SCHEDULE-XII MINERALS

Income Tax Bill, 2025

Introduction

SCHEDULE-XII of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and SCHEDULE 07 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 are statutory appendices that enumerate specific minerals and groups of associated minerals. These Schedules are integral to the operation of certain provisions within the respective statutes-most notably, in the context of tax deductions and allowances related to mineral prospecting, extraction, and processing. The principal legal context for these Schedules is their reference in sections dealing with capital expenditure on mineral prospecting (e.g., section 35E of the 1961 Act and the corresponding provision in the 2025 Bill). The relevance of these Schedules lies in their role as definitive lists for qualifying minerals, directly affecting the scope of tax incentives available to mining and allied industries. The legislative intent is to provide clarity and certainty regarding which minerals and mineral groups are covered for specific tax treatments, thereby reducing ambiguity and litigation. This commentary provides an in-depth analysis of SCHEDULE-XII of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, followed by a comparative evaluation with SCHEDULE 07 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, highlighting similarities, differences, and their practical implications.

Objective and Purpose

The primary objective of SCHEDULE-XII (and its predecessor, SCHEDULE 07) is to delineate, with precision, the categories of minerals and groups of associated minerals that qualify for certain tax benefits under the Income Tax regime. The legislative intent stems from the need to incentivize investment in mineral exploration and development-a sector characterized by high capital intensity, long gestation periods, and significant risk. By providing tax relief on capital expenditure incurred in the prospecting, extraction, and processing of specified minerals, the law seeks to promote industrial growth, resource security, and technological advancement in mining. Historically, the inclusion of such Schedules was a response to demands from the mining sector and policy-makers for targeted fiscal support, as well as to ensure alignment with the broader national mineral policy. The insertion of SCHEDULE 07 in 1970 (effective from 1971) reflected the government's recognition of the strategic importance of non-ferrous and rare minerals, and the need for a transparent and administrable tax framework.

Detailed Analysis Detailed Analysis of SCHEDULE-XII of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

Part A: List of Minerals

Both SCHEDULE-XII (2025 Bill) and SCHEDULE 07 (1961 Act) enumerate an identical list of 27 minerals, as follows:

1. Aluminium ores
2. Apatite and phosphatic ores
3. Beryl
4. Chrome ore
5. Coal and lignite
6. Columbite, Samarskite and other minerals of the "rare earths" group
7. Copper
8. Gold
9. Gypsum
10. Iron ore
11. Lead
12. Manganese ore
13. Molybdenum
14. Nickel ores
15. Platinum and other precious metals and their ores
16. Pitchblende and other uranium ores
17. Precious stones
18. Rutile
19. Silver
20. Sulphur and its ores
21. Tin
22. Tungsten ores
23. Uraniferous allanite, monazite and other thorium minerals
24. Uranium bearing tailings left over from ores after extraction of copper and gold, ilmenite and other titanium ores
25. Vanadium ores
26. Zinc
27. Zircon

Interpretation and Legal Principles:

• The listing is exhaustive, meaning only these specified minerals qualify for the relevant tax benefits.
• The inclusion of both primary ores (e.g., iron ore, copper, gold) and secondary/minor minerals (e.g., rare earths, uranium tailings) reflects a comprehensive approach.
• The use of collective terminology (e.g., "other minerals of the 'rare earths' group") ensures coverage of evolving mineral classifications and new discoveries within established groups.
• The reference to "precious stones" and "other precious metals and their ores" is broad, likely intended to capture a wide array of valuable mineral resources.

Ambiguities and Interpretation Issues:

• The phrase "and other minerals of the 'rare earths' group" may require periodic updating or interpretive guidance, as the classification of rare earths evolves with technological advancements.
• The inclusion of "uranium bearing tailings left over from ores after extraction of copper and gold, ilmenite and other titanium ores" is technically specific, but may raise questions regarding the threshold of uranium content for qualification.
• The term "precious stones" is not defined within the Schedule, potentially leading to disputes over the inclusion of certain gemstones.

Part B: Groups of Associated Minerals

Part B of both Schedules lists 16 groups of associated minerals-combinations of minerals commonly found together or processed in tandem. The groups are as follows (with minor spelling variations between the two Schedules):

1. Apatite, Beryl, Cassiterite, Columbite, Emerald, Felspar, Lepidolite, Mica, Pitchblende, Quartz, Samarskite, Scheelite, Topaz, Tantalite, Tourmaline.
2. Iron, Manganese, Titanium, Vanadium and Nickel minerals.
3. Lead, Zinc, Copper, Cadmium, Arsenic, Antimony, Bismuth, Cobalt, Nickel, Molybdenum, and Uranium minerals, and Gold and Silver, Arsenopyrite, Chalcopyrite, Pyrite, Pyrrhotite and Pentlandite.
4. Chromium, Osmiridium, Platinum and Nickel minerals.
5. Kyanite, Sillimanite, Corundum, Dumortierite and Topaz.
6. Gold, Silver, Tellurium, Selenium and Pyrite.
7. Barytes, Fluorite, Chalcocite, Selenium, and minerals of Zinc, Lead and Silver.
8. Tin and Tungsten minerals.
9. Limestone, Dolomite and Magnesite.
10. Ilmenite, Monazite, Zircon, Rutile, Garnet and Sillimanite.
11. Sulphides of Copper and Iron.
12. Coal, Fire clay and Shale.
13. Magnetite and Apatite.
14. Magnesite and Chromite.
15. Talc (Soapstone and Steatite) and Dolomite.
16. Bauxite, Laterite, Aluminous Clays, Lithomarge, Titanium, Vanadium, Gallium and Columbium minerals.

Interpretation and Legal Principles:

• The grouping is designed to address the practical reality that mining operations often yield multiple minerals from the same deposit or process stream.
• The inclusion of associated minerals ensures that capital expenditure incurred for the extraction or processing of one mineral can be considered in relation to others found or produced together.
• This approach prevents the fragmentation of tax benefits and recognizes the integrated nature of mining operations.

Ambiguities and Potential Issues:

• The spelling inconsistencies between the two Schedules (e.g., "Corrundum" vs. "Corundum"; "Pyphrotite" vs. "Pyrrhotite"; "Arsinopyrite" vs. "Arsenopyrite"; "Lithomorge" vs. "Lithomarge") are likely typographical and do not alter the substantive coverage but may require correction for legal clarity.
• The inclusion of minerals like "Garnet" and "Sillimanite" in groupings may require cross-referencing with mineralogical definitions for precise application. - The phrase "minerals of Zinc, Lead and Silver" in Group 7 is broad and may necessitate further clarification in specific cases.

Comparative Analysis with SCHEDULE 07 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

1. Structural and Substantive Similarities

A close comparison reveals that SCHEDULE-XII of the 2025 Bill is, in substance and structure, a direct successor to SCHEDULE 07 of the 1961 Act. Both schedules:

• List the same 27 minerals in Part A, in identical order and nomenclature.
• Enumerate 16 groups of associated minerals in Part B, with nearly identical groupings and mineral names.
• Serve the same function in their respective statutes: to delineate the minerals eligible for tax benefits related to prospecting, extraction, or production.

2. Minor Differences and Editorial Changes

A detailed textual comparison reveals only minor variations, primarily in spelling and typographical conventions:

• In SCHEDULE 07, certain mineral names are spelled differently (e.g., "Corrundum" vs. "Corundum", "Pyphrotite" vs. "Pyrrhotite", "Arsinopyrite" vs. "Arsenopyrite", "Lithomorge" vs. "Lithomarge"). These appear to be typographical errors or variant spellings rather than substantive changes.
• The grouping and order of minerals within each group are consistent, with only negligible differences in punctuation or conjunctions.
• Formatting differences (e.g., spacing, use of quotation marks) are not legally significant.

3. Legislative Continuity and Rationale

The continuity between the two schedules reflects a deliberate legislative choice to maintain stability and certainty in the tax treatment of minerals. By retaining the same list and groupings, the 2025 Bill avoids disruption to existing industry practices and ensures a seamless transition from the 1961 Act.

4. Policy and Economic Implications

The decision to preserve the mineral list and groupings underscores the ongoing importance of these minerals to the Indian economy and strategic interests. It signals to investors and industry stakeholders that tax incentives for mineral exploration and production will continue to be available for the same range of minerals, thereby supporting long-term planning and investment.

5. Potential for Future Reform

While the schedules are substantively identical, the static nature of the list may not fully reflect emerging trends in the mining sector, such as the growing importance of battery minerals (e.g., lithium, cobalt) or new rare earth elements. The schedules may require periodic review to ensure alignment with technological advances, market developments, and national priorities.

Practical Implications

For Taxpayers (Mining and Allied Industries):

• Certainty in Eligibility: The Schedules provide clear guidance to taxpayers regarding which minerals and mineral groups are eligible for tax deductions on prospecting and extraction expenditure.
• Scope of Deductions: Expenditure related to the listed minerals-whether incurred directly or as part of associated group mining-qualifies for the relevant tax benefits (e.g., amortization u/s 35E of the 1961 Act or its equivalent in the 2025 Bill).
• Integrated Operations: The groupings in Part B facilitate the inclusion of multi-mineral mining operations, reducing compliance complexity and the risk of disallowance due to technicalities.
• Compliance Requirements: Taxpayers must maintain records and evidence to establish the nature of minerals extracted and their classification under the Schedules. Any ambiguity or misclassification could lead to disputes or denial of benefits.

For Tax Authorities:

• Administrative Clarity: The Schedules streamline the process of assessment and verification, providing a definitive list for reference.
• Scope for Dispute: Potential for disputes remains where the mineral in question is not clearly covered by the nomenclature or where classification is contested (e.g., in the case of polymetallic ores or new mineral discoveries). 
• Need for Updates: As mineral science evolves, and new economically significant minerals are discovered, periodic review and amendment of the Schedules may be necessary to maintain relevance.

For Policy Makers:

• Strategic Focus: The inclusion of rare earths, uranium, and thorium minerals reflects a strategic policy orientation towards minerals critical for energy, defense, and technology sectors. 
• Alignment with National Policy: The Schedules are consistent with the objectives of the National Mineral Policy, which emphasizes the development of non-ferrous and strategic minerals.

Comparative Analysis with Other Jurisdictions

• International Practice: Many jurisdictions provide similar lists or schedules for mineral-related tax incentives (e.g., Canada's flow-through shares, Australia's exploration incentives). The approach of enumerating eligible minerals is common, though the scope and detail vary.
• Unique Features: The Indian Schedules are notable for their comprehensive inclusion of both primary and secondary minerals, as well as for recognizing associated mineral groups-an approach that reflects the complex geological realities of the subcontinent.
• Potential Conflicts: The reliance on static schedules may lead to obsolescence as new minerals gain economic significance (e.g., lithium, rare earths not currently named). Other countries have adopted more dynamic or criteria-based approaches.

Conclusion

SCHEDULE-XII of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 represents a direct continuation of the framework established by SCHEDULE 07 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, with only minor editorial refinements. The Schedules play a critical role in defining the scope of tax incentives for the mining sector, balancing the need for legal certainty with the practical realities of mineral extraction. The exhaustive listing of minerals and associated groups provides clarity for both taxpayers and tax authorities but necessitates periodic review to remain aligned with technological and industrial developments. The legislative approach reflects a policy commitment to supporting the mining sector, especially in areas of strategic and economic importance. While the Schedules are largely effective in their current form, future reforms could consider mechanisms for more flexible updating (e.g., through delegated legislation or periodic review committees) and clearer definitions to address ambiguities in mineral classification.

---

Full Text:

- SCHEDULE-XII MINERALS

Mineral classification determines tax incentive eligibility for prospecting and extraction, preserving continuity but requiring clearer definitions. Statutory classification of minerals determines which mineral activities qualify for tax incentives under income tax law by listing specified minerals and associated groups; SCHEDULE XII (2025) reproduces SCHEDULE 07 (1961) verbatim in substance, enumerating 27 minerals and 16 associated groups as the determinative reference for eligibility of capital expenditure on prospecting, extraction and processing, while leaving interpretive issues (broad terms, technical thresholds, typographical inconsistencies) that may require periodic review and clearer definitions.