with retrospectively cancelled registration; the court found such coercive recovery during search impermissible and directed restoration of the ITC while preserving the department's power to investigate and, if ineligible or fraudulent ITC is found, pass appropriate protective orders.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Pre-deposit payment method: Electronic credit ledger debit does not satisfy pre-deposit; cash ledger payment required for appeals.
    Pre-deposit for appeals under the CGST/BGST regime must be paid from the cash ledger; debit from the electronic credit ledger does not satisfy the statutory pre-deposit requirement. A revenue circular restricting ECRL use to certain output tax payments and excluding reverse charge, interest, penalties, fees, and similar amounts supports that ECRL cannot be used for pre-deposit. The court emphasized the statutory payment scheme and strict appeal filing timelines, rejecting arguments that ECRL debit could substitute for cash ledger payment.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Requirement of clear reasons in GST cancellation: retrospective deregistration must be reasoned and consider input tax credit effects.
    Cancellation of GST registration must be supported by clear reasons and concrete factual findings in show cause notices and cancellation orders; labels that a registration is "liable to be cancelled" without specifying dues or factual basis constitute mechanical action. Retrospective cancellation cannot be applied routinely; authorities must follow statutory procedure, assess causes for non-filing, consider exceptional disruptions to business operations, and account for the impact on input tax credit before fixing an effective date of cancellation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Use of portal data: digital information needs a direct evidential link before reopening income tax assessments.
    Reopening assessments requires a direct evidential link between portal-derived information and the income alleged to have escaped assessment; portal data alone is insufficient without documentary support for transactions or gifts, and a show cause notice must provide adequate particulars and reflect proper consideration of the taxpayer's response before reassessment proceeds.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Non retrospective application of punitive benami provisions affirmed, limiting enforcement to post amendment transactions.
    Application of Section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 concerns whether punitive provisions enacted in 2016 apply to transactions predating the amendment. The Appellate Tribunal relied on Supreme Court precedent that such punitive provisions must be applied prospectively, and the High Court emphasized adherence to that interpretation while allowing parties to pursue further remedies pending the Supreme Court review.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional release of perishable imports allowed pending valuation, subject to provisional assessment and bond to protect revenue interests.
    The dispute concerns provisional release of perishable imported apples amid a valuation contest tied to a stayed minimum import price notification. The instrument requires provisional assessment of the Bill of Entry within a brief timeframe and permits conditional provisional release upon the importer furnishing a bond and meeting terms set by customs, thereby reconciling the protection of revenue interests with the practical need to avoid loss to perishable consignments pending final resolution of the notification's applicability.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Prospective application of punitive benami amendment upheld, limiting reach to post-enactment transactions and preserving pre-enactment protections.
    The Madras High Court affirmed that the enhanced punitive provision introduced by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 is substantive and applies prospectively; it endorsed the Tribunal's reliance on the Supreme Court's Ganapati Dealcom decision, treated a pending Supreme Court review petition as not displacing that precedent, and disposed of the appeals while allowing further proceedings consistent with prospectivity and prior constitutional findings.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Disallowance of expenses must rest on specific documentation defects, not on blanket percentage adjustments.
    Disallowance of business expenses on a summary or estimate basis requires specific, pointed deficiencies and cannot rest on generalized conclusions about excessiveness; in businesses with routine small transactions, tax authorities must examine the nature of operations and identify particular defects in documentation before applying blanket percentage disallowances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Statutory Minimum Price interpretation: excess cane payments treated as appropriation of profits, not deductible business expense.
    The core issue is whether payments for sugarcane in excess of the Statutory Minimum Price (SMP) are deductible business expenditures or constitute an appropriation of profits. The Assessing Officer relied on standard accounting practice requiring provisions for liabilities at year end and treated post closing excess payments as distributions of operational surplus. The appellate view upheld that cooperative status does not alter the tax analysis and that payments beyond the SMP do not qualify as allowable business expenses absent proper provisioning within the accounting period.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Direct incriminating evidence requirement: third party search materials alone cannot sustain unexplained investment additions.
    Additions alleged as unexplained investments and undisclosed interest income based on third party search materials require a demonstrable direct nexus between those seized records and the assessee; absent such direct incriminating evidence, reliance on third party statements or documents is insufficient. Procedural safeguards and transactional indicia-such as cross examination opportunities, banking records, documentary support, and TDS-reduce the probative value of seized material when direct linkage is lacking.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty under Section 114A: no justification where importer accepted correct classification and paid differential duty before notice.
    Issue: imposition of a penalty for alleged suppression when the importer accepted correct tariff classification and paid the differential duty with interest before issuance of a show cause notice. The importer attributed the earlier misclassification to an agent error and denied intent to evade duty. The authority observed the accurate product description, admission of correct classification and prompt payment, concluded absence of suppression of facts and determined that the statutory penalty provision was not justified on these facts.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Liability under Section 72: duty rests with duty-free shop licence-holder when trade facility conditions are breached.
    Duty arises where a duty-free shop licence-holder breaches voucher and recordkeeping conditions under the trade facility; the licence-holder bears responsibility for payment of duty and interest when procedural requirements are violated, while penalty depends on culpability and may be disallowed where no intent to evade duty is established and customs were aware of the transactions.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Extended limitation in customs demands inapplicable where no suppression, limiting reassessment for CVD on undeclared MRP entries.
    Reassessment and CVD demand arose from a post-clearance change in classification and retrospective reliance on MRP for past entries; the tribunal held that items described were essential refrigeration parts rather than accessories, that MRP-based reassessment requires clear factual basis, and that the Extended Period of Limitation is inapplicable where no suppression is established, although penalty issues may still be considered where omissions occur.
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Auditor responsibility reinforced: regulatory findings against audit failures stress strict adherence to auditing standards and sanctions.
    NFRA found a statutory auditor guilty of professional misconduct for failures to comply with Standards on Auditing, including inadequate procedures to verify revenue, lack of physical inventory verification, insufficient going concern assessment, deficient materiality application, and inadequate communication with Those Charged with Governance, and applied regulatory sanctions to reinforce auditor responsibilities in preserving financial reporting integrity.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Operational debt classification confirmed for supplier's claim based on the transaction's nature under the insolvency framework.
    Whether a claim from a supply arrangement is a Financial Debt or an Operational Debt depends on the transaction's substantive character. The tribunal examined contractual terms-penalties for non-delivery, interest, and security cheques-and applied precedents on the financial-versus-operational distinction. It characterised the supplier's claim, filed under Section 9, as arising from the supply of goods and therefore as an operational debt, sustaining the Resolution Professional's and Adjudicating Authority's classification.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Commercial wisdom of committee of creditors governs resolution plan approval, limiting valuation and standing challenges by promoters.
    Exclusion of the creditor was non irregular as no claim was filed; undervaluation allegations were rejected since opportunities to raise them during the CIRP were not used; the resolution plan satisfied Committee approval requirements and reflected the Committee's commercial wisdom; and a suspended director/promoter lacked standing to challenge the approved plan, underscoring limited judicial interference post approval.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input tax credit denial over supplier deregistration; remanded for document verification and fresh adjudication to determine genuineness.
    Denial of Input Tax Credit was challenged where the supplier's registration was retrospectively cancelled; the petitioner paid through bank and the supplier appeared on records at the time. The High Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the appellate authority to reconsider the petitioner's documentary evidence, hold a hearing, and pass a reasoned order verifying genuineness and timing of transactions; if purchases are genuine and occurred prior to cancellation, ITC is to be considered per precedent.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit as legislative concession: entitlement subject to statutory conditions, but retrospective deprivation of vested accruals is vulnerable.
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a legislative concession, not a vested right, so the legislature may lawfully prescribe eligibility conditions and procedural limits which taxpayers must strictly satisfy; however, retrospective amendments that destroy or diminish an already accrued entitlement are susceptible to challenge and have been treated as impermissible when they impair rights that vested before the amendment.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 11 "Incomes not included in total income" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      19 August, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 11 Incomes not included in total income.

      Income-tax Act, 2025 [As Passed]

      At a Glance

      The document considered is Clause 11 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version), titled "Incomes not included in total income." It sets out that incomes enumerated in certain Schedules (II-VI) are excluded from total income subject to conditions, and that persons in Schedule VII may be not chargeable to tax subject to conditions. It matters to taxpayers, tax practitioners, and the tax department as it defines categories and conditions for tax-exempt incomes. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause 11 of Chapter III of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version), titled "Incomes not included in total income." The clause enumerates the schedules (II, III, IV, V and VI) whose items are not to be included in computing total income, subject to conditions specified in those Schedules. It also addresses persons in Schedule VII who may not be chargeable to tax for a tax year, subject to conditions in Schedule VII. The clause empowers the Central Government to make rules or notifications for the purposes of this section as specified in Schedules II-VII.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 11 provides a framework for certain incomes and persons to be excluded from the computation of total income under the Act, subject to qualifying conditions specified in schedules II, III, IV, V and VI (for incomes) and Schedule VII (for persons). The operative structure is:

      • Sub-section (1): Prescribes that any income enumerated in Schedules II, III, IV, V, and VI shall not be included in computing the total income of any person for a tax year, subject to fulfilment of the conditions specified in those Schedules.
      • Sub-section (2): States that where the conditions in those Schedules are not satisfied in any tax year in respect of any income enumerated therein, such income shall be charged to tax under the Act for that tax year.
      • Sub-section (3): Provides that persons enumerated in Schedule VII shall, subject to fulfilment of the conditions specified therein, not be chargeable to tax under the Act for a tax year.
      • Sub-section (4): Provides that where the conditions in Schedule VII are not satisfied, the income of such person shall be charged to tax under the provisions of the Act.
      • Sub-section (5): Empowers the Central Government to make rules or issue notifications for the purposes of the section as specified in Schedules II-VII.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The clause establishes a conditional exclusion regime - certain items or persons are excluded from "total income" only upon fulfillment of conditions specified in the referenced Schedules. The presence of sub-sections (2) and (4) indicates a default rule: failure to meet conditions results in taxability. The provision's structure contemplates administrable conditions and the need for rule-making by the Central Government to operationalise the Schedules. Specific legislative intent beyond this structure: Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The clause itself incorporates the exceptions: the exclusion of incomes/persons is conditional. Specific provisos, thresholds, or exceptions applicable to particular incomes or persons are not contained in Clause 11 but are to be found in Schedules II-VII. Therefore: Not stated in the document (for schedule-specific carve-outs).

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: If an income type A is enumerated in Schedule II and the taxpayer satisfies the conditions in Schedule II for tax year Y, income A is not included in total income for year Y. (Specifics of income A and conditions: Not stated in the document.)

      • Example 2: If a person P is enumerated in Schedule VII but fails to satisfy the conditions of Schedule VII in tax year Z, the income of P for year Z shall be charged to tax under the Act. (Specifics of P and the conditions: Not stated in the document.)

      Interplay

      Interaction with Rules/Notifications/Circulars: Clause 11 expressly empowers the Central Government to make rules or issue notifications for the purposes specified in Schedules II-VII. No references to particular existing Rules or Circulars are provided in the clause. Any detailed interplay with other provisions of the Bill/Act, or with administrative guidance, is: Not stated in the document.

      Differences Between Section 11 (As Passed) and Clause 11 (Old Version)

      • Punctuation and enumeration: The passed version (Section 11) lists "Schedules II, III, IV V and VI" (missing comma between IV and V), whereas the Old Version lists "Schedules II, III, IV, V, and VI."
        • Practical impact: purely typographical; no substantive legal effect if schedules are otherwise unambiguous.
      • Reference to charging to tax - scope wording in sub-section (2): Old Version states that, where conditions are not satisfied, such income "shall be charged to tax under this Act for that tax year." The passed version states such income "shall be charged to tax under this Act on the total income for that tax year."
        • Practical impact: the passed version expressly clarifies that the income will be included in "total income" for that tax year. This is a clarification of basis of charging (inclusion in total income) rather than a substantive change in taxability; it may reduce ambiguity about the tax base into which the income is to be placed.
      • Sub-section (3) wording - persons in Schedule VII:Old Version: "not be chargeable to tax under this Act for a tax year." Passed version: "not be chargeable to tax under this Act on the total income for a tax year."
        • Practical impact: same as above - the passed text clarifies the basis (total income) of the non-chargeability rather than altering who escapes tax; again primarily clarificatory.
      • Sub-section (4) temporal clarity: Old Version states that if conditions in Schedule VII are not satisfied, "the income of such person shall be charged to tax under the provisions of this Act." The passed version adds "for that tax year."
        • Practical impact: the passed text makes explicit the temporal application (the specific tax year), reducing potential interpretive uncertainty about retroactivity or broader application; substantive tax effect is unlikely changed.
      • Overall drafting changes: The passed version uses explicit references to "total income" in sub-sections (2) and (3) and reiterates temporal limitation in sub-section (4).
        • Practical impact: these are drafting clarifications that make legislative intent about the tax base and tax year explicit, aiding interpretation and administration; they do not introduce new substantive tax exemptions or conditions beyond those already stated in the schedules.
      • Ancillary commentary: The Old Version includes an editorial explanatory sentence (a short clause summary) after the provision text; the passed version does not contain that sentence in the provided excerpt.
        • Practical impact: none on legal effect; the summary is explanatory material that may assist readers but not part of statutory text.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Clause 11 places the onus on taxpayers and persons benefited by schedule-based exclusions to ensure that conditions in the relevant Schedules are met each tax year. Failure to satisfy conditions converts an exclusion into taxable income for that tax year-thus risk of unintended tax liability exists where compliance with schedule-conditions is insufficient or not documented. The specifics of compliance duties are set out in the Schedules and rules (Not stated in the document).
      • Record-keeping/evidence: Given the conditional nature of exclusions, stakeholders should expect to maintain evidence demonstrating fulfillment of schedule conditions (nature of evidence, forms, timelines: Not stated in the document). The Central Government's rule-making power suggests additional procedural requirements may follow in subordinate legislation or notifications.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 11 establishes a conditional exemption framework: listed incomes (Schedules II-VI) and listed persons (Schedule VII) are excluded from total income subject to schedule-specific conditions.
      • Failure to satisfy schedules' conditions results in chargeability to tax for the relevant tax year.
      • The provision empowers the Central Government to issue rules or notifications to operationalise the schedules, indicating procedural detail will be provided by subordinate legislation.
      • The Old Version is largely administrative and structural; the substantive content of exemptions and conditions resides in the referenced Schedules, which are not reproduced in this clause.
      • Clause 11 shifts legal focus to compliance with schedule conditions and documentation to sustain exclusions.

      Full Text:

      Section 11 Incomes not included in total income.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax