Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Interpreting "Or": The Disjunctive Mandate for Personal Hearing in Tax Matters
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Registration Process u/s 80G: Insights from the ITAT Ruling
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Ensuring Fair Proceedings: The Importance of Proper Notice Service in Income Tax Matters
    Demarcating Authority: High Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Limits of GST Officers
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unraveling the Royalty Conundrum and DTAA: ITAT's Stance on Marketing and Reservation Fees
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Royalty or Not? Decoding the Taxability of Marketing and Reservation Contributions under India-USA D...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unraveling the Intricacies: Assessing a Political Party's Claim for Income Tax Exemption
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Bogus Capital Gains and Accommodation Entries: Unraveling the Penny Stock Scam and Tax Evasion
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Strict Interpretation of Exemption Provisions: Supreme Court's Ruling on Section 10B(8) of the Incom...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance u/s 14A: Prospective or Retrospective Effect of the Amendment?
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Complexities of "Charitable Purpose" in Income Tax Exemptions
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Cooperative Banks vs. Primary Agricultural Credit Societies: Implications for Section 80P Deduction
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Exemption u/s 11: Condonation of Delay in Filing Form 10
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting Section 249(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act: When Non-Payment of Advance Tax Cannot Dismiss...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Retrospective Amendments and the Doctrine of Vested Rights: A Judicial Perspective
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Upholding Equality: HC Strikes Down Discriminatory Circular on Charitable Trust Approvals
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Judicial Review of Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) Orders: Navigating the Boundaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Assessee's Lackadaisical Conduct Leads to Dismissal of Income Tax Appeal
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Faceless Appeal Scheme: Lessons from the Judgement on Delayed Filing and Deduction u/...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unraveling the Maze of Round-Tripping: The Doctrine of "Source of Source" in Share Capital Transacti...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Personal hearing mandate in tax proceedings: failure to afford hearing requires reconsideration and a reasoned decision.
    Section 75(4) of the UPGST Act mandates that an opportunity for personal hearing be granted either upon a written request by the person chargeable with tax or penalty or whenever an adverse decision is contemplated; the disjunctive word "or" must be given its plain meaning, creating independent triggers for the hearing obligation. The court concluded the authorities failed to comply with this requirement and directed that a personal hearing be afforded and a reasoned order issued thereafter to ensure procedural fairness in tax adjudication.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 80G registration: provisional approval permits subsequent final registration, with commencement dated from provisional grant.
    The tribunal construed the proviso-based registration mechanism to permit institutions granted provisional approval to apply for final registration, counting the date of commencement of activities from the grant of provisional approval; administrative circulars extending renewal deadlines apply to specified renewal applications and do not curtail the availability of final registration for provisionally approved institutions, while a view excluding applicants who commenced activities prior to provisional approval was considered inconsistent with the proviso scheme.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Proper service of notice: portal-only publication cannot substitute direct communication and mandates a fresh hearing.
    Proper service of notice in income tax proceedings is essential to safeguard the right to be heard and facets of natural justice. Placing notices on an electronic portal without direct communication does not, by itself, satisfy statutory methods of service, and cannot be presumed to give the taxpayer effective notice. Where service in terms of the Act and Rules is not shown, affected parties are entitled to a fair opportunity to file replies and be heard, and the tax administration must provide a fresh hearing and issue an independent speaking order after considering the reply.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdictional limits of GST officers: no proceedings against assessees assigned to counterpart authority absent cross-empowerment notification.
    The judgement clarifies that appointment and delegation of powers under the Central and State GST regimes are confined to officers appointed under each statute, and that assessees allocated administratively to Central or State authorities may be lawfully proceeded against only by those authorities unless a formal cross-empowerment notification permits otherwise; no general cross-empowerment notification exists except for limited refund purposes.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Taxability of marketing contributions: non taxable where receipts are fiduciary and subject to mutuality, not royalty.
    Where receipts from hotels are received with a corresponding obligation to expend them for agreed common purposes and are held in a fiduciary capacity, such marketing contributions, reward program receipts, reservation contributions and central reservation system fees are not consideration for use of intellectual property or fees for technical services and thus do not qualify as royalty or fees for included services under the India-US DTAA, particularly in the absence of a permanent establishment and where coordinate precedent on identical facts supports non taxability under the principle of mutuality.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Royalty characterization: marketing and reservation contributions treated as non-royalty under DTAA when tied to agreed-use obligations.
    Whether marketing and reservation contributions from Indian hotels to a US company qualify as Royalty or Fees for Included Services under the India-USA DTAA turns on their substantive nature: the presence of a corresponding contractual obligation to apply funds for agreed marketing, advertising and reservation activities and supporting auditor evidence indicates such receipts are not consideration for making available intellectual property or technical services, distinguishing them from factual scenarios where contributions increase brand value or transfer intangible know how.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 13A compliance: failure to meet proviso conditions bars political party exemption and informs stay assessment approach.
    A registered political party's claim of exemption under Section 13A was rejected for failure to meet proviso conditions, including receipt of donations in breach of the cash donation prohibition; the tribunal treated non exempt voluntary contributions as income from other sources, disallowing deductions; allegations of mala fides were dismissed due to the party's procedural delays; and the tribunal's prima facie framework for stay applications-assessing merits, undue hardship, and likelihood of success-was upheld, with liberty to apply afresh to the tribunal given changed circumstances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Burden of Proof under section sixty eight: genuineness of share transactions must be established or treated as accommodation entries.
    The dispute concerned alleged bogus long term capital gains from penny stock trading characterised as an accommodation entry; revenue contested genuineness, identity and creditworthiness of parties while assessees relied on expert and market information. Applying the doctrine of preponderance of probabilities, the court reiterated that the initial burden to prove identity and genuineness lies with the assessee, criticised inadequate enquiries by authorities, rejected expert and media reliance as a substitute for due diligence, and described the accommodation entry modus operandi leading to findings that the transactions were not satisfactorily proved.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Strict compliance with exemption conditions: declaration and filing deadline mandatory; revised returns cannot introduce new exemption claims.
    The Court held that both conditions for claiming the exemption-furnishing a written declaration to the assessing officer and submitting it before the due date for the original return-are mandatory and must be strictly complied with. It rejected treating the time limit as directory, distinguished deduction-related authorities, and held that a revised return cannot introduce new exemption claims or claim carry-forward benefits not made in the original return.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Retrospectivity of tax amendment: amendment held prospective; prior rule barring disallowance where no exempt income applies.
    The court held that the Finance Act amendment described as "for removal of doubts" cannot be given retrospective effect where it alters prior law; the Finance Bill memorandum fixing commencement determined prospectivity, and existing Division Bench precedent that no disallowance can be made if no exempt income was earned was applied, subject to the ultimate outcome of the pending higher court challenge.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Charitable purpose clarified: statutory public bodies generally exempt; commercial receipts taxed under quantitative proviso, with annual scrutiny required.
    The judgement narrows the scope of charitable purpose under Section 2(15) by treating statutory public utility bodies as generally exempt while excluding income from commercial activities beyond core regulatory or public-interest functions. Trade-promotion and non-statutory bodies may qualify if charges are nominal, but ancillary fee-generating services and high-fee providers produce taxable commercial receipts. Private trusts' advertisement income is commercial. Assessing authorities must perform yearly scrutiny and apply the proviso's quantitative limits to determine exemption eligibility.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deduction 80P eligibility turns on whether a cooperative society's banking status classifies it as a cooperative bank; AO to verify.
    A cooperative society carrying on deposit-taking and lending, issuing cheques and providing banking services may fall within the banking business definition under the Banking Regulation Act; whether it qualifies as a cooperative bank under that Act-affected by its bye-laws and membership rules-must be determined by fact-specific examination to decide entitlement to the cooperative deduction.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of Delay in Filing Form Ten: reasonable professional oversight accepted, delay condoned and rectification allowed.
    Condonation of delay in filing Form Ten was granted where the auditor's bona fide oversight-reporting accumulation in the audit report (Form Ten B) and misconstruing separate filing requirements-led to a 361 day delay; the court found the lapse inadvertent amid pandemic conditions, accepted the explanation, quashed the refusal order and permitted rectification steps, treating the delay as condoned.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax obligation: absence of taxable income prevents dismissal of appeal for non-payment of advance tax.
    The Tribunal held that the advance tax payment condition for appeal maintainability applies only when the assessee had a legal obligation to compute and pay advance tax; in the absence of taxable income no such obligation exists, and an appeal cannot be dismissed solely for non-payment of advance tax. The Tribunal directed that the matter proceed to merits with an opportunity to be heard, stressing that the payment requirement must be applied in light of factual circumstances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Vested rights preserved against retrospective tax amendments; filings made before enactment remain effective for settlement consideration.
    The court addressed whether a retrospective Finance Act amendment prohibiting settlement applications from a specified date could divest a taxpayer who filed earlier of its vested right to have the application considered. It held that retrospective legislation cannot take away rights already accrued by actions completed before enactment unless clearly intended; that section 119 confers time-extension power but cannot impose new substantive eligibility conditions; and that administrative delay by revenue does not justify denying access where an application was already filed.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Reasonable classification principle: differential deadline for charitable trust tax recognition cannot lack rational basis or equality protection.
    A departmental circular extended a filing deadline for tax recognition to mitigate hardship but excluded newly formed charitable trusts without offering reasons; the exclusion lacked an intelligible differentia and rational nexus to the circular's object, making the differential treatment arbitrary and ultra vires the constitutional guarantee of equality, requiring the excluded applications to be treated as within time and decided on merits.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ITSC jurisdiction extends beyond application disclosures, while full and true disclosure and narrow judicial review govern settlement oversight.
    The Income Tax Settlement Commission may inquire into and decide issues disclosed in the application and any other matters relating to the case as reflected in the Commissioner's report or uncovered by further inquiry; full and true disclosure is mandatory and amendments or contradictory positions that undermine that requirement are impermissible, yet contesting taxability before the Commission does not automatically negate disclosure; judicial review is limited to statutory contravention, prejudice, fraud, bias or malice, while sufficiency of materials placed before the Commission is generally beyond routine court scrutiny.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Delay condonation denied where litigant's evasive conduct and non participation failed to constitute sufficient cause for appeal filing.
    The court refused condonation of delay for filing an appeal where a best judgment assessment treated cash bank deposits as unexplained after the assessee failed to file returns or participate in proceedings; reliance on transition to a faceless e filing regime and lack of alerts was held insufficient, as the assessee's evasive and habitual non participation did not amount to sufficient cause warranting condonation under the applicable doctrine.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Sufficient cause for delay in filing appeals rejected where faceless scheme migration did not excuse prolonged inaction.
    The court held that migration to a faceless appeal system did not, without persuasive evidence, constitute sufficient cause to condone a lengthy delay in filing an appeal, finding the explanation reflective of litigant inaction rather than unavoidable impediment. On tax deduction, the court applied authority that a non-obstante clause does not negate the employer's obligation to deposit employees' statutory contributions by the due date as a condition for claiming the deduction, and treated the appeal as meritless and barred by limitation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Source of source doctrine used to pierce the corporate veil where share capital appears round tripped among related entities.
    The assessee must prove identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of investors under section 68; examination extends to the true origin of funds where bank records show circular transfers, related party directorships, lack of business operations, and arbitrary share premium, permitting lifting the corporate veil and application of the source of source doctrine to treat such receipts as not satisfactorily explained.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Determination of Tonnage for Shipping Companies under Indian Tax Law : Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961

      28 May, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 227 Computation of tonnage income.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      1. Introduction

      Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Section 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961, both address the determination of the tonnage of ships and inland vessels for the purposes of the tonnage tax regime. The tonnage tax system provides a special method of computing profits for shipping companies, diverging from the conventional income computation under the Income Tax Act. Instead of taxing actual profits, the regime taxes notional income based on the net tonnage of ships operated by qualifying companies. This system is intended to enhance the global competitiveness of Indian shipping companies, provide fiscal certainty, and align the Indian tax regime with international practices.

      Clause 227(9) is a part of a broader legislative overhaul proposed in the Income Tax Bill, 2025, which seeks to modernize and consolidate the law. Section 115VX, on the other hand, is an existing provision under Chapter XII-G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which introduced and governs the tonnage tax scheme in India. Both provisions are fundamentally similar in their structure and objective, but a detailed analysis is necessary to highlight nuances, legislative intent, and practical implications for stakeholders.

      2. Objective and Purpose

      Legislative Intent and Policy Considerations

      The primary objective of both Clause 227(9) and Section 115VX is to provide a clear, uniform, and objective method for determining the tonnage of ships and inland vessels for the computation of tonnage income. The rationale is to ensure certainty, minimize disputes, and align Indian law with international conventions and best practices.

      • Certainty and Uniformity: By linking the determination of tonnage to certificates issued under internationally recognized conventions and domestic statutes, the provisions reduce the scope for subjective interpretations and administrative discretion.
      • Alignment with International Practice: The use of certificates under the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969, and the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, ensures that Indian law is in harmony with international norms, facilitating global operations for Indian shipping companies.
      • Facilitation of the Tonnage Tax Regime: The tonnage tax regime is designed to provide a simplified and predictable tax environment for shipping companies, thereby encouraging investment, fleet expansion, and the development of India as a maritime hub.
      • Inclusion of Inland Vessels: The explicit inclusion of inland vessels (especially after the Inland Vessels Act, 2021) reflects the government's intent to broaden the scope of the tonnage tax regime, recognizing the growing importance of inland water transport.

      3. Detailed Analysis of Clause 227(9)

      Breakdown and Interpretation

      1. Sub-clause (a): Tonnage Determination by Certificate
        The tonnage of a ship or inland vessel is to be determined strictly as per the certificate indicating its tonnage. This removes any room for alternative methods of measurement or estimation, ensuring objectivity and consistency.
      2. Sub-clause (b): Definition of "Valid Certificate"
        • (i) Ships Registered in India
          • (A) Length less than 24 metres: Certificate under the Merchant Shipping (Tonnage Measurement of Ship) Rules, 1987, made under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.
          • (B) Length 24 metres or more: International tonnage certificate under the Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969, as specified in the same Rules.
        • (ii) Ships Registered Outside India
          Such ships must have a licence from the Director-General of Shipping u/ss 406 or 407 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958. The licence must specify net tonnage based on a Tonnage Certificate from the Flag State Administration, or any other evidence acceptable to the Director-General of Shipping.
        • (iii) Inland Vessels Registered in India
          The tonnage is determined by a certificate issued under the Inland Vessels Act, 2021.

      Key Features and Legal Principles

      • Reliance on Statutory Certificates: The provision mandates reliance on statutory certificates, thus limiting disputes regarding tonnage computation and providing legal certainty.
      • International and Domestic Compliance: By referencing both domestic and international certificates, the provision caters to the needs of both Indian and foreign-registered vessels operating in India.
      • Administrative Discretion: For foreign ships, the Director-General of Shipping is vested with limited discretion to accept alternative evidence if the standard certificates are unavailable, but this discretion is circumscribed and subject to regulatory oversight.
      • Inclusion of Inland Vessels: The explicit inclusion of inland vessels and reference to the Inland Vessels Act, 2021, marks a progressive step in broadening the regime.

      Ambiguities and Potential Issues

      • Discretion in Accepting Evidence: The phrase "any other evidence acceptable to the Director-General of Shipping" for foreign ships introduces some subjectivity, which could potentially lead to inconsistent application unless further clarified by rules or guidelines.
      • Overlap of Regulatory Jurisdiction: The provision references multiple statutes (Merchant Shipping Act, 1958; Inland Vessels Act, 2021), which may lead to jurisdictional overlaps, especially for vessels operating in both inland and coastal waters.
      • Update and Harmonization: The reference to the Merchant Shipping (Tonnage Measurement of Ship) Rules, 1987, presumes that these rules will remain unchanged. Any amendment to the underlying rules could necessitate corresponding legislative updates.

      4. Practical Implications

      For Shipping Companies

      • Compliance Certainty: Companies can structure their operations and tax planning with certainty, relying on the tonnage as certified by competent authorities.
      • Ease of Documentation: The requirement of statutory certificates simplifies documentation and reduces the compliance burden, as these certificates are already required for regulatory purposes.
      • Potential for Disputes: Limited to cases where certificates are absent, ambiguous, or where alternative evidence is submitted for foreign ships.

      For Tax Authorities

      • Objective Assessment: Tax officers are bound to accept the tonnage as per the valid certificate, reducing scope for arbitrary assessments.
      • Verification: The main task is to verify the authenticity and validity of certificates, rather than engage in technical measurement.

      For Regulators (DG Shipping, etc.)

      • Central Role: The Director-General of Shipping plays a pivotal role in certifying and, where necessary, accepting alternative evidence for foreign ships.
      • Need for Clear Guidelines: To ensure uniformity and avoid allegations of arbitrariness, regulators may need to issue detailed guidelines on what constitutes "acceptable" alternative evidence.

      For Inland Water Transport Operators

      • Inclusion in Tonnage Tax Regime: Operators of inland vessels are explicitly brought within the regime, providing them with potential tax benefits and compliance obligations similar to ocean-going shipping companies.

      5. Comparative Analysis: Clause 227(9) vs. Section 115VX

      AspectSection 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025
      ApplicabilityShips and, post-amendment, inland vessels for tonnage tax schemeShips and inland vessels; explicitly covers both categories
      Definition of Valid CertificateSpecifies certificates under Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, and Inland Vessels Act, 2021Repeats same requirements, consolidates language for clarity
      Ships <24m (India)Certificate under Merchant Shipping (Tonnage Measurement of Ship) Rules, 1987Same
      Ships >=24m (India)International tonnage certificate under 1969 Convention, as per 1987 RulesSame
      Ships Registered Outside IndiaLicence by DG Shipping under s.406/407, with Flag State certificate or other evidenceSame, with slightly more explicit language on acceptable evidence
      Inland VesselsCertificate under Inland Vessels Act, 2021 (post-2025 amendment)Same
      Discretion to DG ShippingPermits "any other evidence acceptable to DG Shipping"Same
      ConsolidationSeparate section; earlier only ships, now includes inland vesselsIntegrated in a new, comprehensive provision

      Substantive Differences and Similarities

      • Substantial Parity: Both provisions are almost identical in substance and language, reflecting a deliberate legislative decision to retain the existing framework for tonnage determination in the new Bill.
      • Inclusion of Inland Vessels: Section 115VX was amended by the Finance Act, 2025, to include inland vessels, effective 01-04-2026, whereas Clause 227(9) incorporates this inclusion ab initio. This harmonizes the coverage under both regimes.
      • Administrative Discretion: Both provisions vest discretion in the DG Shipping to accept alternative evidence for foreign ships, ensuring practical flexibility.
      • Legal Certainty: Both provisions provide for legal certainty by relying on statutory certificates, reducing potential for disputes.

      Contextual Differences

      • Legislative Context:Clause 227(9) is part of a comprehensive new Income Tax Bill, intended to replace and modernize the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 115VX remains operative until the new Bill comes into force.
      • Structural Placement: Clause 227(9) is situated within a broader, restructured framework for computation of tonnage income, whereas Section 115VX is located within Chapter XII-G, which is specifically dedicated to the tonnage tax scheme.

      Potential Conflicts or Overlaps

      • Transitional Issues: During the transition from the 1961 Act to the new Bill, there may be some confusion or overlap regarding the applicability of the two provisions, especially for assessment years straddling the commencement date.
      • Consistency in Interpretation: Given the near-identical language, judicial and administrative interpretations u/s 115VX are likely to be relevant and persuasive for Clause 227(9), ensuring continuity in legal principles.

      6. Comparative Analysis with International Practice

      The reliance on international certificates (such as those issued under the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969) aligns Indian law with prevailing global standards. Many maritime nations adopt similar approaches in their tonnage tax regimes, using internationally recognized certificates for determining net tonnage. This harmonization facilitates international operations, reduces compliance barriers, and enhances the competitiveness of Indian shipping companies.

      7. Conclusion

      Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, represents a continuation and consolidation of the principles enshrined in Section 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Both provisions are designed to foster certainty, objectivity, and international alignment in the determination of tonnage for the purposes of the tonnage tax regime. The explicit inclusion of inland vessels reflects the evolving scope of the Indian shipping industry and the government's intent to provide a level playing field for all operators.

      While both provisions are largely identical, the transition to the new Bill offers an opportunity for further clarification, especially regarding the exercise of discretion by the Director-General of Shipping and the harmonization of procedures across different classes of vessels. Stakeholders should monitor subsequent rules and administrative guidelines to ensure smooth implementation and minimize disputes.


      Full Text:

      Clause 227 Computation of tonnage income.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax