Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Jurisdictional Prerequisites for Initiating Reassessment u/s 148: Non-Depoist of TDS by the Employer
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Revisiting the Scope of "Record" u/s 263: Embracing Subsequent Records
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting "Record": Revisiting the Scope of Revision Powers u/s 264 and Rectification of Mistake ...
    The Doctrine of Natural Justice in GST Proceedings: A Case Study on Show Cause Notice u/s 74"
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) and the Concept of "Plant" under GST: Supreme Court
    Case LawsCustoms
    Inordinate Delay in Adjudication: High Court's Stance on Quashing Show Cause Notices
    Case LawsCustoms
    Inordinate Delay in Adjudication: Upholding the Principles of Natural Justice
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Re-Assessment Notices Issued During COVID-19 Lockdown
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Unraveling the Mineral Rights Regime: The Supreme Court's Landmark Judgment
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Faceless Assessment Regime: A Judicial Perspective
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Evidentiary Value of Statements Recorded During Income Tax Surveys: A Judicial Analysis
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Faceless Assessment: Ensuring Compliance with Statutory Provisions
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Faceless Assessment Mechanism: Jurisdictional Limits in Income Tax Proceedings
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reassessment Notices for AY 2013-14: Upholding the Doctrine of Limitation
    Principles of Tax Fairness and Mens Rea: Quashes Penalty for Mere Technical Errors
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Decoding the Mandatory Timelines: A Thorough Examination of the Income Tax Assessment Order Nullific...
    Expiry of E-Way Bill AND Mens Rea: Technical Violation Alone Insufficient for Penalty Imposition
    Maintainability of Appeals: High Court Upholds Strict Interpretation of Limitation Provisions in GST...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Stay of Tax Demand: Interpreting the Discretionary Power u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting "Technical Services" under Tax Treaties: A Comprehensive Analysis
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdictional prerequisite: notice in the name of a deceased person invalidates reassessment initiation under Section 148.
    A notice under Section 148 issued in the name of a deceased person is a jurisdictional defect because a valid notice to the correct person is a condition precedent to reopening an assessment; legal representatives have no statutory duty to intimate death; where salary tax has been deducted at source, reassessment cannot be pursued against the deceased or their representatives, and employer non-deposit of TDS does not create an outstanding demand against the assessee or their legal representatives.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revisional power: Commissioner may consider subsequent records available at time of examination in tax proceedings.
    The Court construed the Commissioner's revisional power to permit consideration of all materials relating to the proceeding that are available at the time of his examination, including documents and valuation reports that came on the file after the assessment order; the Explanation to the provision was read as clarificatory, giving an inclusive meaning to "record" rather than restricting it to what the Assessing Officer had when passing the assessment.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revision powers under section 264: Commissioner must consider expanded record and rehear revision petitions on merits.
    The Court held that the Commissioner must consider a revision petition on its merits and that the term record in revision proceedings extends beyond the return and assessment order to include material from other sources and prior assessments. It emphasised consistency in treatment of continuing transactions and required the Principal Commissioner to take into account all relevant materials, identify any apparent mistakes, afford a personal hearing, and pass a reasoned order within a short timeframe.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Natural justice in tax proceedings: show cause notices must allege fraud or concealment before enhanced recovery is invoked.
    The court quashed the enhanced-provision show cause notice for failing to allege the essential elements of fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts and held that the enhanced regime may be invoked only when the adjudicating authority is prima facie satisfied of those elements and records that satisfaction in the notice; absent such express allegations the proceedings are without jurisdiction though fresh proceedings may be initiated with a proper notice.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Plant classification under GST: functionality test determines ITC eligibility for buildings serving special technical requirements.
    The expression plant or machinery in Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act must be interpreted by reference to functionality rather than by equating it with the statutory definition of "plant and machinery." A building qualifies as a plant for ITC purposes if, on the facts, it was planned and constructed to serve the assessee's special technical or operational requirements. The functionality test is fact-specific and requires case-by-case analysis of the building's role in the assessee's business.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Inordinate delay in adjudication bars further proceedings on stale show cause notices absent a reasonable explanation.
    The court found the delay from 2008 to 2021 inordinate and unexplained, concluding the respondents did not provide a reasonable explanation; the delayed transfer to the call book without intimation breached statutory intimation requirements, and established precedent limits reliance on higher authority to excuse gross unexplained delays in adjudication of show cause notices.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Inordinate delay in adjudication undermines procedural fairness and bars continuation of prolonged, unexplained proceedings.
    The court found that prolonged, unexplained delay in adjudicating a show cause notice breached procedural fairness and natural justice, causing irretrievable prejudice by impairing evidence preservation and business planning. Delay attributable to the revenue authorities, contrary to Tribunal directions for timely disposal, rendered continuance of proceedings unsustainable and emphasized the necessity of justifying delay and ensuring timely adjudication.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Pandemic relief legislation upheld: re-assessment notices issued during lockdown remain valid despite later procedural rule.
    The court interpreted the pandemic relief legislation as providing comprehensive relief that extended to procedural obligations in force at the time of issuance, not confined solely to extensions of time. It applied the principle that statutes operate prospectively and concluded the later-introduced procedural provision does not apply retrospectively to invalidate earlier-issued re-assessment notices, limiting its analysis to the validity of issuance and not the merits of re-assessment proceedings.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Central legislative competence over mineral regulation affirmed; royalties characterised as compensation for resource depletion, limiting state levies.
    The Court concluded that the central legislative framework occupies the field of mineral regulation and that royalties are compensation for depletion of state-owned natural resources, not conventional taxes; consequently the Centre may impose such levies while States remain constrained from imposing royalties in the nature of compensation that would encroach on the Centre's exclusive regulatory domain.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Faceless assessment mechanism requires reassessment steps to follow a centralized faceless procedure, otherwise territorial officer lacks jurisdiction.
    The Scheme framed under the enabling provision must be read to include preliminary proceedings linked to reassessment, so that reassessment initiation and related steps follow the faceless mechanism; concurrent exercise of territorial and faceless functions would undermine the Scheme's purpose and render steps taken outside the faceless protocol inconsistent with the statutory framework.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Evidentiary value of survey statements: survey disclosures lack conclusive weight and require independent corroboration.
    Statements recorded during a tax survey are permissive and not taken on oath, so they are not conclusive evidence by themselves; they cannot be treated as inherently incriminating material to justify reopening assessments or making additions without independent corroboration, and must be recorded free of coercion in line with administrative instructions and judicial precedents.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Faceless assessment jurisdiction: JAO lacked authority under the statutory faceless procedure, invalidating improperly issued notices.
    The court determined that reassessment notices and related proceedings were inconsistent with the statutory faceless assessment framework because they were issued without following the prescribed allocation of jurisdiction and procedural sequence under the faceless mechanism; administrative orders purportedly exempting cases were not read to displace the statutory requirements and earlier precedent interpreting the faceless provisions was applied.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Faceless Assessment: statutory scheme governs jurisdiction and extends to central and international taxation proceedings.
    The court analysed Section 151A read with Sections 144B and 148A and held that administrative instructions dated March 31, 2021 and September 6, 2021 issued under section 119 apply only to assessment orders and do not extend to proceedings under Sections 148A and 148; those instructions cannot be read into the scheme notified on March 29, 2022. The mandatory faceless procedure under Sections 144B and 151A applies to notices and proceedings, including central charges and international taxation charges, and notices issued outside that mechanism fall outside the statutory jurisdictional framework.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Doctrine of limitation prevents revival of lapsed reassessment powers; administrative instructions cannot "travel back in time."
    The court held that when the right to reopen assessment had already lapsed under the pre amended limitation regime, subsequent amendments or administrative instructions could not revive that right; administrative attempts to "travel back in time" and extend limitation were invalid, assessees retain the defence of limitation, and pandemic era notifications did not cover years whose limitation had already expired.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Mens rea requirement in tax penalties: technical errors without intent cannot justify penalty imposition under GST compliance.
    Requirement of mens rea for imposition of tax penalties is central where e Way Bill compliance is questioned. Mere procedural or timing inconsistencies, without evidence of intent to evade tax and where valid tax invoices accompany the goods and tax has been charged, do not justify penal action. Authorities must establish culpable intent with cogent reasoning and comply with procedural and natural justice safeguards before imposing penalties.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Mandatory timelines under Section 144C require assessments to be completed within the prescribed month after DRP direction, else invalid.
    Once the DRP framed directions, the Assessing Officer was obliged to complete the assessment in conformity with those directions within one month from the end of the month in which the DRP's direction was served; service by uploading the DRP directive on the ITBA portal constitutes valid service for computing that period. The procedure does not envisage further involvement of the Transfer Pricing Officer once the DRP's direction is issued and an order under the transfer pricing provision has been remitted to the AO.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Mens rea requirement: technical expiry of an e way bill alone cannot justify a tax penalty without intent to evade.
    The court held that a purely technical lapse in E Way Bill formalities - where goods were otherwise covered by two e invoices and two E Way Bills and there was no dispute on consignor, consignee or goods - does not demonstrate the mens rea necessary to impose a penalty under the tax penal provision; authorities' focus on the expired E Way Bill alone was legally insufficient given documentary explanations and absence of intent to evade tax.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Exclusion of Limitation Act: GST Act's specific appellate time limits operate as a self contained code, barring general extensions.
    The court analysed whether the GST Act's appellate limitation regime operates as a complete code excluding the general Limitation Act. It applied the principle that fiscal statutes with detailed procedural and temporal rules are to be strictly construed, treating the special statute's limitation provision as implying exclusion of the Limitation Act's extension mechanism, and emphasised policy aims of expeditious dispute resolution, revenue certainty and administrative finality.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Assessing Officer discretion in granting stay of tax demand cannot be rigidly constrained by administrative OMs, requiring case specific consideration.
    The Assessing Officer's discretionary power under section 220(6) to grant stay of tax demand is not fettered by CBDT Office Memorandums; those OMs are administrative guidelines and do not mandate a uniform pre deposit. The AO must consider prima facie case, likelihood of success, and undue hardship and may require a higher, lower or no deposit depending on case specific facts. Administrative adjustment of refunds without considering a pending stay application was held arbitrary and the matter was remitted for reconsideration applying these principles.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Technical services interpretation requires specialized expertise and a demonstrable link to payments for withholding tax consequences.
    Interpretation of technical services under the India Ireland DTAA requires the application or transfer of specialized knowledge, skill or expertise; incidental training or assistance enabling a reseller to market standard software does not meet that threshold. The Reseller Agreement did not contemplate technology transfer or bespoke solutions, payments were tied to reseller net revenue, and the record lacked material linking remittances to customized technical services. Authorities must establish an evidentiary and contractual nexus between payments and provision of specialized technical services before applying withholding tax under the treaty.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Determination of Tonnage for Shipping Companies under Indian Tax Law : Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961

      28 May, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 227 Computation of tonnage income.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      1. Introduction

      Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Section 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961, both address the determination of the tonnage of ships and inland vessels for the purposes of the tonnage tax regime. The tonnage tax system provides a special method of computing profits for shipping companies, diverging from the conventional income computation under the Income Tax Act. Instead of taxing actual profits, the regime taxes notional income based on the net tonnage of ships operated by qualifying companies. This system is intended to enhance the global competitiveness of Indian shipping companies, provide fiscal certainty, and align the Indian tax regime with international practices.

      Clause 227(9) is a part of a broader legislative overhaul proposed in the Income Tax Bill, 2025, which seeks to modernize and consolidate the law. Section 115VX, on the other hand, is an existing provision under Chapter XII-G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which introduced and governs the tonnage tax scheme in India. Both provisions are fundamentally similar in their structure and objective, but a detailed analysis is necessary to highlight nuances, legislative intent, and practical implications for stakeholders.

      2. Objective and Purpose

      Legislative Intent and Policy Considerations

      The primary objective of both Clause 227(9) and Section 115VX is to provide a clear, uniform, and objective method for determining the tonnage of ships and inland vessels for the computation of tonnage income. The rationale is to ensure certainty, minimize disputes, and align Indian law with international conventions and best practices.

      • Certainty and Uniformity: By linking the determination of tonnage to certificates issued under internationally recognized conventions and domestic statutes, the provisions reduce the scope for subjective interpretations and administrative discretion.
      • Alignment with International Practice: The use of certificates under the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969, and the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, ensures that Indian law is in harmony with international norms, facilitating global operations for Indian shipping companies.
      • Facilitation of the Tonnage Tax Regime: The tonnage tax regime is designed to provide a simplified and predictable tax environment for shipping companies, thereby encouraging investment, fleet expansion, and the development of India as a maritime hub.
      • Inclusion of Inland Vessels: The explicit inclusion of inland vessels (especially after the Inland Vessels Act, 2021) reflects the government's intent to broaden the scope of the tonnage tax regime, recognizing the growing importance of inland water transport.

      3. Detailed Analysis of Clause 227(9)

      Breakdown and Interpretation

      1. Sub-clause (a): Tonnage Determination by Certificate
        The tonnage of a ship or inland vessel is to be determined strictly as per the certificate indicating its tonnage. This removes any room for alternative methods of measurement or estimation, ensuring objectivity and consistency.
      2. Sub-clause (b): Definition of "Valid Certificate"
        • (i) Ships Registered in India
          • (A) Length less than 24 metres: Certificate under the Merchant Shipping (Tonnage Measurement of Ship) Rules, 1987, made under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.
          • (B) Length 24 metres or more: International tonnage certificate under the Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969, as specified in the same Rules.
        • (ii) Ships Registered Outside India
          Such ships must have a licence from the Director-General of Shipping u/ss 406 or 407 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958. The licence must specify net tonnage based on a Tonnage Certificate from the Flag State Administration, or any other evidence acceptable to the Director-General of Shipping.
        • (iii) Inland Vessels Registered in India
          The tonnage is determined by a certificate issued under the Inland Vessels Act, 2021.

      Key Features and Legal Principles

      • Reliance on Statutory Certificates: The provision mandates reliance on statutory certificates, thus limiting disputes regarding tonnage computation and providing legal certainty.
      • International and Domestic Compliance: By referencing both domestic and international certificates, the provision caters to the needs of both Indian and foreign-registered vessels operating in India.
      • Administrative Discretion: For foreign ships, the Director-General of Shipping is vested with limited discretion to accept alternative evidence if the standard certificates are unavailable, but this discretion is circumscribed and subject to regulatory oversight.
      • Inclusion of Inland Vessels: The explicit inclusion of inland vessels and reference to the Inland Vessels Act, 2021, marks a progressive step in broadening the regime.

      Ambiguities and Potential Issues

      • Discretion in Accepting Evidence: The phrase "any other evidence acceptable to the Director-General of Shipping" for foreign ships introduces some subjectivity, which could potentially lead to inconsistent application unless further clarified by rules or guidelines.
      • Overlap of Regulatory Jurisdiction: The provision references multiple statutes (Merchant Shipping Act, 1958; Inland Vessels Act, 2021), which may lead to jurisdictional overlaps, especially for vessels operating in both inland and coastal waters.
      • Update and Harmonization: The reference to the Merchant Shipping (Tonnage Measurement of Ship) Rules, 1987, presumes that these rules will remain unchanged. Any amendment to the underlying rules could necessitate corresponding legislative updates.

      4. Practical Implications

      For Shipping Companies

      • Compliance Certainty: Companies can structure their operations and tax planning with certainty, relying on the tonnage as certified by competent authorities.
      • Ease of Documentation: The requirement of statutory certificates simplifies documentation and reduces the compliance burden, as these certificates are already required for regulatory purposes.
      • Potential for Disputes: Limited to cases where certificates are absent, ambiguous, or where alternative evidence is submitted for foreign ships.

      For Tax Authorities

      • Objective Assessment: Tax officers are bound to accept the tonnage as per the valid certificate, reducing scope for arbitrary assessments.
      • Verification: The main task is to verify the authenticity and validity of certificates, rather than engage in technical measurement.

      For Regulators (DG Shipping, etc.)

      • Central Role: The Director-General of Shipping plays a pivotal role in certifying and, where necessary, accepting alternative evidence for foreign ships.
      • Need for Clear Guidelines: To ensure uniformity and avoid allegations of arbitrariness, regulators may need to issue detailed guidelines on what constitutes "acceptable" alternative evidence.

      For Inland Water Transport Operators

      • Inclusion in Tonnage Tax Regime: Operators of inland vessels are explicitly brought within the regime, providing them with potential tax benefits and compliance obligations similar to ocean-going shipping companies.

      5. Comparative Analysis: Clause 227(9) vs. Section 115VX

      AspectSection 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025
      ApplicabilityShips and, post-amendment, inland vessels for tonnage tax schemeShips and inland vessels; explicitly covers both categories
      Definition of Valid CertificateSpecifies certificates under Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, and Inland Vessels Act, 2021Repeats same requirements, consolidates language for clarity
      Ships <24m (India)Certificate under Merchant Shipping (Tonnage Measurement of Ship) Rules, 1987Same
      Ships >=24m (India)International tonnage certificate under 1969 Convention, as per 1987 RulesSame
      Ships Registered Outside IndiaLicence by DG Shipping under s.406/407, with Flag State certificate or other evidenceSame, with slightly more explicit language on acceptable evidence
      Inland VesselsCertificate under Inland Vessels Act, 2021 (post-2025 amendment)Same
      Discretion to DG ShippingPermits "any other evidence acceptable to DG Shipping"Same
      ConsolidationSeparate section; earlier only ships, now includes inland vesselsIntegrated in a new, comprehensive provision

      Substantive Differences and Similarities

      • Substantial Parity: Both provisions are almost identical in substance and language, reflecting a deliberate legislative decision to retain the existing framework for tonnage determination in the new Bill.
      • Inclusion of Inland Vessels: Section 115VX was amended by the Finance Act, 2025, to include inland vessels, effective 01-04-2026, whereas Clause 227(9) incorporates this inclusion ab initio. This harmonizes the coverage under both regimes.
      • Administrative Discretion: Both provisions vest discretion in the DG Shipping to accept alternative evidence for foreign ships, ensuring practical flexibility.
      • Legal Certainty: Both provisions provide for legal certainty by relying on statutory certificates, reducing potential for disputes.

      Contextual Differences

      • Legislative Context:Clause 227(9) is part of a comprehensive new Income Tax Bill, intended to replace and modernize the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 115VX remains operative until the new Bill comes into force.
      • Structural Placement: Clause 227(9) is situated within a broader, restructured framework for computation of tonnage income, whereas Section 115VX is located within Chapter XII-G, which is specifically dedicated to the tonnage tax scheme.

      Potential Conflicts or Overlaps

      • Transitional Issues: During the transition from the 1961 Act to the new Bill, there may be some confusion or overlap regarding the applicability of the two provisions, especially for assessment years straddling the commencement date.
      • Consistency in Interpretation: Given the near-identical language, judicial and administrative interpretations u/s 115VX are likely to be relevant and persuasive for Clause 227(9), ensuring continuity in legal principles.

      6. Comparative Analysis with International Practice

      The reliance on international certificates (such as those issued under the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969) aligns Indian law with prevailing global standards. Many maritime nations adopt similar approaches in their tonnage tax regimes, using internationally recognized certificates for determining net tonnage. This harmonization facilitates international operations, reduces compliance barriers, and enhances the competitiveness of Indian shipping companies.

      7. Conclusion

      Clause 227(9) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, represents a continuation and consolidation of the principles enshrined in Section 115VX of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Both provisions are designed to foster certainty, objectivity, and international alignment in the determination of tonnage for the purposes of the tonnage tax regime. The explicit inclusion of inland vessels reflects the evolving scope of the Indian shipping industry and the government's intent to provide a level playing field for all operators.

      While both provisions are largely identical, the transition to the new Bill offers an opportunity for further clarification, especially regarding the exercise of discretion by the Director-General of Shipping and the harmonization of procedures across different classes of vessels. Stakeholders should monitor subsequent rules and administrative guidelines to ensure smooth implementation and minimize disputes.


      Full Text:

      Clause 227 Computation of tonnage income.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax