Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    PMLA and Predicate Offenses: Deciphering the Scope of Proceeds of Crime under PMLA: A Supreme Court ...
    Resolution Applicant's Eligibility under the IBC: A Balancing Act Between Stringent Rules and MSME P...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Dynamics of Tax Exemption Registrations: A Comprehensive Analysis of ITAT Ahmedabad’s Decision on ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Transfer Pricing Litigation: The Evolving Landscape of Arm's Length Price Determination in India
    Case LawsCentral Excise
    Pre-deposit Compliance in Appeals: Judicial Overreach by CESAT
    Revisiting Shareholder Rights in Securities Law: Deciphering the Bounds of Confidentiality in Corpor...
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Professional Conduct in Auditing: Exploring the Jurisdiction and Compliance in Auditor (Chartered Ac...
    Comprehensive Legal Analysis of Jurisdictional Challenges and SEBI's Regulatory Framework in Securit...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Revisiting the Scope of Revisionary Powers U/s 263: Assessing the Adequacy of Assessment Procedures ...
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel in Governmental Policy Decisions: Tax Incentives and Public Inte...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Maintaining the Sanctity of Search and Seizure Procedures: Emphasizing the rigorous compliance with ...
    The Confluence of Insolvency and Limitation Laws: Insights from a NCLAT Decision
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Analyzing the Tax Implications of Cross-Border Payments: Recognizing the payments as either 'Royalty...
    Case LawsCustoms
    A Judicial Perspective on Duty Assessment and Procedural Fairness in Customs Law: Validity of CBIC C...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Non-Delegability of Discretionary Powers in Income Tax Assessments: Administrative Discretion in Spe...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Taxation of Domain Registration Services in Godaddy.Com LLC Case: Tax Implications for Digital Serv...
    Reinforcing Fair Administrative Processes in GST Registration Cancellation: An In-Depth Case Study
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    The Arbitration Conundrum: Enforceability of Unstamped Agreements
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Reassessing Tax Penalties: HDFC Bank's Challenge under the DVAT Act
    Input Tax Credit Eligibility under GST Legislation: Time-Bound Compliance in GST ITC Cases
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsPMLA
    Show AI Summary
    Proceeds of crime: PMLA targets handling of tainted assets even where the person is not named in the predicate offence, scope narrowed for conspiracies.
    Existence of proceeds of crime is a prerequisite for an offence under the PMLA and must be derived from a scheduled offence; the PMLA reaches persons who handle, conceal or possess tainted proceeds even if not named in the predicate offence. Conspiracy under Section 120B becomes a scheduled offence only when the conspiracy aims to commit an offence already listed in the PMLA Schedule, narrowing scheduled-offence scope. Property acquired prior to the scheduled offence cannot be treated as proceeds, whereas disputed acquisitions require trial determination of their linkage to tainted funds.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Resolution applicant eligibility under Section 29A clarified; MSME exemption under Section 240A applies at plan submission stage.
    Whether a resolution applicant is disqualified under Section 29A depends on the ineligibility criteria and the timing of assessment; the operative date for eligibility is the submission of the resolution plan, and Section 240A provides an MSME-targeted exemption from certain disqualifications to protect continuity and livelihoods.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax exemption registration: tribunal ordered reconsideration where delay arose from bona fide reliance on provisional registration and circulars.
    The Tribunal held that rejection of the final registration application under Section 80G for being time barred was improper where the Commissioner did not consider administrative circulars extending filing timelines and the trust's bona fide reliance on provisional registration; the ITAT set aside the order and directed reconsideration with an opportunity to be heard.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Arm's Length Principle enforcement: comparables, functional profiling, and admissibility of additional evidence determine transfer pricing outcomes.
    Dispute concerns determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for international transactions, focusing on comparable selection, adjustments for functional differences, and functional profiling's effect on ALP reliability. The Tribunal also deals with the admissibility of additional evidence on appeal and scrutiny of changes in benchmarking approaches across assessment years, stressing contemporaneous, consistent documentation and justification for methodological changes while balancing procedural finality and factual completeness.
    Case LawsCentral Excise
    Show AI Summary
    Pre-deposit requirement undermined by tribunal restoration without compliance, raising jurisdictional and laches concerns in excise appeals procedure scrutiny.
    The Tribunal's restoration and allowance of excise appeals without a prior pre-deposit requirement raises whether a lower tribunal may waive mandatory pre-deposit obligations and whether such action aligns with supervisory limits imposed by higher court directives and doctrines like functus officio and res judicata.
    Case LawsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Shareholder access to confidential corporate documents affirmed where confidentiality is overstretched, strengthening minority investor protections.
    Minority shareholders are entitled to access corporate documents where confidentiality claims are overstated; confidentiality and privilege cannot be used to withhold information necessary for assessing compliance with securities law. SEBI's settlement framework cannot shield material information from shareholder scrutiny; regulatory processes must balance investigatory integrity with transparency and natural justice. Non compliance with Minimum Public Shareholding norms undermines market integrity and minority rights, and settlements of serious violations require sufficient transparency to protect investor interests.
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Retrospective jurisdiction of regulator challenged; effect on auditor liability, standards compliance and sanctions under companies law.
    Allegations of professional misconduct assert auditors failed to comply with statutory audit obligations, disclose material facts, exercise due diligence, obtain necessary information, and identify departures from accepted audit procedures. Appellants challenge the regulator's retrospective jurisdiction, invoke constitutional protection against retrospective penalization, and allege procedural breaches of natural justice; the regulator maintains jurisdiction, contends it afforded hearing opportunities, and asserts substantive non compliance with Standards on Auditing.
    Case LawsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Territorial jurisdiction disputes in securities cases shape venue decisions and challenge regulatory settlement revocations and discretion.
    Disputes over venue in securities enforcement pivot on territorial jurisdiction and forum non-conveniens, using cause of action and convenience factors to determine appropriate forum. SEBI's settlement regime under the SEBI (Settlement Proceedings) Regulation 2018 and the regulator's power to revoke settlements raise questions about regulatory discretion, enforceability of negotiated resolutions, and implications for corporate governance and market integrity, while High Courts' supervisory role under Article 226 intersects with statutory enforcement mechanisms.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revisionary powers under Section 263 limited where assessment thoroughly examined transactions and no specific error is shown.
    Scope of revisionary powers under Section 263 is limited where the original assessment shows a detailed examination and allowance of losses; direction for re-examination without specific findings of error prejudicial to revenue is insufficient. Transactions integral to business and carried out as hedging do not fall within the definition of speculative transactions under Section 43(5).
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Promissory estoppel prevents withdrawal of promised tax incentives for industrial units that invested in reliance on them.
    The dispute concerns whether the State could withdraw tax incentives by reclassifying areas and thereby affect units that invested relying on those incentives. Applying promissory estoppel, the court determined that promises inducing substantive investment could not be retracted to the detriment of the beneficiaries during the promised exemption period, balancing that protection against the State's public interest prerogative and subsequent structural tax reform.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Search and seizure procedural compliance: satisfaction note requirement under section 153C governs validity of assessments.
    Assessments against persons other than the searched individual require a recorded satisfaction by the assessing officer that seized assets or documents belong to that other person; absence of a satisfaction note in the searched person's file invalidates consequential assessments under the search-derived assessment provisions. Determination of the applicable assessment years hinges on whether the assessment period is tied to the date of search, the date satisfaction is recorded, or the date seized material is received, requiring harmonious construction to align enforcement with taxpayer protections.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation in insolvency: admissibility requires established debt and default and bars further merits inquiry at admission.
    Where a claim establishes debt and default and the petition is within limitation, the Tribunal's role at the admission stage is limited to admitting the corporate insolvency resolution process without undertaking an extensive merits inquiry into the underlying debt or default.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Characterisation of cross-border payments as royalty or service fees determines withholding obligations under tax treaty and domestic law.
    Characterisation of cross-border payments under the Income Tax Act and the India-USA DTAA focused on whether payments to a US non-resident constituted royalty or fees for included services under section 9(1)(vii) and Article 12, whether TDS obligations arose, and whether sections 201(1) and 201(1A) could be invoked; the Karnataka High Court and ITAT concluded the payments were not royalty/fees for included services, services were rendered outside India, the payee lacked an Indian permanent establishment, and therefore withholding obligations did not arise.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Procedural fairness in customs law limits administrative conditions on provisional release, ensuring statutory discretion and fair hearing.
    The court evaluated whether the impugned Circular and order unlawfully limited the adjudicating authority's statutory discretion by imposing conditions on provisional release, and whether those measures violated principles of natural justice; it emphasised that executive instructions may supplement but cannot supplant statutory provisions and that administrative actions must preserve statutory discretion and fair hearing requirements.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Non-delegability of discretionary powers: extension of tax audit report time must be granted by assessing officer, not delegate.
    The power to order a special audit and to extend the timeframe for submission of the audit report is vested in the Assessing Officer and must be exercised by that officer alone; administrative convenience cannot justify delegation to the Commissioner. An extension granted by the Commissioner, even if prompted by the AO's recommendation, is inconsistent with the statutory scheme and can render subsequent assessment orders vulnerable to being barred by limitation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Royalty characterization of domain registration fees requires a transfer of proprietary or use rights; mere registrar facilitation does not qualify.
    Whether fees for domain name registration qualify as royalty depends on whether the registrar transfers a proprietary or right-to-use interest; a registrar acting as intermediary under its accreditation agreement that disclaims ownership and does not convey exclusive or transferable rights does not convert registration fees into royalty.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Natural justice in GST registration: deficient show cause notices require reconsideration and a fresh opportunity to respond.
    Cancellation of GST registration on grounds such as fraud or suppression must comply with natural justice; a show cause notice lacking specific allegations and a decision that does not consider the taxpayer's response constitutes procedural deficiency, necessitating administrative reconsideration with a reasoned notice that permits an adequate reply.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Arbitration agreement enforceability tested against stamp duty compliance, affecting admissibility and tribunal jurisdiction.
    The central issue is whether an arbitration agreement in an unstamped instrument is enforceable, engaging the Arbitration Act, Stamp Act and Contract Act and asking if courts must examine only the existence of an arbitration clause or also its validity when stamp duty non compliance is alleged. The text contrasts lines of authority treating non stamping as either a jurisdictional bar that voids enforceability or a curable defect affecting admissibility, and highlights statutory mechanisms for stamping, impoundment, and remediation while mapping the practical consequences for arbitration access and enforcement.
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty proportionality: penalties require deceptive conduct and mens rea before applying to disputed tax assessments.
    The decision analyzes penalties under the DVAT framework in relation to sales of repossessed vehicles, stressing that taxability remained unsettled and that penalties require conduct that is false, misleading, or deceptive. It highlights that mens rea is central to quasi criminal tax penalties and that proportionality and reasoned discretion are prerequisites to lawful penal levies; absent those elements, penalty imposition lacks statutory support.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit time limits require strict compliance with statutory filing conditions, not relaxation for business constraints.
    The court construes Input Tax Credit as a concession contingent on strict compliance with statutory prerequisites, holding that time-bound procedural conditions operate as substantive preconditions to claiming ITC. The non-obstante clause is given a limited operative scope and does not nullify mandatory temporal conditions; established principles of tax-statute interpretation require literal application of the scheme and adherence to filing timelines despite commercial hardships.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 11 "Incomes not included in total income" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      19 August, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 11 Incomes not included in total income.

      Income-tax Act, 2025 [As Passed]

      At a Glance

      The document considered is Clause 11 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version), titled "Incomes not included in total income." It sets out that incomes enumerated in certain Schedules (II-VI) are excluded from total income subject to conditions, and that persons in Schedule VII may be not chargeable to tax subject to conditions. It matters to taxpayers, tax practitioners, and the tax department as it defines categories and conditions for tax-exempt incomes. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause 11 of Chapter III of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version), titled "Incomes not included in total income." The clause enumerates the schedules (II, III, IV, V and VI) whose items are not to be included in computing total income, subject to conditions specified in those Schedules. It also addresses persons in Schedule VII who may not be chargeable to tax for a tax year, subject to conditions in Schedule VII. The clause empowers the Central Government to make rules or notifications for the purposes of this section as specified in Schedules II-VII.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 11 provides a framework for certain incomes and persons to be excluded from the computation of total income under the Act, subject to qualifying conditions specified in schedules II, III, IV, V and VI (for incomes) and Schedule VII (for persons). The operative structure is:

      • Sub-section (1): Prescribes that any income enumerated in Schedules II, III, IV, V, and VI shall not be included in computing the total income of any person for a tax year, subject to fulfilment of the conditions specified in those Schedules.
      • Sub-section (2): States that where the conditions in those Schedules are not satisfied in any tax year in respect of any income enumerated therein, such income shall be charged to tax under the Act for that tax year.
      • Sub-section (3): Provides that persons enumerated in Schedule VII shall, subject to fulfilment of the conditions specified therein, not be chargeable to tax under the Act for a tax year.
      • Sub-section (4): Provides that where the conditions in Schedule VII are not satisfied, the income of such person shall be charged to tax under the provisions of the Act.
      • Sub-section (5): Empowers the Central Government to make rules or issue notifications for the purposes of the section as specified in Schedules II-VII.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The clause establishes a conditional exclusion regime - certain items or persons are excluded from "total income" only upon fulfillment of conditions specified in the referenced Schedules. The presence of sub-sections (2) and (4) indicates a default rule: failure to meet conditions results in taxability. The provision's structure contemplates administrable conditions and the need for rule-making by the Central Government to operationalise the Schedules. Specific legislative intent beyond this structure: Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The clause itself incorporates the exceptions: the exclusion of incomes/persons is conditional. Specific provisos, thresholds, or exceptions applicable to particular incomes or persons are not contained in Clause 11 but are to be found in Schedules II-VII. Therefore: Not stated in the document (for schedule-specific carve-outs).

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: If an income type A is enumerated in Schedule II and the taxpayer satisfies the conditions in Schedule II for tax year Y, income A is not included in total income for year Y. (Specifics of income A and conditions: Not stated in the document.)

      • Example 2: If a person P is enumerated in Schedule VII but fails to satisfy the conditions of Schedule VII in tax year Z, the income of P for year Z shall be charged to tax under the Act. (Specifics of P and the conditions: Not stated in the document.)

      Interplay

      Interaction with Rules/Notifications/Circulars: Clause 11 expressly empowers the Central Government to make rules or issue notifications for the purposes specified in Schedules II-VII. No references to particular existing Rules or Circulars are provided in the clause. Any detailed interplay with other provisions of the Bill/Act, or with administrative guidance, is: Not stated in the document.

      Differences Between Section 11 (As Passed) and Clause 11 (Old Version)

      • Punctuation and enumeration: The passed version (Section 11) lists "Schedules II, III, IV V and VI" (missing comma between IV and V), whereas the Old Version lists "Schedules II, III, IV, V, and VI."
        • Practical impact: purely typographical; no substantive legal effect if schedules are otherwise unambiguous.
      • Reference to charging to tax - scope wording in sub-section (2): Old Version states that, where conditions are not satisfied, such income "shall be charged to tax under this Act for that tax year." The passed version states such income "shall be charged to tax under this Act on the total income for that tax year."
        • Practical impact: the passed version expressly clarifies that the income will be included in "total income" for that tax year. This is a clarification of basis of charging (inclusion in total income) rather than a substantive change in taxability; it may reduce ambiguity about the tax base into which the income is to be placed.
      • Sub-section (3) wording - persons in Schedule VII:Old Version: "not be chargeable to tax under this Act for a tax year." Passed version: "not be chargeable to tax under this Act on the total income for a tax year."
        • Practical impact: same as above - the passed text clarifies the basis (total income) of the non-chargeability rather than altering who escapes tax; again primarily clarificatory.
      • Sub-section (4) temporal clarity: Old Version states that if conditions in Schedule VII are not satisfied, "the income of such person shall be charged to tax under the provisions of this Act." The passed version adds "for that tax year."
        • Practical impact: the passed text makes explicit the temporal application (the specific tax year), reducing potential interpretive uncertainty about retroactivity or broader application; substantive tax effect is unlikely changed.
      • Overall drafting changes: The passed version uses explicit references to "total income" in sub-sections (2) and (3) and reiterates temporal limitation in sub-section (4).
        • Practical impact: these are drafting clarifications that make legislative intent about the tax base and tax year explicit, aiding interpretation and administration; they do not introduce new substantive tax exemptions or conditions beyond those already stated in the schedules.
      • Ancillary commentary: The Old Version includes an editorial explanatory sentence (a short clause summary) after the provision text; the passed version does not contain that sentence in the provided excerpt.
        • Practical impact: none on legal effect; the summary is explanatory material that may assist readers but not part of statutory text.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Clause 11 places the onus on taxpayers and persons benefited by schedule-based exclusions to ensure that conditions in the relevant Schedules are met each tax year. Failure to satisfy conditions converts an exclusion into taxable income for that tax year-thus risk of unintended tax liability exists where compliance with schedule-conditions is insufficient or not documented. The specifics of compliance duties are set out in the Schedules and rules (Not stated in the document).
      • Record-keeping/evidence: Given the conditional nature of exclusions, stakeholders should expect to maintain evidence demonstrating fulfillment of schedule conditions (nature of evidence, forms, timelines: Not stated in the document). The Central Government's rule-making power suggests additional procedural requirements may follow in subordinate legislation or notifications.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 11 establishes a conditional exemption framework: listed incomes (Schedules II-VI) and listed persons (Schedule VII) are excluded from total income subject to schedule-specific conditions.
      • Failure to satisfy schedules' conditions results in chargeability to tax for the relevant tax year.
      • The provision empowers the Central Government to issue rules or notifications to operationalise the schedules, indicating procedural detail will be provided by subordinate legislation.
      • The Old Version is largely administrative and structural; the substantive content of exemptions and conditions resides in the referenced Schedules, which are not reproduced in this clause.
      • Clause 11 shifts legal focus to compliance with schedule conditions and documentation to sustain exclusions.

      Full Text:

      Section 11 Incomes not included in total income.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax