Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS to the Government
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    A Landmark Judgment on Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS ...
    A Case of Coerced Input Tax Credit Reversal - GST recovery during search and seizure proceedings.
    Manner of compliance of conditions of pre-deposit - Debit of amount from electronic credit ledger (E...
    The need for clarity and concrete reasons in the cancellation of GST registrations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of reopening of assessment - need for a direct link between the portal's information and th...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Application of provisions of section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 ...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Provisional release of imported goods (apples) - The dispute centers on the valuation of the import...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Applicability of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of expenses - need for tax authorities to have a practical understanding of the nature ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of the assessee's business expenditure claims related to the purchase of sugarcane from...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Additions made u/s 69 and Section 56 in the absence of direct incriminating evidence linking the ass...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Whether penalty is to be imposed when the appellant has accepted the classification and paid the ent...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Liability for payment of customs duty on sale of excess liquor from the duty-free shop
    Case LawsCustoms
    Demand of customs duty beyond normal period of limitation on the ground of change in classification ...
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Stringent approach towards ensuring compliance with auditing standards - importance of auditors' res...
    Whether the appellant's claim can be classified as a Financial Debt or Operational Debt under the In...
    Scope of Approval of resolution plan - Allegations of undervaluation of the Corporate Debtor's asset...
    Denial of Input Tax Credit since the GST registration of the Supplier of Goods has been Cancelled wi...
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a vested right or concession - Can government impose conditions or restric...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    TDS credit entitlement affirmed: deductee entitled to credit despite deductor's non-deposit, preventing indirect recovery.
    Credit for tax deducted at source on interest payments is to be treated as tax paid on the deductee's behalf and does not depend on the deductor's remittance; statutory protections against indirect recovery prevent the revenue from seeking the same tax from the deductee when the deductor fails to deposit the deducted amount, and the deposit requirement in the applicable provisions does not negate the deductee's entitlement to such credit.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax credit for TDS: deductee entitled to credit even if deductor failed to deposit the retained tax with government.
    The Court treats amounts retained by a deductor as remaining tax and concludes the statutory credit mechanism for tax deducted at source does not condition a deductee's entitlement on the deductor having deposited the retained amount with the government, thereby barring indirect recovery or adjustment against the deductee where tax has been deducted at source.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Coercive tax collection prohibited; forced reversal of input tax credit during search deemed impermissible, with investigatory remedies preserved.
    Dispute involved a search under Section 67 and an alleged coerced reversal of Input Tax Credit from the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger for supplies from a supplier with retrospectively cancelled registration; the court found such coercive recovery during search impermissible and directed restoration of the ITC while preserving the department's power to investigate and, if ineligible or fraudulent ITC is found, pass appropriate protective orders.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Pre-deposit payment method: Electronic credit ledger debit does not satisfy pre-deposit; cash ledger payment required for appeals.
    Pre-deposit for appeals under the CGST/BGST regime must be paid from the cash ledger; debit from the electronic credit ledger does not satisfy the statutory pre-deposit requirement. A revenue circular restricting ECRL use to certain output tax payments and excluding reverse charge, interest, penalties, fees, and similar amounts supports that ECRL cannot be used for pre-deposit. The court emphasized the statutory payment scheme and strict appeal filing timelines, rejecting arguments that ECRL debit could substitute for cash ledger payment.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Requirement of clear reasons in GST cancellation: retrospective deregistration must be reasoned and consider input tax credit effects.
    Cancellation of GST registration must be supported by clear reasons and concrete factual findings in show cause notices and cancellation orders; labels that a registration is "liable to be cancelled" without specifying dues or factual basis constitute mechanical action. Retrospective cancellation cannot be applied routinely; authorities must follow statutory procedure, assess causes for non-filing, consider exceptional disruptions to business operations, and account for the impact on input tax credit before fixing an effective date of cancellation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Use of portal data: digital information needs a direct evidential link before reopening income tax assessments.
    Reopening assessments requires a direct evidential link between portal-derived information and the income alleged to have escaped assessment; portal data alone is insufficient without documentary support for transactions or gifts, and a show cause notice must provide adequate particulars and reflect proper consideration of the taxpayer's response before reassessment proceeds.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Non retrospective application of punitive benami provisions affirmed, limiting enforcement to post amendment transactions.
    Application of Section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 concerns whether punitive provisions enacted in 2016 apply to transactions predating the amendment. The Appellate Tribunal relied on Supreme Court precedent that such punitive provisions must be applied prospectively, and the High Court emphasized adherence to that interpretation while allowing parties to pursue further remedies pending the Supreme Court review.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional release of perishable imports allowed pending valuation, subject to provisional assessment and bond to protect revenue interests.
    The dispute concerns provisional release of perishable imported apples amid a valuation contest tied to a stayed minimum import price notification. The instrument requires provisional assessment of the Bill of Entry within a brief timeframe and permits conditional provisional release upon the importer furnishing a bond and meeting terms set by customs, thereby reconciling the protection of revenue interests with the practical need to avoid loss to perishable consignments pending final resolution of the notification's applicability.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Prospective application of punitive benami amendment upheld, limiting reach to post-enactment transactions and preserving pre-enactment protections.
    The Madras High Court affirmed that the enhanced punitive provision introduced by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 is substantive and applies prospectively; it endorsed the Tribunal's reliance on the Supreme Court's Ganapati Dealcom decision, treated a pending Supreme Court review petition as not displacing that precedent, and disposed of the appeals while allowing further proceedings consistent with prospectivity and prior constitutional findings.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Disallowance of expenses must rest on specific documentation defects, not on blanket percentage adjustments.
    Disallowance of business expenses on a summary or estimate basis requires specific, pointed deficiencies and cannot rest on generalized conclusions about excessiveness; in businesses with routine small transactions, tax authorities must examine the nature of operations and identify particular defects in documentation before applying blanket percentage disallowances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Statutory Minimum Price interpretation: excess cane payments treated as appropriation of profits, not deductible business expense.
    The core issue is whether payments for sugarcane in excess of the Statutory Minimum Price (SMP) are deductible business expenditures or constitute an appropriation of profits. The Assessing Officer relied on standard accounting practice requiring provisions for liabilities at year end and treated post closing excess payments as distributions of operational surplus. The appellate view upheld that cooperative status does not alter the tax analysis and that payments beyond the SMP do not qualify as allowable business expenses absent proper provisioning within the accounting period.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Direct incriminating evidence requirement: third party search materials alone cannot sustain unexplained investment additions.
    Additions alleged as unexplained investments and undisclosed interest income based on third party search materials require a demonstrable direct nexus between those seized records and the assessee; absent such direct incriminating evidence, reliance on third party statements or documents is insufficient. Procedural safeguards and transactional indicia-such as cross examination opportunities, banking records, documentary support, and TDS-reduce the probative value of seized material when direct linkage is lacking.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty under Section 114A: no justification where importer accepted correct classification and paid differential duty before notice.
    Issue: imposition of a penalty for alleged suppression when the importer accepted correct tariff classification and paid the differential duty with interest before issuance of a show cause notice. The importer attributed the earlier misclassification to an agent error and denied intent to evade duty. The authority observed the accurate product description, admission of correct classification and prompt payment, concluded absence of suppression of facts and determined that the statutory penalty provision was not justified on these facts.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Liability under Section 72: duty rests with duty-free shop licence-holder when trade facility conditions are breached.
    Duty arises where a duty-free shop licence-holder breaches voucher and recordkeeping conditions under the trade facility; the licence-holder bears responsibility for payment of duty and interest when procedural requirements are violated, while penalty depends on culpability and may be disallowed where no intent to evade duty is established and customs were aware of the transactions.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Extended limitation in customs demands inapplicable where no suppression, limiting reassessment for CVD on undeclared MRP entries.
    Reassessment and CVD demand arose from a post-clearance change in classification and retrospective reliance on MRP for past entries; the tribunal held that items described were essential refrigeration parts rather than accessories, that MRP-based reassessment requires clear factual basis, and that the Extended Period of Limitation is inapplicable where no suppression is established, although penalty issues may still be considered where omissions occur.
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Auditor responsibility reinforced: regulatory findings against audit failures stress strict adherence to auditing standards and sanctions.
    NFRA found a statutory auditor guilty of professional misconduct for failures to comply with Standards on Auditing, including inadequate procedures to verify revenue, lack of physical inventory verification, insufficient going concern assessment, deficient materiality application, and inadequate communication with Those Charged with Governance, and applied regulatory sanctions to reinforce auditor responsibilities in preserving financial reporting integrity.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Operational debt classification confirmed for supplier's claim based on the transaction's nature under the insolvency framework.
    Whether a claim from a supply arrangement is a Financial Debt or an Operational Debt depends on the transaction's substantive character. The tribunal examined contractual terms-penalties for non-delivery, interest, and security cheques-and applied precedents on the financial-versus-operational distinction. It characterised the supplier's claim, filed under Section 9, as arising from the supply of goods and therefore as an operational debt, sustaining the Resolution Professional's and Adjudicating Authority's classification.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Commercial wisdom of committee of creditors governs resolution plan approval, limiting valuation and standing challenges by promoters.
    Exclusion of the creditor was non irregular as no claim was filed; undervaluation allegations were rejected since opportunities to raise them during the CIRP were not used; the resolution plan satisfied Committee approval requirements and reflected the Committee's commercial wisdom; and a suspended director/promoter lacked standing to challenge the approved plan, underscoring limited judicial interference post approval.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input tax credit denial over supplier deregistration; remanded for document verification and fresh adjudication to determine genuineness.
    Denial of Input Tax Credit was challenged where the supplier's registration was retrospectively cancelled; the petitioner paid through bank and the supplier appeared on records at the time. The High Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the appellate authority to reconsider the petitioner's documentary evidence, hold a hearing, and pass a reasoned order verifying genuineness and timing of transactions; if purchases are genuine and occurred prior to cancellation, ITC is to be considered per precedent.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit as legislative concession: entitlement subject to statutory conditions, but retrospective deprivation of vested accruals is vulnerable.
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a legislative concession, not a vested right, so the legislature may lawfully prescribe eligibility conditions and procedural limits which taxpayers must strictly satisfy; however, retrospective amendments that destroy or diminish an already accrued entitlement are susceptible to challenge and have been treated as impermissible when they impair rights that vested before the amendment.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Determination of Tonnage for Shipping Companies under Indian Tax Law : Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961

      28 May, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 227 Computation of tonnage income.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      1. Introduction

      Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Section 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961, both address the determination of the tonnage of ships and inland vessels for the purposes of the tonnage tax regime. The tonnage tax system provides a special method of computing profits for shipping companies, diverging from the conventional income computation under the Income Tax Act. Instead of taxing actual profits, the regime taxes notional income based on the net tonnage of ships operated by qualifying companies. This system is intended to enhance the global competitiveness of Indian shipping companies, provide fiscal certainty, and align the Indian tax regime with international practices.

      Clause 227(9) is a part of a broader legislative overhaul proposed in the Income Tax Bill, 2025, which seeks to modernize and consolidate the law. Section 115VX, on the other hand, is an existing provision under Chapter XII-G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which introduced and governs the tonnage tax scheme in India. Both provisions are fundamentally similar in their structure and objective, but a detailed analysis is necessary to highlight nuances, legislative intent, and practical implications for stakeholders.

      2. Objective and Purpose

      Legislative Intent and Policy Considerations

      The primary objective of both Clause 227(9) and Section 115VX is to provide a clear, uniform, and objective method for determining the tonnage of ships and inland vessels for the computation of tonnage income. The rationale is to ensure certainty, minimize disputes, and align Indian law with international conventions and best practices.

      • Certainty and Uniformity: By linking the determination of tonnage to certificates issued under internationally recognized conventions and domestic statutes, the provisions reduce the scope for subjective interpretations and administrative discretion.
      • Alignment with International Practice: The use of certificates under the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969, and the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, ensures that Indian law is in harmony with international norms, facilitating global operations for Indian shipping companies.
      • Facilitation of the Tonnage Tax Regime: The tonnage tax regime is designed to provide a simplified and predictable tax environment for shipping companies, thereby encouraging investment, fleet expansion, and the development of India as a maritime hub.
      • Inclusion of Inland Vessels: The explicit inclusion of inland vessels (especially after the Inland Vessels Act, 2021) reflects the government's intent to broaden the scope of the tonnage tax regime, recognizing the growing importance of inland water transport.

      3. Detailed Analysis of Clause 227(9)

      Breakdown and Interpretation

      1. Sub-clause (a): Tonnage Determination by Certificate
        The tonnage of a ship or inland vessel is to be determined strictly as per the certificate indicating its tonnage. This removes any room for alternative methods of measurement or estimation, ensuring objectivity and consistency.
      2. Sub-clause (b): Definition of "Valid Certificate"
        • (i) Ships Registered in India
          • (A) Length less than 24 metres: Certificate under the Merchant Shipping (Tonnage Measurement of Ship) Rules, 1987, made under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.
          • (B) Length 24 metres or more: International tonnage certificate under the Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969, as specified in the same Rules.
        • (ii) Ships Registered Outside India
          Such ships must have a licence from the Director-General of Shipping u/ss 406 or 407 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958. The licence must specify net tonnage based on a Tonnage Certificate from the Flag State Administration, or any other evidence acceptable to the Director-General of Shipping.
        • (iii) Inland Vessels Registered in India
          The tonnage is determined by a certificate issued under the Inland Vessels Act, 2021.

      Key Features and Legal Principles

      • Reliance on Statutory Certificates: The provision mandates reliance on statutory certificates, thus limiting disputes regarding tonnage computation and providing legal certainty.
      • International and Domestic Compliance: By referencing both domestic and international certificates, the provision caters to the needs of both Indian and foreign-registered vessels operating in India.
      • Administrative Discretion: For foreign ships, the Director-General of Shipping is vested with limited discretion to accept alternative evidence if the standard certificates are unavailable, but this discretion is circumscribed and subject to regulatory oversight.
      • Inclusion of Inland Vessels: The explicit inclusion of inland vessels and reference to the Inland Vessels Act, 2021, marks a progressive step in broadening the regime.

      Ambiguities and Potential Issues

      • Discretion in Accepting Evidence: The phrase "any other evidence acceptable to the Director-General of Shipping" for foreign ships introduces some subjectivity, which could potentially lead to inconsistent application unless further clarified by rules or guidelines.
      • Overlap of Regulatory Jurisdiction: The provision references multiple statutes (Merchant Shipping Act, 1958; Inland Vessels Act, 2021), which may lead to jurisdictional overlaps, especially for vessels operating in both inland and coastal waters.
      • Update and Harmonization: The reference to the Merchant Shipping (Tonnage Measurement of Ship) Rules, 1987, presumes that these rules will remain unchanged. Any amendment to the underlying rules could necessitate corresponding legislative updates.

      4. Practical Implications

      For Shipping Companies

      • Compliance Certainty: Companies can structure their operations and tax planning with certainty, relying on the tonnage as certified by competent authorities.
      • Ease of Documentation: The requirement of statutory certificates simplifies documentation and reduces the compliance burden, as these certificates are already required for regulatory purposes.
      • Potential for Disputes: Limited to cases where certificates are absent, ambiguous, or where alternative evidence is submitted for foreign ships.

      For Tax Authorities

      • Objective Assessment: Tax officers are bound to accept the tonnage as per the valid certificate, reducing scope for arbitrary assessments.
      • Verification: The main task is to verify the authenticity and validity of certificates, rather than engage in technical measurement.

      For Regulators (DG Shipping, etc.)

      • Central Role: The Director-General of Shipping plays a pivotal role in certifying and, where necessary, accepting alternative evidence for foreign ships.
      • Need for Clear Guidelines: To ensure uniformity and avoid allegations of arbitrariness, regulators may need to issue detailed guidelines on what constitutes "acceptable" alternative evidence.

      For Inland Water Transport Operators

      • Inclusion in Tonnage Tax Regime: Operators of inland vessels are explicitly brought within the regime, providing them with potential tax benefits and compliance obligations similar to ocean-going shipping companies.

      5. Comparative Analysis: Clause 227(9) vs. Section 115VX

      AspectSection 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025
      ApplicabilityShips and, post-amendment, inland vessels for tonnage tax schemeShips and inland vessels; explicitly covers both categories
      Definition of Valid CertificateSpecifies certificates under Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, and Inland Vessels Act, 2021Repeats same requirements, consolidates language for clarity
      Ships <24m (India)Certificate under Merchant Shipping (Tonnage Measurement of Ship) Rules, 1987Same
      Ships >=24m (India)International tonnage certificate under 1969 Convention, as per 1987 RulesSame
      Ships Registered Outside IndiaLicence by DG Shipping under s.406/407, with Flag State certificate or other evidenceSame, with slightly more explicit language on acceptable evidence
      Inland VesselsCertificate under Inland Vessels Act, 2021 (post-2025 amendment)Same
      Discretion to DG ShippingPermits "any other evidence acceptable to DG Shipping"Same
      ConsolidationSeparate section; earlier only ships, now includes inland vesselsIntegrated in a new, comprehensive provision

      Substantive Differences and Similarities

      • Substantial Parity: Both provisions are almost identical in substance and language, reflecting a deliberate legislative decision to retain the existing framework for tonnage determination in the new Bill.
      • Inclusion of Inland Vessels: Section 115VX was amended by the Finance Act, 2025, to include inland vessels, effective 01-04-2026, whereas Clause 227(9) incorporates this inclusion ab initio. This harmonizes the coverage under both regimes.
      • Administrative Discretion: Both provisions vest discretion in the DG Shipping to accept alternative evidence for foreign ships, ensuring practical flexibility.
      • Legal Certainty: Both provisions provide for legal certainty by relying on statutory certificates, reducing potential for disputes.

      Contextual Differences

      • Legislative Context:Clause 227(9) is part of a comprehensive new Income Tax Bill, intended to replace and modernize the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 115VX remains operative until the new Bill comes into force.
      • Structural Placement: Clause 227(9) is situated within a broader, restructured framework for computation of tonnage income, whereas Section 115VX is located within Chapter XII-G, which is specifically dedicated to the tonnage tax scheme.

      Potential Conflicts or Overlaps

      • Transitional Issues: During the transition from the 1961 Act to the new Bill, there may be some confusion or overlap regarding the applicability of the two provisions, especially for assessment years straddling the commencement date.
      • Consistency in Interpretation: Given the near-identical language, judicial and administrative interpretations u/s 115VX are likely to be relevant and persuasive for Clause 227(9), ensuring continuity in legal principles.

      6. Comparative Analysis with International Practice

      The reliance on international certificates (such as those issued under the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969) aligns Indian law with prevailing global standards. Many maritime nations adopt similar approaches in their tonnage tax regimes, using internationally recognized certificates for determining net tonnage. This harmonization facilitates international operations, reduces compliance barriers, and enhances the competitiveness of Indian shipping companies.

      7. Conclusion

      Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, represents a continuation and consolidation of the principles enshrined in Section 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Both provisions are designed to foster certainty, objectivity, and international alignment in the determination of tonnage for the purposes of the tonnage tax regime. The explicit inclusion of inland vessels reflects the evolving scope of the Indian shipping industry and the government's intent to provide a level playing field for all operators.

      While both provisions are largely identical, the transition to the new Bill offers an opportunity for further clarification, especially regarding the exercise of discretion by the Director-General of Shipping and the harmonization of procedures across different classes of vessels. Stakeholders should monitor subsequent rules and administrative guidelines to ensure smooth implementation and minimize disputes.


      Full Text:

      Clause 227 Computation of tonnage income.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax